Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.
Advertisements

Aftermath of the INES-3 Incident at Paks NPP on 10th April, Lajos Vöröss Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority 7th Annual Meeting of NERS IAEA, Vienna,
History In 1945 after Japan surrendered in WWII Korea split into two parts. The South was Under U.S. control and the North Under Russia North Korea.
Excellences, allow me first to remind you of some relevant information on the present status of peaceful use of nuclear energy within global energy strategy.
IAEA RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety Regional Workshop on Drafting Regulations.
Government E-1275: Nov. 6, 2007 Session #7. The Korean Peninsula.
Graham Allison Presentation to The 35 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy October 28, 2004 Anticipating and Assessing.
Nuclear Renaissance and Nonproliferation in North-East Asia Hua HAN Associate Professor School of International Affairs Beijing University.
Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.
Determining the Irreducible Elements of an Interim Agreement with Iran: A Freeze Plus David Albright ISIS November 5, 2013.
Long Term Storage, The Failure of the Federal Government, and NIMBY.
The Cons of Nuclear Reactors By Michelle Trojanowsky.
AEEC Meeting Brussels Tomasz Jackowski, Poland Department of Nuclear Energy Ministry of Economy Perspective of Nuclear Energy in Poland.
North Korea and a “PEACEFUL” Nuclear Program The Six-Nation Talks Resumed.
Nuclear Energy and Australia Presentation by Prof Jim Falk, Australian Centre for Science, Innovation and Society.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Timothy Pairitz. Nuclear Power 101 Uranium-235 is enriched from 0.7% to 3-5%. Enriched fuel is converted to a uranium oxide powder.
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Sweden and the Nuclear Security Summit Process Jan A. Lodding Deputy Director Disarmament.
“ Second Moscow International Nonproliferation Conference PLUTONIUM UTILIZATION IN REACTOR FUEL A. Zrodnikov Director General State Scientific Center of.
Should Japan Continue to Use Nuclear Power? GROUP 8 Nancy, Jefrey, Alice
International Teamwork – RTG Recoveries and Disposals Joint US-Canadian Presentation Christopher C. Landers U.S. Department of Energy & Nicole C. Evans.
The North Korean Nuclear/Missile Crisis Dr. Clay Moltz Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies June 2005.
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Industry Shaping Event 1996 Millstone Loss of Configuration Management.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
Nuclear Energy Wastes. What ways can we reduce the wastes produced in the reactor core. How can uranium be separated from Plutonium?
LCG Milestones for Deployment, Fabric, & Grid Technology Ian Bird LCG Deployment Area Manager PEB 3-Dec-2002.
NUCLEAR ENERGY: FISSION CONVERSION OF MASS TO ENERGY = mc 2.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Stephen Dembek, Section Chief Export Controls and International Organizations Section Office of International Programs Contact Info: ,

The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Dr. Okan Zabunoğlu Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
August 4,  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS) ceased power operations on December 29, 2014 after 633 days of continuous power operation.
WELCOME MEETING China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Co., Ltd. (CGNPC) and CLP Group Tuesday, 5 August 2008 Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT)
Nuclear Fuel Cycle.  According to World Nuclear Association:  The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes which involve the production.
Nuclear North Korea What is the potential harm of North Korea’s possession of nuclear weapons?
Potential Regional Nuclear Spent Fuel Management and Regional Uranium Enrichment /Reprocessing Paths for Asia Jungmin KANG CISAC, Stanford University 2007.
Maysan Hasan 9 th grade girls April 29,2012 What is Nuclear Fuel? 1. Physics. fissile or fertile material that undergoes fission in a nuclear reactor.
Nuclear Energy.
ROMANIAN EXPERIENCE IN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF THE NPP OWNER/OPERATOR FOR UNIT 1 OF CERNAVODA NPP Dr. Ioan Rotaru TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF SAFEGUARDS IMPLEMENTATION IN IRAQ PRIOR TO THE GULF WAR Iraq was an original signatory of the NPT (July 1968) and became a party.
Update to State Board: Testing Jim Wright, Director Office of Curriculum and Assessment ∙ September 2015.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. Yongbyon Spent Fuel Experience Presented by Mark Mohr
Can North Korea Build More Nuclear Weapons?. A North Korean People’s Army naval unit tests a new type of anti-ship cruise missile in this undated photo.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
The Nuclear Fuel industry The nuclear fuel cycle.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
TOPIC:-NUCLEAR ENERGY.  The energy stored in the nucleus of an atom.  Atomic energy: the energy released by a nuclear reaction.
Project guide By Dr.V.Mahesh T. Bhargav Dean(Research)
Nuclear Power Group Members:
Russia and Iran’s Nuclear Program M.A. in Nonproliferation Studies
AN INTEGRAL PWR, “CAREM”, IS BEING DEVELOPED BY CNEA, ARGENTINA
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Update
Maximum and Minimum Nuclear Power Paths for the Republic of Korea
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
What does it take for the DPRK to be a nuclear threat?
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Alex Thirkell.
Due Dates subject to change. Watch for dashboard updates.
Institute for Science and International Security
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
GNI Advanced Reactors Security Analysis & Findings
Daniel Wojtaszek 3rd Technical Workshop on Fuel Cycle Simulation
Plutonium Reprocessing and Recycling
JUNE 2010 CALENDAR PROJECT PLANNING 1 Month MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY
US-DPRK NEXT STEPS WORKSHOP January 27, 2003 Washington DC
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Presentation transcript:

Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International Non-Proliferation Conference, Washington, D.C. November 8, 2005

Visits to Pyongyang: S.S. Hecker and Prof. J.W. Lewis Jan. 6-10, 2004 and Aug , 2005 and Yongbyon, Jan. 6-10, 2004 North Korea has the raw materials and nuclear infrastructure for the full plutonium nuclear fuel cycle

Key nuclear issues as of January 2004 visit What is the status of the nuclear reactors? 5 MWe (previously operating – generates ~6 kg Pu/year) 50 MWe – under construction (56 kg Pu/year) 200 MWe – under construction (220 kg Pu/year) What happened to the spent fuel rods from 5 MWe reactor? Placed in safe storage (25 – 30 kg Pu) with U.S. help Monitored by IEAE until December 2002 Does the DPRK have a uranium enrichment program? Does the DPRK have nuclear weapons?

Additional technical issues as of August 2005 What is the status of the nuclear reactors? 5 MWe - is it operating with a fresh core? (5 to 7 kg Pu/year) 50 MWe – has construction resumed? (~ 56 kg Pu/year) 200 MWe – future plans? (~ 220 kg Pu/year) What is status of fresh fuel fabrication? Reprocessing status? If reactor was refueled, what is status of spent fuel rods? How much additional plutonium was extracted? Status of DPRK uranium enrichment program? Status of DPRK nuclear weapons program?

Update on status of 5 MWe reactor in Yongbyon 5 MWe (25 MWth) graphite-moderated, gas-cooled indigenous reactor (uses natural uranium metallic fuel) (began operations in 1986) We were told by the director of the Yongbyon Nuclear Center that: The reactor operated from Feb to end of March 2005 The reactor operated well at full power – 25 MWth The reactor was unloaded in April 2005 Prompted by concerns about fuel rods that were loaded in January 2003 and fabricated prior to Agreed Framework of 1994 and To extract the plutonium Fuel rods were found to be in good shape The reactor was reloaded and operations resumed in mid-June 2005 They are refurbishing the fuel fabrication facility to make more fuel because they loaded the last load made prior to 1994

Update on status of 50 and 200 MWe reactors 50 MWe reactor in Yongbyon (construction was frozen in 1994) Ready to resume construction soon Redesign has been completed Construction workers preparing to return Some components will be retained, others replaced Only the containment vessel is inside reactor now Core was fabricated elsewhere in 1994 – it will be retained DPRK did not give us an estimated completion date Director implied a couple of years, rather than five or six Regulatory framework Start-up license from State Nuclear Regulatory Commission required before operations Self-regulated for operations Electricity will go into the grid 200 MWe reactor in Tacheon (construction also frozen in 1994) The are still analyzing the 200 MWe construction DPRK claims to have methods of recovering construction But, investment is bigger than starting anew

Plutonium reprocessing update We were told that: 8000 spent fuel rods were unloaded beginning in April 2005 Cooled ~ 3 months in spent-fuel pool Reprocessing to extract Pu began in late June Through-put increased by x 1.3 by technical improvements Director explained the mystery of the “second” line It is used as a back-up and spare Director said reprocessing almost finished in late August DPRK officials told Governor Richardson on Oct. 20 that they finished reprocessing and they were decontaminating the building As in 2003, the Pu was processed to metal U.S. estimates are 10 to 14 kg Pu metal could have been extracted during this campaign

Technical summary of Aug visit 5 MWe reactor Operated for 26 mo., unloaded, reloaded – operating well at full power (can run “indefinitely”). Reprocessing Throughput improved by x1.3; reprocessing of 8000 fuel rods almost complete. Will have extracted 10 to 14 kg plutonium (Pu) [U.S. estimate]. Reactor construction Redesign of 50 MWe complete. Construction workers preparing to restart construction. 200 MWe still under study. Would cost more to complete than to start over. Radioisotopes Run Soviet-supplied IRT research reactor occasionally to produce I-131 for thyroid cancer therapy. Limited by not having received fresh fuel since Soviet times. DPRK is moving full-speed ahead with nuclear weapons program

Rough estimate of DPRK nuclear status as of Nov Plutonium < 1994 (IRT & 5 MWe)~ 8.4 kg(1+ weapons worth) 2003 (5 MWe)~ 25 kg(4-6 weapons worth) 2005 (5 MWe)~10-14 kg(~ 2 weapons worth) Nov Highly likely to have 43  10 kg of separated plutonium > 2005 MWe capacity~ 5-7 kg/yr(1+ weapon worth/yr) Future MWe~ 60 kg/yr(~ 10 weapons worth/yr) Nuclear weapons We know very little. Given demonstrated technical capabilities, we must assume they have produced at least a few simple, primitive nuclear devices. No information on whether or not devices are missile capable. Uranium enrichment We know even less. Continued denial by Ministry of Foreign Affairs against overwhelming evidence that they have some level of uranium enrichment program. *Based on estimates by David Albright and Kevin O’Neill, editors, “Solving the North Korean Nuclear Puzzle,” ISIS Reports (The Institute for Science and International Security), Washington, D.C., 2000 and Lewis/Hecker Jan and Aug visits.