Main Drift Chamber Yuanbo Chen Ihep 2001.10. Motivation (MDC IV) The BGO crystal used in L3 will be used for BES III ’ s Calorimeter. The space for MDC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

The CLEO-III Drift Chamber Vienna Conference on Instrumentation, 19-February-2001 Daniel Peterson, Cornell University K. Berkelman R. Briere G. Chen D.
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Drift chamber for super-Belle Present performance and background Idea for upgrade Upgrade plan Summary Shoji Uno (KEK) Jan-20 th, 2003 at Super B-factory.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
BES III Main Drift Chamber MDC group Yuanbo Chen June 5,2002, Beijing.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
October 28-th, 2005Straw tracker 1 Status of Straw Tracker for P236 P.L. Frabetti, V.Kekelidze, K.Kleinknecht, V.Peshekhonov, B.Peyaud, Yu.Potrebenikov,
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
More design Works More simulation to study the physics reaches with BESIII. magnet? solid angle coverage ? Identify several important physics topics, and.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Simulating the Effects of Wire Sag in ATLAS’s Monitored Drift Tubes Ashley Thrall, Vassar College ‘04 Dan Levin, Mentor REU Presentations August 5, 2004.
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
Physics Requirements Current CDC Design R&D Items What We Have Achieved (Publications) What is Left Out? Summary and Conclusions JLC CDC R&D Status As.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Update on TPC R&D C. Woody BNL DC Upgrades Meeting October 9, 2003.
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
Semiconductor detectors An introduction to semiconductor detector physics as applied to particle physics.
Dan Peterson, Cornell University Presented at the Workshop on Detector R&D Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for the ILD Experiment at.
16/04/20031PNPI / LHCb Muon EDR Wire Pad Chambers PNPI design for regions R4 in Stations M2,M3,M4  4 gas gaps of 5mm±70µm;  Active area: 1224x252.8 mm².
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
April 22nd, 2004Nigel Lockyer / Young-Kee Kim1 Drift Chambers AMY experiment at e + e - TRISTAN collider CDF experiment B = 3 T B = 1.4 T.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Study of GEM Structures for a TPC Readout M. Killenberg, S. Lotze, J. Mnich, A. Münnich, S. Roth, M. Weber RWTH Aachen October 2003.
TPC ExB distortion at LHC-ALICE experiment Yasuto Hori for the ALICE-TPC collaboration Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo 1.
9 September 2004The Straw Tube Chamber1 The CDC Curtis A. Meyer Carnegie Mellon University Physics Requirements and Specifications Prototype Construction.
Design and performance of Active Target GEM-TPC R. Akimoto, S. Ota, S, Michimasa, T. Gunji, H. Yamaguchi, T. hashimoto, H. Tokieda, T. Tsuji, K. Kawase,
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
TPC/HBD R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL Mini Workshop on PHENIX Upgrade Plans August 6, 2002.
GLD central-tracker task-list (with start of assigning names to the tasks) Performance/Simulation (names) Design (names) Backgrounds/alignment/distortion.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
03/21/2005Michael Spitznagel (MIT)Page 1 The Babar Drift Chamber Michael Spitznagel Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
1 A CLUster COUnting Drift Chamber for ILC …and… can we adapt this chamber to SuperB ? F.Grancagnolo, INFN – Lecce, Italy.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
Review of Micromegas Tracking Detectors for CLAS12 – May 7, 2009 Reviewers: Madhu Dixit, Mac Mestayer Presentations covered the following topics: –detector.
The BoNuS Detector: A Radial Time Projection Chamber for tracking Spectator Protons Howard Fenker, Jefferson Lab This work was partially supported by DOE.
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Detectors for VEPP-2000 B.Khazin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 March 2006.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
Annecy, Carleton/CRPP, Colorado, Colorado State, LBNL, Maryland, McGill, MIT, Montreal, INFN Padova, INFN Pisa, Princeton, INFN Rome, UC San Diego, UC.
Joerg Dubert’s Questions as you all aware we currently do not yet know how the final mechanical design of the new Small Wheel will look like. Nevertheless,
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
Electron Microscope and Spectral Analysis of Sense Wires used in COMPASS Drift Chambers Vivek Britto, Soobin Lim, IhnJea Choi, Pedro Montuenga – University.
1 PANDA FWD Meeting, GSI-Darmstadt, Preparation of the TDR for the forward tracker University Ferrara + Jagiellonian University, Cracow Main.
BABAR  &  L. de Brunhoff Drift Chamber System BABAR Drift Chamber Project Co-System Managers D.B.MacFarlane, McGill University A.J.S.Smith, Princeton.
Status of TRIUMF Prototype Studies Christopher Hearty University of British Columbia/IPP May 31, 2010.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
G. Finocchiaro – INFN LNF XI SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session LNF, 1 December 2009.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
1 Preliminary Considerations on Tracking for HIEPA Yifei Zhang and Jianbei Liu University of Science and Technology of China Workshop on Physics at Future.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
A. Calcaterra, R. de Sangro, G. Felici, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo INFN LNF XIII SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session Elba, 30 May.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
TPC for ILC and application to Fast Neutron Imaging L. An 2, D. Attié 1, Y. Chen 2, P. Colas 1, M. Riallot 1, H. Shen 2, W. Wang 1,2, X. Wang 2, C. Zhang.
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Simulation of Properties of COMPASS Drift-Chamber Prototypes
Llea Nasira Samuel Benedict College Charlotte Wood-Harrington
Structure and etc Shoji Uno (KEK) at B2GM
WBS: : Tracking for CLAS12
CDC Structure S. Uno KEK
CDC structure Shoji Uno (KEK)    July-8, 2009.
Cluster Counting Drift Chamber as high precision tracker for ILC experiments G.F. Tassielli(1,2) (1) Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universita’ del Salento,
Engineering Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Main Drift Chamber Yuanbo Chen Ihep

