Verification tools at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute By Helen Korsmo EGOWS 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

8.10 Weather Forecasts Objectives:
Hydrological information systems Svein Taksdal Head of section, Section for Hydroinformatics Hydrology department Norwegian Water Resources and Energy.
Probabilistic forecasts of precipitation in terms of quantiles John Bjørnar Bremnes.
A.Q.M.E.I.S.: Air Quality Meteorological and Environmental Information System in Western Macedonia, Hellas International Conference on Buildings Energy.
ENERTECH REMODECE REMODECE MEETING September, the 24th 2007.
Diana and recent developments at met.no EGOWS 2007, Dublin Eivind A. Martinsen, Bjørn Kristian Larsen and Trond Michelsen.
Mentor – a performance support system for forecasters Chris Ryan 1, Ankur Jha 2 and Swarup Joshi 2 1 Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia.
Remote Monitoring of Weather at Norwegian Airports by Kjell Hegg and Lasse Stenberg.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
CSI 400/500 Operating Systems Spring 2009 Lecture #1 – Operating System Fundamentals Wednesday January 21, 2008.
Predicting the Weather
1 Simulation Modeling and Analysis Verification and Validation.
Chapter 25 Weather Section 4 Forecasting Weather Notes 25-6.
PRODUCTION TOOL FOR FRENCH OVERSEAS TERRITORIES Brigitte Bénech, Météo-France, Toulouse, France and Pascal Venzac.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Predicting the Weather. Weather Forecasting Meteorologists are scientists who study the causes of weather and try to predict it. –They analyze data and.
Weather Observation What is the weather in different places?
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Limbering up VERSUS for operational use COSMO-GM, September.
 A data processing system is a combination of machines and people that for a set of inputs produces a defined set of outputs. The inputs and outputs.
Tropical cyclone analysis and forecasting : products and tools
MARS METEOROLOGY Eve Halligan Science Education Consultant
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Recent development at met.no EGOWS 2008, Ljubljana Michael O. Akinde Martin L. Sætra Bjørn K. Larsen.
NovaStar 5 Software. Multi-user web page access to base station database No client access software required User preferences kept on client workstations.
Moonlight reflecting off ice crystals in cirrostratus clouds can cause a halo to appear around the moon. Such a halo often indicates that precipitation.
Beyond the PROFET Juergen Schulze MET Norway. Who's MET Norway?
Recent developments at FMI EGOWS 2007 Dublin Mikko Strahlendorff.
Met Alert Tool (MAT). Introduction What is MAT? –Met Alert Tool (MAT) monitors and alerts the user to weather conditions exceeding thresholds (for example,
Section 4: Forecasting the Weather
1. There are different assistant software tools and methods that help in managing the network in different things such as: 1. Special management programs.
Weather at Your Fingertips Eleanor Vallier-Talbot Co-Chair NWA Education Committee Presenting Real Time Weather in Your Classroom.
Weather forecasting began in the mid 1800’s when basic tools, like the thermometer and barometer, were invented Global Weather Reporting Weather observations.
Chilling at Penn: Weather-Analysis of Load Tool (WALT) Abstract: Penn’s MOD 7 plant supplies chilled water to the entire campus for its air- conditioning.
P. Ñurmi / WWRP QPF Verification - Prague 1 Operational QPF Verification of End Products and NWP Pertti Nurmi Finnish Meteorological Institute.
24.6 Predicting the Weather
Surface Weather Map a.k.a: Surface Synoptic Chart.
Automatic Forecast Verification in WSFS Juha Markkula, Bertel Vehviläinen SYKE
Meteorology What is it? How does it work? Meteorology in action!!
Predicting the Weather P. 62 Pages Many Different Technologies to detect and help forecast weather Weather Satellites Radar (Doppler, NEXRAD) Balloons.
Intranet Portal. Intranet Portal to manage all internal activities of a company.
C H 17 W EATHER P ATTERNS Predicting the Weather.
Improved road weather forecasting by using high resolution satellite data Claus Petersen and Bent H. Sass Danish Meteorological Institute.
What’s New in Office 2007 By: Kathleen MacKinnel.
Table of Content 6.5 How Do Meteorologist Predict Weather? Predicting the Weather Ms. D 6 th Grade Weather Patterns.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Managing Data Processing Section B.
PRICING A FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT TO GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF A WEATHER FORECAST Harvey Stern and Shoni S. Dawkins (Bureau of Meteorology, Australia)
Weather 101 Brainstorm Why do we study the weather? Create a concept map with as many words you know about weather.
New Applications for Forecasters EGOWS 2007 Heleen ter Pelkwijk.
Demonstration of Diana and WMS EGOWS 2007, Dublin Eivind A. Martinsen, Bjørn Kristian Larsen and Trond Michelsen.
16.3 Weather Forecasts.
Weather Forecasting Subtitle.
Corn Yield Comparison Between EPIC-View Simulated Yield And Observed Yield Monitor Data by Chad M. Boshart Oklahoma State University.
Objective and Automated Assessment of Operational Global Forecast Model Predictions of Tropical Cyclone Formation Patrick A. Harr Naval Postgraduate School.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
Weather Section 4 Section 4: Forecasting the Weather Preview Key Ideas Global Weather Monitoring Weather Maps Weather Forecasts Controlling the Weather.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no QC2 Status
SmartMet Lea Saukkonen FMI What is SmartMet? A software tool for visualizing and editing meteorological data.
WEATHER Week of Feb BELLRINGER: FEB 15 TH No School: Presidents Day.
INFORMATION SOURCES Resources in a library are determined by the information requirements of the users of the Library.
Weather To start… Think of six careers/ jobs where knowing weather conditions is crucial? What we are going to learn about: The weather and its elements.
WaterWare description
How do we predict and forecast weather?
Weather Forecasting Lesson Objectives
Be The Weather Guy Presented to UCALL on October 14, 2009
PREDICTING THE WEATHER
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Predicting the Weather
WEATHER FORECASTING.
Presentation transcript:

Verification tools at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute By Helen Korsmo EGOWS 2004

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Model output Quba Editor Forecaster Quba databases Newspapers TV VePS Verification Presentation System Observations Verification by PRODUCTION AND VERIFICATION OF POINT FORECASTS AT met.no Intranet verification portal

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Production of point forecasts - Quba 3 regional offices produce forecasts for a total of about 140 locations with Quba editor. One central production database for subjective forecasts, model output and observations. Forecasters log on to the database, personal verification is possible. All data copied to separate historical database for verification purposes.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Quba editor Weather, temperature, and wind forecasts edited on the map or in tables. Bidirectional communication with the database.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Why verify? The three most important reasons to verify forecasts are: 1.to improve forecast quality - the first step toward getting better is discovering what you're doing wrong. 2.to compare the quality of different forecast systems - to what extent does one forecast system give better forecasts than another, and in what ways is that system better? 3.to monitor forecast quality - how accurate are the forecasts and are they improving over time? (from

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification at met.no Daily batch jobs producing – verification results for the intranet – personal verification – sent automatically by VePS user interface is under development Verification of models and of subjective forecasts. Meteorologists can learn how they perform compared to the models and which models are best to use as a starting point.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no The intranet verification portal Verification results for the following parameters are updated daily and are available on our intranet: Temperature, wind, cloud cover, precipitation, weather symbol and geopotensial height.Timeseries and tables of observed values versus NWP model forecasts and subjective forecasts, as well as computed MAE,RMS and BIAS values are available for most synop stations.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification portal example(1)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification portal example(2)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification portal example(3)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification portal example(4)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Personal verification by

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Every day the forecaster that made the forecast receives an comparing his or hers subjective temperature forecast with observations and with various NWP models. |∆T|≤ 1 ºC  1 point |∆T| ≤ 2 ºC  1/2 point |∆T|> 2ºC  0 points A grade is calculated from the ratio of total score to the maximum possible. The same is done for the NWP forecasts so the forecaster can compare how well he is doing compared to the models, where he could improve etc. The scores are only available to the forecaster that made the forecast and are not meant for the bosses… Personal verification by

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no VePS –Verification Presentation System Graphical user interface to produce verification results on demand. Forecasts and observations read from the Quba historical database in real time. Forecasters log in to check their own verification results. Timeseries, contingency tables, scatterplot, geographical distribution produced according to user spesifications. The system is connected to the meteorological workstation Diana,where the verification results are displayed on the map.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Map dialog(1) Forecasted/observed weather symbol

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Map dialog(2) Temperature bias for a chosen period

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Diagram dialog(1) Observed/Hirlam/subjective temperture

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Diagram dialog(2) Hirlam/subjective temperature RMS

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification in Quba Editor Verification results for each station is produced twice a day. Show how the previous forecast performed, + statistics (RMS,bias,MAE). Info is shown while forecast for this station produced.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Future plans 2004 –Scatterplots and contingency tables will also be available in VePS –Verification of text forecasts: Today one of our most important product is the text forecasts, which is not verified. A text forecast editor/generator will be made, which renders the text forecasts more verifiable.