QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
Advertisements

Evaluation of a potential mutagenic MOA based on analysis of the weight of evidence and using the modified Hill criteria Martha M. Moore, Ph.D. Director,
Chemical Carcinogens – workplace risk assessment and health surveillance Tiina Santonen Paide.
National Pesticide Program A New Toxicology Testing Paradigm: Meeting Common Needs Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office.
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
Chemical Category Formation: Toxicology and REACH Dr Steven Enoch Liverpool John Moores University 14 th May 2009.
Figure S1. ID#1 Lipid Metabolism, Small Molecule Biochemistry, Drug Metabolism.
Acetaminophen and p-Aminophenols
Overall Objectives Demonstrate the existence of new modalities of toxic tissue injury with increasing dose using a series of representative case examples.
Peter L. deFur Environmental Stewardship Concepts Richmond, Virginia March 2010 Copyright 2009.
Criteria for Screens— Review of the EDSTAC Recommendations Presentation to the EDMVS July 23, 2002.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 08 – Mechanisms Signalling and regulation.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 02 – MECHANISMS OVERVIEW.
28/05/12 Questions (Rispondete alle domande che seguono usando il colore rosso per il testo) Tossicologia - Rubbiani Maristella.
Mechanisms of Toxicity
Mike Comber Consulting TIMES-SS Assessment of skin sensitisation hazard Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia.
Lecture 10 – Second Messengers IV – Niric Oxide, cGMP, and ROS Signalling BIOL 5190/6190 Cellular & Molecular Singal Transduction Prepared by Bob Locy.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 01 - INTRODUCTION.
Kevin M. Crofton, PhD US Environmental Protection Agency McKim Conference Duluth MN September 17, 2008 Thyroid Mediated CNS Dysfunction How to use what.
INTRODUCTION Nutrigenomics Dr. Muhamad Firdaus
Health Canada experiences with early identification of potential carcinogens - An Existing Substances Perspective Sunil Kulkarni Hazard Methodology Division,
Characteristics of Cancer. Promotion (reversible) Initiation (irreversible) malignant metastases More mutations Progression (irreversible)
2 n McKim Workshop on Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment | 8 – 10 May 2012 | Baltimore, MD Highlighting the Need for AOPs in Streamlining Hazard.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 10 – BIOMARKERS Introduction.
Cytokines, Growth Factors and Hormones SIGMA-ALDRICH.
Biomarkers Biomarkers - markers in biological systems with a sufficently long half-life which allow location where in the biological system change occur.
Laboratory toxicology. Toxicological methods In vitro –Cell cultures –Cell-free systems –Mechanistic In vivo (lab animals) –Acute –Subchronic –Chronic.
Use of Toxicological Pathways for Hazard Assessment in OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox: McKim Conference September 2008, Duluth, USA LMC, Bourgas University, Bulgaria.
Which information identifies a chemical as endocrine disrupting? Poul Bjerregaard Institute of Biology University of Southern Denmark Odense and Danish.
Narušení regulace buněčného cyklu, programované buněčné smrti či mezibuněčné komunikace prostřednictvím organických polutantů – mechanismy karcinogeneze?
Mike Comber TIMES-SS Application of Reactivity Principles in Screening for Skin Sensitisers Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia & International.
Biomarkers and mechanisms of toxicity Course summary 1) Introduction - Overview of toxicity mechanisms (with special respect to environmental contaminants)
Clinically relevant drug intoxications and their therapy
QSAR Foundation Goals Facilitate promising QSAR technologies for setting priorities (TIMES-SS, Multipath, ASTER, OECD Toolbox) Encourage the expansion.
Chemical Carcinogenesis: GENOTOXIC and NON-GENOTOXIC carcinogens
 Definition ◦ It is combination of two Latin words ◦ Pathos meaning disease ◦ Logos meaning study Pathology is a branch of medicine that deals with the.
The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) for Skin Sensitisation (SS): How We Got Here and Where We are Going 1 T. W. Schultz Professor Emeritus The University.
The McKim Conferences for the Strategic Use of Testing Gitchee Gumee Conference Center Duluth, Minnesota June 27-29, 2006.
Black Box Lush Prize 2015: Skin Sensitization Adverse Outcome Pathway G. Frank Gerberick The Procter & Gamble Company.
T. W. Schultz Presented at the McKim Conference September 17, 2008.
OECD’s work on Adverse outcome pathways
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Narcosis as a Reference Gilman Veith.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 16-18, 2008 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
PHL 472 Chemical Carcinogens Abdelkader Ashour, Ph.D. 2 nd Lecture.
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Duluth, MN, USA 19 May, 2010.
Cellular Senescence What is it? What causes it? Why is it important (cancer and aging)?
Furan-Induced Cytotoxicity, Cell Proliferation, and Tumorgenicity in Mouse Liver Dr. Glenda Moser.
『창의적 예측경영』『 효율적 내실경영 』 Toxicity Lee, sang-hwi Chapter 17.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Toxic effects Acute / chronic Reversible / irreversible Immediate / delayed Idiosyncratic - hypersensitivity Local / systemic Target organs.
Targeting of reactive oxygen species can be a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment Ying-Ray Lee 1, San-Yuan Chen 2, and Hau-Ren Chen 3 1.
11 Simulating of in vivo metabolism taking into account detoxification logics.
10 – BIOMARKERS Introduction
Potential mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury
Cellular responses to stress (Adaptations, injury and death) (3 of 5)
Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization
Drug-induced liver injury part II
Toxicity and the Factors That Modify Toxic Responses
INTRODUCTION Nutrigenomics Dr. Muhamad Firdaus
Ovanes Mekenyan, Milen Todorov, Ksenia Gerova
Instructions Fig 1 Fig 2 Fig 3 Select a template slide
Using Mode of Action to Reduce Uncertainty in Risk Estimates
The Category Approach for Predicting Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
T. W. Schultz Presented at the Logan Workshop March 23-24, 2010
Kathryn E. Wellen, Craig B. Thompson  Molecular Cell 
Unit 4.2: The Endocrine System and Blood Sugar Regulation
Kathryn E. Wellen, Craig B. Thompson  Molecular Cell 
Nathalie Ganne-Carrié, Pierre Nahon  Journal of Hepatology 
Presentation transcript:

QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010

Lethality Sensitization Birth Defect Reproductive Impairment Cancer Altered Function Altered Development Gene Activation Protein Production Signal Alteration Chemical Reactivity Profiles Receptor, DNA, Protein Interactions Structure Extinction Cellular Organ Mechanistic Profiling In Vivo Testing Biological Responses ITS and Adverse Outcome Pathway T oxicant Organism Macro -Molecular Interactions Molecular Initiating Event Population Cellular & In Vitro Testing

PATHWAYS IN REACTIVE CHEMICALS Michael Addition Schiff base Formation S N 2 Acylation Michael Addition Schiff base Formation S N 2 Acylation Atom Centered Irreversible (Covalent) Binding Atom Centered Irreversible (Covalent) Binding Interaction Mechanisms Molecular Initiating Events In vivo Endpoints Pr-S Adducts GSH Oxidation GSH Depletion NH2 Adducts RN Adducts DNA Adducts Pr-S Adducts GSH Oxidation GSH Depletion NH2 Adducts RN Adducts DNA Adducts In vitro Endpoints Death Impaired Growth Impaired Development Impaired Reproduction Cancer Membrane Alteration _ Oxidative Stress _ Genotoxicity

OXIDATIVE STRESS from GSH DEPLETION Pr-S Adducts GSH Oxidation GSH Depletion NH2 Adducts RN Adducts DNA Adducts Oxidative Stress Cell toxicity Other Effects Direct GSH Reactions Altered Synthesis Oxidation How Many Ways to Deplete GSH?How Many Downstream Effects?

Karlberg et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, Haptenation; 2. Epidermal inflammation & LC activation; 3. LC migration; 4. DC: T cell interaction; 5. T cell proliferation; 6. Increase in hapten-specific T cells; 7. Hapten re-exposure; 8. Acute inflammation; 9. T cell-mediated inflammation

GROUPING BY CANCER PATHWAYS  Genotoxic Carcinogenesis  Direct DNA damage through abiotic chemical “binding”  Most electrophiles bind to many DNA/protein sites  Metabolic differences impact cell, organ, species sensitivity  Epigenetic Carcinogenesis  Cytoxicity-induced cell proliferation  Receptor-mediated pathways  Disturbance of homeostatic control  Loss of immune surveillance  Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage  Loss of intercellular communication

Mode of Action Receptor-mediated pathways Disturbance of homeostaticcontrol Loss of immune surveillance Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage Loss of intercellular communication Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation GENOTOXICITY Direct DNA Damage Indirect DNA Damage NON-GENOTOXICITY

