2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS: GETTING THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK! GPA Fall Conference 2013 Kyle Mote GDOT Office of Planning October 10, 2013.

Advertisements

Data Collection Methods BluFax: vehicle identification using bluetooth MAC addresses – provides corridor traffic patterns (origin-destination data) and.

Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.

D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.

Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)

I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.

ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 2: Results Renee Alsup DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting.

ARTERIAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IN THE METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON REGION FY 2007 CONGESTION MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Meeting.

Traffic & Congestion In Connecticut State of Connecticut Department of Transportation April 2010.

Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.

Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.

2011 Freeway Congestion Monitoring Program Findings TPB Technical Committee December 2, 2011 Greg Jordan, SKYCOMP, Inc & Daivamani Sivasailam, DTP TPB.

CEE 320 Fall 2008 Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.

N TELEGRAPH RD Vehicle Position vs. Signal Timing for the Intersection of Telegraph Road and Maple Road Position 1: Vehicle entering intersection 0.1 seconds.

Traffic Signal Warrants

Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.

Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.

The London Congestion Charge. Facts Traffic speed in central London had fallen more that 20% since the 1960s (14.2 mph to 10mph) I n 1998 drivers in inner.

1 Segment Level Analysis of Travel Time Reliability Meead Saberi K., Portland State University I-5 SB, San Diego, CA.

COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Coalition for Smarter Growth Presentation on Staff Recommendations for Bus Rapid Transit Silver Spring.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,

Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental.

Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.

 Presentation at the 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, NJ Monday, May 18 th Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M.

Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.

Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.

What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.

How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.

Congestion Causes and Solutions. Traffic Congestion Characteristics Slower speeds Longer trip time Increased queues More vehicles.

TRAFFIC MICROSIMULATION & 3-D VISUALIZATION Presenters: Fadi Emil Nassar, P.E. Veronica A. Boza, E.I. FDOT – MAY 4, 2007.

Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.

Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.

Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.

Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.

Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.

CEE 320 Spring 2007 Transportation Facts and Figures CEE 320 Steve Muench 26 March 2007.

Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,

Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.

1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,

Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.

HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.

Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.

Best Practices for Collecting Counts and Risk Evaluation for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Krista Nordback, P.E., Ph.D., PSU Taylor Phillips, PSU Mike Sellinger,

Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.

The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.

Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments

Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.

IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.

Applicability of Paths Derived in Regional Planning Models to Traffic Micro-Simulation Paul Ricotta, P.E., Caliper Corporation Jon Fricker, PhD, Purdue.

Do Mobility-Based Performance Measures Reflect Emissions Trends? Congestion and Emissions Co-performance Alex Bigazzi & Dr. Miguel Figliozzi ITE Western.

Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.

Expertise SR 710 North Study An Evaluation of the DEIR/EIS Presentation to the City of San Gabriel City Council February 2, 2016 Leland C Dolley, Special.

Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures

1. If you travel at 10mph for 1 hour, how far do you travel?

High way and Transportation 2(Lab) LCIV 3034

ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD

FM 518 By-pass Traffic Review

ACEC of Arizona & ADOT Liaison Todd A. Emery, PE

Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update

Signal Timing: Putting it All Together

Quaker Lane & Seminary Road/ Janney’s Lane March 14, 2013

Transportation Engineering Calculating Signal Delay February 23, 2011

Webinar: Responding to the FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures:

Presentation transcript:

2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005

2

3 Regional Partners ARC EPD FHWA FTA GDOT GRTA MACOC MARTA

4 “The Vital Few” Mobility Air Quality Safety Transit Accessibility

5 Mobility Daily vehicle miles traveled per person and Daily vehicle miles traveled per registered driver Freeway and Arterial congestion Percent of the state highway system with a PACES rating greater than 70 Transit passenger miles traveled Annual transit passenger boardings

6 You asked for it… VMT Per Licensed Driver

7 Atlanta Freeway System

8 Freeway Travel Times 16 bidirectional segments in the Metro Atlanta freeway network covered by the Georgia NaviGAtor system Average travel-times are obtained for each 15 minute period AM peak period: 6 AM – 10 AM PM peak period: 3 PM – 7 PM Data is averaged over all lanes

9 1: I-75 SB – AM Peak (Wade Green Road to I-285 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:52 55mph travel time 38mph 35mph travel time

10 1: I-75 NB – PM Peak (I-285 NW to Wade Green Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:16 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

11 3: I-75/85 SB – AM Peak (Brookwood to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:47 55mph travel time 50mph

12 3: I-75/85 SB – PM Peak (Brookwood to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:47 55mph travel time 25mph 20mph travel time 35mph travel time

