P HI T S Shielding exercise Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Last revised 2015/10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Nuclear Data in Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2011 Symposium on Nuclear Data Daiki SATOH Japan Atomic Energy Agency 1. Dosimetry calculations powered.
Tenth lecture Last lecture.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
Radiation at accelerator laboratories Prompt radiation from the particle beam Beam induced radiation –Neutrons –Gammas –Synchrotron radiation Radiation.
K. Oishi, K. Kosako and T. Nakamura Institute of Technology, Shimizu Corporation, Japan id=17 SATIF-10.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Dose. Energy Gained Particles lose energy in matter. Eventually energy loss is due to ionization. An important measure is the amount of energy gained.
Space radiation dosimetry and the fluorescent nuclear track detector Nakahiro Yasuda National Institute of Radiological Sciences.
P HI T S Evaluation of Induced Radioactivity: Connection between PHITS & DCHAIN-SP Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 Last.
IAEA Quantities and Measurements - 3 Radiation Protection Quantities Day 3 – Lecture 1 1.
P HI T S Advanced Lecture (II): variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Instrumentation 1 – Gas detectors / Part 1 Anthony WAKER, University of Ontario Instutute of Technology Wed. 21/11/2012,
Photon and Energy Fluence
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Basic Lecture I: Geometry and Source Definition
P HI T S Basic Lecture II: Definition of Tally Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Oct revised.
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
SOI detector Geant4-based studies to characterise the tissue-equivalence of SOI and diamond microdosimeteric detectors, under development at CMRP S. Dowdell,
P HI T S PHITS Tutorial for making Voxel Phantom Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Last revised 2014/8.
Neutron Dose Per Fluence and Weighting Factors for Use at High Energy Accelerators (Submitted to Health Physics) J. Donald Cossairt, Ph.D., C.H.P. Kamran.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
P HI T S Melt a snowman by proton beam Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Aug revised.
7 Days Until the Benchmark Catalyst: 1.What is nuclear fission? 2.Iodine is 80% 127 I, 17% 126 I, and 3% 128 I. Calculate the average atomic mass of iodine.
P HI T S Setting of various source Part I Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 Aug revised.
P HI T S Exercises using Recommendation Settings and Utilities Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Jun revised.
Investigating the Feasibility of a Small Scale Transmuter – Part II Roger Sit NCHPS Meeting March 4-5, 2010.
P HI T S PHITS Tutorial How to use DICOM2PHITS Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 Last revised 2015/3.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Radiation Fields.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
JASMIN December Counter Experiments (T-972/994) Toshiya SANAMI on behalf of JASMIN Counter team JASMIN Counter team H.Arakawa, M.Hagiawara, Y.Iwamoto,
1 A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high energy photon and electron beams AAPM TG-21 Protocol (Med Phys 10: , 1983) 和信治癌中心醫院.
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
P HI T S Setting of various source Part II Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 May 2016 revised.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
A Brachytherapy Treatment Planning Software Based on Monte Carlo Simulations and Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Amir Moghadam.
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System
Basic Lecture II: Definition of Tally
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
Guidance for hands-on exercise Environmental radioactivity
Setting of various sources A
Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Guidance for hands-on exercise Detector
Guidance for hands-on exercise Medical linac
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System
MAGiC Shielding Simulations
Setting of various source Part II
Presentation transcript:

P HI T S Shielding exercise Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Last revised 2015/10

Contents2 Purpose of this exercise Let us consider effective building material to shield high energy neutron using PHITS Dose assessment should be considered in effective dose ? High energy neutron

Effective dose3 What is effective dose ? Absorbed dose (Gy) Fluence Ambient dose equivalent (Sv) Personal dose equivalent (Sv) Effective dose (Sv) Monitored quantities Survey meters, Personal dosimeter Radiation health risk Cancer risk, Fatality rate Simulation ICRU sphere Quality factor [Q(L)] Simulation Human model (phantom) Radiation weight factor [W R ] Tissue weight factor [W T ] Physical quantities Operational quantitiesProtection quantities Calibrate Relate Dose conversion coefficient (DCC) Use [T-track] instead of [T-deposit] to compute effective dose with DCC

shield.inp 4Check Input File Basic setup Projectile: Geometry: Tally: 200MeV proton Geometry trackXZ.eps 200MeV proton (Pencil beam with radius 0.01cm) 10 aligning cylinders with radius of 50cm and 10cm thickness (Air inside) [t-track] Flux distribution (xz 2D, z 1D) [t-cross] Energy spectrum at each surface of cylinders cross.eps Air … 10 cylinders 10cm Proton Neutron Cell 100 => Cell 1 Proton flux (1 st page)

