Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the  0  Experiment A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC for the PrimEx Collaboration Outline  Physics Motivation  PrimEx-I.
Advertisements

Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Computed Tomography RAD309
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Tagger hodoscope and photon beam monitoring D.Sober, F.Klein (CUA) Tagger Review, Jan.23-24, 2006.
The GlueX Photon Beam Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Tagging spectrometer and photon beamline Review January 23-24, Response to Questions Bremsstrahlung Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beam Review.
Gamma ray spectrum, its acquiring and analysis
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
5/10/20101GlueX Col meeting, A. Gasparian1 The PrimEx HyCal Calorimeter A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  HyCal calorimeter.
Rate and Gain Measurements of the 1-m long GEM detector Aiwu Zhang EIC tracking R&D weekly meeting.
The Hall D Photon Beam Overview Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagged Photon Beam ReviewNov , 2008, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Update on High Precision Measurement of the Neutral Pion Decay Width Rory Miskimen University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline  0 →  and the chiral.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Luminosity Monitoring For PrimEx Dan Dale PrimEx Collaboration Meeting December 16, 2006.
High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  Previous experiments and proton size.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
Status of the PrimEx Experiment: A Precision Measurement of the Neutral Pion Lifetime 7 th European Conference on “Electromagnetic Interactions with Nucleons.
Photon Beam Position Stability Mike Grissom UNCW July 29,2005.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
Test of fundamental symmetries via the Primakoff effect Test of fundamental symmetries via the Primakoff effect Liping Gan University of North Carolina.
Objectives Determine Detector offsets in hall B reference frame and thus absolute beam position at Hycal Examine Flux calculation and see if beam trips.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
Kelli Hardy Compton Study from Experimental Data.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
L/T separation in the 3 He(e,e’p) reaction at parallel kinematics Freija Descamps Supervisors: Ron Gilman Eric Voutier Co-supervisor: Jean Mougey.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Luminosity Monitoring For PrimEx Dan Dale PrimEx Collaboration Meeting February 23, 2007.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
PrimEx Analysis Status Mark Ito November 19, 2005 ● Accomplishments ● In progress ● Anomalies ● Next steps ● Bias.
JLab PAC33, January 16, 2008 Polarization transfer in WACS 1  p   p Polarization transfer in Wide-Angle Compton Scattering Proposal D. Hamilton,
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
Objectives: Measure production of vector mesons ( , ,  ) on nuclei in the energy range Measure production of vector mesons ( , ,  ) on nuclei in.
High Performance PbWO 4 - Lead Glass Hybrid Calorimeter at Jefferson Lab M. Kubantsev ITEP, Moscow, Russia/Northwestern University, Evanston, USA A. Gasparian.
Compton Data Analysis Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
Physics Case of the Day - Sunday
A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Bubble Chamber – Beam Requirements
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
Status of Compton Analysis
The PrimEx-I Experiment
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
Dan Dale Idaho State University February 19, 2012
(Single Arm) Pair Production Cross Section at PrimEx Status Report
Report on p0 decay width: analysis updates
Energy Calibration with Compton Data
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
Compton Run Liping Gan June 18, 2004.
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW

Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative tagging ratio Sensitivity of beam position stability Summary

PrimEx-  Requirement The number of tagged photons on the physics target must be known at 1% precision

Tagged Photon A tagged photon should satisfy following conditions: A good scattering electron in the tagger that has good reconstructed energy and timing information from the tagger spectrometer. A Photon reaches the physics target that must be in coincidence with a good tagged scattering electron in the tagger.

Number of tagged photons on the target is not equal to the number of hits recorded by the tagger due to following reasons: A event in which a bremsstrahlung photon is produced but it does not reach the physics target due to the collimation or absorption along the photon beam line. Moller scattering in the radiator which produces an electron in the photon tagger without an accompanying photon. Extra hits registered in the tagger due to accidental background.

Procedure to obtain number of tagged photons In a special calibration run (TAC run), replace the physics target with a lead-glass total absorption counter (TAC) directly in a low intensity photon beam so that TAC is able to withstand. The absolute tagging ratio is obtained by: Where is the number of photons registered by TAC which are in coincidence with tagged electrons in the tagger, and is the number of electrons registered in the tagger. Conditions for TAC run: (1) TAC is 100% efficient (by assumption). (2) the radiator thickness should be similar to the radiator used in the production runs so that the scattering electrons will experience similar multiple scattering and absorption in the radiator for both TAC run and production runs; (3) Photon beam must low enough for TAC to withstand. For a R.L. Radiator, the electron beam current should be  1nA. For a physics production run (normal beam intensity), the number of tagged photon on the target is calculated by: Where is the number of electron registered in the photon tagger during the production run.

High order corrections to tagged photon flux The number of tagged photon described in the previous slide must be corrected by measuring the relative tagging ratio due to following reasons: 1.Since the absolute tagging ratio is measured at orders of magnitude lower beam intensity than the production runs, the beam current effects, such as non-linearity of the tagger counters at higher beam current, should be corrected. 1.The TAC calibration runs can only be performed at intervals between the production runs. One needs monitor the long term stability of the absolute tagging ratio over the time.

Relative Tagging Ratio Take the e + e - pair-production data continuously in both TAC calibration runs and physics production runs. Relative Tagging Ratio is calculated by: Where is the number of the e + e - pairs registered by the PS spectrometer which are in coincident with tagged electrons in the tagger, is the number of electrons registered in the tagger. Any changes in the relative tagging ratio will be used to correct the tagged photon flux.

Sensitivity to beam position stability 5 mm collimator To control the tagged photon flux within 1%, the center of photon beam position should be maintain within  200  m at primary collimator location

Summary To control the absolute tagged photon flux at 1% level, special TAC calibration runs must be performed periodically with a reduced electron beam current (  1 nA). In order to correct the effects due to beam non-stability, the tagged photon flux should be monitored and corrected by measuring the relative tagging ratio with the e + e - pair-production measurement in parallel to both TAC calibration runs at lower beam intensity and physics production runs at higher beam intensity. The beam requirements for TAC calibration runs: (1) capability of  1 nA electron beam current, and (2) photon beam center position should be stable within  200  m at primary collimator location