Discussion of Clean Air Act Authorities and GHGs Bill Harnett WESTAR April 3,2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Advertisements

Copyright Holland & Hart LLP All Rights Reserved. The Deseret Power Case and Implications for CO2 Regulation Under the Clean Air Act Presented by.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United.
Update on CAAAC Workgroup, EPA Guidance, and Possible Future EPA GHG Regulations.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting 2008 Steve Page, Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Office.
CMI 9 th Annual Meeting: US Refining Outlook & Climate Policy Implications Jim Keating – BP America, R< February 9 th, 2010.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
1 CE Air Pollution Control Regulations and Philosophies Jeff Kuo, Ph.D., P.E.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
The Impact of Greenhouse Gas Regulation on Energy Production: Legal Framework for Greenhouse Gases Standards for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
EPA CLIMATE CHANGE ANPR: WHAT IT MEANS FOR STATIONARY SOURCES Peter Glaser U.S. Chamber of Commerce Washington, D.C. October 30, 2008.
UTILITY NSR REFORM TIMEFRAMES EARLY 90’SBEGIN CAAA IMPLEMENTATION MID 90’SNSR REFORM DEVELOPMENT - S/A Principles - EPA Proposals.
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
John A. Paul RAPCA. Background  Supreme Court Decision  Endangerment Finding  Johnson Memorandum  Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Rule  Tailoring.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear Skies Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear.
The Clean Air Act. Overview of the Clean Air Act tool kit: multiple strategies cathedral: not put together at one time.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
REGULATIONS & LEGISLATION BIG TEN ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GROUP STEVE MARUSZEWSKI – PENN STATE Greenhouse Gases.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Update on EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rulemakings Norman W. Fichthorn Hunton & Williams LLP 2010 American Public Power Association Energy and Air Quality Task.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Intersection of Climate Law, Policy & Science Margaret Claiborne Campbell Troutman Sanders LLP November 16, 2015.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
New Source As defined in the CAA, construction of a new source, or modification of an existing source, that will produce a significant increase in emissions.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Clean Air Act Litigation Update State Air Director Meeting May 2015
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Bill Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 8, 2009
Greenhouse Gas Permitting: One Year After the Tailoring Rule
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
GHG Permitting: Regulatory Update
Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Presentation transcript:

Discussion of Clean Air Act Authorities and GHGs Bill Harnett WESTAR April 3,2008

2 Outline of Discussion What are sources of GHGs? –GHG emissions from U.S. sectors –CO2 emissions from electricity generation –Key industrial sources associated with GHG emissions Issues and authorities –Key Elements and Issues before EPA i. Title II ii. Ongoing stationary source rulemakings/litigation: boiler NSPS, refinery NSPS, cement kiln NSPS iii. Permitting actions –Clean Air Act (CAA) Authorities to regulate emissions from stationary sources i. Section 108 ii. Section 111 iii. Section 112 iv. Others –Implications of CAA regulations for PSD Legislation Conclusions NOTE: The purpose of this document is to stimulate discussion among the CAAAC. The Administrator is still developing an overall strategy and has made no decisions regarding the direction of the Agency.

3 GHG Emissions by Economic Sector Electricity generation accounted for the largest portion of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions Transportation activities accounted for the second largest portion and Industry comprised the third largest portion of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions Source: EPA - Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

4 CO 2 Emissions from Electricity Generation Source: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: (EPA, 2007). Electricity generation is the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions = 2,381 Million Metric tons (MMT) CO 2 in 2005 Coal = 1,958 MMT CO 2 Natural gas = 320 MMT CO 2 Petroleum = 102 MMT CO2 1,700 power plants (emitting >10,000 tons) 1,209 power plants in the Acid Rain Program

5 Key Industrial Sources Source: Based on EIA Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey and EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks Percentages reflect contribution to GHG emissions

6 Key Elements and Issues Massachusetts vs. EPA Energy Independence and Security Act Upcoming Stationary Source actions –NSPS for Petroleum Refineries (Subpart J) – Consent decree deadline for final rule is April 30, 2008) Environmental commenters argue EPA is legally compelled to regulate GHGs in refinery NSPS –NSPS for Utility Boilers – Remanded Issue of regulating CO2 from power plants via section 111 back before the Agency –NSPS for Portland Cement Mfr – Consent decree deadline for NPRM deadline of May 2008 Permitting actions for which comments have been received calling for GHG controls –There are several New Source Review permitting actions pending before EPA (or its delegated States) for which comments have been received calling for GHG controls and/or raising other GHG related issues. –EPA (and a delegated State) have also issued three permits for which GHG-related comments were received during the comment period, and where those issues are part of a permit appeal: Christian County Generation Power – Issued by IL 6/5/07; EAB denied appeal 1/29/08 Deseret Bonanza (UT) – Issued by EPA 8/30/07 Conoco Phillips (IL) – Appealed to EAB 8/07

7 Clean Air Act Authorities Section 108 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Section 111 New Source Performance Standards Section 112 Hazardous Air Pollutants (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) Section 115 International Air Pollution Section 615 Stratospheric Ozone Protection

8 Section 108 – National Ambient Air Quality Standards Steps: –List pollutant if: Emissions cause or contribute to air pollution that is reasonably anticipated to endanger public health or welfare Emitted by numerous or diverse stationary or mobile sources EPA plans to issue air quality criteria –Establish air quality criteria (through criteria document) –Promulgate primary and secondary NAAQS Challenges: –What is the pollutant of concern? –What is the scientific information on effects on human health or welfare in the U.S.?

