THE EFFECTS OF PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY USE IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM ASSIGNMENT 5: PRESENTATION OF ACTION RESEARCH PLAN BY: DR. DANIEL OFSTEIN CUR 526 – SUMMER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christine A. Draper Michelle Reidel Georgia Southern University.
Advertisements

Slide with text and image Harvesters – The Community Food Network Nutrition Services We teach in the community on location to low- income populations.
Dr. Todd R. Leif Scott Schultz Cloud County CC Delta College Concordia, KS University City, MI.
Richard Turner Assessment and Certification Center Manager Florida State College at Jacksonville Kent Campus 1.
Franklin Pierce College Cellular Service Market Research Study Prepared by: James Parrott Greg Desmarais Anthony Giovanangelo.
Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation: Parent Aware Statistical Analysis Lauren Bach, Marin Beck, Kristen Paulsen, and Katie Westermayer Minnesota State.
A Teachers’ Overview of Digital Marketing Education in China Guangzhi Chu Professor of Advertising, Communication University of China Chenyu Li Ph.D. Candidate.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
Hilton Rose Hall, Montego Bay Best practices in Teacher Education
How Does A Student’s Schedule Affect Their Learning? Chapter 5 Discussion Dean Papadakis SED 697.
Student Use of IT from EDUCAUSE 2007 Survey Pat Burns, VPIT IAC Meeting Feb. 13, 2008.
Home Economics Teachers’ Readiness for Teaching STEM
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
How Technology Affects Education. In today’s technology-driven world, there is growing aspiration by both administrators and students to use technology.
USING MOODLE TO CREATE ONLINE COURSES FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS Cheryl Usher Cherokee County School District.
Effects of video conferencing on teachers’ motivation and participation in professional development: An action research project By Nazima Ally.
INSETROM PROJECT TEACHER TRAINING EVALUATION REPORT Barry van Driel, International Association of Intercultural Education, the Netherlands Dragana Nikolajevic,
The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY
AN EVALUATION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE ALGEBRA PROGRAM IN GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 8 th Grade Algebra 1A.
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
ITNW Cooperative Education - Networking Instructor: Nguyen Chi Thanh Semester: Spring 2009 Campus and Room: Saigontech Tower, Room 701 Days and.
Professional Development and Network Comparison by Julia Evans Lamar University EDLD 5362 Week 2.
Arunee Wiriyachitra, Chiang Mai University
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
What do Safety Town volunteers do? Safety Town is a two-week educational summer program for children entering Kindergarten or First Grade sponsored by.
MS STATE UNIVERSITY DELVRISHA MAGEE EDU 505: FUTURE OF EDUCATION DR. LINDA KAISER Vision for Education
Planning for a Digital Future: 24/7 Web Services.
Methods Conclusions Introduction Results A Teachers’ Overview of Digital Marketing Education in China Guangzhi Chu & Chenyu Li Advertising.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO ELL Students District One Schools Special Services Department.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
CROSS-CURRICULAR COLLABORATION Chad Carter. PRESENTATION OUTLINE Background Timeline Problem Identification Review of Literature Cross-Curricular Student.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Friends (Temporarily) Forever: Frequency of Facebook Use, Relationship Satisfaction, and Perception of Friendship Zack Hayes, Jerad Hill, Heather Jacobson,
Attitudes towards E-Learning By Fairouz Farah Sarkis Director Arab Open University - Lebanon.
INTERNET FOR CAMBODIAN STUDENTS: USES, ATTITUDES AND ACADEMIC UTILIZATION PI: Chivoin Peou Mentor: May O. Lwin 1.
Classroom Technology Plan By Saundra Tyson-Dawson E7801 Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merrwether.
 My philosophy is perseverance cannot be divorced from progress to success.  My goal is to use these tools that I have learnt and insight I have gained.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
ASHLEIGH LENTYCH CYBER BULLYING AND INTERNET SAFETY.
The Effects of Authentic Audience on ESL Writers: A Task-Based, Computer-Mediated Approach By Julian Chen & Kimberly Brown.
Optimizing Business/Marketing Curriculum Dr. Leane Skinner By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Students’ perceptions on using blogs for reflective learning in higher educational contexts Presenters : Irshad Ali and Dr Kevin Byard.
Bethune Middle School Technology Plan Presented by: William Carter E7801-Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merriwether.
Walden University. By the year 2024 nearly 80% of learning will evolve through Distant Education. Online Learning Media & Technology Dynamic Communication.
Having Our Say: Middle Grade Student Perspectives on School, Technologies, and Academic Engagement Hiller A. Spires, Ph.D. John Lee, Ph.D. Kimberly Turner.
EDLD 5306 ET8014 Week 2 Sarah Shiver. What is an ? A network is an online community of people “who share interests/activities” (Social network service,
Technology to Create International Learning Networks
By: Danny Biro. Introduction  My literature review addresses the barriers and benefits of electronic collaboration and knowledge management, and the.
Company LOGO Utilizing China’s DEPRS to Improve Teacher Quality Glen Haven Elementary School Presented by Jennifer Martin November 2012
Tim McCarthy EDU Data Analysis II Dr. Ianni Fall 2013.
BUT HOW WILL THIS WORK FOR ME? Reading Apprenticeship at Edmonds Community College… a work in progress. Melody Schneider.
How can the middle school model promote post secondary success?
WELCOME!! What is your college currently doing to support, develop and mentor Adjunct Faculty? What is missing?
Ayoub Kafyulilo DUCE Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating ICT in Education.
Language Barriers in Health Care Lauren Houle Honors Project Spring 2010.
Introduction My class is a 7 th grade Science class which consist of 20 students total, 11 females-9 males, 4students are special needs and.
Professional Development Presentation By: Ms. Donna Marks.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
RUBRICS Presented by: Dan, Chanel & Nancy. What is a rubric? For TEACHERS:a tool for assessment, for providing instructions to students, and for outlining.
Development of SafeT Kids Mobile App An injury prevention resource for parents Kerrie L. Roye Temple University.
BYOD at GHES Parent Information. Vision Statement Our Vision is to create an environment of student centered learning through collaboration, critical.
GIBBS COUNTY SCHOOLS TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MS. CHARLON L. GIBBS LIBERTY UNIVERSITY.
Patricia Colorado / Irina Pereyra Oxford 2014 Retention Strategies Reading Street.
Digital Access Thulasizwe Nkosi
Using the Internet to Support Teaching and Learning
Presentation transcript:

