Dump Heating temperature (Revision 2, part 2) Ang Lee April 7, 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Advertisements

NEEP 541 Design of Irradiated Structures Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
D. Passarelli, M. Merio, L. Ristori, B. Wands March 29, 2012
Slide HALLD TAGGER MAGNET STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Presented by William Crahen 6/10/09 Pole Plate analysis Vacuum chamber analysis Vacuum chamber tie rods and.
Design of an Aerospace Component
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Buckling Critical Load Considerations
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
FE calculations for the bolted helium vessel May 6th 2015
VG.1 SCWR Fuel Rod Design Requirements Design Limits Input for Performance Evaluations H. Garkisch, Westinghouse Electric Co.
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
An Investigation into the use of FEA methods for the prediction of Thermal Stress Ratcheting Huse, Stephen.
Awake CNGS Window and Shutter Szymon Sroka, Antonio Perillo-Marcone — EN/STI/TCD Thermo-Mechanical Calculations.
Pressure Vessels.
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Fermilab requirements and recent FEA Analyses PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN 06/05/2015 Page 1 CERN, May 6th 2015.
API 6HP Process1 API 6HP Example Analysis Project API E&P Standards Conference Applications of Standards Research, 24 June 2008.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
NSTX CSU Preliminary Assessment of PFCs Art Brooks December 8,
Chapters Project title : Hirbawi Center A building lies in the east side of Tulkarm, this building consists of five stories of ( m 2 ) A building lies.
Micro-Resistor Beam.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slides Lunar Lander Structure April 9, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
Aaron Aoyama 1, J. Blanchard 2, N. Ghoniem 1, S. Sharafat 1* 1 University of California Los Angeles 2 University of Wisconsin Madison With Contributions.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
SHMS FEA Review Prepared for: Jefferson Lab Prepared by: AMSEC LLC.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
1 NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. 2 SOURCES OF NON LINEAR BEHAVIOUR non-linear supports contact stress tension/compression only links elastic foundation offset or.
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
Conclusions on Transverse Shearing Stress Calculations Maximum Value at Neutral Axis – IF CROSS- SECTION IS NOT NARROWER ELSEWHERE –Depends on Shape of.
3/5/2008, A Lee1 A Preliminary Result for a Helical Tube Subjected to the Internal Pressure Ang Lee, PPD/MD March 5,2008.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Design Factor Collapse
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Mechanical Design and Analysis of LCLS II 2 K Cold Box
2K CB Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
FLAT PLATE COLUMN BUCKLING
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
10 Columns.
Slender Columns and Two-way Slabs
CENF - LBNF cryostat Relevant safety codes
Design Factors Collapse Corrected
10 Columns.
Fire Resistance of Steel Structures
Presentation transcript:

Dump Heating temperature (Revision 2, part 2) Ang Lee April 7,

Slide from March 16, 2010 For structural calculation: 1) Buckling calculation: to find critical collapsing pressure Pcr for a given structure (E and t) and compare it with CGA (SF=2)or ASME (SF=3) code for the safety factor (SF).  Done 2)Stress calculation : if the structure passes the buckling SF requirement, then the working stress needs to be checked under the operating load (p=15 psi).-  done 3)The thermal stress due to temperature rise.  today 4)The combine stress due to the thermal and structure load (vacuum).  today 5)The deformation if it is required/interested.  today 2

Slide from March 16, 2010 Temperature (K) Result after 30 days =1.26KW 15 =0.84kw Contact area100%50%100%50% Beam area= 24 cmx4 cm x 1 inch 412 (K) (139 C or 282 F) 539 (K) (266 C or 510 F) 374 (K)459 (K) Beam area= 12 cmx4 cm x 1 inch 422 (K)554 (K)381 (K)469 ( K) 3

ASME SEC VIII, Div 2,& SEC II, part D requirement 1)Pm (primary membrane)< Sm 2)Pm + Pb (primary bending) < 1.5*Sm 3)Pm+Pb+Q(secondary stress)< 3*Sm Where the thermal stress is considered to be secondary stress_ Q(self limiting stress) Where Sm is code allowable stress for a given temperature. It is based on Sec II, part D 4

