February Testing Campaign Summary. Disclaimer This presentation is based on the reports of the testing campaign and focuses on the problems arisen during.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2014 EMC Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Basic Network Configuration for File Upon completion of this module, you should be able to: Configure.
Computer Parts Assignment
Networked HVAC Controller Bradley University Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering By: Ed Siok Advisor: Dr. Malinowski.
Face Recognition and Biometric Filters By Fred_the_token Identity Confirmed: Osama bin Laden.
Target Online Software J. Leaver 01/12/ /06/2015Imperial College 2 Target Controller Software Software for Stage 1 upgrade nearing completion –Hardware.
Chapter 9: Moving to Design
Smart Home Current Progress Summary. Main Processor – Stellaris.
Review of the test results and plan for the final TC ESR 5 ELENI ADAMIDI IASA, NTUA SUPERVISOR: PROF.EVANGELOS GAZIS WORK PACKAGE 3: SAFETY SYSTEM MODULARITY.
Review of the test results and plan for the final testing campaign Panagiotis Mousouliotis EDUSAFE ESR3 PhD Candidate, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Advanced Phasor Measurement Units for the Real-Time Monitoring
Computerized Train Control System by: Shawn Lord Christian Thompson.
1 Daniel Micheletti Darren Allen Daniel Mazo Jon Lamb Lyle Johnson Pixel Perfect WiCam: A Wireless Digital Camera Presented by : Kyle Swenson.
Authentication Approaches over Internet Jia Li
Eye Detector Project Midterm Review John Robertson Roy Nguyen.
Elements of a Computer System Dr Kathryn Merrick Thursday 4 th June, 2009.
Sumit Kumar Archana Kumar Group # 4 CSE 591 : Virtualization and Cloud Computing.
Go Iwai, KEK/CRC 13 – 15 Feb. Univ. of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Geant4 Go! DVD Geant4 9.1 / CLHEP / ROOT / gLite UI no more installation.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2013 / Semester 2 / week 8 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
CHAPTER FOUR COMPUTER SOFTWARE.
1. COMMUNICATION Liam O’Sullivan  Control was off board (on the GCS)  Used XBee ZigBee RF modules for telemetry  Point to point communication.
Main Board Status MB2 v1 for FATALIC & QIE 10/06/2015Roméo BONNEFOY - LPC Clermont1 Roméo BONNEFOY François Vazeille LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
UF-PNPI HV system upgrade Presented by N. Bondar. CERN  Part 1. HV System migration to USB interface  Part 2. HV System proposal of Stage 2.
NIMIA October 2001, Crema, Italy - Vincenzo Piuri, University of Milan, Italy NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SENSORS AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS Part II Vincenzo.
ESR 9: Review of test results and plan for the final testing campaign 1/24 EDUSAFE Summer School, 22 nd June 2015 Yuta Itoh (TU Munich)
(More) Interfacing concepts. Introduction Overview of I/O operations Programmed I/O – Standard I/O – Memory Mapped I/O Device synchronization Readings:
WRM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DANIELE FELICI (ER1), ALI ABDALLAH (ESR1) WP2 EDUSAFE MEETING CERN, JUNE 2015.
Software Status Sonja Vrcic Socorro,
ESR 2 / ER 2 Testing Campaign Review A. CrivellaroY. Verdie.
20th September 2004ALICE DCS Meeting1 Overview FW News PVSS News PVSS Scaling Up News Front-end News Questions.
Lecture Introduction to Software Development SW Engg. Development Process Instructor :Muhammad Janas khan Thursday, September.
RICE UNIVERSITY “Joint” architecture & algorithm designs for baseband signal processing Sridhar Rajagopal and Joseph R. Cavallaro Rice Center for Multimedia.
9 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
9 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
TDAQ Upgrade Software Plans John Baines, Tomasz Bold Contents: Future Framework Exploitation of future Technologies Work for Phase-II IDR.
1 Structure of Aalborg University Welcome to Aalborg University.
IDE DCS development overview Ewa Stanecka, ID Week, CERN
CHEP March 2003 Sarah Wheeler 1 Supervision of the ATLAS High Level Triggers Sarah Wheeler on behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger.
IPHC - DRS Gilles CLAUS 04/04/20061/20 EUDET JRA1 Meeting, April 2006 MAPS Test & DAQ Strasbourg OUTLINE Summary of MimoStar 2 Workshop CCMOS DAQ Status.
Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.
Online System Status LHCb Week Beat Jost / Cern 9 June 2015.
Software Engineering Chapter: Computer Aided Software Engineering 1 Chapter : Computer Aided Software Engineering.
23/2/2000Status of GAUDI 1 P. Mato / CERN Computing meeting, LHCb Week 23 February 2000.
CS 351/ IT 351 Modeling and Simulation Technologies HPC Architectures Dr. Jim Holten.
Status Report #4 LYRA The Remote Accessible Automated Camera Stand Developed by: Juan Cuellar, Nathan Dye, Timothy Hawley, & Matthew Hect October 8, 2012.
Edusafe Summer School G. Aielli (on behalf of O. Beltramello) 22 June 2015 Ideasquare, CERN Edusafe Summer School 22 – 26 June 2015.
Quiz Week 8 Topical. Topical Quiz (Section 2) What is the difference between Computer Vision and Computer Graphics What is the difference between Computer.
Software Requirements for the Testing of Prototype Correlator Sonja Vrcic Socorro, December 11, 2007.
By: Matt Kelly (CE), Michael Krenzer (EE), Hemsley Pichardo (EE), Tina Podrasky (ISE), Brad Wideman(CE)
SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 Computer Hardware 1-1. HARDWARE TERMS CPU — Central Processing Unit RAM — Random-Access Memory  “random-access” means the CPU can read.
Timothy Kritzler and Joseph Mintun Sponsor: Martin Engineering, Illinois Advisors: Dr. Malinowski and Dr. Ahn Bradley University Electrical and Computer.
OpenCV C++ Image Processing
Version Control How and why to control changes in a software artifact.
Control Software Features  Modularity and flexibility to ensure the long-term viability and scalability of the MUST-SIM Control System  System setup.
EDUSAFE FINAL CONFERENCE June, 2016
Chapter 6 Input/Output Organization
Software Overview Sonja Vrcic
WP2 – Testing campaign and beyond
Enrico Gamberini for the GTK WG TDAQ WG Meeting June 01, 2016
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
Understanding the OSI Reference Model
A WRM-based Application
Serial Data Hub (Proj Dec13-13).
Computer Repair & Maintenance
Low cost FPGA implimentation of tracking system from USB to VGA
Fundamental of computer
Intelligent HVAC Control
LONI Pipeline Integration/ UNC shape analysis
Presentation transcript:

February Testing Campaign Summary

Disclaimer This presentation is based on the reports of the testing campaign and focuses on the problems arisen during it. Detailed results can be found on the fellows’ reports. It is possible that the issues reported here were solved in the past months after the campaign.

Some numbers 2 weeks (+1) of campaign ~80% of the identified items accomplished Maybe more but no reports from some fellows

PTU, Supervision System The HW of the PTUs and their software has been tested quite successfully. Cooling problems in both prototypes

PTU – Server Communications Using the NTP protocol, computer clock synchronization is possible through network. Small factor USB WiFi adapters perform poorly in the ATLAS environment.

Server Setup The server has been successfully set up and tested. HW and SW installation for the DB, DAQ, CS (Control System) and UI development is completed and in case we need a brand new installation there are instructions and documentation ready to apply. Integration with EPFL+ROME code. Installation of SW dependencies, EPFL’s and WRM code on the server (OpenCV, Eigen, ArUco) is completed.

WRM (Software Implementation) No major issues Each block of the scheme has been tested (performances and speed) in their software implementation

EPFL algorithm Tested and improved (see reports for details). PTU only PTU + sever Total time per frame (markerless): ~740 ms Total time per frame (markerless): ~610 ms (USB camera) ~690 ms (GoPro)

EPFL algorithm (2) Remarks: The accuracy is similar using a simple edge detector (Canny) and more sophisticated segments detectors (WRM or LSD). This suggests there’s margin for better segment exploitation in the tracking algorithm. Pose transmission time over WiFi is not stable. Image processing time (markerless) Pose transmission time over WiFi

IMU and Sensor Fusion The behavior of IMU drift over time has been studied Camera-IMU calibration Virtual content rendering

Sensor Board and Power Board HW and SW integration in the system tested but we need to finalize the HW specifications for future prototype including processor board with all input output devices Some bugs needs to be fixed

EDUSS UI Code and interface improved Some bug fixes requested Performances optimization requested

GUI integration Completed: Dose data information integration AR view integration Gamma-camera (EduPix) interface integration Function transition test (HMD-based architecture design) Issues: Split GUI elements to the monitor window and the HMD window

Known issues All the problems that prevents the tests has been faced and solved by each fellows Some bugs still remains and should be investigated: Overheating problems in both prototypes PTU processor (i5), Frame grabber, Splitter and GoPro are very hot after few minutes of operations Random crashed (e.g. blank images) Someone probably related to the cooling Small factor USB WiFi adapters perform poorly in the ATLAS environment WiFi transmission is not stable Some problems in software modules communication Bugs in single parts of the system

Few remarks The “tablet” prototypes (especially GoPro version) are not so manoeuvrable Several combinations of hardware and software to test. Some bugs could not have been seen We should converge on a final configuration One last thing…

Thank you Questions? Remarks?