Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Advertisements

Expected counting rates. FRS experimental setup Total load is limited by SC1 and MUSIC1.
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter.
GEANT4 simulations for the Lund R 3 B prototype Douglas Di Julio Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
1 A Search for Massive Magnetic Monopoles at the Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope A Search for Massive Magnetic Monopoles at the Baksan Underground.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
N. Saito The RISING stopped beam physics meeting Technical status of RISING at GSI N. Saito - GSI for the RISING collaboration Introduction Detector performance.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Status of Atlas Tile Calorimeter and Study of Muon Interactions L. Price for TileCal community Short Overview of the TileCal Project mechanics instrumentation.
SuperNEMO Simulations Darren Price University of Manchester July, 2005.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Design and performance of Active Target GEM-TPC R. Akimoto, S. Ota, S, Michimasa, T. Gunji, H. Yamaguchi, T. hashimoto, H. Tokieda, T. Tsuji, K. Kawase,
Rare Isotope Spectroscopic INvestigation at GSI. abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Beta decay around 64 Cr GANIL, March 25 th V 63 V 64 V 60 V 61 V 63 Cr 64 Cr 65 Cr 61 Cr 62 Cr 60 Cr 64 Mn 65 Mn 66 Mn 65 Fe 67 Fe 1) 2 + in 64.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Performance of Shower Maximum Detectors Saori Itoh (Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK,Kobe,Konan,Niigata,Shinshu,Tsukuba) Introduction Detector.
1 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target EM miniCAL GSI’s.
Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Studies of Electroweak Interactions and Searches for New Physics Using Photonic Events with Missing Energy at the Large Electron-Positron Collider Marat.
The Muon g-2 Experiment – Investigating how the spin of a muon is affected as it moves through a magnetic field Astrid Rodrigues.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Design and performance of Active Target GEM-TPC R. Akimoto, S. Ota, S, Michimasa, T. Gunji, H. Yamaguchi, T. Hashimoto, H. Tokieda, T. Tsuji, S. Kawase,
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
The Lund R3B prototype: In-beam proton tests and simulations
Exclusive w/h production in pp collisions at Ekin=3.5 GeV with HADES
Calibrating the CAL in flight: Galactic Cosmic Ray Calibration
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
GAMMA-400 performance a,bLeonov A., a,bGalper A., bKheymits M., aSuchkov S., aTopchiev N., bYurkin Y. & bZverev V. aLebedev Physical Institute of the Russian.
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Event Reconstruction and Data Analysis in R3BRoot Framework
“minimum-ionisation” peak
CALET-CALによる ガンマ線観測初期解析
of secondary light ion beams
DSSSD for b decay investigations of heavy neutron-rich isotopes
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Imaging crystals with TKR
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
A. Menegolli, University of Pavia and INFN Pavia
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon. All fragments lighter than Ni are produced in the target, sorted out by the spectrometer (magnetic rigidity) and identified (Z,A,E) thanks to the detection system. Plan: different energies and EM angles, all elements (2<Z<26) dedicated runs with specific ions: C, Si, Fe (use of “degrader”) Issue: Synchronisation of two data streams Slide 1 GSI experiment (November 14-24,2003) EM 1st dipole pair2nd dipole pair

Goals of the GSI experiment C O Si Fe Eloss (MeV) Counts Determination of dL/dE as a function of (E,Z) Test of the algorithms for rejection of reaction events: heavy ions + lighter ions (alphas…) Test of the EM’s response to real, high-energy events (comparison with detectors fitted with good electronics) Goals: Side benefit: Simulated GCR Eloss distributions in orbit Slide 2

Birk’s formula: L(E)  E/(1+k B dE/dx) High energy: for a given dE/dx, E is higher for greater Z  more  electrons  less quenching exemple of functional: L(E)   E (1- X ln(1+X -1 )+ bAZ 2 ln((1+X)/(X+cA/E))) with X=a AZ 2 /E Quenching Effects: dL/dE NaI(Tl) Salamon and Ahlen lower limit at GSI upper limit at GSI Ganil Slide 3 “punchthrough point” “relativistic rise”

GANIL experiment (Easter 2003) 6 Si detectors2 CsI bars (hidden) E in CsI deduced from Eloss in Si (loss in wrapping foil taken into account) 73 MeV/nucleon 78 Kr+Au, Pb targets VERY PRELIMINARY results E estimated from Si Energy loss « no quenching » Effect of shaping time (0.5 –2 –6  s) also investigated Slide 4

Nuclear reactions: rejection Will be tested with GSI data: 1.7 GeV Fe will « punch » through the whole calorimeter at normal incidence. Rejection algorithms based on: E i /E i+1 ratios, significantly different from 1 (thresh: TBD) for reactions charge-changing (« stripping ») reactions: Z  Z-1:  E/E  1/Z = 4% for Fe presence of energy in neighboring crystals Numbers of identified reactions can be confronted with expected (= real!) values from empirical cross sections Simulations: JQMD, INC in GEANT4, Fluka? Slide 5

CERN-SPS experiment in 2003 (August 7-13) Goals:  precise measurement of longitudinal shower profile (~20 X 0 )  test of energy-reconstruction methods  investigation of crack effects (2 detector subsets)  investigation of the impact of direct energy deposit within photodiodes on position determination  determination of nuclear-reaction patterns (pion-induced reactions)  verification of CsI time constants Beams (H6a line) : electrons 6 GeV<E<150 GeV pions+muons Setup: « Cal »: at least 32 crystals (50 proposed by Sweden) trigger: 2cm x 2cm plastic scintillator position: Si strips (?) Slide 6

Slide MeV “sum” 511 keV CERN-SPS experiment in 2002 Good electronics Longitudinal shower profile (calibration with muons…) detector (2x4 CsI crystals) Pb

Slide 8 Transverse “shower profile” at 200 GeV