North American Panel 23 March 2009 Stamford, CT. Peter M. Swift.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PANAMA MARITIME IX Initiatives to reduce toxic gas emissions: perspective of the shipping companies. Iniciativas para reducir las emisiones de gases tóxicos:
Advertisements

MARINTEK 1 Assessment of CO 2 emission performance of individual ships: The IMO CO 2 index Øyvind Buhaug MARINTEK.
IMO Symposium on a Sustainable Maritime
REDUCING GHG FROM SHIPS INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Cancun October 28/29, 2008.
2nd Nordic Carbon Disclosure Project Report Copenhagen, 20th October 2008 Lars Lundegaard Senior Vice President.
Virtual Arrival means reduced emission Greening Logistics European Parliament Brussels 28 April 2010 Manager Research and Projects.
European Maritime Day Stakeholder Conference "Port & Maritime training & education" 20 May 2010 Gijon Peter M Swift, MD INTERTANKO.
Adam Larsson, Project Manager, DNV 26 May 2011 Oshima ECO-ship 2020 The open hatch bulk carrier of the future.
CNSS related environmental issues for the Port of Antwerp. G. F. Van Meel Adviser Environmental department.
GHG Indexing of Ships and its updates Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
Managing the Environmental Challenge 1 Gateway to Asia Conference November 2014.
World Ports Climate Conference “ Big Steps - Small Footprint: The Challenge for Shipping ” 9 July 2008, Rotterdam Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
WAVESPEC Limited A Braemar Seascope Plc. Group Company October 2005 Factors involved in selecting a propulsion system for your LNG shipping project Presentation.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION The perspectives of applying ecotaxes in the EU. Christos LIOLIOS BERLIN,
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES FOR IMO
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
Latin American Panel September, 2010 Lima, Perú GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Peter M. Swift.
“ Revision of Marpol Annex VI and its implications for the Gulf region ” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO 15 December 2008, Dubai.
Environmental Landscape A burden or opportunity? Tony Field South East Europe Marine Business Manager.
Latin American Panel October 2009 Vina Del Mar, Chile Peter M. Swift.
IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Eivind S. Vagslid Head, Chemical and Air Pollution.
Developments in Green Ships Design/Technologies
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility Contribution to the European Bus and Coach Forum 2011 Huib van Essen, 20 October 2011.
ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Attracting Green Ships May About RightShip The Current Environment The Existing Vessel Design Index Accuracy of data Factoring in relative CO 2.
Carbon Footprint Needs in Logistics Diego Klabjan, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Climate Strategy for the Helsinki Metropolitan Area Hannu Penttilä.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Drew Brandy Defining Connectivity at Sea INMARSAT > June 2015 © Copyright Inmarsat Global Limited 2015.
An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director.
GL – Your competitive edge Take the lead through innovation Fuel Cells in maritime Applications - Challanges, Chances and Experiences
COP 10, Buenos Aires, 06 December 2004 UNFCCC Mads Bergendorff UIC Environmental Advisor Building on the Railways’ environmental strengths Rail today is.
” JOHN B. LACSON FOUNDATION MARITIME UNIVERSITY Best Practices in Maritime Education and Training “Views of a Shipowners’ Association” 29 January 2008.
Leading the way; making a difference Sustainability of the Oil Transportation Industry China Oil Transportation Safety Conference Nanjing September 2012.
Port of Green Bay. Today, the Port of Green Bay is a vital part of the NE Wisconsin economy, our history and our lives. It is critical to the wellbeing.
Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Kyoto and Beyond.
国际航运高级论坛 2008· 上海 WORLD SHIPPING SENIOR FORUM 2008·SHANGHAI Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Northern European Panel 31 March 2009 Hamburg Peter M. Swift.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and INTERTANKO Policy Position Members’ Meeting Singapore 2 November 2009 Peter M. Swift.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
International Shipping and Climate Change Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy.
North American Panel 4 November 2010 Houston Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
Dr. Haakon-Elizabeth Lindstad and Professor Gunnar. S. Eskeland
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Hellenic Forum 27 March 2008 Athens Peter M. Swift.
Asian Panel 3 December 2010 Hong Kong Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
Climate Challenge and the Tanker Industry Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager Image Courtesy of NORDEN AS Maritime Cyprus 2009.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.
Oil tankers under the spotlight Bureau Veritas International General Committee Oil tankers under the spotlight Paris, 26 June 2008 Nicholas Fistes Chairman.
Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
CAPP – GHG emissions Pipelines need to be constructed because they use significantly less energy to operate and have a lower carbon footprint than tanker.
Baltic Ports Organization, Lübeck 2008 City Ports for Better Climate – C40 Initiative Christel Wiman CEO, Ports of Stockholm.
UNFCCC COP 19 The case of Turkish Industry on transition to low carbon economy: Opportunities and Challenges.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
Asian Regional Panel Tokyo
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
CO2 emissions from road transport IRU’s response
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008
DNVPS - INTERTANKO seminar
Shipping Industry Combating Climate Change
Industrial Power Sails for Ocean Shipping
Energy Efficiency Design Index for Challenge Emissions (EEDI)
INTERTANKO Seminar 27 April 2010 Singapore
Climate action in the international shipping sector
Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization
Presentation transcript:

North American Panel 23 March 2009 Stamford, CT. Peter M. Swift

[ Initiatives to Reduce ] Greenhouse Gas Emissions Shipping has a head start as the most energy efficient means of transport

