Making the Case for Interregional Transmission Projects: Evaluation of Benefits and Allocation of Costs Jose Fernando Prada Engineering & Public Policy,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guatemala: El Canada Hydroelectric Project
Advertisements

Electricity Industry The Potential Effect of Locational Marginal Pricing on Renewable Resources for Environmental Issues in Energy NECPUC Annual Symposium.
Legal Framework, Investment Opportunities and Technical Innovation in the Electricity Sector Security of Supply through competitive markets: Design of.
Integrated Resource Planning: An overview Mark Howells & Bruno Merven Energy Research Centre Energy Research Centre University of Cape Town.
Alberta’s Future Electricity Needs: What’s the Real Story? Economic Developers of Alberta Annual Professional Conference April 10, 2014 John Esaiw, Director.
SMUD Sustainable Energy Supply Progress in Carbon Reduction POU 101: CMUA Briefing of Legislative Staff February 26 th, 2015 Obadiah Bartholomy Powering.
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
1 John J. Conti Acting Director Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Prepared for the Energy Technology System Analysis Program (ETSAP) Florence,
SPP’s 2013 Energy Consumption and Capacity 2 12% annual capacity margin requirement CapacityConsumption Total Capacity 66 GW Total Peak Demand 49 GW.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Citizens League Electrical Energy: Affordability and Competitive Pricing Working Team Electric Transmission.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
Transmission; Foundation of a Power Market 12 May 2006.
Luis A. Camargo S. Wholesale Electricity Market Manager Colombia The Andean Electricity Market -TIE- Cartagena de Indias, October 14&15th
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
P.Labra – EWEA March 2012 ENTSO-E’s & TYNDP’s vision on adapting European Transmission Grid to large amounts of wind power.
Congestion Pricing: Competitive Locational Prices of Power Stoft (2002)
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition November, 2011 Competitive.
Economics of Regional Energy Cooperation: Nepal Case Study Dr Priyantha D C Wijayatunga Head, Portfolio Management Unit Nepal Resident Mission Asian Development.
1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
EAEI Department  Electricity Markets and Policy Group Congestion Measures for Organized Electricity Markets in the U.S. Emily Fisher Lawrence Berkeley.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
PJM© PJM Confidential PJM Generation Interconnection Overview Virginia Offshore Wind Conference Virginia Beach June 22, 2011 Paul McGlynn General.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
World Bank Water Week – 2004 Jerson Kelman. Hydroelectric power accounts for more than 90% of the total electric energy produced in Brazil.
Electricity Market Design Presentation at the 31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference November 5-7 Austin, Texas Lars Bergman IAEE and Stockholm School.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Dr. Ion LUNGU AFEER President. DRIVERS FOR INVESTMENTS Demand; Fuel availability; Market signals; Production costs; Energy mix; Environmental concerns;
ENTSO-E’s Network Development Plans and Network Codes: How a strong European grid supports security of supply, affordable electricity prices through market.
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
Increasing the Role of Renewable Energy Sources Bill Abolt Chicago District Manager Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. May 10, 2007.
Smart Capacity Markets: Can they be Smart Enough? Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Smart Capacity.
Wholesale Electricity Market – Western Australia APEx Conference 2008 – Sydney Allan Dawson 13 October 2008.
Electric Energy Issues and the Region Connecticut Business and Industry Association Stamford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President,
Bulk Power Transmission System
K E M A T & D C O N S U L T I N G Power System Conference, Clemson, South Carolina, March 8-11, 2005 Principles and Issues Relating to the Interconnection.
1 Clean Line Energy National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Charleston SC Annual Meeting June 2012.
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
Increasing integration of variable RES-E: Policy and regulatory measures for T&D networks Luis Olmos Pontificia Comillas University Madrid / Spain
Cross border redispatching Central West Electricity Regional Energy Market Mini Forum Alain Marien 20 th of June 2006.
VIRTUAL NET METERING AND LOCAL NETWORK CHARGES IN AUSTRALIA: AN UPDATE Smart Future Cities Conference 2015, Newcastle, NSW, October 1 st 2015.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
ERGEG Public Hearing 30. June 2005 Congestion Management Guidelines.
The Role of Energy Storage as a Renewable Integration Solution under a 50% RPS Joint California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
Designing Energy Solutions without Borders National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.
THE ALEVO ECOSYSTEM ENERGY STORAGE SUPERCOMPUTING CYBER SECURITY ANALYTICS ECOSYSTEM ANALYTICS ENERGY STORAGE SUPERCOMPUTING CYBER SECURITY FREQUENCY REGULATION.
1 NAUSCA Summer Meeting Boston June 30, 3009 David W. Hadley Vice President State Regulatory Relations Midwest ISO.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Updated 1/28/2011. Renewables Integration Plans and Challenges March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
Linnfall Consulting Market design: the energy-only market model Linnfall Consulting September 2015.
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Use and Conceptualization of Power Sector Baselines: Methodology and Case Study from El Salvador Lasse.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
SLED Electricity Modelling results – Serbia László Szabó, András Mezősi
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
Regional Transmission Organizations
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Strategies of Reliable Transmission of Energy In A Competitive Market
Presentation transcript:

