Capacity of HRSST-2 buoys to measure SST with a high degree of accuracy Pierre Blouch E-SURFMAR Operational Service Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMOIOC 1 OOPC-XII, Paris, 2-5 May 2007 DBCP issues for OOPC Boram Lee IOC Secretariat for JCOMM.
Advertisements

Presented by: Mayra Pazos And Erik Valdes Drifter Data Assembly Center NOAA/AOML Collaborators: Rick Lumpkin and Shaun Dolk DBCP XXV – Paris, France, 28.
DBCP Workshop, La Jolla, October 2006 Iridium communications for data buoy applications.
Satellite Drifter Technology Dr. Sergey Motyzhev.
Foundation Sea Surface Temperature W. Emery, S. Castro and N. Hoffman From Wikipedia: Sea surface temperature (SST) is the water temperature close to the.
OSMOSIS Primary Production from Seagliders April-September 2013 Victoria Hemsley, Stuart Painter, Adrian Martin, Tim Smyth, Eleanor Frajka-Williams.
Presentation to Data Buoy Cooperation Panel XVII J-CAD (JAMSTEC Compact Arctic Drifter)
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGICAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE ESTOC, PLOCAN,
The Eta Regional Climate Model: Model Development and Its Sensitivity in NAMAP Experiments to Gulf of California Sea Surface Temperature Treatment Rongqian.
Measuring pressure. Conductivity, Temperature and Depth (CTD) Despite the name, all CTDs actually measure pressure, which is not quite the same thing.
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP9: New Methods to Assess the Impact of Coastal Observing Systems Presented by.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service Jan-Peter Schulz Deutscher Wetterdienst 27 th EWGLAM and 12 th SRNWP Meeting 2005.
Activities of the South Atlantic Argo Regional Center (SA ARC) Silvia Garzoli, Bob Molinari, Claudia Schmid (NOAA/AOML), Huiqin Yang (CIMAS/UM)
SVP-Barometer Drifter Performance Jeffrey Wingenroth VP and General Manager Technocean, Inc. Cape Coral, Florida USA
BPO Science Program14 December 2014Webiinar We cannot manage what we do not measure: Martin Kramp - JCOMMOPS Ship Coordinator.
The DBCP – GHRSST Pilot Project: an update How to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear (How to make good wine out of bad wine) David Meldrum
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
ECOOP-WP3 Better use of remote-sensing data and in situ measurements Francis Gohin, Ifremer T3.1 Optimal synergy between altimetry and tide gauge data.
Topics describe the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) –aims, –achievements and –Challenges network status developments of data buoy technology JCOMM.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
DMI-OI analysis in the Arctic DMI-OI processing scheme or Arctic Arctic bias correction method Arctic L4 Reanalysis Biases (AATSR – Pathfinder) Validation.
Drifting Buoy Update: WOTAN and Iridium
Underway Salinity/Temperature and Moored Temperature Sterling A. Wheaten
Lagrangian Salinity Drifters In SPURS Luca Centurioni Verena Hormann Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
2nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop - June Ocean state estimates from the observations Contributions and complementarities of Argo,
New developments to progress Smart Buoy Idea Motyzhev S.*, Horton E.**, Lunev E.*,Kirichenko A.*,Tolstosheev A.*,Yachmenev V.* * Marine Hydrophysical Institute.
Data Buoy Cooperation Panel Hester Viola
Ice Tethered Profiler (ITP) Moorings WHOI Principle Investigators John Toole Rick Krishfield Andrey Proshutinsky WHOI Principle Investigators John Toole.
E-SURFMAR Report Gilbert EMZIVAT– Jon TURTON DBCP 31 Geneva – October 2015.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
MARACOOS - International Constellation of Satellites – Since 1992 X-Band (installed 2003) L-Band (installed 1992) Sea Surface Temperature - SST Ocean.
Weight: 52 kg Hull Diameter: 21.3 cm Vehicle Length: 1.5 meters Depth Range: 4–200 meter (coastal model) or 1000 meter (1- km model) Speed: 0.4 m/sec.
CTD - Salinity and Temperature at Depth Jonathan Walter University of North Carolina at Wilmington CHM Jonathan Walter University of North Carolina.
WP3 – Task 3.6 Surface drifters Author: Pierre Blouch (EUMETNET) Date: 10 th June 2015 Version:1.0.
Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.
CO2 MEASUREMENTS ON THE PIRATA NETWORK
An evaluation of a hybrid satellite and NWP- based turbulent fluxes with TAO buoys ChuanLi Jiang, Kathryn A. Kelly, and LuAnne Thompson University of Washington.
© Crown copyright Met Office Upgrading VOS to VOSClim Sarah North.
Permanent Meanders in the California Current System and Comparison of Near- Surface Observations with OGCM Solutions Luca Centurioni (SIO-PORD) Collaborators:
AMSR-E Vapor and Cloud Validation Atmospheric Water Vapor –In Situ Data Radiosondes –Calibration differences between different radiosonde manufactures.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
The California Current System from a Lagrangian Perspective Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California,
Studying Earth Science
Evaluation of SVP-BW drifters thanks to deployments near moored buoys DBCP-18 workshop - Martinique October 2002 By Pierre Blouch Presentation :
E-SURFMAR 17 th June 2008, Toulouse Jean Rolland - Pierre Blouch Météo-France IABP/IPY.
Practical Steps For “Smart Buoy” Project Realization Motyzhev S.*, Brown J.**, Horton E.*, Lunev E.*, Tolstosheev A.*, Motyzhev V.* * Marine Hydrophysical.
Andrea Kaiser-Weiss, Melbourne Joint GHRSST Workshop, 6 th March 2012 Experiences with SST profiles from near-surface Argo measurements A. Kaiser-Weiss.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Ship SST data for satellite SST and ocean.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
Diurnal Variability Working Group: GHRSST-10 Breakout Session Report Chris Merchant Gary Wick.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
DBCP Monthly Report January 2016 Prepared By DBCP Technical Coordinator
Edward Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Mike Chin Mike Davis James Pogue JPL PO.DAAC California Institute of Technology 28 May 2009 GHRSST Symposium, Santa Rosa,
Argo Floats and Near-Surface Temperature Stephen Riser University of Washington, USA.
ST-VAL Breakout Summary Gary Corlett. ST-VAL Breakout 16:20 Introduction and objectives for session (G Corlett) 16:30 The Data Buoy Co-operation Panel.
Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, days mean.
GHRSST interest in upgraded drifters - Summary from the GHRSST Joint Workshop Melbourne Andrea Kaiser-Weiss, Gary Corlett, Chris Merchant, Piere LeBorgne,
GHRSST 10: Report from Diurnal Variability Working Group Report on activities of the Diurnal Variability Working Group Chris Merchant University of Edinburgh.
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
Impacts of Climate and basin-scale variability on the seeding and production of Calanus finmarchicus in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank Avijit Gangopadhyay.
Understanding ocean bottom pressure variability with Antares data
5th International Conference on Reanalysis (ICR5), Rome, November 2017
Comparison of AATSR SST with other sensors
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Assessment of the Surface Mixed Layer Using Glider and Buoy Data
Comparison of CTD vs XBT data
Density Ratios and Heat Flux within the Beaufort Sea Utilizing WHOI Ice-Tethered Profiler Data By LCDR Greg Caro.
Estimating ocean-shelf flux and exchange with drifters
Presentation transcript:

Capacity of HRSST-2 buoys to measure SST with a high degree of accuracy Pierre Blouch E-SURFMAR Operational Service Manager

Background  DBCP Pilot Project for High Resolution SST  Requirements:  Hourly measurements  Report design depth in calm water to ± 5 cm  Report of geographical location to ± 0.5 km or better  SST accuracy to ± 0.05K or better, resolve 0.01K  Report of time of SST measurements to ± 5 minutes

 HRSST-1: standard SVP-B (or SVP-BS) Iridium drifters  Fitted with a GPS  Using dataformat #000 (or #021) => resolution 0.01K  Fitted with an analog SST probe on the drifter hull => digitalization made by the buoy electronics Claimed accuracy: ± 0.2K  More than 400 buoys deployed since the end of 2010  HRSST-2: same but…  Fitted with a digital SST probe on the drifter hull Claimed accuracy: ± 0.05K  36 buoys deployed: 24 SVP-B and 12 SVP-BS Metocean HRSST-1 and HRSST-2 buoys

Accuracy of HRSST-1 vs HRSST-2 buoys  Salinity drifters (i.e. SVP-BS) have two temperature probes:  This of the buoy hull (subject of the study - 17 cm depth)  This of the SeaBird conductivity sensor (centered at 45 cm depth) Its accuracy is garanteed because it is required to compute salinity from conductivity and temperature  How to proceed ?  Comparisons to model outputs (interpolations) ?  Comparisons to satellite products (match up) ?  Comparisons to moored buoys in the vicinity of drifters ?  Comparisons to measurements carried out by an already accurate temperature sensor on the same buoy !! Fortunately we have what we need with salinity drifters

Metocean Salinity Drifters Collaboration with LOCEAN

 Computation of monthly mean ‘hull – SeaBird’ temperature differences for each buoy  Temperature probes being at a different depth, night observations are exclusively used. This allows to remove cases of a possible stratification (upper layer warmed by the sun above a colder water at the level of the SeaBird sensor) Methodology From GHRSST SST definitions

HRSST-1 Salinity Drifters Monthly mean ‘hull – CT probe’ temperature differences Standard deviations < 0.015K Mean differences up to 0.35K (i.e. worse than the claimed accuracy)  All positive  More or less constant for a given buoy but

HRSST-2 Salinity Drifters Standard deviations < 0.015K Mean differences up to 0.06K for all buoys but one (i.e. ~ the claimed accuracy)  All slightly negative  Constant for a given buoy

HRSST-2 Salinity Drifters Y = 1.130x – r = ± 0.05K tolerance interval (calibration)

HRSST-2 Salinity Drifters ± 0.05K tolerance interval (measured at sea) Y = 1.130x – r = 0.714

Conclusion  HRSST-2 buoys measure SST with a better accuracy than HRSST-1 buoys  This is probably due to the fact that digital probes are better calibrated. The standard deviation of differences with CT SST probes is similar with HRSST-1 or HRSST-2 buoys (< K)  HRSST-2 buoys meet the accuracy requirement (0.05K) during calibration tests but some do not meet it at sea  The most part of the « HRSST-1 to HRSST-2 » upgrade cost is due to the probe calibration  Data users requiring such accuracy (satellite SST community) should contribute to borne the extra cost: EUMETNET does not plan to purchase more HRSST-2 buoys at its own expenses