3 CO 2 Emissions per Unit Load by Transport Mode Source: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Japan): The Survey on Transport Energy 2001/2002 MOL (Japan): Environmental and Social Report 2004 Large Tanker Large Containership Railway Coastal Carrier Small-size Commercial Truck Airplane Standard-size Commercial Truck Units Relative Shipping energy efficient

TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY Shipping’s GREEN Credentials This car, weighing one tonne, uses 1 litre of fuel to move 20 kms This oil tanker uses 1 litre of fuel to move one tonne of cargo 2,500 kms –more than twice as far as 20 years ago

Reductions in GHG (CO 2 ) Emissions DRIVERS FOR CHANGE Driven hardest by a limited number of governments –Supported mostly by EU governments, plus Japan, Australia, Canada and a few others –Until recently only limited support in US (mostly environmental interests) –Relatively little enthusiasm in much of the developing world, but now changing ? Environmental Lobby growing –And becoming more coordinated Maritime industries showing considerable support –Proactive involvement –Although “hesitant” on market based instruments Economic incentives strong –Fuel savings translate into potentially significant cost savings; plus incentives for innovation & new technologies

One particular challenge for the shipping industry - i.e. seaborne trade will continue to grow strongly Source: Fearnleys/INTERTANKO Index There has been strong growth in shipping Trends – Population, Energy Use, Seaborne trade & CO 2 e missions

Initiatives underway at the IMO 1998: IMO initiated work on Green House Gas emissions 2003: IMO Assembly adopted Resolution A.963(23): Policies and Practices Related to the Reduction of GHG from Ships Today: Work continues through the MEPC This year: we can expect MEPC 59 to adopt - Mandatory Energy Efficiency Design Index for new ships Ship Energy Management Plan – existing ships: - Best practices to save energy used by the ship - Use of voluntary Energy Efficiency Operational Index In December: the outcome(s) of MEPC 59 will be presented to UNFCCC COP15 meeting in Copenhagen

Initiatives underway at the IMO Ship Performance Index: CO 2 / work done e.g. tonnes of CO 2 produced per tonne mile of cargo Energy efficiency design index for new ships incentivises designers and builders. At the next stage: The ship’s design index should be less than a maximum limit to be set by regulations. The maximum value will then be lowered over time. Voluntary energy efficiency operational indicator measures efficiency of ship in service. A management tool for owners and charterers to measure energy efficiency on a voyage. Incentivises the owner to keep hull and machinery “clean” and charterer to use the ship efficiently – capacity, routing and speed.

SEMP: Examples of Best Practices for tanker emissions & energy efficiency 1.Programme for Measuring and Monitoring Ship Efficiency 2.Voyage Optimization Programme 1.Speed selection optimization 2.Optimised route planning 3.Trim Optimization 3.Propulsion Resistance Management Programme 1.Hull Resistance 2.Propeller Resistance 4.Machinery Optimisation Programme 1.Main Engine monitoring and optimisation 2.Optimisation of lubrication as well as other machinery and equipment 5.Cargo Handling Optimization 1.Cargo vapours control procedure on all crude tankers (80-90% reduction of cargo vapours) 2.Cargo temperature control optimization 6.Energy Conservation Awareness Plan 1.On board and on shore training and familiarisation of company’s efficiency programme 2.Accommodation-specific energy conservation programme

IMO is also reviewing possible economic measures to reduce CO 2 emissions Emissions Trading Scheme Bunker Levy GHG Compensation Scheme Hybrids of above Other, e.g. differentiated charges Industry has established Guiding principles and believe any measure should: Be effective in reducing global GHG emissions Be binding on and applicable to all ships Be cost effective Not distort competition Support sustainable environmental development without penalising trade growth Promote technical innovation and leading technologies Be practical, transparent, fraud-free, easy to administer

Initiatives already under way - parallel voluntary measures For most ship types, some form of : Speed optimisation Voyage optimisation Capacity optimisation is already in hand. For Tankers: Liaison is encouraged between owners and charterers to optimise vessel speed and voyage schedules

Other initiatives under discussion Pending the setting of mandatory upper limits for the Energy Efficiency Design Index of new ships, there exists the potential for: The Establishment of a Reference Value for a New Ship (i.e. a Target) Development of a Rating System relative to the Reference Value Similar to the performance rating of white goods

Other initiatives already under way - parallel voluntary measures Ports / terminals Ports developing Environmental Ship Index (for pollutants and GHGs) Incentives to improve port efficiency Reward environmentally friendly ships with lower port dues

UNCTAD Conference Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge Engine Design Fuel Efficiency Gain Engine derating < 3.5% Diesel electric drives 5-30% Combined diesel electric and diesel mechanical drives <4% Waste heat recovery <10% Enhanced engine tuning and part load operation <4% Common rail engine <1% New BuildRetro-fit Operational Source: International Transport Forum 2009, OECD Estimates of fuel efficiency improvements are drawn from (Wartsila, 2008), (Green, Winebrake, & Corbett, 2008), (Bond, 2008) Tanker/Bulker Container Ro-ro Ferry-Cruise Offshore Supply

UNCTAD Conference Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge Propulsion Systems Fuel Efficiency Gain Wing thrusters <10% Counter-rotating propellers <12% Optimised propeller-hull interface <4% Propeller-rudder Unit <4% Optimised propeller blade sections <2% Propeller tip Winglets <4% Propeller nozzle <5% Propeller Efficiency Monitoring <4% Efficient Propeller Speed Modulation <5% Pulling Thruster <10% Wind power: Flettner rotor <30% Wind power: Kites & Sails <20% New BuildRetro-fit Operational Tanker/Bulker Container Ro-ro Ferry-Cruise Offshore Supply

THANK YOU For more information, please visit: