MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, 2004 1 Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition Lecture 4 Visibility and Noise, Certainty in Medical Decisions Oleh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A small taste of inferential statistics
Advertisements

Probability Unit 3.
Anthony Greene1 Simple Hypothesis Testing Detecting Statistical Differences In The Simplest Case:  and  are both known I The Logic of Hypothesis Testing:
MAT 1000 Mathematics in Today's World. Last Time 1.What does a sample tell us about the population? 2.Practical problems in sample surveys.
Lecture 2: Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Continued Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.
Chapter 10.  Real life problems are usually different than just estimation of population statistics.  We try on the basis of experimental evidence Whether.
Copyright © 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course Fifth Edition Arthur.
Thursday, September 12, 2013 Effect Size, Power, and Exam Review.
MIPR Lecture 5 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition Lecture 5 Image Measurements and Operations Oleh Tretiak.
Digtial Image Processing, Spring ECES 682 Digital Image Processing Oleh Tretiak ECE Department Drexel University.
Statistics for the Social Sciences
What z-scores represent
Understanding Statistics in Research
C82MCP Diploma Statistics School of Psychology University of Nottingham 1 Overview of Lecture Independent and Dependent Variables Between and Within Designs.
How do we know whether a marker or model is any good? A discussion of some simple decision analytic methods Carrie Bennette on behalf of Andrew Vickers.
Statistics for Health Care
Sample Size Determination
Chapter 12 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Computer Vision Lecture 8 Performance Evaluation.
Categorical Data Prof. Andy Field.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Scientific Method and Experimentation
Tuesday, September 10, 2013 Introduction to hypothesis testing.
MIPR Lecture 2 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition Lecture 2 Images and Fourier Analysis Oleh Tretiak.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
IDL GUI for Digital Halftoning Final Project for SIMG-726 Computing For Imaging Science Changmeng Liu
Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p).
The Argument for Using Statistics Weighing the Evidence Statistical Inference: An Overview Applying Statistical Inference: An Example Going Beyond Testing.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Exam 1 Median: 74 Quartiles: 68, 84 Interquartile range: 16 Mean: 74.9 Standard deviation: 12.5 z = -1: 62.4 z = -1: 87.4 z = -1z = +1 Worst Question:
How do we know whether a marker or model is any good? A discussion of some simple decision analytic methods Carrie Bennette (on behalf of Andrew Vickers)
Scientific Inquiry & Skills
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods Introductory Topics Part 2.
1 Statistics and Image Evaluation Oleh Tretiak Medical Imaging Systems Fall, 2002.
Chapter 1 Statistical Thinking What is statistics? Why do we study statistics.
Copyright  2003 by Dr. Gallimore, Wright State University Department of Biomedical, Industrial Engineering & Human Factors Engineering Human Factors Research.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING Null Hypothesis and Research Hypothesis ?
1 Statistics and Image Quality Evaluation III Oleh Tretiak Medical Imaging Systems Fall, 2002.
Introduction to Inference: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing Presentation 8 First Part.
Introduction to Inference: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing Presentation 4 First Part.
Data Analysis.
P Values Robin Beaumont 8/2/2012 With much help from Professor Chris Wilds material University of Auckland.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING Null Hypothesis and Research Hypothesis ?
Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis test is a statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis.
Chapter 21 More About Hypothesis Tests Using a Single Sample.
The inference and accuracy We learned how to estimate the probability that the percentage of some subjects in the sample would be in a given interval by.
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
More about tests and intervals CHAPTER 21. Do not state your claim as the null hypothesis, instead make what you’re trying to prove the alternative. The.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
Agenda n Probability n Sampling error n Hypothesis Testing n Significance level.
Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p)
9.3 Hypothesis Tests for Population Proportions
Statistics Use of mathematics to ORGANIZE, SUMMARIZE and INTERPRET numerical data. Needed to help psychologists draw conclusions.
P-values.
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Central Limit Theorem, z-tests, & t-tests
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Digital Image Processing
Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition
Lecture 3. Edge Detection, Texture
Screening, Sensitivity, Specificity, and ROC curves
A Review in Quality Measures for Halftoned Images
Chapter 12 Power Analysis.
Karl R Gegenfurtner, Jochem Rieger  Current Biology 
What are their purposes? What kinds?
  Pick a card….
1 Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 Hypothesis Testing The general goal of a hypothesis test is to rule out chance (sampling error) as.
Presentation transcript:

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Medical Imaging and Pattern Recognition Lecture 4 Visibility and Noise, Certainty in Medical Decisions Oleh Tretiak

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Lecture Overview Factors affecting visibility of objects in images Noise as a factor in image quality Probability and experimental findings Types of errors in medical diagnosis

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, How many blobs? contrast = 1 contrast = 8contrast = 4 contrast = 2

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, How many flowers?

