Expectation B6: how to get it to work across multiple sites and multiple programmes Dr Nick Dickson Chief Academic Officer, Cambridge Education Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Outcomes & Staff Development Dr Lorraine Walsh, University of Dundee Bologna Stakeholder Conference February 2008 Heriot.
Advertisements

SEDA Professional Development Framework
Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Handbook for Academic Review Karen Czapiewski.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
College Assessment Board Dr Kim Wolff: Chair CAB.
Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.
The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
Professional Recognition: Gain the recognition you deserve
Higher Education Review January Higher Education Review – What is it? External Review of how effectively Kent manages: Academic Standards Quality.
The UK Quality Code for Higher Education Jenny Beaumont LTC February 2012.
UWE Bristol External Examiner Annual Reporting Rebecca Smith, Curriculum Enhancement Manager
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
Assessment practices: Quality and standards. Assessment and the assurance of academic standards The assurance of academic standards embraces a wide range.
Skills for Life Improvement Programme Professional Development Planning for literacy, language and numeracy The Skills for Life Improvement.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
UELSU reps conference Student Engagement: What does is mean for you?
The National Qualifications Framework Liz Heydon/Jill Reilly.
Copyright © 2012 Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo, LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING., GRE, POWERPREP, TOEFL, TOEFL Ibt and.
Quality assurance for e- learning Dr Tim Brown (formerly) Deputy Director, Validation Services, Open University UK.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.
The common inspection framework: education, skills and early years.
Learning and Teaching at The University of Bradford.
Embedding quality – a quality enhancement driven approach Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement, School of Arts and Media.
Public Providers Forum Murisi Auditorium CHE 21 February 2012.
What is an effective induction (within an academic context) and how do you implement it across the whole university or college? Michael Hill Action on.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Our assessment objectives
Student Voice in Academic Audit Dr Jan Cameron Director Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities May 2015.
The Quality Assurance of Higher Education when delivered in partnership with Further Education Colleges: The Canterbury Christ Church University Approach.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
Moderation. What it’s not Moderation can provide: Insights into the standards attained by different pupils: progress (learning over time) rate of learning.
Constructive Alignment One approach to curriculum development
Sue Southwood Programme Manager for Professional Standards and Workforce Development.
Using the New Zealand Certificates in English Language in a secondary school context Breda Matthews.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Aspects of ‘outcomes for learners’ for learners with learning difficulties or disabilities, including provision in Independent Specialist Colleges Charlie.
Supporting the achievement of deaf children Assess Plan Do Review.
2 What are Functional Skills? How do they fit in and how will they be assessed?
Approach to Functional Skills A Provider Prospective Sue Morgan Director of Workplace Skills Valkyrie Support Services.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Assessment & Feedback: Policy and practice
Course Director’s Strategy Day
OTLA Report Writing Training
Applying for HEA Fellowship
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
The Role of the External Examiner at Plymouth University
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
The view from the ‘regulator’
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
OTLA Report Writing Training
External Examiner Reports
The Role of the External Examiner at the University of Plymouth
OTLA Report Writing Training
Gifted & Talented Provision
Presentation transcript:

Expectation B6: how to get it to work across multiple sites and multiple programmes Dr Nick Dickson Chief Academic Officer, Cambridge Education Group

Expectation B6 Higher education providers operate equitable, valid and reliable processes of assessment, including for the recognition of prior learning, which enable every student to demonstrate the extent to which they have achieved the intended learning outcomes for the credit or qualification being sought.

FoundationCampus Provides university preparation programmes for international students (UG and PG) Multiple sites across the UK, Europe, US. Range of teaching staff (English language specialists, FE, HE) Students with English as a second language

The issues Multiple programmes at multiple levels Different sites Teaching staff have different ranges of qualifications and experience Students have low English

How we tackled B6 Subject leaders – responsible for devising assessments and leading CPD for all related teachers across all sites across the range of programmes English language specialist input – gaining their buy-in to ensure assessments were suitably worded for students’ English levels Student feedback – assuring ourselves the pitch was right

Responsibilities for Indicators B6 Policy (1,2,3,4,9,10,11, 13,14,15,18) External Examiners (13,16,17,18) Teachers (6,7,9,13,14,18) Subject Leaders (1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,14,16,17,18)

Top tips Managing CPD (Indicators 4, 5) – subject leaders receive targeted development, and they are responsible for ensuring teachers are brought up to the same level Gaining engagement from all staff – especially English teachers – involve them in the assessment development process (Indicators 6,7,8,10)

More top tips Make sure you ask students for their understanding of assessment requirements – sometimes their understanding will not match yours! (Indicators 6,10) Use every technological/pedagogical trick to discover plagiarism, and remember your teachers know your students well enough to know if the work isn’t their own (Indicators 7,11,14)

Group discussion What particular issues does your institution have in embedding Expectation B6? Can the group come up with any practical solutions?