9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
ILC Electron and Positron Sources Wei Gai for the ILC e- and e+ collaboration PAC review, 2012 KEK, Japan.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
ILC Polarized Electron Source Annual DOE HEP Program Review June 5 – 8 International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center A. Brachmann,
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
Status of Undulator-based Positron Source Baseline Design Leo Jenner, but based largely on a talk given by Jim Clarke to Positron DESY-Zeuthen,
MeRHIC Design V.Ptitsyn on behalf of MeRHIC Design team: M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Burrill, R. Calaga, X. Chang, A. Fedotov,
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Siegfried Schreiber, DESY The TTF Laser System Laser Material Properties Conclusion? Issues on Longitudinal Photoinjector.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
1) Source Issues 2) SLAC’s ITF Jym Clendenin SLAC.
EIC Meeting, Stony Brook University, January 10, 2010 Dmitry Kayran for MeRHIC group EIC Meeting January , 2010 MeRHIC: Injection System.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
ParameterL-bandS-bandX-band Length (m) Aperture 2a (mm) Gradient (Unloaded/Loaded) (MV/m)17/1328/2250/40 Power/structure (MW) Beam.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 9/13/2006 Americas Regional Team FY08-09 Planning Meeting 1 1/11 ILC-Americas FY08-09.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Review of e- source for the low power Option and status update Axel Brachmann, John Sheppard BAW2, SLAC 1/18/2011.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
September 10-14, 2007 XIIth International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets & Polarimetry, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) 1 Polarized Electron.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
1 Challenges for ILC and CLIC polarized electron sources Feng Zhou SLAC Major contributors: Brachmann, Maruyama, Sheppard, and Zhou SLAC Accelerator Seminar.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
GDE FRANCE Why High brillance gun is good for the ERL scheme? And SC GUN? Alessandro Variola For the L.A.L. Orsay group.
CLIC DB injector facility, photo-injector option studies LCWS, Granada, September 26 th -30 th,2011Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  CLIC DB injector  Thermionic.
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
November 17, 2008 A. Brachmann Slide 1 ILC polarized Electron Source R&D Update LCWS 2008 A. Brachmann, J. Sheppard, F. Zhou - SLAC National Accelerator.
LTR for ILC e- (eLTR) RF section solenoid section.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
An Electron source for PERLE
Polarized e- Source Design and R&D 10/24/05
Injector and positron source scheme. A first evaluation Thanks to O
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
CLIC Main Beam Sources and their transfer lines
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Electron Source Configuration
ELIC Injector Working Group High-P, high-I source issues (DC)
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Center for Injectors and Sources
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Presentation transcript:

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 2/20 Introduction Electron source produces bunch train and transports the electrons to the damping ring Treaty point is DR injection device (excluding) Source will use a polarized DC gun using photoemission from a GaAs based photocathode Source consists of NC RF structures that provide bunching and pre-acceleration to 76 MeV ‘Standard’ ILC Linac cryomodules accelerate the beam to 5 GeV An additional electron source will provide the drive beam for the positron ‘Keep Alive Source’ The SLC injector is a good reference point Polarization, charge and lifetime of SLC design indicate feasibility of its technology (on a conceptual level) for the ILC ILC bunch train parameters provides technical challenges for the ILC source and solutions are not demonstrated

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 3/20 Source Parameters ParameterSymbolValueUnit Electrons per bunch (at gun exit)nene 3 x Number Electrons per bunch (at DR injection)nene 2 x Number Number of bunchesNeNe ~ 3000Number Bunch repetition rateFμbFμb 3MHz Bunch train repetition rateF mb 5Hz Bunch length at source tt ~ 1ns Current in bunch at sourceI avg 3.2A Energy stabilityS< 5% rms PolarizationPePe 80 (min)% Photocathode quantum efficiencyQE0.5% Drive laser wavelength 790  20 nm Single bunch laser energyE5μJμJ

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 4/20 Principal Subsystems Laser System DC Gun (Photoemission from GaAs) Subharmonic bunching system L-band bunching system Pre-acceleration Booster Linac Electron source to damping ring transfer line –Spin Rotation –RF Energy Compression