13 10: SR-400 NB – AM Peak (I-285 to SR 120) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:20 55mph travel time 35mph 55mph travel time

14 10: SR-400 NB – PM Peak (I-285 to SR 120) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:20 55mph travel time 26mph 20mph travel time 35mph travel time

15 10: SR-400 SB – AM Peak (SR 120 to I-285) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:21 55mph travel time 28mph 35mph travel time

16 11: I-285 WB – PM Peak (SR-400 to I-75 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:51 55mph travel time 34mph 35mph travel time

17 12: I-285 EB – PM Peak (SR-400 to I-85 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:04 55mph travel time 28mph 35mph travel time

18 12: I-285 WB – AM Peak (I-85 NE to SR-400) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:56 55mph travel time 37mph 35mph travel time

19 13: I-285 SB – PM Peak (I-85 NE to US 78) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:25 55mph travel time 27mph 35mph travel time 20mph travel time

20 6: I-75 NB – AM Peak (Hudson Bridge Road to I-285 SE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:51 55mph travel time 64mph

21 Atlanta Freeway Congestion This measure represents the slowest regional freeway travel speed during a 15-minute peak period, averaged across all directional freeway segments with 45 or more percent of each freeway’s bidirectional traffic volume –“The Worst System Quarter-Hour” In 2002 and 2003 the slowest regional 15 minute peak periods were 8:15 - 8:30 AM and 5:30 – 5:45 PM. In 2004 the slowest 15 minute peak periods were 8:00 - 8:15 AM and 5:30 – 5:45 PM.

22 Atlanta Freeway Congestion (Worst System Quarter-Hour)

Travel Speeds (Worst System Quarter-Hour ) PM Peak Worst Segments < 30mph

24 Travel Time Index (2004 Worst System Hour)

25 Travel Time Index (Worst Segment Hour ) (AM Peak Hour) (PM Peak Hour)

26 Questions?

27 1: I-75 NB – AM Peak (I-285 NW to Wade Green Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:16 55mph travel time 67mph

28 1: I-75 NB – PM Peak (I-285 NW to Wade Green Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:16 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

29 1: I-75 SB – AM Peak (Wade Green Road to I-285 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:52 55mph travel time 38mph 35mph travel time

30 1: I-75 SB – PM Peak (Wade Green Road to I-285 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:16 55mph travel time 65mph

31 2: I-75 NB – AM Peak (Brookwood to I-285 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 9:13 55mph travel time 61mph

32 2: I-75NB – PM Peak (Brookwood to I-285 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 9:13 55mph travel time 52mph

33 2: I-75 SB – AM Peak (I-285 NW to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:34 55mph travel time 51mph

34 2: I-75 SB – PM Peak (I-285 NW to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:34 55mph travel time57mph

35 3: I-75/85 NB – AM Peak (I-20 to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec):4:48 55mph travel time 45mph 35mph travel time

36 3: I-75/85 NB – PM Peak (I-20 to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:48 55mph travel time 41mph 35mph travel time

37 3: I-75/85 SB – AM Peak (Brookwood to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:47 55mph travel time 50mph

38 3: I-75/85 SB – AM Peak (Brookwood to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:47 55mph travel time 25mph 20mph travel time 35mph travel time

39 4: I-75/85 NB – AM Peak (Southern Split to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:13 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

40 4: I-75/85 NB – PM Peak (Southern Split to I-20) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:13 55mph travel time 59mph

41 4: I-75/85 SB – AM Peak (I-20 to Southern Split) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:05 55mph travel time 61mph

42 4: I-75/85 SB – PM Peak (I-20 to Southern Split) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:05 55mph travel time 56mph

43 5: I-75 NB – AM Peak (I-285 SE to Southern Split) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:21 55mph travel time 62mph

44 5: I-75 NB – PM Peak (I-285 SE to Southern Split) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:21 55mph travel time 64mph

45 5: I-75 SB – AM Peak (Southern Split to I-285 SE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:29 55mph travel time 60mph

46 5: I-75 SB – PM Peak (Southern Split to I-285 SE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:29 55mph travel time 67mph 35mph travel time

47 6: I-75 NB – AM Peak (Hudson Bridge Road to I-285 SE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:51 55mph travel time 64mph

48 6: I-75 NB – PM Peak (Hudson Bridge Road to I-285 SE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:51 55mph travel time 76mph

49 6: I-75 SB – AM Peak (I-285 SE to Hudson Bridge Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:45 55mph travel time 75mph

50 6: I-75 SB – PM Peak (I-285 SE to Hudson Bridge Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 15:45 55mph travel time 48mph

51 7: I-85 NB – AM Peak (I-285 NE to Old Norcross Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:41 55mph travel time 64mph