FEA Structure model 5

Stress resultant Mode 1 100% contact Tmax=412 K (139 C/282F) Thermal stress_ksi (due to temperature rise) Structure_ksi (due to 15 psi) Thermal + structure_ksi Beam section _24cmx4cmx1” (ksi) Top plate _1” thick Sided section (0.25”)

Stress resultant _ continues Mode 2 50% contact (very close to 0% contact) Tmax=539K (266C /510F) Thermal stress _ ksi (due to temperature rise) Structure (due to 15 psi)_ ksi Thermal +structure (ksi) Beam section (ksi) Top plate Sided section

Stress for the beam section due to the thermal loading 8

Stress for the top plate under the thermal loading 9

Stress for the sided area under thermal loading 10

Stress criteria (ASME) Seems we need a material with a Sy (min. yield strength= 21 ksi at T=~300F such that Sm (allowable)=2/3*Sy=14 ksi at T=300 F (since Q_secondary stress)<3*Sm=42 ksi By looking on the ASME II, part D table Y 11

12

Code requirement 13

14

Code stress 15

Working &Allowable stress Material 1: C 10200; SB-187 ; copper rod -line19 Sy=6.3 ksi(300F)&5.6 ksi (450F) Then, its allowable Sm=2/3 Sy Sm=4.2 ksi (300 F) & 3.73 ksi (450F) 1)The stress due to the structure load has to be below the Sm. –> OK. Since max stress due to 15 psi is 1.9 ksi < both 4.2 & 3.72 ksi for given temperature. 2)Secondary stress due to the thermal loading : Sth<3*Sm = 12.6 & ksi Beam section, Sth=27 ksi > 12.6 ksi-  not ok. Top plate,Sth=41.5 ksi > 12.6 ksi -> not ok Sided sectionSth=36 ksi > 12.6 ksi -  not ok 3)If we take a look it more aggressively: Beam section, if we take the “B “ contour and really don’t care that corner section Sth~18 ksi > 12.6  not ok and top plate, if we take “A” contour line, then Sth~14 ksi >  not ok again. 16

Working & Allowable stress Material 2,C or C-63000, Table Y, line 21—27, The Yield stress does not change too much as the temperature rise and stays around ~29 to 31 ksi range. Let ‘s take line 25 as an example: Plate or sheet, SB-169, C-61400,temper 025/or 060 Sy=31.1K (300F) & 30.4 ksi (450F) Then its allowable=Sm=30.4*2/3=20.6 ksi (450 F) 1)The stress due to the structure load has to be below the Sm. –> Yes. Since max stress due to 15 psi is 1.9 ksi<< 20.6ksi for given temperature. 2)Secondary stress due to the thermal loading : Sth<3*Sm = 62 ksi Beam section, Sth=27 ksi < 62 ksi-  ok! Top plate,Sth=41.5 ksi ok! Sided sectionSth=36 ksi < 62 ksi -  ok! 3)So, Material from line 21—27 will work for 100% contact case (most likely case) And also works for 50% contact case where the contact occurs only both end and the beam hits in the center portion-  very close to ~0% contact case (most pessimistic case. 17

Conclusion Six sided section needs to be a copper with Sy (min) = ~30 ksi at T=450 F due to thermal stress. 18

Implication for upstream 8”beam Pipe Since the 8” beam pipe is fixed at the upstream side, the thermal expansion due to the sided section will create a compressive force on that beam pipe besides 15 psi external pressure. We need to take a look 19

Implication for upstream 8”beam Pipe First mode will be most unlikely and second mode SF=11 should be sufficient. The beam pipe will be fine. 20

Temperature vs time for a given power (100% contact) _ additional Thermal W_0-10KW with DW=0.2KW) 21

Additional Thermal calculation W=0-10 KW with DW=0.2 KW This temperature vs the beam power curve is the maximum temperature after the “ curve flat” __steady state. 22

Appendix A _ Thermal stress for the beam section _50% contact case 23

Appendix A _ Thermal stress for the Top plate_50% contact case 24

Appendix A _ Thermal stress for the sided section_50% contact case 25