Customer Success Story State of Michigan : MAGI Case Study Beth Long, CGI Don Kosy, Oracle Consulting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connected Health Framework
Advertisements

Rational Unified Process®
Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) Replacement
Life Science Services and Solutions
Enerjetic Strengths Enerjetic is not marketed as a technology company, we are a data company. One that identifies business value through data and delivers.
Business Architecture
Information Security Level 2 – Sensitive© 2009 – Proprietary and Confidential Information of Amdocs Recommend Friends Program.
DC Access System (DCAS)
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger
(Insert Title of Project Here) Kickoff Meeting (Month Date, Year)
<<replace with Customer Logo>>
© 2013 IBM Corporation Tivoli and Maximo Quality Improvement Initiatives March 2014.
PMO Services RFP Overview Patty Fontneau ED and CEO.
Operations Process Workflow September 13, Streamlined Operations – No Wrong Door (MAGI Medicaid/CHIP/APTC/QHP) AHCT, DSS and other partners have.
Validata Release Coordinator Accelerated application delivery through automated end-to-end release management.
Office of the Chief Information Officer EFCOG Annual Meeting Fred Catoe (IM-32) U.S. Department of Energy.
 The Rise of Computer Science ◦ Machine Language (1 st Gen) ◦ Assembly Language (2 nd Gen) ◦ Third Generation Languages (FORTRAN, BASIC, Java, C++, etc.)
IS 421 Information Systems Management James Nowotarski 16 September 2002.
Customer Success Story State of Michigan : MAGI Case Study Beth Long, CGI Don Kosy, Oracle Consulting.
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 6-1 Chapter 6 Decision Support System Development.
Development Processes and Organizations
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Preliminary Discussions with IT and Implementation Subcommittee – Strategic IT Decisions November 21, 2011.
Affordable Care Act (ACA) The Affordable Care Act
General Services Administration Shared Cloud Platform model Informational Brief June 2012 Sonny Hashmi – GSA Deputy CIO.
ASAP Overview Presentation 98/07/30, Publication Number SWEO S ervices A lliance A pplication P rogram When strategic business applications…
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
Case Study on how the Navy DASN Acquisition Cut Allocated Web Technology Budget by Two- Thirds.
The California Health Benefit Exchange: Design Options HBEX Board Meeting Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.
Industry SDLCs and Business Climate. Justin Kalicharan Credentials Director and Senior Technology Officer Over 14 years of coding experience in various.
First Class User Experience for Affordable Care Act Enrollment Terri Shaw Project Director Enroll UX 2014 NASHP 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference.
1 Project Management Introduction. 2 Chap 1 What is the impact? 1994: 16% of IT projects completed “On-Time” 2004 : 29% of IT projects “On- Time” 53%
ONCHIT – 3 NHIN Prototype and other Initiatives for Kentucky Kentucky e-Health Network Claudine Beron February 21, 2006.
IIL’s International Project Management Day, 2007 The Power of the Profession: A Lesson Learned and Solution Implemented Becomes a Best Practice in Project.
IS Methodologies. Systems Development Life Cycle - SDLC Planning Planning define the system to be developed define the system to be developed Set the.
XP Overview Short Life cycle Risky / Dynamic Requirements Increase developer productivity.
Application Integration Enabling separate pieces to work as one E-Business applications require direct and immediate access to business(s) data and application.
MnCHOICES Olmstead Planning Committee June 21, 2012 Alex Bartolic Kristi Grunewald 2.
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
MITM743 Advanced Project Management Dr. Abdul Rahim Ahmad Assoc. Professor College of IT, UNITEN Kerzner Chapter 4 Project Management Methodologies.
Overview of RUP Lunch and Learn. Overview of RUP © 2008 Cardinal Solutions Group 2 Welcome  Introductions  What is your experience with RUP  What is.
MODELS Demonstrations, Ottawa, Canada, Ta’id H OLMES Infrastructure Cloud, Deutsche Telekom Technik GmbH Facilitating Agile Prototyping of.
Modelling the Process and Life Cycle. The Meaning of Process A process: a series of steps involving activities, constrains, and resources that produce.
Oracle’s EPM System and Strategy
Building a BA Center of Excellence Gain Momentum...Produce Results!
Shared Services Initiative Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
©2009 HP Confidential1 1 Teresa Schlegelmann CMS World Cup 2010 AMS - Houston Solution Consulting Services.
What’s New in SPEED APPS 2.3 ? Business Excellence Application Services.
Digital Asset Management & Storage Program Program Summary
Flight Software Conference 2016
HRSA Overview HHS Op. Div. Budget Authority ($M) FY20081 IT Budget
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Description of Revision
E2E Testing in Agile – A Necessary Evil
Speaker’s Name, SAP Month 00, 2017
Vertex & EnterpriseOne
BU IS GIG Chemical, Oil & Gas
Advantages OF BDD Testing
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger Joanne M. Atlee 4th Edition.
Agile Process: Overview
Business transformation and GDPR compliance platform
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Adapting Agile in Pharmaceutical Industries
OU BATTLECARD: E-Business Suite Courses and Certifications
Presentation transcript:

Customer Success Story State of Michigan : MAGI Case Study Beth Long, CGI Don Kosy, Oracle Consulting

MAGI Overview 2 MAGI Project Goal Comply with new CMS Medicaid regulations as required by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) MAGI Challenges Short time to implement Complicated regulations Multiple SOM Departments: coordination and governance Integrate with existing highly complex State systems, the Federal Application, and the Federal Marketplace system Leverage lessons learned from the rollout of the Federal Healthcare.gov, to ensure the success of a highly visible State solution

3 MAGI Vendor Selection Why CGI / Oracle? CGI provided a comprehensive project plan to meet the go- live milestones Oracle provided an e xisting MAGI Eligibility Engine, built to model the Federal regulations Oracle Policy Automation product o English language rules engine o Self-explaining decisions CGI + OPA Team Skills / Experience Bid Competitiveness to Overall Value

Aggressive schedule requiring multiple integrated systems to modify in parallel Integrating with new Federal systems including verification sources Modularized solutions developed in parallel under direction of resource constrained State SMEs Enabling legislation not finalized Extreme security and reliability requirements for cloud host environment 4 MAGI Execution Challenges

MAGI Execution Methodology Very thorough CGI project plan Iterative, overlapped design/build/test cycles Adaptation not Creation Agile scope control based on design prototypes Thorough State & Federal UAT integration prior to go-live 1/14 5 MAGI Success Factors

CGI – SOM Collaboration Functioned as a Partner - not as a vendor Demonstrated clear separation of responsibilities Executive level support Risk Management Promoted a governance model for issue and risk management 6 MAGI Success Factors

During bid development Alliance history Oracle OPA solution seen as best fit and value for SOM During execution Partnership relationship rather than prime/sub Oracle team OPA expertise CGI project management and methodologies CGI hosting solution and capabilities Clear separation of responsibilities 7 MAGI Success Factors CGI – Oracle Collaboration

MAGI Medicaid eligibility requirements experts Prior experience in other states Policy Automation product experts Eligibility data experts 8 MAGI Success Factors Oracle’s Role In MAGI

9 MAGI Solution Architecture MI MAGI Eligibility Service Architecture Baseline Federal MAGI Rulebase Data Model Mapping via High Level Tools Baseline Eligibility Framework Michigan-specific Options Verification and Validation Add-Ons

10 MAGI Success Factors Iterative Parallel Development Process

11 MAGI Success Factors PM Level Support

MAGI has implemented 4 quarterly releases over 2014 including implementation of: 5 required MAGI Medicaid/Chip programs & 2 state options Presumptive eligibility determinations for under 19 and pregnant women State Medicaid Expansion program “Healthy Michigan Plan” Integration with existing State of Michigan Medicaid and CHIP case management systems 12 MAGI Go-Live!

13

MAGI Success Lessons Learned Closing Comments 14 MAGI Success

15 Questions & Answers