Sustaining and Scaling the Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: State Examples I Susan Barrett – Maryland Howard Muscott -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants
Advertisements

School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Susan Barrett Sheppard Pratt Health System Going to Scale: Essential Features of the Blueprint at the District Level.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
1 Implementing a Three-Tiered State Evaluation Structure Bob Putnam The May Institute Karen Childs University of South Florida 2009 National PBIS Leadership.
Building Evaluation Capacity for States and Districts
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Building Effective Coaches to Expand & Sustain PBIS Implementation.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Virginia’s State Improvement Grant and State Personnel Development Grant The Content Literacy Continuum & Response to Intervention.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Building Capacity for Scaling Up PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Designing and Implementing Evaluation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob HornerHolly Lewandowski University of Oregon Illinois State Board of.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Minnesota School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Scaling up and sustaining Lessons Learned CEC Conference Boston 2008 Char Ryan, PBIS.
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Maryland Susan Barrett
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
Starting/Sustaining Universal Team Milt McKenna, Co-Coordinator, PBIS MD Maryland State Department of Education
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Quad-level Engagement: Leveraging Partnerships That Support Change in School and Statewide Professional Development Practices.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
Welcome! January VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Evaluation Day 2.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Data Driven Decisions: Using the Tools Susan Barrett, Jerry Bloom PBIS Maryland Coaches Meeting October 2007
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Coaching in Maryland Susan Barrett
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

Sustaining and Scaling the Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: State Examples I Susan Barrett – Maryland Howard Muscott - New Hampshire Char Ryan-- Minnesota

Guiding Questions How do you support teachers to implement best practices in schools? How do you support school teams to guide this process? How do you support districts to guide this process? How do you support state to guide this process? What are the differences between supporting 60 schools to 600 to 6000?

Implementation Levels Student Classroom School State District

4 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Leadership Team Management Team Funding Marketing Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Active Coordination Braiding Initiatives 1.Phase One: Commitment to School Level Implementation 2.Phase Two: Commitment to Capacity Building 3.Phase Three: Commitment to Large Scale Implementation

You have knowledge about the Blueprint State/District will be successful if: State/District will be successful if: –They start with sufficient resources and commitment –They focus on the smallest changes that will result in the biggest difference –They have a clear action plan –They use on-going self-assessment to determine if they are achieving their plan –They have access to an external agent/coach who is supportive, knowledgeable and persistent.

Implementers Blueprint Self Assessment More like guidelines Provides a common language

Phase One Commitment to School Level Implementation Will this work here? –Establish Local Sites in Multiple Districts –Small and Large –Urban, Suburban and Rural – ES, MS, HS, Alt, JJ

Group Cost Benefit Office Referral Reduction Across 12 PBIS Schools = 5,606 Across 12 PBIS Schools = 5,606 If students miss 45 minutes of instruction for each Office Referral, 5,606 X 45= If students miss 45 minutes of instruction for each Office Referral, 5,606 X 45= 252,270 minutes hours or 700 days of instructional time recovered!!!!!

Group Cost Benefit Office Referral Reduction Across 12 PBIS schools= 5, PBIS schools= 5,606 If one Office Referral=15 minutes of administrator time, then 5,606 x 15= If one Office Referral=15 minutes of administrator time, then 5,606 x 15= 84,090 minutes hours or hours or 233 days of administrator time recovered and reinvested. of administrator time recovered and reinvested.

Transformation More than a behavior initiative The foundation of the academic house you are trying to build Systemic School Reform Model Colorado APBS 2008 “Bottom Up and Top Down” Student Services Example Student Services Example

Phase Two Commitment to Capacity Building –Demonstrated High Fidelity/High Impact –Demand Increases –State Team won’t be able to keep up with demand Created Partnership Agreements –Roles and Responsibilities Roles and ResponsibilitiesRoles and Responsibilities

Features Point of Contact and Coaches become Local Coordinators –Transfer role to local person –Use phase of implementation to guide decision points Meet with local team to build action plan- model after state team

Phase Three Commitment to Large Scale Implementation –Large number of schools in each district –Sustain and Build Integrated Systems Model- Braiding Initiatives Shelf Life –Increased roles and duties within District

Phase Four- “Continuous Regeneration” Innovation –Demonstrated impact throughout –Change/Adapt to fit culture every year –Renew Commitment –Easier, More Efficient, Cost Reduces –Organizational Framework allows for integration –Educators as better consumers

Transfer Skill to Local School System Local Team and Coordinator Identified –Access to support and technical assistance –“Fostering the Pipeline of Leadership” –Develop action plan through blueprint- model after state with local context

Evaluation What do you want ? ( ID results and behavior) How will you know when it happens? (Measure) How will they know? (Feedback) How do you create “want-to-do” situation that yields discretionary behavior? (Reinforce) Did you produce the intended effect? Are the results and behaviors aligned? (Evaluate) Lattal 2008

PBIS Maryland - Schools Trained and Implementing PBIS Maryland - Schools Trained and Implementing

Successes/Serendipity State- Non Profit- University Partnership –Protected FTE Student Services and Special Education School Psych Conference Prior Relationship in each LSS Small, functional state team Successful Demo Sites Willing to talk to anyone who would listen

KEYS TO SUCCESS KEYS TO SUCCESS Leadership at State, Regional, District and School levels Private, Public, University partnership Standards and Protocols developed and implemented State-wide impact: –494 of 565 schools in all 24 systems are implementing universal PBIS with fidelity. State and Regional Training Capacity PBIS Maryland WEBSITE and DATABASE ( Ongoing Technical Assistance-Coaching Capacity Ongoing Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Evaluation Tools Ongoing Data Collection for Decision Making –SETs, SWIS, BOQ Ongoing expansion of Local School System infrastructure—staff designation and funding Federal Grants Rigorous Randomized Evaluation Activity through grants received by JHU

Evaluation What are your questions? Do the tools/forms/surveys answer your questions? Can you get the answers quickly? –Easy, efficient, relevant Economic Benefits Regular Feedback to Stakeholders

96% Rate of Return in 2008

Evaluation Question: Are schools in beginning or advanced stages of implementation? Data Source: Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI) Overall, the IPI data suggest a relatively advanced level of self- reported implementation among the schools in Maryland

Evaluation Question: Are schools implementing School-wide PBIS? Data Source: Team Implementation Checklist (TIC) (Target Criterion = 80%) Based on the average of the 327 checklists submitted, school teams report that 78% of items are in place.

Evaluation Question: Are schools implementing SW-Positive Behavior Support? Data Source: System-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET) (Objective Criterion = 80%) -All regions met objective criterion -A pre-post comparison regional average shows a 69% increase.

Evaluation Question: Where is the location of behavior problems in Middle Schools? Data Source: SWIS The majority of the problem behaviors reported occur in the classroom followed by hallways.

Outcomes

Good News/Bad News Visibility increasing/Overly enthusiastic legislature resulting in mandated PBIS implementation Initiative has momentum/Maryland’s budget doesn’t Green zone training and implementation with fidelity is institutionalized/Yellow and Red Zone training and implementation needs similar structure and higher resources Districts are increasing capacity/State Leadership has to “let go” OF THE RIGHT THINGS to ensure fidelity and sustainability Districts are increasing capacity/State Leadership has to “let go” OF THE RIGHT THINGS to ensure fidelity and sustainability

Challenges FundingMandates 3 Tiered Logic 2 nd Generation Coordinators –Death, Taxes and Attrition –Transfer of Skill Rapid Expansion (25% increase each year)

Final Thought “We have a unique opportunity and responsibility to promote integration of services for students across a continuum that meets all students needs.”

Contact