Step 1: Generate neutrons 5Step 1 Set tungsten target and generate neutrons by irradiating with proton beam Incident protons stop in the target 1.Cylinder (Cell 20) with thickness 5cm (z=-10 to -5) and radius 5cm centering Z axis 2.Tungsten is registered (material #2) with density19.25g/cm 3 3.Exclude target area from Cell 100 trackXZ.eps Neutrons generated by the collision with the target Proton flux (1 st page) Neutron flux (2 nd page)

Step 2: Convert to effective dose 6Step 2 Convert flux to effective dose using DCC at multiplier sections Neutron contribution is dominant [ T - T r a c k ] title = Track Z... y-txt = Effective dose [pSv/source] multiplier = all part = neutron emax = mat mset1 all ( ) multiplier = all part = photon emax = mat mset1 all ( ) … [ M u l t i p l i e r ] number = -201 interpolation = log ne = E E DCC [ICRP116] (Flux => effective dose) 1/cm 2 pSv Multiplier # to use Normalization factor Add multiplier subsection Change title of y axis 2nd trackZ.eps

[ T - T r a c k ]... y-txt = Effective dose [pSv/source] multiplier = all part = neutron emax = mat mset1 all ( ) multiplier = all part = photon emax = mat mset1 all ( ) Step 3: Adjust proton beam current 7Step 3 Calculate effective dose (Sv/h) for continuous beam current of 1  A Effective dose was expressed in pSv/source by multiplying DCC 1A denotes status that 1C current is conducting in 1 second The electric charge of a proton is 1.6x10-19C  (micro) and p (pico) denotes and respectively Hint 1.# of protons consisting 1A current per sec is 1.0 / 1.6e-19 = 6.25e18 particles 2.# of protons consisting 1  A current per hour is 6.25e18 x 3600 x 1.0e-6 = 2.25e16 particles 3.Thus normalization factor to output in Sv/h is 2.25e16 x 1.0e-12 = 2.25e4 At 100 to 105cm => 86 th line of effective_dose.out 2nd [Sv/h] 2.25e4 2.25e E+01 Sv/h

Step 4: Shield with wall 8Step 4 Change material of Cell 1 & 2 (20cm in total) Add angel = ymin(1.0e-3) ymax(1.0e3) in 2 nd [t-track] tally to make y axis scale uniform Change gshow into 2 for 1 st [t-track] tally to distinguish material easier Iron (MAT[4], 7.7g/cm 3 ) Concrete (MAT[3], 2.2g/cm 3 ) trackZ.eps E E+01

Step 5: Make the wall thicker 9Step 5 Change material of Cell 1, 2, …, 10 (100cm in total) Iron (MAT[4], 7.7g/cm 3 ) Concrete (MAT[3], 2.2g/cm 3 ) Neutron deep-penetration calculation => Difficult to achieve sufficient statistical precision TrackXZ.eps

Step 6: Make neutrons reaching far edge 10Step 6 Set [Importance] to make neutrons reaching far edge [ I m p o r t a n c e ] set: c1[1.0] part = neutron photon reg imp 100 c1**0 1 c1**1 2 c1**1 3 c1**2 4 c1**3 5 c1**4 6 c1**5 7 c1**6 8 c1**7 9 c1**8 10 c1**9 200 c1**9 Set more than 1.0 If too large importance is set, calculation suddenly becomes very slow showing the following message jbnk = 0, ibnk = 1... **** Warning: Too many secondary particles created **** **** MAXBNK overflowed thus HDD is used 10 times **** Concrete Effective dose at 100 to 105cm => trackXZ.eps c1= E+00 Sv/h E+00 Sv/h for concrete for iron

