FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

An Intergroup Randomised Trial of Rituximab versus a Watch & Wait Approach in Patients with Advanced Stage, Asymptomatic, Non-bulky Follicular Lymphoma.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Follicular lymphoma Optimal primary therapy and consolidation ? Seminars in Hematological Oncology * Israel, April M. Dreyling, Dept. of Medicine.
Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Novel Agents for Indolent Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Kochenderfer JN et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 168.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Renal Cancer Immunotherapy Walter Stadler. 2 Renal cancer natural history.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Rituximab Maintenance: Stage III/IV Follicular Lymphoma (ECOG/CALGB E1496) Subset: 237 FL pts CVP x 6-8 → PR/CR (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)
Eastern cooperative oncology group E1496: ECOG and CALGB Cyclophosphamide/Fludarabine (CF) with or without Maintenance Rituximab (MR) in Advanced Indolent.
Phase I Trial of Autologous CD19-Targeted CAR-Modified T Cells as Consolidation After Purine Analog-Based First-Line Therapy in Patients with Previously.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Alliance/CALGB 50803: A Phase 2 Trial of Lenalidomide plus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma1 The ‘RELEVANCE’ Trial:
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Promotes High Response Rate, Durable Remissions, and is Tolerable in Treatment- Naïve.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Continued Late Conversion to Complete Remission and Durability of Remission in Patients with B-cell Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated with Rituximab Followed.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of indolent NHL Dr Christian Buske.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation with a Single Dose of 90 Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin ® ) (Z) vs Maintenance with Rituximab (R)
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
A phase III trial comparing R-CHOP 14 and R-CHOP 21 for the treatment of newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma Results from a UK NCRI Lymphoma.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Increased Incidence of Therapy- Related Myeloid Neoplasia (t-MN) After Initial Therapy for CLL with Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (FC) vs Fludarabine (F):
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Safety and Efficacy of Abbreviated Induction with Oral Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C) Combined with Dose-Dense IV Rituximab (R) in Previously.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
What is the best approach for a follicular lymphoma patient who achieves CR after frontline chemoimmunotherapy? Radioimmunotherapy! Matthew Matasar,
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Following Rituximab Induction in Patients with Follicular B-cell Lymphoma: Progression-Free Survival at 4-year.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Idelalisib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Is Superior to BR Alone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Ibrutinib plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study1 Phase I Study of Rituximab,
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Wiestner A et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 008.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T David G. Maloney, Barbara Pender, Erin McCarthy, and Daniel P. Gold Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Patient specific active idiotype immunotherapy with immunoglobulin idiotype is a promising new therapy for follicular non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Response to therapy may include both humoral and cellular anti-idiotypic immunity, but it is not clear which is most important. Background Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Prior studies have suggested that immunoglobulin FCgammaRIIIa (FC  RIIIa ) polymorphisms at position 158 valine (V) or phenylalanine (F) affect the response to treatment with rituximab as well as outcomes from idiotype immunotherapy following objective response to chemotherapy. Background Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Polymorphisms in FCgRIIIA (CD16) Influence PFS following Single Agent Rituximab CD16 Amino Acid 158 encodes valine (V) or phenylalanine (F) - V/V phenotype associated with higher affinity interaction with human IgG1 - F/F phenotype associated with lower affinity interaction and poorer outcome to rituximab Initial therapy of low-tumor burden follicular NHL patients treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 x 4 weeks (Cartron G, Blood 99:754, 2002) - Treatment of patients with relapsed follicular NHL (Weng and Levy, JCO 21:3940, 2003) - Also observed in Waldenstrom’s but not in CLL (Treon S, ASH 2003, Farag S, Blood 103:1472, 2004) Background: FC  RIIIA Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Mitumprotimut-T is a patient-specific and B-cell tumor-specific idiotype (Id) protein chemically conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), a potent non-specific immunogenic protein Mitumprotimut-T induces a cellular and humoral immune response to the Id protein expressed by the patient’s own tumor, leading to active immunization against the tumor while sparing normal B-cells Background Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Mitumprotimut-T is co-administered with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to further enhance immune anti-Id immune responses The Id protein is produced by proprietary recombinant technology; ~8 weeks from biopsy to final product Background Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T To assess the correlation between long term progression free survival (PFS) following combined rituximab + mitumprotimut-T (Id-KLH) treatment and FC  RIIIa (CD16) polymorphism expression To assess the correlation of FC  RIIIa polymorphisms and outcomes from idiotype immunotherapy following treatment with rituximab Objective Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Key Inclusion Criteria: – Histologically confirmed Grade 1 or 2 follicular B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification) – Treatment-naïve, relapsed/refractory to chemotherapy, or relapsed following prior ≥ 6-month response to rituximab – ≥8 weeks between completion of any prior lymphoma therapy and start of rituximab on study – Measurable disease (≥2 cm) following node biopsy – Performance status (ECOG) of 0, 1 or 2 Methods Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Key Exclusion Criteria: – >3 prior chemotherapy or anti-CD20 regimens – Prior fludarabine – Concurrent immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., high-dose steroids) Methods Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T PCR primers were designed to specifically amplify the regions of interest in FC  RIIIa The FC  RIIIa genotypes of 55 rituximab-naïve patients treated on a Phase II trial of mitumprotimut-T were determined using a SSCP method with genomic DNA Bands were sequenced to confirm the presence of the polymorphism Methods Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

