ED Measure Recommendations Change Review Process Meeting November 2015 Lisa Nelson Lantana Consulting Group Last Updated: November 9, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Hospital Overview
Advertisements

Interdisciplinary Approach to Stroke Patients Stormont-Vail HealthCare Primary Stroke Center.
A Healthier Tomorrow High Cost Users South West LHIN Hospital CCAC Leadership Forum September 13, 2013.
South Carolina Department of Mental Health (DMH) Division of Medical Affairs Telepsychiatry Consultation Program Achieving Tomorrow, Today Last Update:
HCAHPS and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (Hospital VBP) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Utilization Management. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this section the participant will be able to: Define Utilization Management. Understand.
1 Medical Necessity Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI Manager Accretive Health.
Skilled Nursing Facility Rules and How “The Rules” Impact Patients
PRELIMINARY DRAFT Behavioral Health Transformation September 26, 2014 PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT, SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Inpatient Coding Strategies American College of Physicians March 1, 2013.
Sacred Encounters Perfect Care Healthiest Communities New CMS FY 14 IPPS Rule affecting Inpatient Status What does the physician need to know.
2014 Standard Definitions and Metric Goals. Consensus Statement Definitions for consistent emergency department metrics were introduced and signed on.
John Wieler Management Information Systems In a Healthcare Setting.
Present on Admission. Requirements of Deficit Reduction Act 2005 CMS and CDC choose conditions that are: High Cost, High Volume, or both. Assigned to.
Calculating & Reporting Healthcare Statistics
Task Force on Behavioral Health Data Policies and Long Term Stays Meeting Two December 18, 2014 Beth Waldman and Megan Burns.
Department of Health Nicole Doran Ambulatory and Coordinated Care Department of Health November 2009 Transition Care Program: Victorian Update Improving.
INTRODUCTION TO ICD-9-CM PART TWO ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines (Sections II and III): Selection of Principal Diagnosis/Additional Diagnoses for Inpatient.
August 2012 If you have an Emergency Department, you are in the Behavioral Health Business…..
Medicaid Hospital Utilization Review and DRG Audits: Frequently Asked Questions The Department of Medical Assistance Services Division of Program Integrity.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Query Health Technical WG 8/2/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm Specification, RI and Pilot Updates2:05 – 2:20 pm Comparison between.
From Registration to Accounts Receivable – The Whole Can of Worms 2007 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Briefing:Coding Inpatient Professional Services Date:21 March.
1 Sheryl Hurt AFMC Provider Representative Episodes of Care AFMC has partnered with the initiative to provide communication design and printing.
Washington State Hospital Association Washington state is one of the leaders in efficient use of services. Year-to-year differences in inpatient use patterns.
Segmentation in Reliability Design (Application of the Christensen Model) Roger Resar April 2006.
Decision Support for Quality Improvement
Potentially Preventable Readmissions: Overview of Definitions and Clinical Logic HSCRC April 6, 2010 Elizabeth McCullough, 3M Health Information Systems.
1 Measuring What Matters: Care Transitions Karen Adams, PhD Senior Program Officer National Quality Forum February 4, 2008.
Day Weighted Resident Rosters New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services AND July-August 2010.
County of San Diego Division of Emergency Medical Services EMS 1 Mental Health Disorders and Substance Use and Abuse in the Emergency Department County.
Colorado Trauma Registry Colorado Trauma Network Prepared by Health and Safety Data Services July 2014.
©2008 Thomson Reuters Psychiatric Care in General Hospitals With and Without Psychiatric Units: How Much and for Whom? Tami L. Mark, Thomson Reuters Elizabeth.
Patient Volume for Meaningful Use Richard Kashinski Meaningful Use National Business Analyst DNC (Contractor) for U.S. Indian Health Service OIT Last Updated:
INTERACT COLLABORATIVE ORIENTATION SESSION NYSHFA/IPRO PARTNERSHIP Sara Butterfield, RN, BSN, CPHQ, CCM Christine Stegel, RN, MS, CPHQ NYSHFA/IPRO INTERACT.
Exploratory Analysis of Observation Stay Pamela Owens, Ph.D. Ryan Mutter, Ph.D. September, 2009 AHRQ Annual Meeting.
CYE 15 APR-DRG Implementation The APR-DRG payment methodology will be implemented for all acute/general hospitals (provider type 02) The same payment methodology.
June 9, 2008 Making Mortality Measurement More Meaningful Incorporating Advanced Directives and Palliative Care Designations Eugene A. Kroch, Ph.D. Mark.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Health Information Solutions Gaining Insights through Data Linkage: The VS-PDD Linked Data Files Presenters: Beate Danielsen & Jan Morgan.
Medicare Documentation & ICD-9-CM Coding Presented by Rhonda Anderson, RHIA President Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc
Cleveland Clinic Science Internship Program How Fast Are We? Throughput Times for Admissions from the Emergency Department Brian Hom; Deborah Porter RN,
Community Acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED) Emergency Department Nurses & Physicians Dr. Mark Cichon, Director; Bridget Gaughan, Manager.
School of Health Sciences Week 4! AHIMA Practice Brief Fundamentals of Health Information HI 140 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
Quality Measure Results for Episodes of Care that Span Multiple CCNs
CMS National Conference on Care Transitions December 3,
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Antidepressant Medication Management Updates (CMS128) Change Review Process Meeting November 19, 2015 Jenna Williams-Bader Anne Marie Smith Stephanie Rodriguez.
Community Paramedic Payment Reform December 2 nd,2015 Terrace Mall- North Memorial.
© Copyright The Joint Commission Observation status in hospital eCQMs Change Review Process Meeting October 15, 2015 Rute Martins Division of Healthcare.
 To identify the Emergency Department efficiency measures for Inpatient admissions.  To demonstrate an understanding of the process of determining median.
Memphis, TN Thomas Duarte, Executive Director, MSeHA.
The DSAMH High-End User Program Steven Dettwyler, Ph.D. Director of Community Mental Health Services
TUTORIAL How to Count Patients Admitted from the Emergency Department (ED) in the Casemix Hospital Discharge Data (HDD)
Nursing Workload Acuity in the EHR Mary Beth Mitchell, MSN, RN, BC, CPHIMS CNIO Texas Health Resources September 26 th, 2015.
‘Environment’ Glossary Administrative categories from UK National Health Service.
/ ©2015 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 TERRANCE GOVENDER MD CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION INTEGRITY.
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
Primary Care Expansion Enhance Urgent Medical Advice
Telepsychiatry Consultation Program Achieving Tomorrow, Today
Facility & Hospital Patient Types
By: Marie-Josée Pagé, DO
Evaluating Sepsis Guidelines and Patient Outcomes
Canadian Institute for Health Information
VSAC and Quality Measures
Engaging a Microsystem to Reduce 30-Day Readmissions on an Acute Care Unit Erin Johnson, MSN, RN, Sara Stetz, MSN, RN.
Emergency Department Disposition Support Program Overview
The Effect of Emergency Department Waiting Time
Observation vs Inpatient
Presentation transcript:

ED Measure Recommendations Change Review Process Meeting November 2015 Lisa Nelson Lantana Consulting Group Last Updated: November 9,

Quality Measure Results for Episodes of Care that Span Multiple CCNs Recap Emergency Department process quality measures include timing logic that spans 2 kinds of encounters (ED Visits and Inpatient Encounters)occuring in a series. – ED-1 & ED-2 focus on Inpatient Encounters where there was an ED Visit that concluded within an hour before or concurrent with the start of the IP Encounter. – ED-3 focuses on ED Visits where no IP Encounter started within 6 hours after the ED Visit ended. Do the measure definitions work as expected when the two encounters occur at facilities from distinct CCNs? Several JIRA tickets from implementers – CQM-1475, CQM-1499, CQM-1598, CQM-1341, CQM-1345, CQM-1645, CQM-1610, CQM-1605, CQM-1063 CCN stands for CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Certification Number. A CCN uniquely identifies a reporting entity. It may encompass multiple facilities. 2

Measure intent: What is the episode of care? Most inpatient measures are looking for data encompassed in a single episode of care: An episode of care is defined as the health care services given during a certain period of time, usually during a hospital stay (e.g., from the day of arrival or admission to the day of discharge). Source: Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality MeasuresSpecifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures For a patient who is admitted to inpatient care, the episode of care can include care provided in the ED and while in observation status, prior to the inpatient admission When measuring Emergency Department processes, what is the episode of care? 3

Considerations MeasureED-1 (CMS55)ED-2 (CMS111)ED-3 (CMS32) Measure Item CountEncounter, Performed: Encounter Inpatient Encounter, Performed: Emergency Department Visit Initial PopulationInpatient Encounters ending during the measurement period with Length of Stay less than or equal to 120 days. Emergency department encounters discharged during the measurement period. Measure PopulationInpatient Encounters preceded by an ED Visit Inpatient Encounters where a decision to admit was made during the preceding ED Visit IP and not ED Visits that end with a subsequent Inpatient Encounter Measure Population Exclusions None Patient Expired during visit Measure ObservationDischarge Datetime minus Admission Datetime Decision to Admit Datetime minus Admission Datetime Facility Location Departure Datetime minus Facility Location Arrival Datetime StratificationS1: M S2: not M S1: M S2: not M S1: M S2: T and not union of M and T S3: All not in S1 or S2 M = Primary Diagnosis is a Mental Health Disorder T = Transferred to an Acute Care hospital (environment) within 6 hours of the end of the ED visit. 4

