Stat 100 Feb 11 Read Chapter 12, try 1-9. Problem 14 of Chapter 12 Case control study: 239 lung cancer patients and 429 controls 98 of the lung cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Advertisements

1 Hypothesis Testing Chapter 8 of Howell How do we know when we can generalize our research findings? External validity must be good must have statistical.
MEASURES OF DISEASE ASSOCIATION Nigel Paneth. MEASURES OF DISEASE ASSOCIATION The chances of something happening can be expressed as a risk or as an odds:
Copyright (c) Bani Mallick1 Lecture 2 Stat 651. Copyright (c) Bani Mallick2 Topics in Lecture #2 Population and sample parameters More on populations.
Relative and Attributable Risks. Absolute Risk Involves people who contract disease due to an exposure Doesn’t consider those who are sick but haven’t.
Measures of association
Risk and Relative Risk. Suppose a news article claimed that drinking coffee doubled your risk of developing a certain disease. Assume the statistic was.
Confidence Interval for Relative Risk
Copyright (c) Bani Mallick1 Lecture 4 Stat 651. Copyright (c) Bani Mallick2 Topics in Lecture #4 Probability The bell-shaped (normal) curve Normal probability.
CHAPTER 2 Basic Descriptive Statistics: Percentages, Ratios and rates, Tables, Charts and Graphs.
Handling Categorical Data. Learning Outcomes At the end of this session and with additional reading you will be able to: – Understand when and how to.
200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt.
Statistical Analysis – Chapter 4 Normal Distribution
Understanding study designs through examples Manish Chaudhary MPH (BPKIHS)
Medical Statistics (full English class) Ji-Qian Fang School of Public Health Sun Yat-Sen University.
Categorical Variables, Relative Risk, Odds Ratios STA 220 – Lecture #8 1.
Stat 100 Work Chapter 20, Try Problems 1-9 Chapter 19, Try Problems 1-7 Read Chapter 4.
Estimation of Various Population Parameters Point Estimation and Confidence Intervals Dr. M. H. Rahbar Professor of Biostatistics Department of Epidemiology.
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
Hypothesis Testing Field Epidemiology. Hypothesis Hypothesis testing is conducted in etiologic study designs such as the case-control or cohort as well.
Please turn off cell phones, pagers, etc. The lecture will begin shortly.
Measures of Association
R Programming Odds & Odds Ratios 1. Session 3 Overview 1.Odds 2.Odds Ratio (OR) 3.Confidence Intervals for OR’s 4.Inference based on OR’s 2.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 8 – Comparing Proportions Marshall University Genomics.
Investigating the Relationship between Scores
O RGANIZING & DISPLAYING DATA Dr. Omar Al Jadaan Assistant Professor – Computer Science & Mathematics.
Biostatistics Class 6 Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Inference 2/29/2000.
1 An Introduction to the Minnesota Epidemiological Profile Minnesota State Epidemiological Workgroup and Minnesota Institute of Public Health Fall Forums.
Chapter 12 A Primer for Inferential Statistics What Does Statistically Significant Mean? It’s the probability that an observed difference or association.
R Programming Risk & Relative Risk 1. Session 2 Overview 1.Risk 2.Relative Risk 3.Percent Increase/Decrease Risk 2.
MBP1010 – Lecture 8: March 1, Odds Ratio/Relative Risk Logistic Regression Survival Analysis Reading: papers on OR and survival analysis (Resources)
Contingency Tables 1.Explain  2 Test of Independence 2.Measure of Association.
Please turn off cell phones, pagers, etc. The lecture will begin shortly.
Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data Lock 5 STAT 250 Dr. Kari Lock Morgan Describing Data: Categorical Variables SECTIONS 2.1 One categorical variable.
Tim Wiemken PhD MPH CIC Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville, Kentucky Confounding.
Sampling distributions rule of thumb…. Some important points about sample distributions… If we obtain a sample that meets the rules of thumb, then…
Intermediate Applied Statistics STAT 460 Lecture 20, 11/19/2004 Instructor: Aleksandra (Seša) Slavković TA: Wang Yu
Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.
4.3 Relations in Categorical Data.  Use categorical data to calculate marginal and conditional proportions  Understand Simpson’s Paradox in context.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 5. Measuring Dispersion or Spread in a Distribution of Scores.
1 Probability and Statistics Confidence Intervals.
THE CHI-SQUARE TEST BACKGROUND AND NEED OF THE TEST Data collected in the field of medicine is often qualitative. --- For example, the presence or absence.
Copyright ©2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning Relationships Between Categorical Variables – Risk Class 26 1.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 3 Investigating the Relationship of Scores.
CHAPTER 8 ESTIMATING WITH CONFIDENCE 8.2 Estimating a Population Proportion Outcome: I will state and check all necessary conditions for constructing a.
Dr.Theingi Community Medicine
Smoking and Lung Cancer
Inference for Population Proportions.   Inference means what you make out of data  Statistics is the practice of measuring Data  Significance! The.
Measures of Association (2) Attributable Risks and fractions October Epidemiology 511 W. A. Kukull.
Relative and Attributable Risks
Probability Distributions
Statistics 200 Lecture #7 Tuesday, September 13, 2016
Chapter 9: Non-parametric Tests
The binomial applied: absolute and relative risks, chi-square
Lecture 8 – Comparing Proportions
Do Now Write each proportion and answer.
Sampling Distributions
Analysis based on normal distributions
Chapter 1 Data Analysis Section 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data.
Odds Ratio Interpretation Confounder  Diabetes
Estimating with Confidence
AP Statistics Chapter 3 Part 2
Measurements of Risk & Association …
Section 12.2 Comparing Two Proportions
Practice #7.7 #7.8 #7.9. Practice #7.7 #7.8 #7.9.
Measures of risk and association
Chapter 12 Inference for Proportions
Chapter 8: Estimation Confidence Intervals.
Case-control studies: statistics
BMTRY 736 Foundation of Epidemiology Fall 2019
Presentation transcript:

Stat 100 Feb 11 Read Chapter 12, try 1-9

Problem 14 of Chapter 12 Case control study: 239 lung cancer patients and 429 controls 98 of the lung cancer patients had at some time owned a bird 101 of the controls had at some time owned a bird.

Part a Construct a contingency table

Contingency Table Lung cancer ControlsTotal Owned Bird Never Owned Bird Total239429

Contingency Table Lung cancer ControlsTotal Owned Bird Never Owned Bird Total

Risk of Lung Cancer Compute the risk of lung cancer for bird owners and non-owners Risk=percent or proportion falling into the “bad” category For bird owners, 98/199=.492 or 49.2% For non-owners, 141/469=.301, or 30.1%

Comparing Risks Relative Risk Divide risk in one group by risk in other Rel. Risk of lung cancer for bird owners=.492/.301=1.63 Interpretation: For bird-owners, the risk of lung cancer is 1.63 times the risk for non- owners.

Percent Increase in Risk Divide difference in risks by the lower of the two risks. (express as percent) ( )/.301=.191/.301=63% Interpret: Having owned a bird increases the risk of lung cancer by 63%

Thought Question Do you think the risks calculated in this problem correctly describe the risk of lung cancer? Can you think of any other explanation for the results aside from “having owned a bird increases the risk of lung cancer?”

NOTE Because this was a case-control study, cancer patients were purposely “over- sampled” Makes risk of cancer in this sample much higher than normal risk in population

Thought Question Can you think of any other explanation for the results aside from “having owned a bird increases the risk of lung cancer?” Maybe bird owners are more likely to smoke

Odds Comparison of chance something happens to chance it doesn’t Suppose 42 of 92 short kids have been bullied. Odds of being bullied are 42 to 50 Suppose 30 of 111 normal height kids have been bullied Odds of being bullied are 30 to 81

Odds ratio Comparison of odds for two different groups Short kids compared to normal height – Odds of being bullied = (42/50)/(30/81) = 2.27 For short, odds of being bullied are 2.27 times odds for normal height