Flux Emergence Rate in Coronal Holes and in Adjacent Quiet-sun Regions Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Lennard Fisk Lennard Fisk University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uncovering the Global Slow Solar Wind Liang Zhao and Thomas H. Zurbuchen Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
SH13A-2240 Automatic Detection of EUV Coronal Loops from SDO-AIA Data Alissa N. Oppenheimer¹ ( ), A. Winebarger², S. Farid³,
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
East-West Asymmetry of the Yohkoh Soft X-ray Corona L.W. Acton 1, D.E. McKenzie 1, A. Takeda 1, B.T. Welsch 2,and H.S. Hudson 2,3 1 Montana State University,
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Do active Regions Emerge in a Similar Regime? Valentyna Abramenko Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Big Bear Solar Observatory California,
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Magnetic fields in the photosphere and heliosphere: structure, statistical parameters, turbulent state Valentyna I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Connections Between the Magnetic Carpet and the Unbalanced Corona: New Monte Carlo Models Steven R. Cranmer & Adriaan van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
Valentina Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT Multi-fractality of Solar Magnetic Fields: New Progress with HMI Abstract. The SDO/HMI instrument.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Statistical Distributions of Speeds of Coronal Mass Ejections 1 Big Bear Solar Obs, Big Bear, CA 92314; 2 Catholic University of America, Washington DC.
Spatially Dependent Emergence Rate V. Abramenko. Outlook Compare results from the paper by Abramenko, Fisk, Yurchyshyn ApJ 641 (hereafter AFY) with that.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Distribution of the magnetic flux in elements of the magnetic field in an active region Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Calculation of Intermittency in the Photosphere and Corona from Hinode Data Valentina I. Abramenko And Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory of.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Magnetic Field and Heating of the Corona Valentyna Abramenko and Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.
Pre-Flare Changes in Current Helicity and Turbulent Regime of the Photospheric Magnetic Field V.I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory,NJIT Crimean Astrophysical.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Valentina Abramenko 1 Gary Zank 2 Alexander Dosch 2 Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear solar Observatory of NJIT, CA 2 – CSPAR, Univ. of Alabama in Nuntsville,
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
Analysis of Coronal Heating in Active Region Loops from Spatially Resolved TR emission Andrzej Fludra STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1.
Seething Horizontal Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Solar Photosphere J. Harvey, D. Branston, C. Henney, C. Keller, SOLIS and GONG Teams.
Observational Criteria for Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamo in the Solar Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Philip Goode, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Kwangsu Ahn Big Bear.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Semi-Empirical MHD Modeling of the Solar Wind Igor V. Sokolov, Ofer Cohen, Tamas I. Gombosi CSEM, University of Michigan Ilia I Roussev, Institute for.
Signatures of Intermittent Turbulence in Hinode Quiet Sun Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Big Bear Solar Observatory, USA, Plasma.
Big Bear Solar Observatory. New View on Quiet Sun Photospheric Dynamics Offered by NST Data Big Bear Solar Observatory Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 2: Corona & Heliophere.
NoRH Observations of RHESSI Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD E.J.Schmahl, Dept. of Astronomy, University.
1 Abramenko V.I., 1 Yurchyshyn, V., 2 Linker, J., 2 Mikic, Z. 1 - Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT; 2 – Predictive Science Inc., San Diego Anomalous.
Valentina Abramenko 1, Vasyl Yurchyshyn 1, Philip R. Goode 1, Vincenzo Carbone 2, Robert Stein Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT, USA; 2 – Univ.
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Karen Meyer University of St Andrews Scotland 1 st year PhD student (3 months in)
Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Philip R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT SH31C-18 06: Size and Lifetime Distributions of Bright Points.
Direct Spatial Association of an X-Ray Flare with the Eruption of a Solar Quiescent Filament Gordon D. Holman and Adi Foord (2015) Solar Seminar on July.
New Insights into the Sun’s Photosphere Dynamics Offered by New Solar Telescope of BBSO Big Bear Solar Observatory Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Sunspot activity and reversal of polar fields in the current cycle 24 A.V. Mordvinov 1, A.A. Pevtsov 2 1 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of SB RAS,
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
STOCHASTIC COUPLING OF SOLAR PHOTOSPHERE AND CORONA (Astrophysical J
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Carrington Rotation 2106 – Close-up of AR Mr 2106 Bt 2106
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
Studying Transition Region Phenomena with Solar-B/EIS
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Emerging Active Regions: turbulent state in the photosphere
Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT
Valentina Abramenko and Kwangsu Ahn
Presentation transcript:

Flux Emergence Rate in Coronal Holes and in Adjacent Quiet-sun Regions Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Lennard Fisk Lennard Fisk University of Michigan Vasyl Yurchyshyn Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory

Abstract Coronal holes are regions where the open magnetic flux of the Sun, the component that forms the heliospheric magnetic field, is concentrated. We determined that the rate of emergence of new We determined that the rate of emergence of new magnetic dipoles is systematically lower, by a factor of about 2, in coronal holes relative to the surrounding quiet Sun. This result is consistent with a prediction in a recent This result is consistent with a prediction in a recent model (Fisk 2005), which demonstrated that open flux tends to accumulate in regions where the rate of emergence of new magnetic flux is a local minimum. 1

QS Abramenko, Fisk, Yurchyshyn 2006 (ApJ 641,L65) 2 From EIT images we determine a boundary of a coronal hole (CH), then we project the boundary onto a full disk MDI magnetogram. For each pair of CH and Quiet Sun (QS) area, we used the same set of HR/MDI magnetograms so that, in QS and in CHs, the newly emerged dipoles had an equal opportunity to be detected. Our main goal was to study whether there exists a difference between CHs and QS in the rate of emergence of magnetic dipoles. CH

A number of dipoles that emerged during 24 hours inside an area of 200 x 200 Mm during 24 hours inside an area of 200 x 200 Mm is taken as the Dipole Emergence Rate: m = Number of dipoles Area · Time Interval 3 By comparing subsequent magnetograms we detected newly emerged dipoles. An example is shown here:

bisector m(CH) m(QS) N=34 m(CH) – the dipole emergence rate in Coronal Holes; m(QS) – the dipole emergence rate in Quiet Sun We thus obtained 34 values of the dipole emergence rate inside CHs, and, for each CH, we obtained the dipole emergence rate inside the adjacent QS area. The scattering is large, however, in all of the cases, the dipole emerging rate for CHs (m(CH)) is lower than that (m(QS)) for QS : all data points are above the bisector. 4

5 Distribution of the dipole emergence rate The peak of distribution for CHs is located at the significantly lower magnitudes than the peak for QS areas. We observe the difference of approximately two times between CHs and QS areas.

There could be concern, of course, that our low cadence might influence our conclusions To evaluate this possibility, we analyzed one pair a CH and QS observed with 5 min time cadence during 10 hours. We show here a fragment of the entire magnetogram. An area above the line is predominantly a QS, whereas the CH is below the red line (a movie is available). The dipole emergence rates became higher than those derived from our usual routine. However, the ratio did not change significantly: again we observed more dipoles emerged in QS than in the CH on an area of the same size. Therefore, our choice of time cadence does not significantly affect the conclusion that the dipole emergence rate is lower in CHs. CH QS High cadence: m(QS) m(CH) = 3.6 m(QS) m(CH) = 4.4 Low cadence: High cadence data 6

Conclusions 7 An analysis of 34 pairs of coronal holes and quiet sun areas showed that, on average, the dipole emergence rate in QS areas exceeds twice that in CHs. This implies that a coronal hole is a region with a local minimum in the rate emerging dipoles. This result is consistent with the prediction of Fisk (2005), who argues that open field lines are transported by both - (1) random convective motions and - (2) reconnection with coronal loops, and subsequent random displacement. (1) (2)

The observational evidence presented here supports the concept that reconnection of open field lines with coronal loops is an important transport mechanism on the Sun and needs to be included in models for the evolution of the solar magnetic field. In this model, the transport of open flux is coupled to the properties of the loops, which it turn are dependent on the rate of emergence of new magnetic flux. In regions where the rate of emergence of new flux is a local minimum, open flux will accumulate and form coronal holes 8

This research was conducted as a part of the Targeted Research and Technology (TR&T) program of the NASA LWS program in the framework of the activity of the Heliospheric Focus Team led by T. Zurbuchen. References: Abramenko, V.I., Fisk, L.A., Yurchyshyn, V.B. 2006, Astrophys J 641, L65. Fisk, L.A. 1996, J.Geophys.Res. 101, Fisk, L.A. 2001, J.Geophys.Res. 106, Fisk, L.A. 2005, Astrophys.J., 626, 563 Fisk, L.A., & Schwanron, N.A., 2001, Astrophys. J, 560, 425 Fisk, L.A., Zurbuchen, T.H., & Schwanron, N.A, 1999, Astrophys.J., 521, 868 Hagenaar, H.J. 2001, Astrophys.J., 555, 448 9