Conclusions Tangly logic and inconsistent measure design, largely due to the history of their development (siloed due to IP vs OP) The current intention is for ED-1 and ED-3 to be a “companion set” of “complementary measures” for Median Time from ED Arrival to ED Departure which look at two different situations: – 1. ED visit was part of a larger “episode of care” (admitted patients) – 2. ED visit was not part of a larger “episode of care” (discharged patients) ED-2 is just like ED-1, but measures a different observation—median time to decision to admit – ED-2 can be “carried” in this discussion as a “shadow measure” following the same approach as ED-1 5

Prior Recommendations (Sept.) All measures intended to assess ED Visit process throughput should use the ED Visit as the Measure Item Count – Eliminates use of the Inpatient Encounter to find the ED Visits – Affects ED-1 and ED-2 – Achieves greater consistency across all three ED measures To measure only ED Visits that are not part of a larger episode of care, define the Measure Population Exclusion using the Encounter, Performed: Discharge Disposition attribute – Eliminates logic that depends on availability of data about subsequent encounters which may not be present in the EHR for the CCN being assessed. – Affects ED-1, ED-2, ED-3 – May create opportunity to improve how we address the issues associated with episodes of care that include transfer to other “departments” before ending up as an Inpatient Encounter, like ED to Cath Lab to Inpatient, or ED to Observation Unit to Inpatient. (paradigm shift: episode of care = a set of encounters not limited by “facility”) Clarify the meaning of the term “facility” in the measure definition to better explain how the CCN id effects the notion of “facility”? 6

Current Recommendation – logic Initial Population – no change Measure Population – ED-1 (ED-2) Use new timing to account for possible gap in Observation Status – ED-3 Remove exclusion for ED Visits that are not a part of a larger “episode of care” Measure Exclusion – ED-1 (ED-2) Add exclusion for ED Visits transferred from another hospital setting (alignment) – ED-3 Add exclusion for ED Visits that are part of a larger “episode of care”, use new timing to account for possible gap in Observation Status Measure Observation – ED-1 (ED-2) Use Facility Location Arrival Datetime – ED-1 Use Facility Location Departure Datetime with clarified definition – ED-3 no change *The time that the patient departed the specific facility location related to the encounter 7

Current Recommendation – strata Stratification – ED-1 (ED-2) segment for: S1: M AND: Encounter, Performed: ED Visit (Diagnosis: M) VS M (harmonization) S2: not M AND NOT: Encounter, Performed: ED Visit (Diagnosis:M) VS M (harmonization) – ED-3 segment for: S1: M Aligned with D2, Change to VS M (harmonization) S2: T Aligned with D3, Change to VS T (alignment) S3: Not M AND Not T Aligned with D, Change to VS T (alignment) S4: M AND T Needed to compute the logical strata relationships *The time that the patient departed the specific facility location related to the encounter M -M T -T Measure Observation S2 S1 S4 S3 Think Sudoku 8

Summary of Current Recommendations MeasureED-1 (CMS55)ED-2 (CMS111)ED-3 (CMS32) Measure Item CountEncounter, Performed: Encounter Inpatient Encounter, Performed: Emergency Department Visit Initial PopulationInpatient Encounters ending during the measurement period with Length of Stay less than or equal to 120 days. Emergency department encounters discharged during the measurement period. Measure PopulationInpatient Encounters preceded by an ED Visit using new timing gap Inpatient Encounters where a decision to admit was made during the preceding ED Visit using new timing gap Same as IP Measure Population Exclusions Patients transferred from another hospital care setting Patient Expired during visit; ED Visits that end with a subsequent Inpatient Encounter using new timing gap Measure ObservationFacility Location Departure Datetime minus Facility Location Arrival Datetime Decision to Admit Datetime minus Admission Facility Location Arrival Datetime Facility Location Departure Datetime minus Facility Location Arrival Datetime StratificationS1: M S2: not M S1: M S2: not M S1: M S2: T S3: not M AND not T S4: M AND T M = Encounter, Performed: (Diagnosis: Mental Health Disorder) T = Transferred to an Acute Care or VA hospital (environment) within 6 hours of the end of the ED visit. 9

Assessment of Recommendation Up-side: Clearer purpose Clearer logic Incorporation of new QDM New approach for addressing Observation Status Restored/improved alignment with paper measure Acute Care & VA Hospital VS will have more than one concept Down-side: More changes… Complex issues to understand Triggers a need to add a concept to the Acute Care VS – will have to do Harmonization analysis, scan for usage interdependencies – Make a new grouping VS that combines Acute Care VS with additional concepts. 10

Motion: Support making proposed changes to ED-1 (ED-2) and ED-3 11

Discussion 12

Vote Support making proposed changes to ED-1 (ED-2) and ED-3? – Support making these changes – Don’t support making these changes – Not sure, need more time to consider the proposed changes 13