OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.
SAM LPLP Provider Training Program June 27, 2014Helena, Montana.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Creating a Course Portfolio Office of Faculty and Instructional Development and the College of Education Qatar University.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
OCM BOCES Day 5 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
Statewide Awareness Presentation Dr. Karen Butterfield, Associate Superintendent Jan Amator, Deputy Associate Superintendent Highly Effective Teachers.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Principal Effectiveness: Domains Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Sherri M. Kenley Seeking ~ MCPS Elementary School Assistant Principal position position.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
McREL’s Balanced Leadership
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
EDAD 5389 Domains and Competencies. Domain I—School Community Leadership Domain II—Instructional Leadership Domain III—Administrative Leadership.
Kevin Croff Educational Leadership Portfolio March 2005.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Rachelle Kuehl Assistant Principal Applicant Roanoke City Public Schools.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Supporting Ethical Decision Making Laura Kent, Valerie Cervantez, Velma Kitcheyan Workshop Facilitators.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Candidate’s Name: Date:.  Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Educational Service Unit 7 Wednesday, September 24, 2008 Dr. Dan Ernst and Dr. Bill Kenagy Administrator Evaluation: Superintendent Principal.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Child Development Parent Training Jessica Amezcua-Gallegos.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Implementing Race to the Top
Competency Reflections
Presentation transcript:

OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1

Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components

3

4

5 Day One Agenda

6 Day Three Agenda

7 Day Two Agenda That’s today!

8 Resources

9 Checking In

10 Checking In

11 Checking In

12 Checking In

13 Checking In

14 Checking In

15 Checking In

16 Checking In

17 Checking In

18 Checking In

19 Regrouping

When Value-Added is implemented Reviewing the Regs

Growth: Elem/Middle  Result of student growth  Added to as measures become available  Other measures being used for teachers in the school Reviewing the Regs

Growth: High School  Result of student growth  Added to as available  Progress to graduation  Other measures being used for teachers in the school Reviewing the Regs

Achievement: Elem/Middle  District-wide achievement measures  Achievement on state tests  Growth or achievement for subgroups Reviewing the Regs

Achievement: High School  Regents participation rates  College ready rates  Graduation rates  Credit accumulation  Dropout rates  PSAT, SAT, AP, IB, etc. Reviewing the Regs

Other 60%: Required  Multiple measures  ≥ 2/3 based on broad assessment of actions via supervisor visits  Include at least two:  Feedback from constituencies  School visits from others  Review of documents Reviewing the Regs

Other 60%: Required  Locally-selected measure of teacher effectiveness contribution, such as:  High performer retention  Granted v. denied tenure  Teacher satisfaction w/ feedback  Evaluation quality Reviewing the Regs

Other 60%: Required  All standards at least once per year Reviewing the Regs

Other 60%: Optional  Teacher and/or student attendance  School goals  Goals and reflection Reviewing the Regs

Student Growth 20% Achievement 20% Other 60%Composite Ineffective0-2 Ranges determined locally 0-64 Developing Effective Highly Effective SED interpreting that this also has to be revised. Reviewing the Regs

30 Regrouping

Principals Reviewing the Regs

32 Directions

33 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders 5 Ethics & Integrity 3 Managing Organizational Systems & Safety

3 rd largest economy world’s An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders. is the 1 Vision, Mission & Goals

world’sis the 2 Teaching & Learning An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.

36 world’sis the 3 Managing Organizational Systems & Safety An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.

37 world’sis the 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources.

38 5 Ethics & Integrity world’sis the An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner.

39 6 The Education System world’sis the An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.

Look at some research  Marzano & Waters  Hattie 40 Regrouping

Balanced Leadership: School Leadership that Works™

McREL’s meta-analyses Meta-analysesPublication titles Classroom-level practices Classroom Instruction that Works (Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001) School-level practices & student characteristics What Works in Schools (Marzano, 2003) Leadership responsibilities & practices School Leadership that Works (Marzano, Waters, & McNulty, 2005)

Findings from McREL’s meta-analysis 1.There is a relationship between leadership and student achievement — leadership matters. 2.There are 21 leadership responsibilities, each with statistically significant and positive relationships to student achievement. 3.Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive impact on achievement.

Responsibilities & practices 21 leadership responsibilities 66 leadership practices All correlated to student achievement Each correlation is statistically significant

21 leadership responsibilities

The differential impact of leadership Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive effect on student achievement.

Examples of ineffective focus Focus on improving school and classroom practices that are already well developed and implemented. Focus on school and classroom practices that are implemented marginally. Focus on practices that lack evidence for improving student achievement.

4.Two major factors: first-order change and second-order change 5.21 responsibilities with positive correlations to changes perceived as first order 6.11 responsibilities with correlations to changes perceived as second order Findings from McREL’s factor analysis

Look at some research  Marzano & Waters  Hattie 49 Regrouping

Effective homework practices (0.29) Research

Distributed practice (0.71) Research

Ensure teachers intellectually stimulated with current theories and practices (0.64) Research

Promoting and participating in teacher learning (0.91) Research

Planning, coordinating & evaluating teaching and the curriculum (0.74) Research

Direct involvement in support & evaluation of teaching via frequent visits w/ feedback (0.74) Research

Overall instructional leadership influences on student achievement (0.66) Research

Overall leadership influences on affective outcomes (0.54) Research

One last thing. What is the best way to motivate [principals]? A. Public Recognition B. Private recognition C. Bonus for performance D. Threats for poor performance E. Data on personal and team progress F. Annual Professional Performance Review 58 Research

One last thing. What is the best way to motivate [principals]? A. Public Recognition B. Private recognition C. Bonus for performance D. Threats for poor performance E. Data on personal and team progress F. Annual Professional Performance Review 59 Research

60 Regrouping

61 Regrouping

62 Regrouping

63 Homework

64 Homework