More shielded by denser material ? 11Step 6 Use lead (11.34g/cm 3 ) instead of iron (7.7g/cm 3 ) Add lead as MAT[5] and use it for Cell 1, 2, …,10 Lead (11.34g/cm 3 ) X-section (shielding effect) of high-energy neutron X-section per nucleus # of nucleus in unit volume ∝ × ∝ A 2/3 × Density/A Iron 2.01 Lead 1.91 Shielding effect is smaller than iron E+0 [ M a t e r i a l ] MAT[5] 204Pb Pb Pb Pb trackZ.eps Iron (7.7g/cm 3 ) E+0

Step 7: Combine two materials 12Step 7 Set iron (MAT[4], 7.7g/cm 3 ) for Cell 1, 2,…, 5 Set concrete (MAT[3], 2.2g/cm 3 ) for Cell 6, 7,…, 8 Then compare the effective dose with the one for single material Is there any difference if the positions of iron and concrete are exchanged ? E-01 Iron Concrete E+00 Concrete Iron trackZ.eps

Spectrum of transmitted neutrons? 13Tally Neutrons can be shielded by degrading energy with iron (high density) and then stoping low-energy neutrons with concrete (containing hydrogen element) cross.eps (Conc. => Iron) cross.eps (Iron => Conc.) Air => Conc.Conc. 20cm Conc. => Iron Iron 30cmIron => Air Air => IronIron 20cm Iron => Conc. Conc. 30cm Conc. => Air

14Step 8 Activate [t-dchain] tall and assess induced radiation activated by 1 hour irradiation up to 50 years later in 10-year step [ T - D C H A I N ] $ must section for DCHAIN title = Induced radiation mesh = reg reg = ( ) ( ) file = tdchain.out timeevo = h y 0.0 outtime = h 10.0 y 20.0 y 30.0 y 40.0 y 50.0 y $ beam current (nA) set:c21[1000.0] amp = c21*1.0e-9/1.602e-19 jmout = 1 file(21)= c:/phits/dchain-sp/data e-mode = 0 Add to [parameters] section Set iron for Cell 1, …, 5 and concrete for 6, …, 10 Remove “Off” Execute DCHAIN by using input “tdchain.out” obtained by PHITS tdchain.eps (6 th page) Iron Concrete 26 Al is dominant Step 8: Assess induced radiation of walls

Iron Concrete Influence of trace impurity 15Step 8 Add trace impurity ( 59 Co,1ppm) to iron wall (modify “tdchain.out”) and recalculate DCHAIN tdchain.eps ( 6 th page ) Without impurity ( 59 Co) With impurity ( 59 Co) Iron Concrete After a few ten years 60 Co produced from trace impurity becomes dominant !1)HRGCMM 2)IREGS 3)ITGNCLS... DUMMY E Fe E-03 Fe E-02 Fe E-03 Fe E-04 Co E-06 tdchain.out (around 50 th line) # of elements

16 Effective dose can be calculated using [Multiplier] section and [T-track] tally High-energy neutrons can be effectively shielded with high-density material (such as iron) followed by material containing hydrogen element Consideration of trace impurities which may produce long-lived radionuclide is important for assessment of long-term induced radiation Summary

Homework17 1.Let’s calculate induced radiation of the target (tungsten) 2.1 hour radiation with current beam setting and investigate at 1 day later 3.Compute effective dose at 1m distance from the target Homework (Hard work!) Hints (work flow) Modify [t-dchain] tally Set volume of target in [volume] section Do in order of PHITS => DCHAIN=> PHITS 1 st PHITS Copy [source] section from DCHAIN output (tdchain.pht) Replace wall with air and unset [importance] Normalization factor of multiplier subsection in [t-track] should be 3600x1.0E-6=3.6E-3 Title of color bar can be changed by “z-txt = *** ” 2 nd PHITS

Homework18 An answer (answer-step1.inp, answer-step2.inp) trackZ.eps trackXZ.eps One order magnitude lower than the value of rough estimate by DCHAIN (Line 1121 of tdchain.act) total g-ray dose-rate E+03 [uSv/h*m^2] Effect of self-shielding by target itself