Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 13 - Synchrotron Radiation 2 For a relativistic particle, the total radiated power (S&E.
Advertisements

S. Guiducci, INFN-LNF Seventh International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders Hosted by Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology 4 December 2012.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Linear Collider Damping Rings Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Syllabus and slides Lecture 1: Overview and history of Particle accelerators (EW) Lecture 2: Beam optics I (transverse) (EW) Lecture 3: Beam optics II.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 20 November 20141/30 Electron beam dynamics in storage rings Synchrotron radiation and its effect on electron dynamics.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Lecture 15  Radiation Damping Radiation Damping USPAS,
ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
Synchrotron radiation R. Bartolini John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science, University of Oxford and Diamond Light Source JUAS February 2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Synchrotron Radiation
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
2 nd International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders, Erice, Sicily 1 – 10 October, 2007 Damping Rings Lecture 1 Damping Ring Basics Andy Wolski.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 19 November 20141/39 Electron beam dynamics in storage rings Synchrotron radiation and its effect on electron dynamics.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Ft. Collins, CO June 13-24, 2016 E. Prebys - Accelerator Fundamentals, Synchrotron Radiation 2 For a relativistic particle,
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Synchrotron radiation
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Electron dynamics with Synchrotron Radiation
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Lecture 1: Synchrotron radiation Lecture 2: Undulators and Wigglers
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Lecture 1: Synchrotron radiation Lecture 2: Undulators and Wigglers
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Lecture 15 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Radiation Damping S.A. Bogacz, G.A. Krafft, S. DeSilva and R. Gamage
Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Radiation Damping - Low emittance lattices
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Electron Rings 2 Eduard Pozdeyev.
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school

Outline Betatron motion Synchrotron motion Radiation damping Beam energy spread Beam emittance Intrabeam scattering

Synchrotron motion

Synchrotron Radiation Emission of Synchrotron Radiation (S.R.) exerts a strong influence on electron beam dynamics in storage rings. Emission of synchrotron radiation leads to damping of synchrotron and betatron oscillations and determines the beam sizes. At present energies, these effects strongly affect the design of electron machines, while are negligible for proton machines. For the next proton collider LHC synchrotron radiation effects have to be taken into account. In the following we will refer to electrons.

Radiated Power Synchrotron radiation is the energy emitted by a relativistic particle in motion on a circular trajectory S.R. is emitted on a broad frequency spectrum and in a narrow cone of aperture ~1/  with respect to the electron velocity The instantaneous rate of power emitted by S.R. is: ;

Energy Loss Per Turn I2 is the second radiation integral. The radius of curvature is related to the field of the bending magnets by: cE = B  ;E [GeV] =.3 B  [Tm] For isomagnetic lattice (uniform bending radius):

Energy loss per turn and related parameters for various electron storage rings The same quantities for the next proton storage ring. * dip = from dipoles, excluding contributions from wigglers

Synchrotron Oscillations The energy lost by S.R. has to be replaced by means of the electric field in the Radio Frequency (RF) cavities. The synchronous particle travels on the reference trajectory (closed orbit) with energy E 0 and revolution period T 0 = 1/f 0 = L/c The RF frequency must be a multiple of the revolution frequency f RF = hf 0 The synchronous particle arrives at the RF cavity at time t 0 so that the energy gained is equal to the energy U 0 lost per turn by S.R.

 = 0 L 0, t 0  = eV(t 0 ) = U 0  > 0 L > L 0, t > t 0  = eV(t) < U 0  < 0 L U 0 Synchrotron Oscillations The arrival time for an off-momentum particle is given by the momentum compaction  c The momentum compaction is generally positive E = E 0 +  E = E 0  c = I 1 /L 0

τ = Δ s/c > 0 is the time distance for an e- ahead of the synchronous particle Assuming that changes in ε and τ occur slowly with respect to T 0 : On average in one turn: For small oscillations the we assume linear RF voltage: Synchrotron Oscillations

Combining these equations we obtain the usual equation of harmonic motion for the energy oscillations with an additional damping term Synchrotron Oscillations The solution is:

Damping of Synchrotron Oscillations The rate of energy loss changes with energy because it is itself a function of energy the orbit deviates from the reference orbit and there may be a change in path length and P is a function of E 2 and B 2

Damping Time For separated function lattice D << 1 : Taking into account also the path lengthening the damping coefficient is:    is the time in which the particle radiates all its energy = I 4 /I 2

Damping of Vertical Betatron Oscillations Effect of energy loss due to S.R. and energy gain in the RF cavity After the RF cavity, since z’ = p  /p, we have: average over one turn The damping decrement is

Damping partition In the horizontal plane the damping coefficient has an additional term which accounts for the path length variation In general: i = x,z or  and J i are the damping partition numbers: J x = 1 - D ; J z = 1; J  = 2 + D ; D = I 4 /I 2 The sum of the damping rates for the three planes is a costant: J x + J z + J  = 4 For damping in all planes simultaneously: all J i > 0 and hence -2 < D < 1

Radiation Damping Effects Equilibrium beam sizes Multicycle injection Damping rings Counteracts the beam instabilities Influence Of S.R. Emission On Machine Design –RF system –vacuum system: heating and gas desorption –radiation damage –radiation background in collider experiments. High Energy Storage Rings –The radius of curvature is increased to keep the power of the emitted radiation below an acceptable level r ナ E 2. Low Energy Storage Rings –It is often useful to insert in the ring special devices, wiggler magnets, in order to increase the power emitted by S.R. and reduce the damping times.

