IRB Perspective: Concept of the Community-Wide IRB David C. Clark, PhD Assistant Dean for Clinical Research Medical College of Wisconsin.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.

Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.

 To facilitate the implementation of employment equity and the communication to employees of matters relating to employment equity and diversity.

Phase O Trials: Ethical Considerations Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman Institute.

THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.

Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.

Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.

YALE MASTER SLIDE HERE Clinical Research Management – Is not just a handshake deal? Jamie Caldwell, MBA Director Office of Research Services for the Health.

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.

8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)

October 19, 2010 Steven Hirschfeld, MD, PhD Julia Slutsman, PhD

Module 2 Sealy Center on Aging What kinds of scholarly products can I produce?

Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)

Internal Auditing and Outsourcing

Central IRBs: Ceding IRB Oversight

IRBMED AND CHESAPEAKE IRB General Procedures for Ceding IRBMED Oversight Procedures Specific to Chesapeake IRB Medical School Institutional Review Board.

Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.

Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.

International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.

Wisconsin Network for Health Research (WiNHR) How to Market Your Network Dr. Howard Bailey, Faculty Head of WiNHR Deb Kruser, Director of WiNHR.

Primary Care and Community Outreach Research VCOM Institutional Review Board Jim Mahaney, PhD Associate Dean for Biomedical Affairs, Virginia Campus Past.

Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.

University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.

Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.

Paula Peyrani, MD Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville The Informed Consent Process.

Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.

Module 3: Informed Consent. This training session contains information regarding: Documenting consent Documenting consent Conducting informed consent.

The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.

UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.

The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

VHA Handbook What’s new. General Requirements for Informed Consent A Legally Authorized Representative may not always qualify as a ‘personal representative’

Abstract ID: 395 Author Name: Araya Sripairoj Presenter Name: Araya Sripairoj Authors: Sripairoj A, Liamputtong P, Harvey K.

Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems Shan He IPHIE 2010.

The Wisconsin Network for Health Research (WiNHR): Overview. An Infrastructure for Conducting Multi-Site Clinical Research across the State of Wisconsin.

Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.

First Annual Meeting. Project Development Teams: Concept and Example Scott C. Denne, M.D. Professor of Pediatrics Associate Director of the Indiana CTSI.

Wisconsin IRB Consortium (WIC): a model for multi-site IRB review Nichelle Cobb, PhD Director, Health Sciences IRBs University of Wisconsin-Madison Secretary’s.

Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.

Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.

The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.

Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.

Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,

Department of Health and Human Services1 Exception from Informed Consent for Emergency Research Brief Highlights Sara F. Goldkind, MD, MA Senior Bioethicist.

VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs.

VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs September.

Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.

Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

Department of Health and Human Services1 Update: October 2006 Public Meeting on Emergency Research Diane Maloney, J.D. Associate Director for Policy FDA.

CIRTL Data Sharing 10/9/15. New Opportunities The CIRTL Network Commons (CNC) offers the potential for easier access to data for evaluation purposes.

Informed Consent It’s a Process …not a form. Outline  Historical Background  Respect for Persons  Consent Process  Elements of Informed Consent 

Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.

Guidance for Researchers on Using the Wisconsin IRB Consortium (WIC) February 2014.

Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor

Conducting Investigator-Initiated Research Lydia A. Bazzano, MD, PhD.

BC SUPPORT Unit: Overview and update

Back to Basics – Approval Criteria

Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor

Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University

FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications

Good Clinical Practice

Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule

To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.

Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule

Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes

IRB Harmonization 2016 Review

CTSA27 So you want COMIRB to be your sIRB: What you need to know.

Presentation transcript:

IRB Perspective: Concept of the Community-Wide IRB David C. Clark, PhD Assistant Dean for Clinical Research Medical College of Wisconsin

Outline Required elements Staging approval -- a practical consideration The role of community-wide IRBs

Element 7: Additional protections Value-neutral questions that are sensitive to community norms and expectations Public disclosure after completion to apprise community of results, including demographics Creation of an independent data monitoring committee (not members of research team – variety of experts)

Element 8: Refreshing consent IRB responsible for ensuring that procedures are in place to inform each subject (or LAR), at earliest opportunity, of subject’s inclusion, details of investigation, and full consent information… … and procedures exist to inform subject that he/she may discontinue participation at any time If LAR used and subject improves, must consent subject If subject dies before LAR consent obtained, investigator must inform LAR about study participation as soon as possible

Additional FDA requirements IRB must document that licensed physician -- member of or consulting to IRB (and not participating in clinical investigation) -- agrees that waiver is allowable, by recording this in minutes

Exclusions Waiver explicitly excludes: Pregnant women, fetuses, human in vitro fertilization Prisoners What if some pregnant women accidentally included?

Staging the IRB review The concept of explicit “stages” “Feasibility and planning” stage “Community disclosure and consultation” stage “Final implementation readiness” stage Approval granted for well-delineated stages, rather than for entire study plan Investigators and IRB work together to formulate mutually acceptable “staging” units and boundaries

Inter-Institutional Agreements Any FWA institution may defer IRB review to another FWA institution by means of a written Inter-Institutional Agreement IRB of records takes responsibility for IRB requirements based on information submitted (know your partner!) Deferring institutions still have responsibility for their investigators, their involvement, and implementation of study

Community-wide IRBs Several IRBs may develop a common Inter- Institutional Agreement, with supporting MOU and conventions memorialized as “policies,” to create a “community-wide IRB” Wisconsin IRB Consortium  University of Wisconsin at Madison  Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee)  Marshfield Clinic (40 centers in N, W and central WI)  Gundersen Lutheran Health System (La Crosse)  Aurora Health Care (Milwaukee)

Role of community-wide IRBs Common Inter-Institution Agreements, policies and procedures for “network” studies facilitate multi-site reviews Consensual decision about “lead institution” Subsidiary sites may defer review; conduct a facilitated review; or conduct a full committee review Network orchestrates sequence and timing of reviews

Advantages of community-wide IRBs Each participating institution chooses its own preferred level of review, study by study Potential: for single IRB review with built-in procedures for considering “local context” for full-information continuing reviews to choreograph consent form language across multiple institutional IRBs

Disadvantages of community IRB review

What is a successful community consultation? Type of consultation (community meeting, focus group, survey)? Number of consultations? Number of persons consulted? (Limited time, staffing, and budget -- how much “respect for persons” can we afford?)

What is a successful community consultation? Community support ratio (51%)? Sampling strategies (representativeness)? Indication from community that there was enough consultation?