52 7: I-85 NB – PM Peak (I-285 NE to Old Norcross Road) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:41 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

53 7: I-85 SB – AM Peak (Old Norcross Road to I-285 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:37 55mph travel time 39mph 35mph travel time

54 7: I-85 SB – PM Peak (Old Norcross Road to I-285 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:37 55mph travel time 66mph

55 8: I-85 NB – AM Peak (Brookwood to I-285 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:51 55mph travel time 63mph

56 8: I-85 NB – PM Peak (Brookwood to I-285 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:51 55mph travel time 57mph

57 8: I-85 SB – AM Peak (I-285 NE to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:24 55mph travel time 52mph

58 8: I-85 SB – PM Peak (I-285 NE to Brookwood) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 11:24 55mph travel time 52mph

59 9: I-85 NB – AM Peak (Camp Creek Pkwy to I-75) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 5:18 55mph travel time 67mph

60 9: I-85 NB – PM Peak (Camp Creek Pkwy to I-75) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 5:18 55mph travel time 63mph

61 9: I-85 SB – AM Peak (I-75 to Camp Creek Pkwy) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:34 55mph travel time 64mph

62 9: I-85 SB – PM Peak (I-75 to Camp Creek Pkwy) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 4:34 55mph travel time 61mph

63 10: SR-400 NB – AM Peak (I-285 to SR 120) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:20 55mph travel time 35mph 55mph travel time

64 10: SR-400 NB – PM Peak (I-285 to SR 120) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:20 55mph travel time 26mph 20mph travel time 35mph travel time

65 10: SR-400 SB – AM Peak (SR 120 to I-285) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:21 55mph travel time 28mph 35mph travel time

66 10: SR-400 SB – PM Peak (SR 120 to I-285) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 14:21 55mph travel time 41mph 35mph travel time

67 11: I-285 EB – AM Peak (I-75 NW to SR-400) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:26 55mph travel time 44mph 35mph travel time

68 11: I-285 EB – PM Peak (I-75 NW to SR-400) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:26 55mph travel time 61mph

69 11: I-285 WB – AM Peak (SR-400 to I-75 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:51 55mph travel time 64mph

70 11: I-285 WB – PM Peak (SR-400 to I-75 NW) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:51 55mph travel time 34mph 35mph travel time

71 12: I-285 EB – AM Peak (SR-400 to I-85 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:04 55mph travel time 61mph

72 12: I-285 EB – PM Peak (SR-400 to I-85 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:04 55mph travel time 28mph 35mph travel time

73 12: I-285 WB – AM Peak (I-85 NE to SR-400) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:56 55mph travel time 37mph 35mph travel time

74 12: I-285 WB – PM Peak (I-85 NE to SR-400) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:56 55mph travel time 51mph

75 13: I-285 NB – AM Peak (US-78 to I-85 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 5:51 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

76 13: I-285 NB – PM Peak (US-78 to I-85 NE) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 5:51 55mph travel time 56mph

77 13: I-285 SB – AM Peak (I-85 NE to US-78) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:25 55mph travel time 67mph

78 13: I-285 SB – PM Peak (I-85 NE to US-78) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 6:25 55mph travel time 27mph 35mph travel time 20mph travel time

79 14: I-285 NB – AM Peak (I-20 E to US-78) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:56 55mph travel time 36mph 35mph travel time

80 14: I-285 NB – PM Peak (I-20 E to US-78) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:56 55mph travel time 56mph

81 14: I-285 SB – AM Peak (US-78 to I-20 E) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:07 55mph travel time 62mph

82 14: I-285 SB – PM Peak (US-78 to I-20 E) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 8:07 55mph travel time 48mph 35mph travel time

83 15: I-20 EB – AM Peak (I-285 W to I-75/85) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:00 55mph travel time 57mph

84 15: I-20 EB – PM Peak (I-285 W to I-75/85) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:00 55mph travel time 63mph

85 15: I-20 WB – AM Peak (I-75/85 to I-285 W) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:46 55mph travel time 63mph

86 15: I-20 WB – PM Peak (I-75/85 to I-285 W) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 7:46 55mph travel time 58mph

87 16: I-20 EB – AM Peak (I-75/85 to I-285 E) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:44 55mph travel time 63mph

88 16: I-20 EB – PM Peak (I-75/85 to I-285 E) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:44 55mph travel time 49mph

89 16: I-20 WB – AM Peak (I-285 E to I-75/85) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:14 55mph travel time 48mph

90 16: I-20 WB – PM Peak (I-285 E to I-75/85) Segment Length (miles): mph Travel Time (min:sec): 10:14 55mph travel time 64mph