Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 BDGP Monitoring Group 27 November 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning and use of funding instruments
Advertisements

Axis 2: Environment/land management DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Biodiversity/HNV indicators and the CAP Zélie Peppiette Rural Development Evaluation Manager DG AGRI, European Commission UK seminar on HNV farming policy,
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
1 Jela Tvrdonova,  Strategic approach to rural development  Common approach to evaluation: legal background and CMEF  Monitoring and evaluation.
Governance and delivery through Opt-In Organisations.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
State Planning Organization Internship Programme in UVER State Planning Organization DG Regional Development and Structural Adjustment Department of Monitoring.
The Role of Data analysis for M& E in the context of ABRDP By: Faye Ensermu Chemeda Data Analysis Expert Ethio-Italian Development Co-operation Asella.
MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Preparation for the next programming period DG AGRI, November 2005 EU rural development policy.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Dr Odysseas Michaelides Auditor General of the Republic June 2014 The role of the SAIs in times of economic crisis Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus.
Lecture 31. Chapter 8 Budgetary Planning and Control.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT IN TANZANIA. STAGE 1 Service Delivery Survey - MDAs have to undertake these surveys which focus on external customers and are.
Presentation on the Corporate Planning Department
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
1 Monitoring and Evaluation John Hough RBEC Environment & Energy Practice Workshop Almaty, 6-9 October 2004.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Evaluation of sector programmes and budget support operations in the context of EU development cooperation 1 st M&E Network Forum 07 to 08 November 2011.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
The Role & Purpose of the Customer Senate Jerry Coulton - Senator.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
The use of impact indicators for the evaluation of support for investment in agricultural holdings : case study of the Rural Development Programme for.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
T HE DEBT OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN P OLAND T HE DEBT OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN P OLAND Iwona Zyman, Director of the Regional Branch in Opole.
111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,
Start and break slide Kick-Off-Meeting April 1 st – 3 rd 2009 Large Conference Hall of Hotel Riga Riga/ Latvia host: Baltic Sea Region Programme
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Taking Account of Strategic Research Agendas in the Research Themes of the FP7 Co-operation.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
M&E Joint Programming in Mozambique 12 th May 2009.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
Regional Policy Guidance on monitoring TÓTH Gábor DG EMPL – Impact Assessment, Evaluation Unit ESF Evaluation Partnership meeting, Rome, 26 November 2014.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 2: Ongoing Evaluation.
Evaluation Experts Meeting, DG AGRI L4, Brüssel, The Monitoring- and Evaluation System of the Austrian RDP Karl M. Ortner (AWI) Otto.
European Union policies and projects International Business and Development Degree Course University of Parma a.y. 2011/2012 From regional analysis to.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
John Grieve Rural Development Company First Results from RDP Programming & Leader Past, Present & Future.
Bottom up evaluation of strategies Jela Tvrdonova 2016.
ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDIT IN STRATEGY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Donor Coordination Process
Introductory Presentation by David Hegarty David Hegarty Phone:
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
April 2011.
إستراتيجيات ونماذج التقويم
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
Monitoring & evaluation in
Doing Assessments Jointly
Demonstrating performance and EU added value John WALSH REGIO Evaluation and European Semester Unit ESI FUNDS ESI FUNDS.
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Monitoring and evaluation
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Rural Development Programme BDGP Monitoring Group 27 November 2015

Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) – what is it and why is it needed? Definitions Monitoring = ongoing task of reviewing budgetary inputs and financed activities  generates data to give feedback on implementation. Evaluation = judging results and impacts of interventions against their stated goals / baseline situation. Purpose Contribute to accountability of public spending (€4 billion to be invested in the new RDP). Measure how policy and programme objectives are being met. To provide a sound basis for future policy design.

Regulatory Requirements for RDP evaluation Data quality and availability are critical to proper evaluation. 4 types of indicators: Context; Output; Result; & Impact. Common Evaluation Questions Annual Implementation Reports (AIRs) – beginning 30 June 2016 and each year thereafter until More detailed AIRs in 2017 & Ex-post evaluation in No formal requirement for mid-term evaluation.

Beef Data & Genomics Programme Aims to deliver genetic improvements in the quality of the beef herd requires a large-scale data collection system. Support based on compensation for costs incurred and income foregone. Besides Commission requirements, additional scheme indicators sought from implementing division. Commitment to undertake a study of the Beef Data and Genomics Programme in Linked to enhanced AIR in 2017.

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.