Motivation (MDC IV) The BGO crystal used in L3 will be used for BES III ’ s Calorimeter. The space for MDC IV will be limited. In MDC IV design, some items have to be considered in the limited space: Cell structure should be small; The height of the cell should be as small as possible, and reduce the space between layers for setting more layers; Since the momentum resolution is dominantly limited by the multiple scattering, a low- Z working gas and low-Z field wires are needed; The inner part of the end-plates of the MDC IV will be designed as a multi-step to allow micro-β components at both ends, and have maximum polar angle coverage.

BES III (MDC location)

The position of micro-β in IR

Baseline design of the drift chamber Expected performance R&D program Time schedule MDC IV

Baseline design  General description  The mechanical design  Drift cell configuration and layer organization  Working gas selection  Low Z-field wire selection  Electronics readout

General description (1)  Length: 1,856 mm  Outer cylinder  Thickness: 5 mm  Material: Al  Inner cylinder  Thickness: 1 mm  Material: carbon fiber  : 0.45%  Endplate  Thickness: 25 mm  Material: Al  Inner section: stepped  Outer section: flat

General description (2)  Layer 8(first-step)+4*2(four steps)+20(outer) = 36 layers  Sense wire 30μm, tungsten gold-plated  Field wire 110μm, aluminum gold-plated  Cell  Small cell configuration  Total number: 5,322  Height: 12 mm (first step) 14 mm (others)  Width: mm

Mechanical design  Multi-step endplate design ( refer to CLEOIII )  Cosθ=0.93 (L 18)  Cosθ=0.83 (L 36)  The inner diameter: 80 mm  The outer diameter: 1,320 mm  The length : 1,906 mm (end-plates are included)  Stepped endplates: 5 steps are interconnected with nonmagnetic steel bands via radial screw.

The structure of MDC IV

Layer organization (1) Small cell configuration with super-layer arrangement is chosen for MDC IV  36 sense wire layers 8 sense wire layers: first stepped section, each layer has different number of cells. 8 sense wire layers: from second step to fifth step,every two layers have the same number of cells..

Layer organization (2) 20 sense wire layers: in the plane section, every four layers have the same number of cells All cells will be symmetrical at 90°  Wire configuration of MDC IV (table.)  The z-direction resolution: σ z < 3 mm

Layer organization (3)

The Cell configuration of MDC IV

Drift cell configuration Cell design of the inner layers of MDC IV

Working gas selection (1)  Important factors to be considered X0 (radiation length) Vd (drift velocity) Electric stability Availability cost  Helium is the only low-z gas condidate Radiation length: 50times longer (≈5300m) than Argon (≈110m)

Working gas selection (2) The properties of various He based gas mixture Gas mixture RatioRadiation length (m) Primary (i.p./cm) Total (i.p./cm) Comment He/C 2 H 6 50/ BELLE He/iC 4 H 10 90/ KLOE He/iC 4 H 10 80/ (20.6)(45.4)BABAR He/CO 2 /iC 4 H 10 83/10/ BABAR He/CH 4 90/103087(7.0)(12.5)KLOE He/CH 4 80/202178(9.1)(17.0)BTCF He/C 3 H 8 60/ CLEOIII

Working gas selection (3)  60% He-40% propane gas mixture as MDC IV working gas will be chosen (refer to CLEO III) Long radiation length (550m) A drift velocity that saturates about 4 cm/μs for a relatively low electric field.