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 5/20 Original Layout

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 6/20 CCR 22 Driven by cost savings concerns Reduced redundancy but seems acceptable solution: –Remove one NC beam line –Keep 2 laser systems and 2 guns However, no separate access during operation –locate laser systems above ground Exact coast saving is difficult to express because of convolution of this CCR with move of DR to central location Estimated saving is ~ 25 % of total cost

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 7/20 Final RDR Layout

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 8/20 Tunnel concept

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 9/20 Source Laser Parameters Central wavelength : ~ 790 nm Laser pulse energy is determined by cathode QE  ~ 5 μJ mirco pulse energy Tunability of  20 nm Pulse shaping requires bandwidth Availability of high power cw pump source to facilitate amplification at 3 MHz To tap industrial resources  common lasing medium is required Choice of Ti:Sapphire laser system pumped by solid state Nd:YAG (or similar)

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 10/20 Source Drive Laser System Layout

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 11/20 Photocathodes Baseline design: strained layer superlattice GaAs/GaAsP Polarization ~ %,QE 1% maximum, % routinely High gradient p-doping increases QE and reduces surface charge limit: 5 x cm-3  5 x cm -3

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 12/20 DC Gun Baseline is SLC gun (120 kV) Higher HV is needed because of 1 ns bunches We anticipate Engineering and R&D as part of EDR phase See Matt Poelkers talk …

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 13/20 Accelerator Physics – NC injector Parmela simulations for low energy beam (to 76 MeV) GunSHBL-band TW buncherNC pre- acceleration

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 14/20 Accelerator Physics – Main SC beam line

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 15/20 Accelerator Physics – Spin Rotation [1] Moffeit et al., SLAC-TN Identical designs are used for e-/e+ sources and RTML 5 GeV Bend of n * o Odd Integer S longitudonal ~ 7.5 m DR Pair of Solenoids (SC) S vertical (Precession) S transverse (Rotation) Dipole and solenoid strength are set by spin manipulation requirements, lattice design remains to be done Dipole: o  ~ 2 kG Solenoid: 26.2 T  2x3.5 m; 38.5 kG

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 16/20 Accelerator Physics – RF compression Hardware is one standard Linac Cryomodule w/o magnets Power source is one 5 MW klystron (+spare) Accomplishes energy spread specification for injection into DR 95% of electrons produce by the DC gun are captured within 6-D damping ring acceptance.  (Ax+Ay)  0.09m and  E x  z  (  25 MeV) x (  3.46 cm )

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 17/20 RF compression – Simulation Results X’ (rad) y’ (rad) X (m) y (m)  t (s) 6D Damping ring acceptance √  (Ax+Ay)  0.09m and  E x  z  (  25 MeV) x (  3.46 cm)

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 18/20 Cryomodules Total number of CM’s: 25 Use of standard Linac CM’s and RF system First three strings (of 3 CM) 1 Quad per CM Remaining 5 strings 1 Quad per 2 CM’s 21 CM’s needed to accelerate to 5 GeV One string provides redundancy One CM (w/o magnets) in eLTR used for energy compression

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 19/20 System Inventory MagnetsInstrumentationRF System Bends25BPM’s SHB Cavity 1 Quads (NC)76Wirescanners SHB Cavity 1 Quads (SC)16Laser wires15 cell L-band buncher 1 Solenoids (NC)12BLMs5L-band TW structure 2 Solenoids (SC)2OTRs21.3 GHz CMs25 Correctors (SC)32Phase Mon.2L-band klystrons/modulat ors 13

9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 20/20 DR – Source RF System Compatibility DR fundamental RF : 650 MHz DR fill patterns provides clearing gaps for electron and ion clod mini-traingap (e.g. total of 44 bunches in mini-train, 82 mini-trains) 3. Pulse1. Pulse2. Pulse tt  t must be an integer multiple of SHB periods, most critical for SHB I Example:  t = 177 DR RF buckets = ns  SHB frequency of MHz Bunch spacing is 2 RF buckets First Revolution Second Revolution