Receptor-mediated pathways Disturbance of homeostaticcontrol Loss of immune surveillance Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage Loss of intercellular communication Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation GENOTOXICITY Direct DNA Damage Indirect DNA Damage NON-GENOTOXICITY DNA Mechanism #1 DNA Mechanism #2 DNA Mechanism #3 DNA Mechanism #n …………………………… Prot Mechanism #1 Prot Mechanism #2 Prot Mechanism #3 …………………………… Prot Mechanism #n AR Binding ER Binding Aromatase Inh. Thyroid Disturbance Mechanism/AlertMode of action

Receptor-mediated pathways Disturbance of homeostaticcontrol Loss of immune surveillance Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage Loss of intercellular communication Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation GENOTOXICITY Direct DNA Damage Indirect DNA Damage NON-GENOTOXICITY Mechanism/Alert DNA #1 DNA #2 DNA #3 DNA #n …………. Prot #1 Prot #2 Prot #3 ………….. Prot #n AR Binding ER Binding Aromatase Inh. Thyroid Disturbance Mechanism/Metabolites DNA Mechanism #1-Met 1…m DNA Mechanism #2-Met 1…m DNA Mechanism #3-Met 1…m …………………………… DNA Mechanism #3-Met 1…m Prot Mechanism #1 - Met 1..m Prot Mechanism #2 - Met 1..m Prot Mechanism #3 - Met 1..m …………………………… Prot Mechanism #n - Met 1..m Receptor-mediated pathways -Met 1…m Disturbance of homeostatic control -Met 1…m Loss of immune surveillance-Met 1…m Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage -Met 1…m Loss of intercellular comm.-Met 1…m Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation-Met 1…m Mode of action

Receptor-mediated pathways Disturbance of homeostaticcontrol Loss of immune surveillance Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage Loss of intercellular communication Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation GENOTOXICITY Direct DNA Damage Indirect DNA Damage NON-GENOTOXICITY Mechanism/Alert DNA #1 DNA #2 DNA #3 DNA #n …………. Prot #1 Prot #2 Prot #3 ………….. Prot #n AR Binding ER Binding Aromatase Inh. Thyroid Disturbance Mechanism/Metabolites Receptor-mediated pathways -Met 1…m Disturbance of homeostatic control -Met 1…m Loss of immune surveillance-Met 1…m Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage -Met 1…m Loss of intercellular comm.-Met 1…m Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation-Met 1…m DNA #1-Met 1…m DNA #2-Met 1…m …………………………… DNA #3-Met 1…m Prot #1 - Met 1..m Prot #2 - Met 1..m Prot #3 - Met 1..m …………………………… Prot #n - Met 1..m DNA #3-Met 1…m In vitro data AmesAmes+S9CA CA+S9 MLAMLA+S9CTA Mode of action

Receptor-mediated pathways Disturbance of homeostaticcontrol Loss of immune surveillance Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage Loss of intercellular communication Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation GENOTOXICITY Direct DNA Damage Indirect DNA Damage NON-GENOTOXICITY Mechanism/Alert DNA #1 DNA #2 DNA #3 DNA #n …………. Prot #1 Prot #2 Prot #3 ………….. Prot #n AR Binding ER Binding Aromatase Inh. Thyroid Disturbance Mechanism/Metabolites Receptor-mediated pathways -Met 1…m Disturbance of homeostatic control -Met 1…m Loss of immune surveillance-Met 1…m Oxidative Stress- Indirect DNA damage -Met 1…m Loss of intercellular comm.-Met 1…m Cytotoxicity-induced cell proliferation-Met 1…m DNA #1-Met 1…m DNA #2-Met 1…m …………………………… DNA #3-Met 1…m Prot #1 - Met 1..m Prot #2 - Met 1..m Prot #3 - Met 1..m …………………………… Prot #n - Met 1..m DNA #3-Met 1…m In vitro data Ames Ames+S9 CA CA+S9 MLA MLA+S9 CTA In vivo data COMETUDSCAMN(BN)CTARCA Mode of action

SCREENING LEVEL HAZARD ID Direct DNA Binding Nongenotoxic Mechanisms Activated Metabolites Indirect DNA Damage Parent Chemical Individual Initiating Events/ Structural Alerts Grouping Data for Interaction Categories Structural Evidence of Cancer Potential Category with Data for Cancer Potential No Evidence Of Cancer Potential