Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extraction of G E n at Q 2 =1 (GeV/c) 2 by Measurements of May 1, 2011 Ge Jin University of Virginia.
Advertisements

A Measurement of the Target Single-Spin Asymmetry in Quasi-Elastic 3 He (e, e) Joe Katich for E and the Hall A Collaboration Two-Photon Physics World.
11 Contribution of Two-Photon Exchange with Excitation to ep Scattering Revisited Shin Nan Yang National Taiwan University Contribution of Two-Photon Exchange.
Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
Jefferson Lab/Hampton U
Electromagnetic Form Factors John Arrington Argonne National Lab Long Range Plan QCD Town Meeting Piscataway, NJ, 12 Jan 2007.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Marc Vanderhaeghen Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz Olympus Coll. Meeting, DESY, February 23-24, 2010 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
Two-photon exchange: experimental tests Studying the QED expansion for elastic electron-proton scattering Motivation The Three Experiments Summary With.
Richard MilnerDESY April 6, OLYMPUS Overview Motivation for the experiment Progress to date on the experiment The path forward.
Coulomb distortion in the inelastic regime Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Work done in collaboration with Dave Gaskell (JLab) and John.
LEPTON PAIR PRODUCTION AS A PROBE OF TWO PHOTON EFFECTS IN EXCLUSIVE PHOTON-HADRON SCATTERING Pervez Hoodbhoy Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad.
Electron-nucleon scattering Rutherford scattering: non relativistic  scatters off a nucleus without penetrating in it (no spin involved). Mott scattering:
THE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON THE POLARIZED NUCLEONS AT EIC E.S.Timoshin, S.I.Timoshin.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
From Luigi DiLella, Summer Student Program
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University Taiwan Review of TBE Physics: Odyssey in the Box 15 th Taiwan Nuclear Physics Summer School Iop AS, 06/27/2011.
Spin-Flavor Decomposition J. P. Chen, Jefferson Lab PVSA Workshop, April 26-27, 2007, Brookhaven National Lab  Polarized Inclusive DIS,  u/u and  d/d.
Monday, Jan. 27, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino-Nucleon DIS 2.Formalism of -N DIS.
Spin structure of the nucleon
Lecture 12: The neutron 14/10/ Particle Data Group entry: slightly heavier than the proton by 1.29 MeV (otherwise very similar) electrically.
11 Professor John Alexander Tjon ( 張尊儒 ) in Tarogo Gorge, Taiwan (April, 2006) John has great devotion to science, not for fame/PR, but only for science.
Size and Structure Mikhail Bashkanov University of Edinburgh UK Nuclear Physics Summer School III.
General Discussion some general remarks some questions.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Xiaochao Zheng, International Workshop on Positrons at JLab 1/64 C 3q Measurement Using Polarized e + /e - Beams at JLab – Introduction — Standard Model.
Two-photon Exchange John Arrington Argonne National Lab International Workshop on Positrons at Jefferson Lab, Mar 25-27, 2009.
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
Electromagnetic N →  (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physic, National Taiwan University  Motivations  Model for  * N →  N DMT (Dubna-Mainz-Taipei)
Two-photon physics in hadronic processes Marc Vanderhaeghen College of William & Mary / Jefferson Lab PPP7 workshop, Taipei, June , 2007.
The Quark Structure of the Nucleon Inti Lehmann & Ralf Kaiser University of Glasgow Cosener’s House Meeting 23/05/2007 Nucleon Structure Generalised Parton.
Search for two-photon effects in charge asymmetry measurements from electron and positron scattering on nucleon and nuclei E. Tomasi-Gustafsson 1,2, M.
Nucleon Polarizabilities: Theory and Experiments
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Lattice QCD Journal Club Two is too many: A personal review.

CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
Nucleon Elastic Form Factors: An Experimentalist’s Perspective Outline: The Fib and the Questions EM FF Strangeness Glen Warren Battelle & Jefferson Lab.
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University Taiwan TBE effects for both parity-conserving and parity-violating ep elastic scattering 12th International.
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
Structure of subatomic particles
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
TPE Contributions to Proton EM Properties in TL Region Dian-Yong Chen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
In the SM to the first order x: variable relevant to the nucleon internal structure Q 2 : Four-momentum transfer squared between the electron and the target.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
PV Electron Scattering
Nucleon Strangeness: What we know and what we are still missing
Theory : phenomenology support 12 GeV
P I N P Two Photon Exchange in elastic electron-proton scattering: QCD factorization approach Nikolai Kivel in collaboration with M. Vanderhaeghen DSPIN-09.
James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab
Weak probe of the nucleon in electron scattering
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Hadron Form Factors Rolf Ent Jefferson Lab
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Two-photon physics in elastic electron-nucleon scattering
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Standard Model Wednesday, Apr 25, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan Two is too many: A personal review of Two-Photon Physics Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan 2007,12.24. National Taiwan Normal University

Nucleon structure Nucleons are the basic building blocks of atomic nuclei. Their internal structure, arising from the underlying quark and gluon constituents, determines their mass, spin, and interactions. These, in turn, determine the fundamental properties of the nuclei and atoms. Nucleon physics represents one of the most important frontiers in modern nuclear physics.

How to explore the proton? Experiments with highly energetic electromagnetic probe acting as a micro-scope Virtual photon resolves the proton on the distance: virtuality electron ( ) Q * g

One-Photon Physics: From Low to High Low Q2, elastic, exclusive High Q2, deeply inelastic, inclusive hadronization Parton distribution Form factors 2 PD

Form factor in quantum mechanics The cross section: Atomic form factor: charge density is the Fourier transform of the charge density. E.g., the hydrogen atom in the ground state: with Bohr radius

Nucleon Form Factors Hofstadter determined the precise size of the proton and neutron by measuring their form factor.