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Visibility of Objects If contrast is to small, object can’t be seen –Increase contrast! If object is too small, it can’t be seen –Magnify!

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Visual Pathway - Anatomy

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Two-Dimensional Systems We would like to have a system model for vision. h x(u,v) y(u,v) Input: Image Output: Our mind’s perception

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, ‘Typical’ Visual Spatial Response

low contrast high contrast

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Objective value (intensity) Subjective (perceived) value Mach Bands

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, The circles have the same objective intensity.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak,

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Image Noise Variations of intensity that have no bearing on the information in the image are called noise White noise means that the variation is uncorrelated from pixel to pixel

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, ‘White Noise’ Pattern

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Noise Patterns White (left), low frequency middle), and high frequency noises. All have same standard deviation The standard deviation is a measure of noise intensity.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Effect of noise on image quality: UL ~ original 8-bit image; UR ~ white noise; LL ~ low pass noise; LR ~ high pass noise. Noise standard deviation is equal to 8.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Effect of noise on image quaity: UL ~ original 8-bit image; UR ~ white noise; LL ~ low pass noise; LR ~ high pass noise. Noise standard deviation is equal to 32.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Conclusions Object visibility can be improved by increasing contrast or object size This is effective only when object is free of noise All physical systems have noise, and this places a limit on visibility

low noise low noise, contrast high noise high noise, contrast

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Noise Limited Resolution 0.4 photons/pixel4 photons/pixel 40 photons/pixel

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Noise Tradeoff In X-ray and radionuclide systems, reduced noise produces higher radiation dose In Magnetic Resonance, reduced noise requires longer time Higher resolution produces more noise

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Probability and Decisions We poll 100 people about whether they will vote for Bush of Kerry. 60 say they will vote for Kerry, 40 for Bush. Will Kerry0 win? We give vitamin C to a group of 10 people who have colds: 6 get better. In a group of 10 people who did not get vitamin C, 4 got better. Is vitamin C effective against the common cold?

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Sampling Two possible outcomes in a trial (Bush/Kerry, Healthy/Sick) A very large population of individuals We select a small number of individuals, and find their outcomes. Can we conclude about the large group from the small group?

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Bernoulli Trials Probability of ‘success’ = p –In the whole population, the fraction of ‘success’ is p Number of observations is n Number of successes is k Probability of this result is P(n, k) = (1-p) n-k p k n!/[k!(n-k)!]

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Probability plot, n = 10, p = 0.5 Probability of any specific outcome is pretty low. The result 6/10 successes with vitamin C, 4/10 successes without could be due to benefit of vitamin C, or it could be chance. It is not convincing.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Probability plot, n = 100, p = 0.5 Probability of any individual outcome is very low Probability of getting 60 or more out of 100 if the probability were 0.5 is That’s unlikely. The result does not support that half the voters support each candidate.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Probability and Experimental Conclusions We would like to predict what will be the effect of a treatment on a large population on the basis of a sample. Chance can give a misleading outcome Probability theory can tell us if the result of the test is 1.Strongly supports the apparent outcome 2.Fails to support the outcome (could be due to chance)

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Medical Diagnosis A good test is one that tells us the truth In medical tests, there are two kinds of errors –Predict the patients are healthy when they are sick –Predict that the patients are sick when they are healthy Both kinds of error are undesirable

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Definition SPECIFICITY is accuracy for diagnosing healthy patients SENSITIVITY is accuracy for diagnosing sick patients

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Comparing Tests Method A: Specificity = 0.95, Sensitivity = 0.80 Method B: Specificity = 0.90, Sensitivity = 0.85 –Which is better? Cannot conclude which test is better on the basis of this information

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Diagnostic Decisions We can have very high sensitivity by deciding every piece of data indicates disease (aggressive treatment). This will lead to low specificity. We can have very high specificity by requiring very strong evidence of disease (conservative treatment). This will lead to low sensitivity. The goal of improved diagnostic technology is to improve both sensitivity and specificity.

MIPR Lecture 4 Copyright Oleh Tretiak, Summary Probability theory and statistics are important tools in the study of medical imaging and pattern recognition. Imaging systems require tradeoff between image resolution, noise, dose, and many other factors. Evaluation of diagnostic systems can only be done from by using probability theory and statistics.