SSCP Analysis for FC  RIIIa Polymorphism at position 158 Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. H2OH2O V/VV/F F/F V/VV/F F/F 200 bp 100 bp PCR SSCP

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Rituximab: 375 mg/m2 weekly infusion x 4 weeks. Subjects with stable disease (SD) or an objective response (CR or PR) to rituximab were eligible for mitumprotimut-T Mitumprotimut-T: 1 mg sc on Day 1 of each course. Courses administered monthly x6, bimonthly x6, and then every 3 months until disease progression or significant toxicity GM-CSF: 250 mcg/day sc on Days 1-4 of each course; same injection site as mitumprotimut-T CT scans: Obtained every 3 months; read by an independent radiologist blinded to clinical data Response assessment: Central review using modified IWG response criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 1999;17: ) Study Schema And Treatment Regimen Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

Study Schema and Treatment Regimen Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia Months CT Scans Mitumprotimut-T + GM-CSF Rituximab Mitumprotimut-T Production Biopsy Cytoreduction Induction Maintenance

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T DNA was isolated from all 55 patients and successfully analyzed by SSCP for polymorphisms at position 158 of FC  RIIIa: – V/V: 9 (16%) – 27 (49%) – V/F 19 (35%) Results Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T 95 patients received rituximab and were evaluable. 38 Treatment-naïve (T-N) patients 57 Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) patients - 25 of the 57 R/R pts were rituximab-naïve - 32 of the 57 R/R pts had previously received rituximab ± chemotherapy 6 of 95 patients were progressive disease (PD) following rituximab and were ineligible to receive mitumprotimut-T (Id KLH) 89 patients received mitumprotimut-T following rituximab Patient Enrollment: Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T 4 patients who progressed following rituximab and therefore did not receive mitumprotimut-T were excluded from this analysis All 55 patients in this analysis had follicular NHL with a median age of 55 years 35 patients were treatment naïve and 20 had relapsed following prior chemotherapy Treatment Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T 4 patients who progressed following rituximab and therefore did not receive mitumprotimut-T were excluded from this analysis All 55 patients in this analysis had follicular NHL with a median age of 55 years 35 patients were treatment naïve and 20 had relapsed following prior chemotherapy DNA Sample Availability Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Polymorphism at Position 158: Distribution Among Evaluable Subjects T-N = treatment-naïve, R/R = relapse-refractory. Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. GroupNV/VV/FF/F All8412 (14%)34 (41%)38 (45%) R/R467 (15%)18 (39%)21 (46%) T-N385 (13%)16 (42%)17 (45%) Rituximab naïve61 (38T-N, 23R/R) 10 (16%)21 (34%)30 (49%) Results

