2-proton emission experimental set-up decay results 2p emission from 45 Fe perspectives Jérôme Giovinazzo – CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan – France PROCON’03 – Legnaro – Feb. 2003
« classic » decay modes beta minus, beta plus alpha emission, fission at the proton drip-line: nuclear strong interaction is not able to bound last nucleons kept inside by Coulomb barrier 1-proton radioactivity 1981: discovered at GSI ( Hoffmann et al. ) ~30 known emitters, Z = 53 à 83 2-proton radioactivity due to pairing predicted in the 60’s ( Goldansky )
from an excited state -2p decay: 22 Al, 26 P, 31 Ar,… other cases: 14 O, 17 Ne, 18 Ne (T. Zergueras et al.) from the ground state in light nuclei 6 Be, 12 O, 16 Ne, 19 Mg half-lives in the order of reaction times (~ s) in the A~50 mass region half-lives: ~ms 45 Fe, 48 Ni, 54 Zn, ?… séquential emission 3 bodies break-up 2 He radioactivity
simple model: tunneling of an 2 He particle through the Coulomb barrier comparison mass models predictions T 1/2 = f(Q 2P ) if Q 2P too high not bound or too short T 1/2 if Q 2P too small tunneling too slow: + dominates the decay
mass region A~50: Coulomb barrier high enough (Z = 20 ~ 30) half-life: 1 s ~ 10 ms candidates: (mass models from Cole, Brown, Ormand) 45 Fe, 48 Ni, 54 Zn 42 Cr, 49 Ni accessible in projectile fragmentation exp. 54 Zn 49 Ni 48 Ni 45 Fe 42 Cr
1996 GSI (Darmstadt - Germany) first observation of 42 Cr, 45 Fe, 49 Ni no information about decay modes 1998 GANIL (Caen - France) looking for 48 Ni (not successful) first observation of 55,56 Zn 1999 GANIL discovery of 48 Ni decay of 42 Cr et 49 Ni 45 Fe: very low statistics (elect. trigger problems) 48 Ni: no decay data 2000 GANIL – 2001 GSI 2-proton decay of 45 Fe
cross sections estimates (accessibility) low confidence… orders of magnitudes (from exp à GANIL) 42 Cr20~200 pb 45 Fe~0.8 pb 49 Ni~1.3 pb 48 Ni~0.04 pb
projectile fragmentation natural Nickel target SISSI device (high acceptance) projectile fragmentation natural Nickel target SISSI device (high acceptance) LISE3 spectrometer B selection achromatic degrader (Be) Wien filter LISE3 spectrometer B selection achromatic degrader (Be) Wien filter detection set-up ions identification decay measurement detection set-up ions identification decay measurement primary beam CSS1 and CSS2 cyclotrons MeV / A intensity on target ~3 Ae primary beam CSS1 and CSS2 cyclotrons MeV / A intensity on target ~3 Ae 10 5 p/s p/s p/s transmission efficiency: 1~10 %
silicon telescope ion by ion identification of implantation events implantation: double side silicon strip detector (X-Y) 16 x 3 mm redundant measurements background reduction time of flight - micro-channel PLATES - cyclotrons HF -light particles veto - residual energy -energy loss
Blank et al. (2000) Observation of 48 Ni 4 implanted nuclei experiment at GANIL events of 45 Fe implantation identification conditions: 8 à 10 parameters almost no background
P P implantation decay pixel correlation of events background reduction in decay energy / time distributions proton energy strip detectorЄ ~ 100 % coincidence with particles neighbour siliconЄ ~ 30 % germanium detectors array detailed spectroscopy - , -p-
comparison with theoretical predictions shell model (nuclear structure, interactions) less exotic higher production rate proton-gamma coincidences some identified transitions mass estimates (IMME)
E P ~ 1.9 MeV T 1/2 ~ s measured half-life: 13.4 ms most likely decay
E P ~ 3.7 MeV T 1/2 ~ s measured half-life: 12 ms most likely decay
transition assignment: peak energy:1.14 ± 0.05 MeV in the expected range for 2p emission to be observable peak width:60 keV 30 % narrower than p no pile-up half-life:4.7 ms compatible with Q 2P filiation: in agreement with p decay of 43 Cr energy and time coherent picture of 2p emission from 45 Fe ground state
comparison of 45 Fe and 46 Fe ( p): same energy conditions: close Q and same E P energy coincidence efficiency: 30~35 %
22 implanted nuclei of 45 Fe / 12 counts in the 2p peak short half-life, acquisition dead-time 0.3~0.5 ms 3 à 4 decay events may be lost 2p branching ratio: 70~80 % competition between p and 2p channel in agreement with GSI results very low statistics…
experiment: simple tunneling model: including spectroscopic factor: S ~ 0.20 shell model (B. Brown) experiment:1.14 ± 0.05 MeV mass models :1.15 ± 0.09 MeV (Brown, 1991) 1.22 ± 0.05 MeV (Cole, 1996) 1.28 ± 0.18 MeV (Ormand, 1996) Q 2P half-life
R-matrix: (Barker, Brown) with p+p interaction s-wave S = body calculation p-p correlation (Jacobi T) good agreement for p-wave correl. from mirror nucleus: last two protons in f state (Grigorenko et al.) sequential emission intermediate state 44 MnQ 1P = -24 à +10 keV T 1/2 few hours ~ few days di-proton 3-body indép.
experiment 42 Cr, 49 Nimost likely decay 45 Fe2-proton emission from ground state coherent full picture including daughter decay ( 43 Cr) possible competition between 2p / p data from GSI in good agreement with GANIL results experiment 42 Cr, 49 Nimost likely decay 45 Fe2-proton emission from ground state coherent full picture including daughter decay ( 43 Cr) possible competition between 2p / p data from GSI in good agreement with GANIL results comparison avec les models results depending on the model new calculations in progress sequential emission seems excluded still open question: 3-body break-up or 2 He radioactivity ? comparison avec les models results depending on the model new calculations in progress sequential emission seems excluded still open question: 3-body break-up or 2 He radioactivity ?
experiment (GANIL) 45 Feconfirm 2p emission (reproducibility) precise Q 2P and T 1/2 daughter decay, branch 48 Niobservation 1999 good conditions for 2p emission decay mode? 54 Znobservation 55,56 Zn 1998 10 à 15 nuclei 54 Zn / day experiment (GANIL) 45 Feconfirm 2p emission (reproducibility) precise Q 2P and T 1/2 daughter decay, branch 48 Niobservation 1999 good conditions for 2p emission decay mode? 54 Znobservation 55,56 Zn 1998 10 à 15 nuclei 54 Zn / day ?
purpose angular correlation measurements of emitted protons discrimination between 2 He emission / other cases TPC development implantation in a gas cell 3D tracking of protons X-Y detector Z time projection MGWC technology (high energy physics) M. Dracos et al. integrated electronics (ASICs) purpose angular correlation measurements of emitted protons discrimination between 2 He emission / other cases TPC development implantation in a gas cell 3D tracking of protons X-Y detector Z time projection MGWC technology (high energy physics) M. Dracos et al. integrated electronics (ASICs) identification drift of ionisation electrons emitting nucleus protons X-Y detector elect. field
Collaborations GANIL: CENBG, GANIL, IAP Bucarest, Univ. Varsovie, NSCL / MSU GSI: Univ. Varsovie, GSI, CENBG, GANIL, ORNL, Univ. Edimbourg research program in a more general 2p emission context 2 He radioactivity emission in light nuclei correlated component in the -2p decay (mainly sequential) ... Jérôme Giovinazzo – CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan – France PROCON’03 – Legnaro – Feb. 2003