EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Advertisements

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
PSB h- injection Layout issues –Are 3 or 4 KSW needed –Geometry of the injection –Element lengths and locations Element performance specifications H 0.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
Cyclotrons Chapter 3 RF modelisation and computation B modelisation and computation Beam transport computation 1.
FFAG Nonscaling FFAGs for Hadron Therapy C. Johnstone, Fermilab FFAG08 Sept 1-5, 2008 University of Manchester Manchester, U.K. Fermilab.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
July PRISM Workshop,ICL Extraction in PAMELA, T.Yokoi Extraction in PAMELA Takeichiro Yokoi (JAI, Oxford University, UK)
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
MADX tutorial: injection and extraction systems Dr Rob Apsimon Dr Öznur Mete.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
FFAG Recirculation and Permanent Magnet Technology for ERL’s
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Physics Design on Injector I
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)

Injection and extraction with linear model

Presumed conditions…. Kicker field :≤0.6kgauss(bipolar) Kicker length : 0.1m Beam emittance: 3πmm (normalized) Energy: 10~20MeV(1MeV step) 4 operation mode (latest lattice:parallel elements) b,c,d,e Tracking code (ZGOUBI: sharp edge field) Septum boundary: +5mm from the outer-most beam envelope

Lattices … ∆x QF ∆x QD B1 QD (T/m) B1 QF (T/m) ∆x QD (mm) ∆x QF (mm) b c d e Horizontal tune

Setup of tracking study QF0 QF1 QF2 Beam QD0 QD1 QD2 Kicker Septum QF0 QF1 QF2QD0 QD1 QD2 Kicker Septum injection extraction * Backtracking from CO * Beam position was monitored at the center of each magnet and drift space

Beam distribution at septum (injection) ∆x’:270mrad ∆x:4mm 70221b

Beam envelope at magnet center QD1 QD2 QF1 QF b 70221c 70221d 70221e xmax xmin Magnet center QF requires large good field region (max 80mm) Large orbit swing comes form 10MeV QD1 requires a little larger good field region than that inscribed. (max 60mm) ±32mm ±56m m *Beam position at the center of magnet is plotted for the orbit inside of target box

Beam envelope at magnet center (2) QD1 QD2 QF1 QF b 70221c 70221d 70221e xmax xmin Magnet center ±32mm ±56m m 10MeV of 70221b enlarges the target box…. Excluding it, orbit swing decreases.

Injection energy and GFR of QF GFR70221b70221c70221d70221e ±32mm15MeV~ 14MeV~13MeV~ ±35mm15MeV~14MeV~13MeV~12MeV~ ±40mm13MeV~12MeV~11MeV~ ±45mm12MeV~11MeV~10MeV~11MeV~ ±50mm11MeV~10MeV~

Beam distribution at septum (extraction) ∆x’:40mrad ∆x:2.5mm 70221b

Beam envelope at magnet center QD1 QD2 QF1 QF b 70221c 70221d 70221e xmax xmin Magnet center QF1 requires large good field region (max 49mm) Large orbit swing comes form 10MeV QD1 requires a little larger good field region than that inscribed. (max 60mm) If larger target box size is accepted, except 10MeV of 70221c and d, extraction is possible with present good field region ±32mm ±56m m Beam position at the center of magnet is plotted for the orbit inside of target box

Injection and extraction with TOSCA 3D field Injection and extraction orbits are one-pass orbits. For such orbits, what is important is bending component, and requirement to quadrupole component might be released.

Magnet & cell modeling QD Pole width:100mm Xt: 15mm QF Pole width:73mm Xt: 11mm Aperture of clamp is 45° rotated square( side: 14cm:D, 10cm:F) Vertical symmetry is introduced Optimized mesh size obtained through individual magnet modeling is used As typical lattices, 4 lattices are modeled (070221b,c,d,e) GFR:±36mm GFR:±26mm

Parameterization of current 2.0cm QF QD     ++ As a nominal focusing power, focusing power of region   2 was taken

Comparison with baseline design Baseline (By. S. Berg) Tracking b: D 4680 AT, F 2960AT c: D 4000AT, F 2640AT d: D3400AT, F 2080AT Except the vertical tune of low energy, the results show so so good agreement with the design

Map geometry for injection study QD QF clamp Insertion insertion Putting the map boundary at 5.5cm from the magnet end, field error caused by the map geometry is less than 0.2% map

8.5714˚ ±65mm X Y 55mm55.76mm ˚ 288mm Map geometry(2) Field map Mesh size X: 1mm,Y: 1mm, Z: 1mm (rough optimization was carried out) Drift space for adjustment mm mm Center of long drift 83mm 57mm 61mm 87mm

Beam distribution at septum (injection) 70221b septum 5mm 140mrad septum For 10, 11MeV of 70221b, 10MeV of 70221c, there is no injection orbit

Beam envelope in magnet (injection) QF1 Required GFR(±32mm) 70221b 70221c QD b 70221c 70221d QD1 Required GFR(±56mm) X max X min 70221b 70221c 70221d QF b 70221c 70221d Center of magnet Injection orbit outside GFR anyhow exists (matching problem remains)

Beam distribution at septum (extraction) 70221b Septum septum 50mrad. 3mm

Beam envelope in magnet (extraction) QF1 Required GFR(±32mm) 70221b 70221c 70221d QD1 Required GFR(±56mm) X max X min 70221b 70221c 70221d QF b 70221c 70221d QD b 70221c 70221d Center of magnet Extraction orbit outside GFR anyhow works

Remaining work …. Optimize current setting Include septum into tracking (matching) Check the remaining 5 operation modes (70221e,f,g,h,l) Confirm the result with final magnet design

Summary Tracking study with the hard edge model indicates that orbit swing of injection and extraction orbit goes beyond the present required good field region of QF. Tracking with 3d model shows extraction and extraction orbits outside of good field region anyhow work, but threre are missing injection conditions ( 10,11MeV of 70221b, 10MeV of 70221c), and beam distribution at septum is broader than that of extraction.  Any possibilities to reverse the magnet sequence ??