Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 1 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT TRB Presentation on SCOOT January 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch. 12 Routing in Switched Networks
Advertisements

Travel Time Estimation on Arterial Streets By Heng Wang, Transportation Analyst Houston-Galveston Area Council Dr. Antoine G Hobeika, Professor Virginia.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
ACS-Lite Offset Tuning Algorithm. Collect data from advance detectors on coordinated approaches Develop a Statistical Flow Profile correlated to the phase.
ACS-Lite Split Tuning Algorithm. Collect data Correlate data to signal phasing Perform analysis Implement phase split adjustments.
Peek – ACS Lite Deployment Quixote Traffic Corporation Peter Ragsdale August 17, 2006.
Siemens – Local Controller Software with Adaptive Control
Traffic Controller Methodologies NEMA-based vs. Interval-based
1 Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE County Traffic Engineer Seminole County Florida 10/18/11.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
CEE 764 – Fall 2010 Topic 7 Special Issues on Signal Coordination.
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date SCOOT MMX (Multi-Modal 2010) Presented by Alan Stevens TRL.
Company confidential Prepared by HERE Transit Sr. Product Manager, HERE Transit Product Overview David Volpe.
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
Progressive Signal Systems. Coordinated Systems Two or more intersections Signals have a fixed time relationship to one another Progression can be achieved.
EE 4272Spring, 2003 Chapter 10 Packet Switching Packet Switching Principles  Switching Techniques  Packet Size  Comparison of Circuit Switching & Packet.
AQM for Congestion Control1 A Study of Active Queue Management for Congestion Control Victor Firoiu Marty Borden.
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
Lec 15, Ch.8, pp : Signal Timing (Objective)
Introduction to Transport
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker Paramics User Group Meeting February.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Ns Simulation Final presentation Stella Pantofel Igor Berman Michael Halperin
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Lecture 2 Basics of Traffic Control Signals Any power-operated traffic control device other than a barricade warning light or steady burning electric lamp,
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
Design of Cooperative Vehicle Safety Systems Based on Tight Coupling of Communication, Computing and Physical Vehicle Dynamics Yaser P. Fallah, ChingLing.
Transportation Engineering
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
SCATS Adaptive Traffic System
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Toronto: Gardiner Expressway Study Paramics 2009 UGM: Newark October 5, 2009.
Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.
Tuen Mun – Yuen Long LRT Traffic Control System 20 th April 2007 Prepared by Michael Chiu P26180/PS/PS PPT/LLH/13APR05.
ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY MODEL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS 1 December 20, 2012.
Chapter 11 – Neural Networks COMP 540 4/17/2007 Derek Singer.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
ACN: RED paper1 Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance Sally Floyd and Van Jacobson, IEEE Transactions on Networking, Vol.1, No. 4, (Aug.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
Session 2 Equipment Requirements for Adaptive Traffic Control SCOOT Axel Reissnecker, EAGLE Traffic Control Systems, Austin, TX TRB Workshop on Adaptive.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
SYSTEM-OF-SYSTEMS THAT ACT LOCALLY FOR OPTIMIZING GLOBALLY EU FP7 - SMALL/MEDIUM-SCALE FOCUSED RESEARCH PROJECT (STREP) FP7-ICT : ADVANCED COMPUTING,
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Stochastic Optimization Method for Coordinated Actuated Traffic Control May 16, 2008 Joyoung Lee and Byungkyu “Brian” Park, Ph.D Presented at VISSIM UGM.
Bernhard Friedrich Hanover, May 2001 Strategic Control in Metropolitan Areas Bernhard Friedrich Institute of Transport Engineering and Planning Hanover.
RHODES Gardner Systems RHODES: Fundamental Principles Larry Head, Gardner Systems Pitu Mirchandani, University of Arizona TRB Annual Meeting 2000 Workshop.
1 RANKING OF FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS/ TOPIC AREAS FOR NEEDED RESEARCH BY THE TRB TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE JULY 21, 2002 MID-YEAR MEETING IN SALT.
CEE 764 – Fall 2010 Topic 6 Delay and Offset Delay and Offset.
Smart Information for a Sustainable World True Adaptive Signal Control A Comparison of Alternatives Technical Paper # Presentation to the 18 th World.
Accessing and Integrating CV and AV Sensor Data into Traffic Engineering Practice Dr. Jonathan Corey ITITS 2015 December 12, 2015 Chang’an, China.
Mission Street Project Update Voyage 2070 Advance Operation Systems Using ASTRO Proactive Plan Selection Average and Split Variant operations Prepared.
Mission Street Voyage Advanced Features Test Facility Mission street is a major arterial corridor that was re-timed 10 years prior to our project. Our.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
GREEN WAVE TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
* Topic 7 Field Operations
School of Civil Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 1 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT TRB Presentation on SCOOT January 2000