Working gas selection (4)

Working gas selection (5)  The drift velocity were measured using specially constructed test chamber.(K.K.Gan,…,1996)

Working gas selection (6) A Small prototype for Tau-Charm feasibility study ( R&D program ) Field wires: Al Working gas: He/CH 4 (80/20) Cell size: 2×2cm 2 Wire length: 1m  The average spatial resolution of 155μm was obtained. The average time resolution

Low z-field wire (1) Several kinds of light material wires have been proposed and tested.Aluminum wire has a relatively long radiation length and is a good field wire candidate. results of the long term creeping test by BTCF (tension lost <10%) The observation result for long time creeping of 0.1mm Al wires

Low z-field wire (2)

 Our choices: (refer to CLEOIII) Sense wire: 30μm gold-plated tungsten, to maximize the drift electric field. Field wire: 110μm aluminum, to reduce the material of the chamber.  A candidate aluminum wire with little creep has been tested.  With the proposed diameter wires, the electric field strength at the surface of the aluminum field wires is always less than 20kv/cm, a necessary condition for avoiding radiation damage.

Electronics readout  The MDC IV has a total of 5,322 sense wires. Both the time (T) and charge (Q) information for each wire will be read out.  Since the single wire spatial resolution is designed to be σχ ≤130μm, the time measurement error from electronics readout ≤ 0.5 ns (20μm) is desirable,assuming a drift velocity of = 4 cm / μs.  The charge deposition could be measured by integrating the signal current from sense wires with an accuracy better than the intrinsic chamber resolution of about 7%. Therefore a charge measurement with a precision of 2 % is sufficient to match the chamber resolution.

Expected performance  Solid angle coverage  Single wire spatial resolution  Momentum resolution  resolution

Solid angle coverage As show in Fig. 2, the solid angle coverage in the Layer 18 (sense wire) is cos  =0.93 and in the last layer is cos  =0.83

Single wire spatial resolution  Single wire spatial resolution consists of following terms: where, : is the contribution from the diffusion, about 60μm in our case, : is the contribution from time measurement error of readout electronics, assumed to be 20μm here, : is the contribution from the statistic distribution of primary ionization electron to the  From the experience of similar chambers, a single wire spatial resolution ≤130μm can be achieved.

Momentum resolution (1) Where, L (lever arm) =56 cm, B ( magnetic field ) = 1.0 Tesla, (spatial resolution)=0.013 cm, N (number sampling) = 30 and ~1. Taking the radiation length of gas mixture,, as 550m, and assuming the wire material uniform distributed in the chamber volume, the total is =163 m. The momentum resolution from both contributions can be written as: So the momentum resolution can be achieved.

Momentum resolution (2) The result from simulation

dE/dx resolution  The dE/dx resolution of CLEO III (experimental results ) is 5% (electrons),  The dE/dx resolution of the MDC IV will be about 7%.

dE/dx resolution ( Simulation results )

The main performances of MDC IV are: single wire position resolution ≤ 130 µ m momentum resolution: efficient tracking down below 100 Mev/c dE/dX resolution around 7% the solid angle coverage is cos  =0.93 The z-direction resolution: σ z < 3 mm

R&D program  Geometry of the MDC IV chamber  Cell and layer organization  Track reconstruction and full simulation  Cooperation with CLEO III and other experiments  Prototype making and testing

R&D program (continue) In process : Feedthrough: Designing, making capability investigation, Structure: Designing & Simulation with ANYSYS, Cell : Designing & Garfield Simulation, Wire: Creeping test,Crimping tool investigation, Prototype : Designing & preparation.

Time schedule itemsTime(year) R&D and chamber design1.5 Machining1.5 Assembly and wiring1 testing0.5 total4.5

The end Thanks a lot !

Referents From Tue Sep 25 09:56: Date: Mon, 24 Sep :35: (EDT) From: To: Re: layer spacings The only place that I have heard about gas cooling was in the BESS-III April description. I recommended that you do not cool the gas. Instabilities in the cooling system could lead to rapid temperature changes of the wires which could lead to broken wires. CLEO does not cool the gas. The CLEO gas system recirculates the gas. In the process of recirculation we remove oxygen and restore the helium to propane ratio to the specified level. The system was built by a SLAC group, lead by Martin Perl,which is a part of CLEO. The total cost was $250,000. I do not have a reference.

R&D:900k Endplates:5,500k Inner cylinder:30k Outer cylinder:200k Feedthrough:1,600k Wires:400k Assembly:500k Wiring:1,800k(clean room,wiring machine,manpower) High voltage boards and cables:700k Gas system:1,000k Cosmic ray test:200k Scientific exchanging and others:300k No predict:800k Total:13,930 K Cost estimate (in RMB)