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T The 3 month response (post rituximab) was: – V/V: 5/9 (56%) – V/F: 9/19 (47%) – F/F: 17/27 (63%) The best response was: – V/V: 6/9 (67%) – V/F: 12/19 (63%) – F/F: 21/27 (78%) Results Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

Initial Overall Response Rate to Single Agent Rituximab Therapy, Among Rituximab-Naïve Patients According to FC  RIIIa Polymorphism at Position 158 The overall response rate is equal to the incidence of complete response and partial response: ORR = CR + PR. Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. GroupNRituximab ORR All6154% V/V1050% V/F2152% F/F3057% Any V3152% Any F5155% ORR = CR+PR

Best ORR Achieved, TTP, and PFS with Combined Rituximab + Mitumprotimut-T Among Rituximab-Naïve Patients According to FC  RIIIa Polymorphism at Position 158 ORR = overall response rate; TTP = time to progression; PFS = progression free survival Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. GroupN* Best ORR to combined rituximab + Id-KLH treatment Med. TTP (months)1 Yr. PFS4 Yr. PFS All5770%17.759%30% V/V967%19.655%29% V/F2162%20.858%34% F/F2778%17.762%28% Any V3063%19.657%33% Any F4876%17.760%30% * 4 Patients ( 3 FF & 1 VV) who were PD post rituximab did not qualify for mitumprotimut-T Id-KLH treatment and are excluded from the analysis for the combined treatment

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Median TTP was: – V/V: 19.5 months – V/F: 22.3 months – F/F 18 months The PFS at 1 year post initiation of rituximab was: – V/V: 57% – V/F: 61% – F/F: 68% Results Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T At the median follow-up of 3.5 years the PFS was: – V/V: 31% – V/F: 42% – F/F: 31% Results Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

PFS for V/V vs. V/F vs. F/F FC  RIIIa at Position 158 Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia V/F V/V F/F Months Progression Free %

PFS for V/V vs. V/F vs. F/F FC  RIIIa at Position 158 Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia Any F Any V Months Progression Free %

Antibody Responses to KLH and Id Among Long Term (> 3 years) Progression Free Survivors* (n=13) positive (+) negative (-) Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. Patient FC  RIIIa GenotypeKLHId 1V/V+– V/F – 7 +– Patient FC  RIIIa GenotypeKLHId 8F/F+– 9 –– 10F/F++ 11F/F+– 12F/F+– 13F/F+– *As measured by ELISA

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T FC  RIIIa polymorphisms were not associated with response rate or time to progression following a treatment program consisting of single agent rituximab followed by idiotype vaccination with mitumprotimut-T in rituximab- naive patients Results from an ongoing randomized Phase III study will assess the efficacy of this combined therapy, but these data suggest that long term PFS in patients receiving an idiotype vaccine following rituximab may rely more on a cell mediated immune response rather than a humoral response to idiotype Conclusions Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T The distribution of FC  RIIIA polymorphisms at Position 158 in this study population is comparable to previously published data among FL patients. In the population of Rituximab Naïve FL patients (23 R/R and 38 T-N), there is no correlation with FC  RIIIA polymorphisms at Position 158 and initial response to 4 course Rituximab therapy nor with time to progression following idiotype immunotherapy with mitumprotimut-T +GM-CSF. Summary Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T  Long term progression free survival (> 3 years) following combined Rituximab plus mitumprotimut-T (Specifid™, Id-KLH, FavId®) therapy does not correlate with production of anti-idiotypic antibody suggesting long term PFS may rely more on a cell mediated immune response. Summary Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

FC  RIIIa Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T Lack of correlation with FC  RIIIA polymorphisms and long term PFS may suggest that if such an association does occur with Rituximab monotherapy, the addition of idiotype vaccine overrides the FC  RIIIA advantage. Results from an ongoing randomized PIII study due to be reported in July 2008 will assess the efficacy of this combined therapy and any potential role for FC  RIIIA polymorphisms. Summary Maloney DG et al. Abstract #3416. Presented December 10, 2007, at the 49th ASH Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.