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 2 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT Version 4.2 MethodMethod ALTERATIONS TO: - SPLITS - OFFSETS - CYCLE TIME FREQUENT, SMALL STOPS & DELAYS SCOOT stands for:- The most effective traffic adaptive control system in the world today. PLIT S YCLE C FFSET O O PTIMIZATION T ECHNIQUE

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 3 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: System Architecture Second by second system, with timing algorithms in central processor Local controller deals with clearance and minimums Local vehicle actuation determined by traffic engineering priorities Heirarchical transmission system with flexibility to suit local traffic control needs

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 4 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT Principles Detector processing Cyclic flow profiles Traffic model Optimisers

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 5 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT - Schematic Overview Phases Flow Demand Profiles Queues Split & Offset Optimizer Traffic Engineer Preferences & Observations Weights & Bias Cycle Optimiser Close Settings All Possible Settings Current SCOOT Timings Translation Array

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 6 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT Systems around the World Toronto Cyprus Madrid London Anaheim Santiago Sao Paulo Bahrain Hong Kong Dalian Durban Port Elizabeth Dubai Arlington County County 101 Systems Worldwide Minneapolis Oxnard San Diego Red Deer Halifax Cape Town Bangkok Chiang Mai Beijing Orlando

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 7 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT - Where will it work? SCOOT works on both Arterial Streets and Grid Networks –Arterial streets - examples »Toronto - Lake Shore Boulevard »London - Cromwell Road »Oxnard, Ca »Sao Paulo - Rio Branco –Networks - examples »Toronto - CBD »Dubai »London - West End »Madrid - Central area SCOOT works on networks from 1000 –Cambridge (UK) - 9 nodes initially –Sao Paulo (Brazil) >1000 nodes

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 8 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Data Requirements Detection on every link for which full optimization required Detectors generally located at upstream end of link Connection to central computer achieved via upstream intersection Links with no detection run fixed length or can have data derived from upstream links –Fixed length phases can be varied by time of day

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 9 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Positioning SCOOT detector loops

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 10 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Communication Dedicated multi-drop transmission lines to outstations Second by second communications to and from outstation Typically six to eight intersections / 1200 Baud

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 11 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Control Variables modelling uses measured vehicle demand (occupancy) and calculated queue length optimization uses demand (flow profiles) and calculated delay/saturation approach is to make small, regular changes to timings to minimize transients seven primary validation parameters (to correlate internal traffic model with the real world) dozens of parameters to allow the traffic engineer to tune system performance –a full library of default values is provided –these are changeable by time-of-day, or manually

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 12 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Data Sampling, Filtering and Smoothing Detection based on vehicle occupancy Detector is typically a loop, with length 2m in direction of travel Sampling rate is 0.25s Algorithm processes raw data into LPUs based on linear discounting Demand profile for each link is built up in four second increments Controller phase replies used to enhance modelling

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 13 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Generation of SCOOT Demand Profile Stopline Demand Cyclic Flow at the Detector Journey Time Dispersion Model

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 14 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Red timeGreen time Time now Flo w Rat e Stop Line Saturation flow rate Flow adds to back of queue Time ‘now’ Modelled queue at time’now’ ACTUAL QUEUE Cruise speed Cyclic Flow Profile Queue Model