9 NAAQS Implementation Implementation Issues –Depending on level of standard, entire country would either be in attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable Attainment designation required within 2-3 years depending on available information –If country is in attainment or unclassifiable (Primary NAAQS): States submit SIPs to implement PSD, conduct monitoring, set limits for existing sources, and require Title V permits –If country is in nonattainment (Primary NAAQS): States must submit transport SIP within 3 years of promulgation of a NAAQS and nonattainment area SIP within 3 years and attain within 10 years of designation –If country is in nonattainment (Secondary NAAQS): Implemented in similar manner as primary NAAQS except there is no maximum attainment date – attainment required “as expeditiously as practicable” Cost may be considered in establishing implementation requirements and schedules for compliance Challenges: –How to attain within statutory timeframes, especially given relative contributions from domestic and foreign emissions? –What resources are needed or not needed for state/local infrastructure issues?

10 Section 111 New Source Performance Standards EPA must list categories of stationary sources which “cause or contribute significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” Standards must reflect “the degree of emission limitation achievable through the application of the best system of emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated.” Standards are to be reviewed at least every 8 years and revised “if appropriate.”

11 Features of Sec. 111 EPA may distinguish among classes, types, and sizes of new sources in setting standards (e.g., utility boilers v. industrial boilers based on heat input) While standards are based on demonstrated controls, EPA generally may not require use of any particular technology. Where pollutants regulated under NSPS are not regulated as criteria or hazardous air pollutants, States must submit plans, in accordance with regulations to be prescribed by EPA, setting standards for existing sources within the category for which NSPS are established Under certain circumstances, in regulating existing sources, States may consider remaining useful life of sources to set requirements

12 Section 112 Hazardous Air Pollutants EPA must list pollutants that present a threat of adverse health effects through inhalation or other routes of exposure, or which cause significant degradation of environmental quality over broad areas EPA must list “all categories and subcategories of major sources” of listed pollutants and certain categories of area sources –Major sources emit 10 tpy or more of any one pollutant or 25 tons of all listed pollutants in the aggregate Regulations for existing major sources must require a level of control of all emitted pollutants that is at least equivalent to what is achieved by the best-performing 12% of sources within the category or subcategory. –Called the MACT “floor” –May regulate more strictly than the floor where justified –Less stringent regulation of area sources possible Regulations for new major sources set the MACT floor based on the best performing similar source

13 Features of Section 112 EPA may distinguish among classes, types and sizes of sources when setting standards, but may not exempt sources Degree of emission limitation is based not on demonstrated technologies, but on what is achieved in practice for whatever reasons –Can result from use of cleaner feedstocks or other local or non- technological factors –Recent case law restricts flexibility with regard to stringency of controls States may, but are not required to, establish their own programs that are no less stringent than EPA standards Standards for existing sources may be less stringent than for new sources, but may not be less stringent than the “floor.”

14 Other Authorities Section 115 International air pollution –EPA is authorized to require States to revise plans to address endangerment of public health or welfare in other countries caused by transported air pollution, but only if it finds that the same rights are granted to the U.S. by the country(s) affected Section 615 Stratospheric Ozone Protection –EPA must regulate “substances, practices, processes, or activities” which it finds may reasonably be anticipated to affect the stratosphere in ways that endanger public health or welfare –Provides broad grant of authority; lack of specific actions or limitations implies significant discretion regarding “practices, processes, or activities”

15 Implications of Regulations on other Clean Air Act Programs Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program –Preconstruction permitting program –Applies to new “Major Sources”: major sources are defined under Sec. 169 as sources that emit one regulated air pollutant greater than or equal to a threshold of: 100 tons per year (tpy), if part of the 28 listed source categories listed in the Clean Air Act. 250 tpy for all other sources not part of the 28 listed source categories. –Applies to changes at existing major sources which result in a “significant” increase in emissions of a regulated NSR pollutant and changes at minor sources that exceed the major source threshold major source thresholds and significance levels are measured on a pollutant-specific basis. –Requires Best Available Control Technology (BACT)

16 Administrator’s Letter of March 27,2008 Concluded that the option of soliciting public input through an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) as the Agency considers the specific effects of climate change and potential regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary and mobile sources is the best approach In the advance notice EPA will present and request comment on the best available science including specific and quantifiable effects of greenhouse gases relevant to making an endangerment finding and the implications of this finding with regard to the regulation of both mobile and stationary sources. ANPR will be issued this spring.

17 Pending Legislation on GHGs Lieberman-Warner (S.2191)Carper, Gregg, Dodd et al. (S.1177) Scope  Economy-wide (87% U.S. emissions)  ~2,000 Facilities  Oil and Gas producers hold allowances for the emissions that result from the fuel they sell once that fuel is combusted (Upstream)  Facilities hold allowances for the emissions that result from the coal they combust (Downstream)  PFC and SF6 producers hold allowances for the emissions that result from the chemical they sell once that chemical is emitted (Upstream)  HFCs in a separate cap  Power Sector  Covers SO2, NOx, HG, and CO2 Timing  Jan 2009: Mandatory Reporting  Jan 2012: Compliance Begins  Jan 2012 Compliance begins Approach  Cap on emissions from covered facilities  Covered facilities hold allowances for their emissions  Allowances can be traded, banked, borrowed  Offsets (GHG reduction projects outside the cap) can be used for compliance Allocation of allowances based on updating electricity output to all generators Banking allowed Allowances may be used in other CO2 trading programs approved by EPA Offsets can be used for compliance