Making the Case for Interregional Transmission Projects: Evaluation of Benefits and Allocation of Costs Jose Fernando Prada Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University Marija D. Ilić Electrical & Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University 33 rd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Pittsburgh, October 28, 2015

Overview  Role and Challenges of Interregional Transmission - IRT (Cross-Border Transmission, CBT)  Integrated Methodology to Evaluate Benefits and Allocate Costs of IRT Projects  Two Applications using Market Coupling and Coordinated Economic Dispatch  Policy Implications 2

The Key Role of Transmission  Strong transmission networks increase the reliability of electrical interconnections  Adequate transmission is required to support robust and competitive trading in electricity markets  Effective integration of utility-scale renewable generation is dependent on availability of transmission  Transmission capacity is an increasingly scarce resource  Transmission investment has lagged behind at regional and interregional levels 3

US Transmission Policy  Open non-discriminatory transmission access  FERC’s orders 888/889 (1996)  FERC initially relied on economic signals to induce efficient investment on transmission  Merchant model proved to be ineffective  Result was low pace of transmission investment  FERC now promotes centralized regional transmission planning and interregional coordination  FERCs Order 1000: cost allocation according to benefits, inclusion of public policy objectives 4

5 US Electric Power Markets Source: FERC US Regional Electricity Markets

Interregional Transmission Projects - ITP  Primarily built for reliability purposes, but markets have brought renewed interest on cross-border trading  Public policy objectives are nowadays an additional driver  New ITPs will serve more than one of these purposes and total benefit should consider their aggregation  Valuation of benefits is not straightforward and fair allocation of costs is a challenge  Project development affected by “market seams” or “harmonization” issues  Big potential benefits but limited development 6

How to make a strong case for Interregional (Cross-Border) Transmission?  Objective is to realize full potential of ITP and provide efficient expansion signals (vis-à-vis other alternatives)  Need a consistent analytical framework to assess net benefits from tie-lines between regional systems  Consider whole range of benefits: economic efficiency, reliability improvements, environmental impact.  Cost allocation between parties should follow the “beneficiary pays” principle  Calculate net benefit of the project and for each system  NPV, B/C or any economic merit measure  Recognize distributional effects: identify winners and losers 7

Allocating scarce Interregional capacity  The foundation of the proposed approach is a decision on how to use the interconnecting transmission lines  How to efficiently allocate scarce interregional transmission capacity?  Arguably, short-term market-to-market coordination is superior to bilateral deals  We consider two efficient methods to schedule and price efficient interregional energy exchange:  Market Coupling  Clearing import/export curves  Coordinated Economic Dispatch  Multi-area OPF  On the basis of efficiently coordinated energy exchanges we can measure the benefits of interregional transmission 8

Methodology to evaluate net benefits of ITP 9  We illustrate the methodology with a graphical example:  Want to find efficient energy transaction between regions A and B: direction, quantity and price

