Pages 233-234 By Gerald Card. Knox County Education Association v. Knox County Board Of Education  158 F.3d 361 (6 th Cir. 1998) cert denied  528 U.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Process and Search and Seizure- 4 th and 14 th Amendments.
Advertisements

1985.  3/7/80, 2 Freshmen at Piscataway High School is found in the girl’s bathroom smoking cigarettes.  They were brought to the AP’s office  One.
 Record in Agenda: 1) Notebook check next class– all notes & class activities should have been completed and glued into your notebook. Check the Absent.
1 Chapter 11 Evidence is Admissible if Obtained During an Administrative Function Under the “Special Needs” of Government Evidence is Admissible if Obtained.
Ellie Ingbritsen and Rosie Parmigiani Board of Education of Independent School District #92 of Pottawatomie County et. al v Earls et. al.
Landmark Cases: Search and Seizure
Pages By Gerald Card. Title and Citation Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser Supreme Court of the United States U.S. 675.
School Law Boot Camp – Part 1.  LEGAL ONE Video LEGAL ONE Video  SMALL GROUP ACTIVITY  ALL GROUPS – ◦ Analyze the Cyberbullying Video Scenario Questions.
The Decline and Fall of the Drug Free Workplace Joseph D. Tessitore, Esquire Bell & Roper, P.A E. Jefferson Street Orlando, Florida (407)
BY: Alexis Stern, Mikey Thompson and Hao Pang.  Freedom of Press- Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. This affects us because it tells us our boundaries on to what.
Getting Fired Up Can Get You Fired & Kicked off the Team A Study of Cases Impacting Drug Testing Policies.
Fourth Amendment Assignment. Amendment 4: Right to Search and Seizure The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Brandon Day EDAD 689 November 3, Overview When analyzing search/seizure methods in public schools, one must be mindful of federal legislation which.
EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE PRIVACY RIGHTS
INVESTIGATIONS IN THE SCHOOL YARD A presentation on behalf of CANFIELD JERRY MOBERG & ASSOCIATES (The Thrilla in Manila)
Search and Seizure: Searching Students for the Possession of Drugs Michael Shumate Clay Moran.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
Student Rights: What rights do students have once inside the schoolhouse door? Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. T.L.O.
The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools.
MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Student Searches presented by Bart Fennemore.
469 U.S. 325 January 15, 1985 Circumstances of the Case On March 7, 1980 a teacher at Piscataway High School found T.L.O with a friend smoking cigarettes.
NJ vs. T.L.O. Peter Kotsovolos and Matt Spiegel. Parties & Roles  Two fourteen year-old high school freshman were caught smoking in the school bathroom.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 39 Regulation of Employment Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business.
Welcome! Indiana State Personnel Department Human Resources Conference April 30 and May 1, 2008 Brown County Inn - Nashville, Indiana.
Student Search and Seizure
Welcome! Important Reminders: Test is on Monday Today we will finish our checkpoint review and play political football.
School district attorneys help to develop searches and seizures policies. School districts should provide trainings at schools in order to make sure of.
Brown vs. board of education of Topeka 1954 Background: segregation, a girl wants to go to school but she can’t because she’s black. Issue: 14 th amendment;
Bellringer What was the theory behind Reaganomics? During the Gilded Age what was the economic policy followed by the government? What was the problem.
Legal Basics Chapters 7-9 Property and Privacy Confidentiality and Reporting Requirements Chronic Illness and Medical Emergencies Chapters 7-9 Property.
New Jersey v. T.L.O By Luke Wills and Caroline Weschler.
Grady L. Hunt Locklear, Jacobs, Hunt & Brooks (910) The information contained in this presentation is intended for general.
The Fourth Amendment Protects the people’s right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Religious & Age Discrimination presented by Bart Fennemore.
By: Adrienne Hardwig Kelsi Teague Kelina Seyferth Ashlee Schaefer Daltun Hasty.
Lockers : Should the Teachers Have the Keys ? Hannah Devore Honaker 3 rd September 2009.
New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) Lori Wolfe and Ann Peterson.
New Jersey vs TLO By Sarah Shelleh.
Search Warrants And My Right To Privacy. How Much Privacy Do You Have?
Do They Have the Right??? You SHALL Decide……. Case #1 The United States is involved in a controversial war. To show their opposition to the war, two students.
Do Now: 1.When can an officer stop and frisk a person? Analyze the data on pg. 135 of your textbook. 2.What happens after charges are brought against an.
Search and Seizure in the School Setting Search and Seizure in the School Setting ACSA LEADERSHIP SUMMIT November 5, 2015 Presented by Diane Beall.
New Jersey v. TLO Unit 4 Lesson 10.
Due Process and the Principal EDAD 689 The School Principal By: Melanie Dozier September 21, 2010.
By Gerald Card P Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley (1982) 458 U.S. 176.
Chapter 12: Criminal Justice Process ~ The Investigation Objective: Student should be able to correlate how the constitution relates to an investigation.
Drug Detection in Schools Class 14. Searches in Schools Generally New Jersey v T.L.O. gave broad discretion to school officials to search students –Diminished.
Facts of the Case  Two students were found smoking cigarettes in a school bathroom.  One of the students (TLO) denied smoking, so her bag was searched.
Jen Polin and Allison Kodroff.   The School District adopted the Student Activities Drug Testing Policy  Requires all students who participate in after.
Limiting the Right of Search
Bill of Rights Scenarios
What Do You Think? The principal is walking down the hall at the end of lunch, hurrying students to class. As he passes the bathroom, he smells marijuana.
Latest Developments on Drug Testing in the Workplace
Jane Doe v. Little Rock School District
Do They Have The Right?.
New Jersey v. T.L.O Rachel Sturgis.
What Happens After Jardines?
The Fourth Amendment Protects the people’s right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The Courts and the Constitution
Introduction to Federal Court System
4th Amendment Jorge Gonzalez.
U.S. Constitution: States, Amending, Federalism, and Ratification
Film Clip: Crash Course - Legal System Basics: #18
Vocabulary Activity Exclusionary Rule
Search & Seizure The act of taking possession of this property.
Safford United School District #1 v. Redding
Due Process and Public Schools
Aim: How do the rights protected in the Bill of Rights apply to the experiences of people accused of crimes in the United States? Do Now: What’s one right.
Alexzandria Rosser 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
Presentation transcript:

Pages By Gerald Card

Knox County Education Association v. Knox County Board Of Education  158 F.3d 361 (6 th Cir. 1998) cert denied  528 U.S. 812 (1999)

 Drug Testing was a violation of the 4 th Amendment-the right to unreasonable search and seizure

 Suspicionless drug testing for all to apply, transfer to, or promoted to a safety sensitive position-such as principals, teachers, aids, subs, secretaries, and bus drivers.  This is a 1 time test.

 Reasonable Suspicion drug/alcohol testing of all school employees-there must be a drug or alcohol related incident to prompt the test.  This does not support random drug testing

United Teachers of New Orleans v. Orleans Parish School Board 142 F. 3d 853 (5 th Cir. 1998)  Policy was Challenged: Anyone injured in the course of employment had to submit to drug testing  Court found that an injury had no correlation to the use of drugs-policy violated 4 th Amendment

Hearn v. Savannah Board of Education 191 F. 3d 1329 (11 th Cir 1999) cert denied 529 U.S (2000) -Routine drug sniffing dog found a partially burned marijuana cigarette in her car. The car was unlocked and the window down. -This was “reasonable suspicion” to prompt a mandatory drug test within a 2 hr. period. -She failed to cooperate and was fired-firing upheld

 When public safety issues are involved, the courts uphold drug testing, If not Reasonable Suspicions is required