Wiggler Magnets A wiggler magnet is made of a series of dipole magnets with alternating polarity so that the total bending angle (i.e. the field integral along the trajectory) is zero. This device can be inserted in a straight section of the ring with minor adjustments of the optical functions. The damping time becomes faster because U 0 increases. Any number of periods can be added in order to get the desired damping time.

DA  NE wiggler Field and Trajectory

Energy Oscillation Parameters for Various Electron Storage Rings

Quantum Excitation and Beam Dimensions Radiation damping is related to the continuous loss and replacement of energy. Since the radiation is quantized, the statistical fluctuations in the energy radiated per turn cause a growth of the oscillation amplitudes. The equilibrium distribution of the particles results from the combined effect of quantum excitation and radiation damping.

Mean Square Energy Deviation The invariate oscillation amplitude is When a photon of energy u is emitted the change in A 2 is: and the total rate of change of A 2 : The equilibrium is reached for dA 2 /dt = 0 and the mean-square energy deviation is:

Radiation Emission The radiation is emitted in photons with energy The total number of photons emitted per electron per second is: And the mean square photon energy is : ;, The mean photon energy is:

Beam Energy Spread The energy deviation at a given time can be considered as the sum of all the previous photon emissions, and all the energy gains in the RF cavities. This sum contains a large number of statistically independent small terms. Therefore, for the Central Limit Theorem, the distribution of the energy deviation is Gaussian with standard deviation σ ε. And the relative energy deviation

Bunch Length A Gaussian distribution in energy results in a similar distribution in  with standard deviation: with  momentum compaction, depends on lattice  synchrotron frequency V 0 RF peack voltage

Beam Emittance Horizontal plane Effect of energy loss on the off-energy orbit and betatron motion in the horizontal plane The betatron oscillation invariant is: and the change due to photon emission:

Horizontal Emittance The average rate of increase of A 2 is: Equating to radiation damping the equilibrium mean square value is obtained. This defines the beam emittance  x :

Emittance and beam sizes The emittance is constant for a given lattice and energy. The projection of the distribution on the x, x’ axis respectively is Gaussian with rms : At points in the lattice where dispersion is non zero the contribution of the synchrotron motion is added in quadrature

Vertical Emittance Generally storage rings lie in the horizontal plane and have no bending and no dispersion in the vertical plane. A very small vertical emittance arises from the fact that the photons are emitted at a small angle with respect to the direction of motion ( θ rms ≈ 1/ γ ) The resulting vertical equilibrium emittance is: This vertical emittance can be generally neglected. For the ILC DR  z  /  ~ 40/100 and  z ~ , which is 4% of the design vertical emittance, not completely negligible

Vertical Emittance In practice the vertical emittance comes from: coupling of horizontal and vertical betatron oscillations due to: –skew quadrupole field errors (angular errors in the quadrupole alignment and vertical orbit in the sextupoles) –errors in the compensation of detector solenoids vertical dispersion due to: –angular errors in the dipole alignment –vertical orbit in the quadrupoles

Effect of Damping Wigglers We have already seen that insertion of wigglers in a ring increases I 2 and therefore the energy radiated per turn The main effect is a reduction of the damping times Wigglers can have a strong effect on emittance We assume: Jx~1 and F w = U w /U a arc emittance wiggler emittance

Effect of Damping Wigglers If F w >>1 the arc emittance is reduced by the factor F w and the ring emittance is dominated by the wiggler Inserting the wigglers in a zero dispersion section the wiggler emittance can be made very small Therefore insertion of wigglers allows to reduce both the beam emittance and the damping time Wigglers are extensively used in damping rings: the ILC DR has 200 m of wigglers Wigglers in dispersive sections are sometimes used to increase the emittance in storage ring colliders

Vertical Emittance 0 <  < 1 If the vertical emittance depends on a large number of small errors randomly distributed along the ring, it can be described in terms of a coupling coefficient  The sum of the horizontal and vertical emittances is constant, often called “natural beam emittance”

References M. Sands, "The physics of electron storage rings. An Introduction" - SLAC 121 CAS, General Accelerator Physics, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland, September CERN 94/01: –J.Le Duff, ‘Longitudinal beam dynamics in circular accelerators’, –R. P. Walker, “Synchrotron Radiation’, ‘Radiation damping’, and ‘Quantum excitation and equilibrium beam properties’, –A. Wrulich, ‘Single-beam lifetime’ S.Y. Lee, ”Accelerator Physics”, World Scientific,1999 Andy Wolski,”Notes for USPAS Course on Linear Colliders”, Santa Barbara, June 2003