Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Constitution and the Branches of Government Landmark Civil Rights Cases.
Advertisements

Civil Rights in the Courts
GGGG REVIEW Government Chapter 7- Beyond the Bill of Rights.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford Background Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master (a doctor) from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois (free state)
Chapter 5 Civil Rights Legal basis for civil rights Enforcing the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment Critical Supreme Court ruling in the battle.
Equal Protection?  The Fifth Amendment (1791): Guarantees equal protection under the law by FEDERAL government  Question: Who does this theoretically.
Supreme Court Impact on Civil Rights US History. Jim Crow Laws  Railroads/transportation and education laws were the most common types of segregation.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Equal Protection ◦ Supreme Court’s Standards  Race and Ethnicity (inherently suspect/strict/difficult to meet)*
Vocabulary. Policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals.
Minority Movements: The Civil Rights Movement. Civil War: Results  13 th Amendment: 1865 – President Andrew Johnson  Abolished Slavery  14 th Amendment.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Chapter 4.4 The Civil Rights Struggle. Background of the Struggle After the Civil War, African Americans routinely faced discrimination, or unfair treatment.
Chapter 4 Civil rights. The Civil Rights Struggle: After the Civil War, African Americans routinely faced discrimination, or unfair treatment based on.
Fighting For Education Brown v. Board of Education.
The Civil Rights Era. Segregation The isolation of a race, class, or group.
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
Clauses in Constitution & Supreme Court Cases Lecture #2.
4. Plessy vs. Ferguson.   SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson and judge the extent to which it set back Civil Rights efforts.
A history of the constitutionality of segregation in the United States Christine Glacken.
The Struggle for Equality. Path to Abolishing Slavery The Constitutional Convention would have failed without a compromise on slavery. Counted slaves.
Josh Rosenberger David Gagliardi Josh Haluptzok
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5. What are civil rights?  Civil rights: protect certain groups against discrimination  Civil liberties: constitutional.
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
Objective 30D Understand the application and significance of the equal protection clause of the 14 th amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Unit 10 By: Bennett Huddleston, Andrew Zucker, Mark Carter, and Michael Noteboom.
Objective 30d Understand the application and significance of the Equal Protection clause of the 14 th Amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Chapter 7: Our Living Constitution. Our Living Constitution  Think of the Constitution as a “flexible document” that can be changed  What are some of.
Warm up: Literacy test! CHAPTER 5-CIVIL RIGHTS. Civil Rights v. Civil Liberties The basic right to be free from unequal treatment based on certain protected.
Civil Rights By T.J.M.. Education Equality (Not) During the 1950s and before, African American children and White children could not attend the same schools.
Unit 3 Objectives 30d 30e 30f. 14 th Amendment No state shall make or enforce any law that shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens.
Goal 5.06A “The Civil Rights Struggle” I: Struggle for Rights A: Discrimination= unfair treatment based on prejudice against a certain group. B: Civil.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
Unit 3. Bell ringer 3-5 Complete sentences Examine the photo below, describe what you see. How does this image make you feel? If this was a part of our.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Learning Target 3: Civil Rights Cases.
Minority Movements: The Civil Rights Movement. Civil War: Results  13 th Amendment: 1865 – President Andrew Johnson  Abolished Slavery  14 th Amendment.
Ratifying the Constitution To ratify the Constitution, a battle would drag on for 2 years.
Sources of our Rights 1.3. Essentials  Essential Standards   Evaluate the rights of individuals in terms of how well those rights have been upheld.
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
The 1950s Civil Rights Movement Vocabulary list. Civil Rights Definition: The rights that every person should have regardless of his or her sex, race,
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
Chapter 28 Our Enduring Constitution
Civil Rights Movement.
GHSGT Court Cases Revised March 2009.
4.4 Struggle for Civil Rights
Discrimination unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice African Americans was a group that was discriminated against in the 1900s.
Gov Review Video #48: Important Civil Rights To Know
Equality before the Law
Challenging Segregation
OUR LIVING CONSTITUTION
Civil Rights.
Chapter 4 Section 3 & 4.
By Page, Alex, Zander, and Dawson
Key Ch. 5 Vocabulary Review – AP Government
Affirmative Action.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Brown vs board of Education 1954
Focus Question: What role did the federal government play in the Civil Rights Movement? Do Now: Answer questions 1-2 on today’s handout.
The Civil Rights Struggle
Court Procedures The Supreme Court is not required to hear all cases presented before it and carefully chooses the cases it will consider. Section 4.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Agenda- 1/18 GRAB A CHROME BOOK AND THE WORKSHEETS!
Brown v. Board of Education
Challenging Segregation
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Civil Rights: protection of citizens by government
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896.
Presentation transcript:

Matt Selby

BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas, protesting the segregation of children in public schools. The Supreme Court was eventually convinced, and voted unanimously to outlaw segregation in public schools. The Brown V. Board outcome overturned the conclusion reached during the case of Plessy V. Ferguson in 1896

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. BAKKE Bakke was a white male in his 30s, and was not admitted to college because he was “too old,” and because he was white. The Supreme Court ruled that having certain quotas for schools was unconstitutional. The conclusion still found affirmative action (giving an advantage to a certain race in college applicants or when giving a job) to be constitutional.

IMPACT Both the Brown v Board & Cal. University v Bakke were landmark decisions by the Supreme Court that furthered civil rights. In both cases, the Court ruled certain types of discrimination as unconstitutional. In the Brown v Board case, the court ruled that state laws supporting segregation of schools was unfair and unconstitutional. Affirmative action was upheld by the court in the University of California v Bakke, allowing schools to give special treatment to minorities, although the decision outlawed “quotas” of specific races.

QUESTIONS 1) Why was outlawing segregation in public schools so important? 2) How did the Bakke decision affect today’s workforce? 3) Were there any other fair solutions to these cases? 4) Were these the right decisions?

CITATIONS oyez.org oyez.org/cases/ /1977/1977_76_811 tomberrigan.com schools.nashua.edu lawyernakmuay.blogspot.com jerzygirl45.wordpress.com