THE EFFECTS OF PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY USE IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM ASSIGNMENT 5: PRESENTATION OF ACTION RESEARCH PLAN BY: DR. DANIEL OFSTEIN CUR 526 – SUMMER 2014

DISCREPANCY STATEMENT Since the advent of the PC, educators and school systems have strived to incorporate technology into every day learning. Unfortunately the education system has not been able to keep up with the societal advancements in this area due to funding and lack of overall training. Students have already adapted to new technologies before they enter a classroom and therefore become bored as opposed to excited about the potential information to be covered by the teacher. Students now are less likely to pay attention than they were before the technology became so widely accessible and user friendly. This study will determine if the restriction of the use of personal technology in a college classroom will improve student learning (Personal technology will be defined as cell phones, tablets and lap tops) as measured by unit test scores and self-reporting.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Setting: The study will take place at a small private University in an urban setting, North Miami, Florida. The college is one of four campuses around the country which host approximately 17,000 students from over 100 countries (“About JWU,” 2014). The leadership course which will serve as the test site meets 2 times a week for 2 hours each period for a total of 11 weeks in a term. Participants: There will be approximately 30 participants in the study and the will be enrolled in a leadership course required for all upper-class students. The average age of the students will be 19 to 23 years old.

LITERATURE REVIEW A review of the literature showed the following: Students feel that personal technology use in the classroom can both enhance learning as well as be a distraction (Burns & Lohenry, p. 809). Teachers feel that personal technology can be useful in the classroom if it is applied appropriately to the lesson (Cui et. al, p. 26). Some of the literature called for more training of teachers in the most recent technology advancements to help them better incorporate it into activities (Leidman et. al., p. 115). One study showed that mobile learning can help create opportunities for students to link theory to practical application (Strong et. al., p. 63). All of the research recommended further study to help enhance technology usage in the classroom.

RESEARCH METHOD This action research plan will be focused on the use of personal technology by students in a college classroom. Previous research has demonstrated that students see potential in the use of personal technology, however, they also recognize it potential as a distraction (Lam & Tong, p. 393). For this study, a survey of the students and a comparison of their test scores will be used as measurements. Goal 1: To demonstrate the effect the use of personal technology by students within a college classroom has on their ability to learn. Objective 1.1: At the completion of two units in the leadership 2001 course, college students who did not use personal technology in the class during the second unit will demonstrate at least a 10% improvement over their unit test scores from the first unit in which they did use the technology. Objective 1.2: At the completion of two units in the leadership 2001 course, college students who were allowed to use personal technology freely in the classroom and then not will be able to self-report their understanding of the effect the technology has on learning through the completion of a survey with 100% accuracy.

IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE Activity 1: For weeks 1 thru 3, the students will be allowed to use their personal technology (cell phones, tablets and laptops), freely within the classroom. This includes being able to take notes, use during assignments and for personal pleasure (ex. Texting and using social network sites). During this time the teacher will cover the first Unit of the classroom, chapters 1, 2, and 3. At the end of week three, the students will be required to take a test based on the chapters covered during the unit. Students will not be able to use their personal technology while taking the test. Activity 2: For weeks 4 thru 6, the students will be told they cannot use personal technology in the classroom for any reason (except in case of emergency). During this time the teacher will cover the second Unit of the classroom, chapters 4, 6, and 14. At the end of week 6, the students will be required to take a test based on the chapters covered during the unit. As with the previous test, students will not be able to use their personal technology. Students will also take a survey to self- report on their experience in both units at this time.

REFERENCES About JWU (2014). Retrieved on May 25, 2014 from Burns, S. & Lohenry, K. (2010). Cellular phone use in class: Implications for teaching and learning a pilot study. College Student Journal, 44(3), Cui, G., Chen, X., Li, W., & Wang, S. (2012). College students’ perceptions of cell phone integration in language learning. International Journal or Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(4), Leadsman, M., McKeague, M., Forrest, J., & Keppel, D. (2011). ET phone home? Cyber communication changes among college freshman. Journal of Communications Media Studies, 3(1), Strong, R., Ho, S., Odom, S., & Irby, T. (2013). A course focused on the critical issues in agriculture: Students’ acceptance and use of mobile learning. NACTA Journal, 57(4),