PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT ‘IN WHOSE BEST INTEREST? EXPLORING UNACCOMPANIED MINORS’ RIGHTS THROUGH THE LENS OF MIGRATION AND ASYLUM PROCESSES’ AND COMPARATIVE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC PHARE project EU IMPACT - Academic network for communicating integration impacts in Croatia Effective networking: Case study EU IMPACT: Academic network.
Advertisements

Local Integration of Refugees in Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine March 2009 – February 2011 EU-funded project Implemented by UNHCR.
The role of networks in the process of immigrant integration NIKOS STATHOPOULOS, NIKOS STATHOPOULOS, DIRECTOR, G&D SOCIAL LAB LTD Integration programs.
THE POSITION OF JOBSEEKERS Paul Minderhoud Centre for Migration Law Coordinator Network on Free Movement of Workers.
The complexity of migration in the Baltic Sea Region Immigration, a threat or a solution? Warsaw, April 24, 2008 Migration Policy Department Ministry of.
Bylaw on drug demand reduction in Serbia. Bylaw(s) - principles  should be based on existing law(s)  should complement existing laws  should not be.
ORGANISED LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA (SALGA) PRESENTATION TO CNM Scope of the relationships between local governments of IBSA July 2009.
Republic of Serbia Commissariat for Refugees and Migration ENARO Closing Conference Ragusa, 28 th -30 th November 2012.
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
EU Funding For Law Centres Pamela Fitzpatrick and Flora Williams.
EU Anti-Discrimination Legislation Tansy Hutchinson Policy Officer European Network Against Racism.
Serbian Network of Knowledge. Context Statistical Information In the past 10 years, the number of highly educated people leaving Serbia has been approximately.
An introduction to children’s rights. Group activity.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN WELFARE MIX MODEL CREATION Best Practice Model Social Center "Home of colors"
European Conference Maastricht Vocational training for asylum seekers: effects & methods Collaboration between Crucial Partners Panel 3.
Overview of ERF, EIF & RF AP th August 2013 Amanda Borg Funds and Programmes Division, MEAIM General Programme Solidarity & Management of Migration.
Virginia Wangare Greiner Virginia wangare Greiner
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
The challenge of demographic changes by inclusion of women in the labour force.
Partnership as a tool to green regional development programmes Gottfried Lamers Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Asylum MINISTRY OF INTERIOR POLICE DIRECTORATE BORDER POLICE DIRECTORATE
Prepared by Grażyna Zarzycka University of Łódź SWOT ANALYSIS OF COUNSELLING METHODS IN POLAND ON THE RIGHT TRACK, 2011.
MIGRATION and ASYLUM NETWORKING INITIATIVES Olga Ozernaya Research and Networking Officer/Söderköping Process Secretariat * The Cross-Border.
SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FP INCO-MPC-1 MEditerranean Development of Innovative Technologies for integrAted waTer managEment.
Exchange of Best Practices on the Integration of Third Country Nationals June Brussels Organized by SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY FOR SΟCIAL COHESION & DEVELOPMENT.
Overview of ERF, EIF & RF AP th May 2013 Amanda Borg Funds and Programmes Division, MEAIM General Programme Solidarity & Management of Migration.
DG ResearchEuropean Commission RTD 06/FK/lb 09/2001 Special measures to further improve participation of Newly Associated States (NAS) in FP-5.
This project is funded by the European Union Supporting the implementation of the migration and development component of the EU-Moldova Mobility Partnership.
1 One year EU membership - impact on regional development in Latvia Maris Pukis, Senior Adviser, Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments.
Implementation of reception and detention regimes in Lithuania prepared by Renata Kulesh Kyiv 7-8 February, 2005.
Someone else’s problem: the concentration of unaccompanied children and lack of responsibility sharing in the UK Jo Wilding University of Brighton Conference.
Unaccompanied minors in Slovenia: Principle of the best interest of the child between theory and practice Blaž Lenarčič, Zorana Medarić, Mateja Sedmak,Tjaša.
SERBIA AND MIGRANTS TODAY Sofia, October 14 th -15 th 2015.
National Information Communication Technologies Strategy Vasif Khalafov “National strategy” working group - Web -
Determining the ‚best interest‘ of unaccompanied minors in Austria: A Study of the „Two-Class-System“ Ayse Dursun, Birgit Sauer University of Vienna, Department.
EU human rights policy on indigenous peoples International expert Dialogue on MDG7 8 April 2010.
Asylum seekers in the Czech Republic Katarina Fagošová.
South-Eastern European Data Services (SEEDS) CPC Introduction Arben Hajrullahu Nit ё Bylykbashi Deliu 04 May 2015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Career Guidance Aimed at Improving Higher Education - role of Ministry of Youth and Sport of Republic of Serbia- Ministry of Youth and Sport Development.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Field placements for students of social policy and social work at the UB-FPS Natalija Perisic University of Belgrade Faculty of Political Sciences Department.
An introduction to Dutch immigration policy Merel Lantzendörffer-Hekker Policy worker
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA EU ACTION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN A CANDIDATE COUNTRY.
DG ResearchEuropean Commission RTD 06/FK/lb 09/2001 Special measures to further improve participation of Newly Associated States (NAS) in FP-5.
The revised EU Asylum Procedures Directive WHAT SUPPORT IS AVAILABLE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS WITH PARTICULAR NEEDS?
Jovan Andonovski, PhD, Deputy Ombudsman Republic of Macedonia
Budget flexibility, agility and readiness to meet demands: Countries’ experience with regard to immigration REPUBLIC OF CROATIA June 2016.
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
The Refugee and Migration Crisis
The Youth Empowerment and Innovation Project (YEIP)
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
ΜΟΝΑΔΑ ΤΑΜΕΙΩΝ ΑΛΛΗΛΕΓΓΥΗΣ
Social Polices and Social Welfare Administration
October 2012 Brussels, Belgium
Centar for social research „Global Analytics“
Centar for social research „Global Analytics“
Accompanied Refugee Children
The County Administrative Boards of Sweden
TWO EVALUATIONS IN SLOVENIA,
Elisa Trossero, Head, Anti-Trafficking Programme, ICMPD
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO ADVOCACY
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
The Health Information Research Infrastructure
“Regional Mechanism for the Comprehensive Protection of Migrant and Refugee Boys, Girls and Adolescents” Guatemala, June 2014.
Actions of the International Committee of the Red Cross to Address
Costa Rica.
The experiences of Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia with the screening for Chapter 18 - Statistics PGSC, Kruševo October 2018.
Presentation transcript:

PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT ‘IN WHOSE BEST INTEREST? EXPLORING UNACCOMPANIED MINORS’ RIGHTS THROUGH THE LENS OF MIGRATION AND ASYLUM PROCESSES’ AND COMPARATIVE RESULTS Mateja SEDMAK UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA, Science and Research Centre ) Conference is organised in the scope of the “In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures (MinAs)” research project, co-funded by the PPUAM 2013 of the European Union. International conference CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE ON THE MOVE: TOWARDS A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THEIR BEST INTERESTS November 2015 Portorož, Slovenia

PROJECT  Project: „In Whose Best Interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Processes (MinAs)“  (Financed: EU, PPUAM)  Consortium: *University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre (project leader), Slovenia *University of Vienna, Austria *University of Brighton, United Kingdom *The National Center For Scientific Research, France *Slovenian Philanthropy *Social Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia (evaluator) In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

GENERAL OBJECTIVES  to deal with the conceptual aspect of the best interest of the child including analysis of legal, non-governmental, political, social aspects and unaccompanied minors’ views  to identify practical dimensions of best interest of the child (BIC) and best interest determination procedures (BID) regarding reception, asylum procedures, protection measures and return of unaccompanied minor migrants  to deliver the project results to policy makers, professionals working with UAM and general public In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

OUTPUTS  National and Comparative State of the Art  National and Comparative analysis of the field work research  Web page  Final conference  Book, University Press Annales  Book, Routledge  Scientific, professional and journal articles  Presentations on international and national conferences  Articles in newspapers and magazines In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

RESEARCH PROCESS 1. National/Comparative State of the art (terminology, definition, analysis of legislation and rights, entitlements of asylum seekers, best practices) 2. Field research: - interviews with experts (governmental and NGOs etc.) - Interviews with UAMs and former UAMs (interviews: recorded and transcribed; information sheet and consent form, anonymity) In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

FINDINGS Some common crucial findings:  In all four states there is no formal process for determination of best interest of the child. 1) the concept of the best interest determination is very vague and therefore left to different interpretations of various expert 2) its implementation depends upon individual actors involved in the procedure of caring for UAMs and meeting their needs (social workers, legal representatives, guardians, employees in different facilities, police officers, etc.). In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

 The main obstacles for the implementation of the best interest determination in practice are following: 1) long asylum procedures, 2) unequal distribution of resources, 3) unequal treatment of UAMs, 4) insufficient accommodation capacities 5) dispersion of powers among all involved actors… The best interest determination principle, as it is currently practiced, is rather „informal and flexible“. In order for this procedure to become successful in practice, the best interest determination principle needs to be incorporated into the relevant legal acts as a part of the asylum procedure AND it needs to be defined in a better and unambiguous way. In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE?  Introduction of responsive support system for UAMs which does not depends on self initiative engagement of individuals (experts and support staff).  Treatment of UAMs as individuals in vulnerable position.  Equal treatment of UAMs and minors citizens.  Improvement of information exchange between individuals and institutions involved during all phases of the process before the submission of application for international protection.  Appropriate procedure duration.  Development of suitable accommodation facilities which would meet all the basic needs of the UAMs. In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

 Permanent education process of professionals involved in all procedures regarding UAMs.  Development of efficient support integration process of UAMs into host societies.  Support for best practices. ALSO COUNTRY SPECIFICS! Discrepancy: existent legislation/guidelines/instructions AND implementation in practice In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures

„I think that if everyone gave a little thought, “what if that was my child”, they would probably take a different approach.“ (Representative of the Ministry for interior, Slovenia) In whose best interest? Exploring Unaccompanied Minors’ Rights Through the Lens of Migration and Asylum Procedures