Directly Influencing Teaching in the Classroom: A Systemic Approach Karen D. Hager ABAI, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Supporting the Instructional Process Instructional Assistant Training.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
RACHEL HANSEN How Can Special Educators Best Support Response To Intervention Practices within the General Educational Setting?
Elevator Speech What do you need to share with …..?
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
Lions Quest Europa Forum Istanbul Michael Di Maria Educational Programs Specialist Lions Quest Introduction and Overview.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Aligning Observations and In-service Professional Development Prek-3 rd Jason Downer May 9, 2012.
Gilbert Primary School A Title One School. Agenda for Evening Introductions Administrators Teachers Ways to help at home Title 1 Information Time in Classrooms.
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Effective Teachers of literacy use:
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
School Governance for Parents: SSC Fundamentals An Introduction to the School Site Council (SSC) and Your Role in Developing the Balanced Scorecard.
Welcome to Glover Middle School! A Title I Educational Community.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC | T | F | dcps.dc.gov DCPS TLF Group 3 Updated.
Teacher Coaching: The Missing Link in Teacher Professional Development Randy Keyworth The Wing Institute.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Hialeah Gardens Elementary September 8, 2015 Sharon Gonzalez, Principal.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Title I Parent Meeting Boston Sept 1, Agenda 8:15-8:20 Welcome Sign in 8:20-8:25 Ice Breaker 8:25-8:40 Pilot School Innovation Zone 8:40-8:50Title.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
Eighth Annual Summit on Evidence-Based Education Teacher Professional Development.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Key Messages and Implication.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
AEA 267 Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance The KASAB June, 2011 KASAB: Knowledge Attitude Skills Aspiration Behavior.
The Writing Conference Empowering Students for Writing Success.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changing Teaching Behaviors: The Road to Student Achievement Powell et al: Technology as a potentially cost-effective alternative to on-site coaching Research.
How to Effectively Communicate With Families A deeper understanding of component 4c: Communicating with Families.
August 21 st, 2014 Louise Roachford-Gould, Principal Annual Title I Meeting John Reith Elementary School.
Professional Development
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Student ParentsTeacher Principal Resource Teacher Guidance Counsellor Liaison worker Divisional Specialists Health Care SpecialistsHealth Care Specialists.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
Educating the Digital Generation Randy Moczygemba.
Damion Bravo, an ESE teacher, Holds Interest in Various Recreational Activities.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
THE MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY NETWORK FOR EDUCATIONAL RENEWAL School/University Partnership Part Two.
What is Title I? Title I is a federally funded program to help children get a quality education and meet academic standards.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
Kathy Hogan, Ph.D. Early Childhood Advisory April 30, 2015.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Annual Title I Meeting John Reith Elementary School
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
©Joan Sedita, Kinds of PD Follow Up ©Joan Sedita,
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Directly Influencing Teaching in the Classroom: A Systemic Approach Karen D. Hager ABAI, 2013

We Have Data… Jack:  Effective strategies/practices Yet are not implemented in the classroom  Skills/knowledge teachers need to be effective Yet, are not taught in teacher prep programs  E.g., constructivist approaches commonly taught in preservice programs

We Have Data… Ronnie: How to measure  Components of measuring performance and providing feedback  Yet, we fail to effectively measure performance and provide the PD an individual teacher needs, rather we provide the same PD for all teachers in the school or district

We Have Data… Randy: Coaching  Professional development that improves outcomes  Yet, we spend tens of billions on ineffective PD

Where Do We Go From Here? 2 components: preservice and inservice development Funding Responsibility for Implementation Developing a Culture of Coaching

Preservice Preparation Programs Huge variations, many teach ineffective instructional approaches (e.g., whole language/constructivist approach) Philosophical differences seem to override research

Preservice Preparation Programs Few consequences - accreditation not based on:  Use of research-based strategies  Effectiveness of graduates Accountability – may be coming for prep programs  Track effectiveness of teaches and trace back to prep program  This brings us to professional development for inservice teachers

Inservice Professional Development Given that:  We have not been able to ensure critical skills are taught in teacher preparation programs (Jack), and  Even when they are taught in prep programs, they are often not implemented or implemented correctly in the classroom (Ronnie)  We must pay more attention to on-going professional development and feedback for inservice teachers, such as coaching (Randy)

Issues to Resolve Funding Responsibility for Implementation Developing a Culture of Coaching

Issues in PD: Funding Resource intensive Districts are already spending enormous amounts on PD  Much of it on one-day trainings that are not effective at changing teaching behavior  Make districts more accountable for the money spent on PD

Issues in PD: Responsibility Districts, particularly smaller ones, are not likely to have the expertise States could provide training to district administrators/lead teachers  Must free up these individuals to implement IHEs could play a role: follow their graduates into the classroom and provide coaching  In their best interest, with increased accountability  Research opportunity  Service opportunity

Issues: Culture of Coaching Coaching has research base to support it  In general, research has not been successful in affecting change in the field of education Teacher preparation programs are not likely to change anytime soon and embrace more student teacher observation/coaching Schools continue to spend money on ineffective PD Perhaps we need to focus on parents/families

Educating Parents/Families Somehow, we have to better educate parents:  What they should see in their schools  What information (e.g., progress monitoring data) should be sent home and presented at parent-teacher conferences and IEP meetings  What questions they should be asking teachers, principals, superintendents, school board members

Developing a Culture of Coaching Public Service Campaign: A Coach for Every Teacher