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 15 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: (seconds) OptimizerFrequency SplitEvery stage change -4, 0, +4 (Temporary) Offset Once per cycle -4, 0, +4 Cycle Time Every 2.5 or 5 mins Change Time -1, 0, +1 (Permanent) -4, 0, +4 (32 to 64) -8, 0, +8 (64 to 128) -16, 0, +16 (128 to 240) The Optimisers

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 16 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SPLIT Optimizer Aim –Equalise saturation + congestion –Considering one stage at a time Method –All upstream and filter links at a node –Link merit values for advance, stay and retard –Move stage change time by -4, 0, +4 –Revert to permanent change of -1, 0,+1 –(Standard values for adjustment quoted - may be varied by the user)

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 17 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SPLIT Optimizer Frequency –Once per stage change –5 seconds before stage change time Constraints –Minimum and maximum stage lengths –Fixed length stages –Split weighting Feedback –Adjust optimiser for stages which do not appear

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 18 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: OFFSET Optimizer Aim –Minimise delay and stops + congestion –Considering one node at a time Method –Each upstream and downstream normal link –Link performance index for advance, stay and retard –Minimise sum of PI’s for all the links –Move stage change time by -4, 0, +4

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 19 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: OFFSET Optimizer Frequency –Once per region cycle time –During nominated stage Constraints –Offset weighting –Fixed and biased offsets Feedback –No account of stage demands

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 20 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: CYCLE Optimizer Aim –Minimise delay –Considering one region at a time Method –Minimum practical cycle time for each node at 90% normal saturation or 80% target saturation –Consider range from maximum MPCY to maximum region cycle time –Consider double cycling if possible –No preset critical node

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 21 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: CYCLE Optimizer Frequency –Usually every 5 minutes –Every 2.5 minutes when cycle rising –Every 2.5 minutes when cycle is falling (if required) Constraints –Maximum region cycle time –MPCY’s of nodes –Minimum node cycle time –Forced single cycle or forced double cycle (if possible) Feedback –Stage demands taken into account

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 22 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT stages - Method A 1 | | 3 | | Phasing Flexibility - SCOOT to Dual Ring NEMA Controller translation SCOOT stages - Method B

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 23 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Measures of effectiveness Optimization targetted in general at minimising delay –User specifies relative importance of stops and delay Split at a node balances degree of saturation on adjacent links –subject to weighting parameters from the local traffic engineer Offset determined by node performance index –choose best offset to minimise stops and delays on all adjacent links Cycle time maintains all links at no more than 90% saturation

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 24 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: MOE’s Data from SCOOT to demonstrate how it is achieving the above targets? “Event Driven messages” from SCOOT M02 / M03 / M04 »02 = link »03 = node »04 = region –Stops ( vehicle.stops / hour ) –Delay ( vehicle.hour / hour ) –Flow ( vehicle / hour ) –Congestion ( intervals / hour ) All this data can be processed by ASTRID

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 25 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: ASTRID Database

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 26 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Transit Priority Transit priority is a standard feature within SCOOT V3.1 Dealt with by optimizing the priority provision –Extensions to running stage –Recall on minima via normal stage sequence to bus stage –Recovery to previous offset as quickly as possible –AVL and loop detection

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 27 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Fire Priority Fire priority is a standard feature within the SCOOT system Optimization suspended during absolute priority, but modelling continues –Fast recovery to normal conditions at end of priority period V4.2 has recovery algorithms (not the same as bus priority)

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 28 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Special Features for Oversaturated Conditions Congestion importance factors / congestion offset per link Congestion links with congestion importance factors Gating Variable Node Based Target Saturation for cycle time optimisation

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 29 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Congestion Importance Factors / Congestion Offset Congestion Importance Factor is specified for each link –Used to influence Split calculations in favour of the link, when congestion is detected Congestion Offset is a fixed offset, specified by the Traffic Engineer, to be used in congested conditions –Congestion Weighting Factor allows the engineer to specify the importance of achieving the Congestion Offset

Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 30 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: Other Features SOFT (on-line calibration of sat. flow) Use of alternative existing detection (although some reduced efficiency results) Variable authorities (i.e. variable bounds on optimiser decisions) Flared approaches (V4.2)