Why bother to go beyond One-photon-exchange framework? Since αEM=1/137, the two-photon-exchange effect is just few percent. However, few percent may be crucial for high precision electroweak experiments. Surprisingly, two-photon-exchange effect is more important than we thought sometimes.

Rosenbluth Separation Method Within one-photon-exchange framework:

Polarization Transfer Method Polarization transfer cannot determine the values of GE and GM but can determine their ratio R.

Two methods, Two Results! SLAC, JLab Rosenbluth data JLab/HallA Polarization data Jones et al. (2000) Gayou et al (2002)

How to explain it? Go beyond One-Photon Exchange…. New Structure

Two-Photon-Exchange Effects on two techniques small large

Possible explanation 2-photon-exchange effect can be large on Rosenbluth method when Q2 is large. 2-Photon-exchange effect is much smaller on polarization transfer method. Therefore 2-photon-exchange may explain the difference between two results. Guichon, Vanderhaeghen, PRL 91 (2003)

One way or another……. There are two ways to estimate the TPE effect: Use models to calculate Two-Photon-Exchange diagrams: Like parton model, hadronic model and so on….. Direct analyze the cross section data by including the TPE effects: One-Photon-exchange Two-photon-exchange

Blunden, Tjon, Melnitchouk (2003, 2005) Hadronic Model Result + Cross diagram Insert on-shell form factors Blunden, Tjon, Melnitchouk (2003, 2005)

Results of hadronic model Blunden, Tjon, Melnitchouk (2003, 2005)

Partonic Model Calculation GPDs Y.C.Chen, Afanasev,Brodsky, Carlson, Vanderhaeghen (2004)

Model-independent analysis Determined from polarization transfer data TPE effects Inputs From crossing symmetry and charge conjugation:

Our Choice of F(Q2, ε) ε→ 1, y→0, F→0 ε→0, y→1, F≠0 Fit (A) Fit (B) YC Chen, CWK ,SN Yang, PLB B652 (2007) Our Choice of F(Q2, ε) ε→ 1, y→0, F→0 ε→0, y→1, F≠0 Fit (A) Fit (B)

Result of fits Dashed Line: Rosenbluth Solid line: Fit (A) Dotted line: Fit (B)

Result of fits Dashed Line: Rosenbluth Solid line: Fit (A) Dotted line: Fit (B)

Puzzle about nonlinearity V.Tvaskis et al, PRC 73, 2005 Purely due to TPE

TPE vs OPE Fit (A) : Fit (B):

TPE contribution to slope Dashed Line : Fit (B) Solid line: Fit (A) SLOPE(TPE)/SLOPE(OPE) =C1/(GE/τ)

Fit (A) Fit (B)

Common features of Two fits GM increase few percents compared with Rosenbluth results GE are much smaller than Rosenbluth Result at high Q2 OPE-TPE interference effects are always destructive TPE play important role in the slope TPE give very small curvature

Any other places for TPE? Normal spin asymmetries in elastic eN scattering directly proportional to the imaginary part of 2-photon exchange amplitudes spin of beam OR target NORMAL to scattering plane Comparison of e-p/e+p : Amp(e-p)=Amp(1γ)+Amp(2γ) Due to Charge conjugation Amp(e+p)=Amp(1γ)-Amp(2γ)

R=σ(e+p) / σ(e-p) Fit (A) Fit (B) Q^2=5 GeV^2 Q^2=5 GeV^2

Strangeness in the nucleon « sea » s quark: cleanest candidate to study the sea Goal: Determine the contributions of the strange quark sea ( ) to the charge and current/spin distributions in the nucleon : “strange form factors” GsE and GsM

Parity Violating Electron Scattering Interference:  ~ |MEM |2 + |MNC |2 + 2Re(MEM*)MNC Interference with EM amplitude makes Neutral Current (NC) amplitude accessible Tiny (~10-6) cross section asymmetry isolates weak interaction

Flavour decomposition NC probes same hadronic flavor structure, with different couplings: GZE/M provide an important new benchmark for testing non-perturbative QCD structure of the nucleon

Charge Symmetry Gg,pE,M GsE,M GuE,M GdE,M Gg,nE,M GZ,pE,M GnE,M GpE,M <N| sgm s |N> GnE,M GpE,M Shuffle Well Measured

Isolating the form factors: vary the kinematics or target For a proton: ~ few parts per million Forward angle Backward angle

Extraction of strange form factors ρand κare from electroweak radiative corrections

Electroweak radiative corrections

Approximations Q2=(p-q)^2 Approximation made in previous analysis: p=q=k p q

One-loop-diagrams

HQ. Zhou, CWK and SN Yang, accepted by PRL, 0708.4297

Impact of our results Avoid double counting Old New

Change of the results of Strange form factors

Overestimate of previous analysis

This above plot should be modified !!! GMs = 0.28 +/- 0.20 GEs = -0.006 +/- 0.016 ~3% +/- 2.3% of proton magnetic moment ~20% +/- 15% of isoscalar magnetic moment ~0.2 +/- 0.5% of Electric distribution Preliminary This above plot should be modified !!!

Summary and Outlook Two-Photon physics is important to obtain the information of nucleon structure even it is small! Two-photon-exchange effect is crucial to extract electric and magnetic form factors. Two-boson exchange effect is also crucial to extract the strange form factors! More TPE-related research is going: N→ Δ transition form factor, normal beam asymmetry and so on… In particular, low energy precision measurement of electroweak experiments which is sensitive to NEW PHYSICS rely on the good theoretical understand of Two-photon physics!

Thank you for your attention And Merry Christmas!!!