EFFECTIVE LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITY FOR WIND-POWER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Advertisements

Mechanical Engineering Department ME 322 Operation and Management of Power Plants Prof. Osama A El Masry Prof. Osama El Masry Load Curves.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Overview of Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) and Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Dan Huffman FirstEnergy Solutions November 20, 2007 OMS Board Workshop Resource.
06/04/2009 TAC 2009 Long-term Demand and Energy Forecast (LTDEF) and Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) Calculation Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
Capacity Valuation.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Results of the 2012 Loss of Load Study January 18, 2013.
BOSTON DENVER LONDON LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Effective Load Carrying Capability of Wind Generation: Initial Results.
The impacts of hourly variations of large scale wind power production in the Nordic countries on the system regulation needs Hannele Holttinen.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
Load Data for Vermont Docket 7081 workshop 9/30/05.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS September 14, 2011.
March 11, 2011 RPG Meeting Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) Import.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Wind ELCC Calculation Comparisons and ERCOT’s NERC LTRA Capacity Forecasts GATF Meeting, June 24, 2014.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
Illustrative FCRPS Examples Comparing Capacity Adequacy Calculations for Federal Hydro- Dominated System Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
Guidance for Utility Adequacy Assessments Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS November 18, 2009.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update October 12, 2012.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
Summary of Astrapé Reserve Margin Impact Analysis for the PUCT Pete Warnken WMS February 4, 2015.
Severe Winter Weather Resource Outage Analysis Chad Thompson Operations Working Group September
DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Long Term Study Resource Expansion Process: Study Findings and Lessons Learned Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray RPG May 21, 2013.
Karen Chiang Diane Cunningham Southern Company Load Research 1 When Normal Weather Is Not Normal AEIC Load Research Workshop April 2006.
LOLEv Methodology Details GATF April 5, Calculation of the Target Reserve Margin in the LOLEv study The reserve margin is calculated by the following.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Response to TAC Questions on PGRR031 TAC– January 28, 2014 Jeff Billo, ERCOT 1.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Meeting April 10, 2014.
Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) UPDATE F EBRUARY 8, 2011.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Understanding Value of Short-Duration Resources CPUC RA Workshop March 5, 2016.
2016 LTSA Update Doug Murray 6/21/2016. Agenda Introduction Scenario Retirement Process Scenario Summary Results Appendix.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
GATF Loss of Load Process (or How to Make Sausage) October, 2012.
6. PLANNING OF POWER SYSTEM RESERVES
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report on Reliable Fuel Operations in ERCOT Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 3,
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Eugene Preston,
WECC 2026 Common Case Capacity Assessment with RECAP
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Planning Reserve Margin
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Presentation transcript:

EFFECTIVE LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITY FOR WIND-POWER

IT IS NOT ALL ABOUT ONE HOUR WE SPEND A LOT OF MONEY ANALYZING ALL 8,760 HOURS TO DEVELOP A % OF PEAK RESERVE TARGET USING LOLP STUDIES WHEN WE USE THE % TARGET DERIVED BY LOLP COMBINED WITH FORECASTED PEAKS THEN ALL THOSE OTHER HOURS ARE INTRINSICALLY INCLUDED ERCOT’s CAPACITY SHORTAGES PERIODS OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE YEAR

THE CDR/LOLP ARE AVERAGE CDR LOAD FORECAST IS AVERAGE/NORMAL RESOURCE SEASONAL RATINGS ARE FOR “AVERAGE” TEMPERATURES CONDITIONS FINAL LOLP CURVE IS AN AVERAGE OF MANY WEATHER YEARS LOLP FORCED OUTAGE ASSUMPTIONS ARE AVERAGE LOLP MAINTENANCE OUTAGES ARE AVERAGE

COMBINED CYCLE RATING vs TEMP

Probability Weightings for Weather Years Weather Year Probabilities based on NOAA data: Extreme summer weather with a 5% probability – Composed of 2011 Warmer than average with a 15% probability – Composed of 2010 Average weather with a 50% probability – Composed of 25% for 2006 and 25% for 2009 Cooler than average with a 25% probability – Composed of % for the following years: 1998 – 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2008 Much cooler than average with a 5% probability – Composed of 1.25% for the following years: 1997, 2001, 2002, 2004 The impact of the likelihood of 2011 weather is seen in the graph on the next slide. January 18, 2013

Study Results Study results are dependent on selection of probabilities for the 15 weather years, as shown in the following graph: January 18, 2013

ELCC SEEKS TO FIND A RATING EQUIVALENT TO A REFERENCE RESOURCE ERCOT’s LOLP PROCESS USES A GAS TURBINE’s ANNUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO COMPARE WITH WIND-POWER’S ANNUAL CHARACTERISTICS THE RATING THAT IS DERIVED HAS THE SAME RELIABILITY VALUE AS THE GAS TURBINES, INCLUDING FORCED AND PLANNED OUTAGES THE BULK OF THE RELIABILITY CALCULATION FOCUSSES ON THE PEAK SUMMER SEASON

ELCC AND % RESERVE ARE LINKED THE LOLP vs % RESERVE CHART CANNOT BE CALCULATED WITHOUT KNOWING ELCC TOTAL CAPACITY = EXITING CONVENTIONAL + ADDED/SUBTRACTED CONVENTIONAL + ELCC X WIND-POWER RATED CAPACITY % RESERVE = ((TOTAL CAPACITY/PEAK LOAD) – 1) X 100

ELCC AND % RESERVE ARE LINKED IF ELCC IS LARGER THEN % RESERVE FOR 0.1 LOLP IS LARGER 100% OF ADDITIONAL WIND-POWER COUNTED IS COVERED BY ADDITIONAL RESERVE MW