IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Satellite based estimates of surface visibility for state haze rule implementation planning Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 6th Semi-Annual Meeting (Jan.
Advertisements

Natural Haze Sensitivity Study “Final” Update Ivar Tombach RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Call 8 May 2006.
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
1 Estimates of worst 20% natural condition deciview: application of the new IMPROVE algorithm and a revised statistical approach Rodger Ames, CIRA
Radiative Effects of Atmospheric Aerosols and Regional Haze Jin Xu DAS Science Talk February 17, 2004.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
Update on Natural Levels II Technical Review Committee By Marc Pitchford for the June 12 th RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Conference Call.
Illumination Independent Aerosol Optical Properties n Extinction Scattering Absorption n Volume scattering function (phase) n Transmittance.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
Substituting Sulfate for Sulfur Impact on the RHR metrics and control strategies Presented at the 2006 IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting by B.A. Schichtel.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.

Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Determination of aerosol components from multiwavelength/depolarization measurements Nobuo SUGIMOTO, Tomoaki Nishizawa, and Atsushi Shimizu National Institute.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Brief Description of CALPUFF Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Options for Estimating Natural Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region Ivar Tombach with benefit of material prepared by Jim Boylan and Daniel Jacob.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June May 2008 Reports:
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Natural Background Conditions: Items for discussion with the Inter-RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Naresh Kumar EPRI 5 March 2004.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Draft, 5 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 2. Critical Evaluation of Current Approach for Estimating Natural Conditions Ivar Tombach.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update Jin Xu. Update Visibility trends analysis (under revision) Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
Properties of Particulate Matter
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Shawn McClure, Rodger Ames and Doug Fox - CIRA
ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL: suspension of condensed-phase particles in air
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Stephen Mueller & Jonathan Mallard Tennessee Valley Authority
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Haze Rule: Natural Conditions Concepts & Approaches
IMPROVE Data Processing
Measuring microphysical, chemical and optical properties of aerosols aboard the NCAR/NSF C-130 during VOCALS Studying size-resolved aerosol cloud interactions.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Introduction to IMPROVE and Regional Haze Data
Air Quality Committee Meeting July 11, 2012 Donnie Redmond
Presentation transcript:

IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee

Current IMPROVE Algorithm Assumptions include that Six particle component terms plus a constant Rayleigh scattering term are sufficient for a good estimate of light extinction; Constant dry extinction efficiency terms for each of the six particle components works adequately for all locations and times; and Light extinction by the individual particle components can be adequately estimated as separate terms (like externally mixed components).

Reasons for Revision Regional Haze Rule utilizes the IMPROVE algorithm for calculating the RHR index –Haze index is in deciview (a logarithmic transformation of light extinction) –Calls for improvement in 20% worst haze to natural levels by 2064 –Rate of progress for each 10-year SIP period is linear between current and natural haze levels –So haze estimates need to be good at the upper and lower extremes, should have no fixable biases and should include all important contributions even if exclusively from natural sources

Recommended Revised IMPROVE Algorithm (Changed terms are in Bold Font) where and nitrate and organic are split using the same process

Split Component Extinction Efficiency Model for Sulfate, Nitrate, and Organic components Composite dry extinction efficiency varies linearly from 2.2 to 4.8m 2 /g Small: D g = 0.2μm &  g = 2.2 Large: D g = 0.5μm &  g = 1.5 Different size distributions dictate different water grow function, f(RH) Small size dominates at low concentrations, while large size dominates at high concentrations Small size is likely young aerosol produce by homogenous gas to particle processes. Large size is likely aged aerosol involving cloud processing.

Other New or Revised Terms Organic Compound Mass to Organic Carbon Mass Ratio changed from 1.4 to 1.8 Sea Salt = 1.8 x [Chlorine] and has its own water growth term f SS (RH). Important at coastal locations Rayleigh Scattering is calculated for the monitoring site elevation and annual mean temperature and integer rounded. Ranges from 8Mm -1 at 10,000’ to 12Mm -1 at sea level NO 2 light absorption in the visible is included for sites that have such data (not routinely available at IMPROVE sites)

Bias = (estimated – measured)/measured

Implementation Steps for Regional Haze Rule Application IMPROVE Steering Committee approval – 11/05 Calculation of water growth functions for monthly & annual averaged conditions for each monitoring site – SAIC task-1 to 2 months Recalculation of current (5-year baseline) and natural haze levels – VIEWS-1 month EPA modifies the regional haze guidance, so states can choose – 6 to 12 months VIEWS will support both versions of the algorithm for the foreseeable future