Patents I Introduction to Patent Law Class Notes: February 19, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Advertisements

EACCNJ European Union IP Forum Mark DeLuca Pepper Hamilton LLP September 27, 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
Introduction to Copyright Principles © 2005 Patricia L. Bellia. May be reproduced, distributed or adapted for educational purposes only.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 14, 2009 Introduction.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 25, 2008 Patent - Utility.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 12, 2007 Patent - Subject Matter.
Ownership of Computer Software Ethical Questions and Concerns.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 11, 2009 Patent - Subject Matter, Utility.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School August 31, 2004 Introduction.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
March 2001SLIS/L624 – Spring 2001 Patent Information Part I – Patent overview & US Patents Part II – International & Trademarks.
INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Professor Fischer Class 1: Introduction August 20, 2009.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
A View from Both Worlds: USPTO and the Federal Labs Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
Federal Civil Practice Seminar Case Study – Multi Jurisdictional Patent Litigation Ronald A. Christaldi October 11,
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
The Patent Document II Class Notes: January 23, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
Introduction to IP Ellen Monson Director Intellectual Property Office University of Cincinnati.
Intellectual Property Part 2: Trademarks, Patents & Piracy Mr. Garfinkel, 2/21/14 An illustration from U.S. patent # 5,375,430, a 'gravity- powered shoe.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Patents III Novelty and Loss of Rights Class 13 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Florida State University College of Law Research Center Research Workshop: Patent Law Research Presented by: Elizabeth Farrell Fall, 2007.
Introduction to Patents Anatomy of a Patent & Procedures for Getting a Patent Margaret Hartnett Commercialisation & IP Manager University.
PatentEng-Berkeley-Lavian Week 1: Introduction to Patent Engineering 1 Patent Engineering IEOR 190G CET: Center for Entrepreneurship &Technology Week 1.
Defenses & Counterclaims II Class Notes: March 25, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Fundamentals of Business Law Summarized Cases, 8 th Ed., and Excerpted Cases, 2 nd Ed. ROGER LeROY MILLER Institute for University Studies Arlington, Texas.
Jump to first page (C) 1998, Arun Lakhotia 1 Intellectual Property Arun Lakhotia University of Southwestern Louisiana Po Box Lafayette, LA 70504,
Patents V Claim Construction Class Notes: March 7, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Indirect Infringement Defenses & Counterclaims Class Notes: March 20, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Intellectual Property & Export Controls Presented by Madelynne Farber, Sandia Vincent Branton, Pacific Northwest Murray Baxter, Savannah River May 26,
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
Federal & State IP Laws The Preemption Doctrine Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
11/18/2015Powell Patent Law Associates, LLC1 PATENT BASICS Marvin J Powell, Esquire
Patent Economics I Class Notes: January 16, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Patents IV Nonobviousness
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Patents Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of Computer.
Data Governance Patents, Security and Privacy Duke University, November 9, 2015 Ryan Vinelli.
1 Some Risks Associated With Research and Development Under Federal Government Contracts Charles R. “Rod” Marvin, Jr., Esq. Venable, LLP Washington, DC.
An Introduction to Intellectual Property & Economics Class Notes: January 15, 2004 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
Intellectual Property Law Introduction Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
IP Basics. What is IP? Right to EXCLUDE others from using IP Intangible assets; right to monetize them Agreement between society and creators; knowledges.
Defenses & Counterclaims III Class Notes: March 27, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Intellectual Property & the Constitution Class 25 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Patents II Disclosure Requirements Class 12 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Introduction to Patent Law Class Notes: January 14, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Intellectual Property & the Constitution I Structural Limitations Class Notes: April 11, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Interference-in-fact The Boston Scientific v. Cordis’ Claim Construction Order mentions an interference-in-fact.Claim Construction Order An Interference-in-fact.
Patent Venue February 2017 By: Patrice Jean.
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
Efficient and Balanced European Patent System Comments from U. S
Loss of Right Provisions
Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003
An Introduction to Intellectual Property & Economics
Patents IV Nonobviousness
Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003
Patents II Disclosure Requirements
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Patents I Introduction to Patent Law Class Notes: February 19, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner

2/19/032Law 507 | Spring 2003 Today’s Agenda 1.Introduction to Patent Law a)Brief History b)The Structure of the US Patent System What is a patent? The patent prosecution process Patent litigation & the federal circuit c)Theories of Patent Law

2/19/033Law 507 | Spring 2003 History of the US Patent System Article I, § 8, cl. 8: [to] promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. Patent Statute: 35 U.S.C. et seq. Since 1790 Most recently re-enacted in 1952 (“The ‘52 Act”)

2/19/034Law 507 | Spring 2003 The Structure of a US Patent US Patent No. 6,203,230 1.Specification a)Front page b)Abstract c)Written Description 1)Description of Technical Field 2)Background of the Invention 3)Summary of the Invention 4)Detailed Description of the Invention 2.Drawings 3.Claims

2/19/035Law 507 | Spring 2003 The Structure of the US Patent System Two Distinct Phases 1.Prosecution Phase (also: Examination) Administrative Agency (USPTO) End: an “Issued Patent” (enables enforcement phase) 2.Enforcement Phase Private actions (civil suits, enforced by patentees) Litigation under federal law oWhere? 28 U.S.C. § 1338; 28 U.S.C. § 1295 Appeals to the the Federal Circuit

2/19/036Law 507 | Spring 2003 The Life of a US Patent

2/19/037Law 507 | Spring 2003 The Requirements for Patentability A valid patent must be... 1.Fully disclosed (§ 112) (Feb. 21) 2.Not subject to a statutory bar (§ 102) (Feb. 26) 3.Novel (§ 102) (Feb. 26) 4.Nonobvious (§ 103) (Feb. 28) Validity analysis: 1.During prosecution phase (by USPTO ‘Examiners’) 2.During enforcement phase - defense to infringement (by Courts) … but, ‘presumption of validity’

2/19/038Law 507 | Spring 2003 Patent Prosecution Basics Key Points about Prosecution 1.Ex parte process 2.Private/secret (for 24 months) 3.Procedures allow “continuing” applications a)Around 90% of all applications eventually result in a patent b)Internal procedural incentives to issue patents 4.Two-stage appeals 1.Board Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) 2.Federal Circuit (also: District DC + Fed. Cir.) 5.Reexamination (ex parte, inter-partes)

2/19/039Law 507 | Spring 2003 The Federal Circuit 1.Mandatory location of all appeals involving cases “arising under” the patent laws. 2.Also, appeals from denials of patent applications by the USPTO. Result: oNationwide jurisdiction oAdministrative oversight Why structure the patent system this way? Will it really reduce forum shopping? Is there some other theory at work? oIf so, what does this imply about the Federal Circuit’s mandate?

2/19/0310Law 507 | Spring 2003 Patent Theories Why do you think the patent law is generally considered the most utilitarian of the IP regimes? If the patent law is all about incentives, then consider what incentives the patent law creates? 1.Invention 2.Disclosure 3.Commercialization 4.Investment in R&D 5.Design-Around What are the costs of granting patents?

2/19/0311Law 507 | Spring 2003 Patent Theories Why not simply subsidize invention/innovation directly? 1.Government-sponsorship of research 2.Cash rewards for inventive activity Won’t these schemes create the same incentives, with less of the costs ?

2/19/0312Law 507 | Spring 2003 Next Class Patents II Disclosure Requirements