Import / Export Market 10 Energy Exchange (MWh) Price ($/ MWh) R B A IX: Coordinated Exchange A = System A trading surplus B = System B trading surplus R = Congestion Rent Import-B Export-A

Impacts of interconnected operation and coordinated trading  Market Impacts: variation of economic surplus  Net trading surplus in each system  Transmission congestion rent  Reliability Impacts: variation of generation reserves  Savings from sharing operating reserves  Interregional provision of planning reserves  Environmental Impact: variation of generation emissions  Social cost of changes in generation emissions  Benefits are calculated for each system and transmission costs are then allocated according to accrued benefits 11

Implementation on annual basis 12

Coordinated Economic Dispatch  Market coupling is suitable for single price markets and bilateral trading over transmission flowgates  Markets with locational prices and multiregional trading require a coordinated economic dispatch  Multi-area Optimal Power Flow  Measure variations against existing baseline 13 Source: Wood and Wollenberg

Application I – Two areas coupling 14 SYSTEM A SYSTEM B GAGA GBGB DADA DBDB IXIX G A = Generation system A G B = Generation system B D A = Peak demand system A D B = Peak demand system B I X = Power flow from system A to system B

15 ANNUAL BENEFIT / COSTConstrainedUnconstrained Transmission Capacity250 MW400 MW Maket & Reliability Benefits System A (MM$/yr)$ 5.60$ 8.58 System B (MM$/yr)$ 9.50$ Congestion Rent (MM$/yr)$ 6.90$ 0.00 Total M & R Benefit (MM$/yr)$ 22.00$ Transmission Costs System A (MM$/yr)$ 4.63$ 7.00 System B (MM$/yr)$ 7.87$ Total TC (MM$/yr)$ 12.50$ Net M&R Benefit System A (MM$/yr)$ 3.52$ 1.58 System B (MM$/yr)$ 5.98$ 2.94 Total Net M&R Benefit (MM$/yr)$ 9.50$ 4.53 B/C Ratio Environmental Benefits (MM$/yr)$ 6.13$ 9.81 Net M-R-E Benefit (MM$/yr)$ 15.63$ 14.34

Optimal Interregional Transmission Capacity 16

Application II: 2-area 5-bus interconnection, with tie-line expansion 17 1 F45 F12 L5 L3 L2 L4 G4 G3 G2 G System ASystem B 4 Second circuit to be added

Coordinated Trading 18 Node Price ($/MWh) Generation (MW) Load (MW) Price ($/MWh) Generation (MW) Load (MW) Before Transmission ExpansionAfter Transmission Expansion System A Local Local Export 144.1Import Import114.2 Export141.7 System B Local Local Export144.1 Import Import 114.2Export 141.7

Market & Environmental Benefits 19 Benefits ($/h)System ASystem BInterconnection  Generation Surplus ,822-2,435  Demand Surplus 5,035 1,7906,825  Congestion Rent -3, ,811 Total Market  Environmental Policy Questions : – Is the regional integration a good deal for system A and B? – Net benefit is positive but CO 2 increases, is it acceptable? – Is this a sustainable energy integration policy? Need monetary compensations?

Thanks ! 20

Data Application I DataSystem ASystem B Installed Capacity (MW)4,0002,500 Peak Demand (MW)3,6002,000 Reserves Requirement (MW) Generation Marginal Cost ($/MWh), MC10 + G A / G B /50 Price of Energy ($/MWh) Price of Operating Reserve ($/MW-h) CO 2 marginal emission factor (kg/kWh) CO 2 social cost ($/ton)20.00 Transmission Equivalent Annual Cost $ 50,000 / MW-yr

Data Application II GeneratorType Pmin (MW) Pmax (MW) Generation Cost ($/h) CO 2 emissions (kg/kWh) G1Coal ST P P G3Gas ST P P G2Gas GT P + P G4Gas CCGT P P Load Summer Peak (MW) Winter Peak (MW) L L L L Line Resistance (p.u) Reactance (p.u) Maximum Capacity (MW)