Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 12, A Look at Pedagogical Content Knowledge Overview Curriculum: Biology Content Pre-Assessment using CPS Reflection Instruction: What do.
Advertisements

Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: Anthropology Chair: Dr. Roger Kurtz Assessment Coordinator: Dr. Pilapa Esara Date of Presentation:
Assessment Report Biology School of Science and Mathematics Rey Sia, Chair Laurie B. Cook, Assessment Coordinator.
Just what you need to know and do NOW!
Rajlakshmi Ghosh Cadey Korson Being a TA in a Science Lab.
MS Program Learning Outcomes. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Measures and CriteriaAssessment Schedule 1. Demonstrate knowledge of broad and specialty.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
Making Your Assessments More Meaningful Flex Day 2015.
UA Introductory Biology Redesign: Final report Lisa Elfring, Elizabeth Willott, Susan Jorstad, Ted Weinert, Ravi Palanivelu, Rob Leonard, Brian Larkins,
Interactive Teaching Techniques: Are they transferable across cultures?
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
A Faculty Team Works to Create Content Linkages among Various Courses to Increase Meaningful Learning of Targeted Concepts of Microbiology Gili Marbach-Ad,
GRADUATE EDUCATION IN RESEARCH ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS Jorge J. Ferrér-Negrón 1, William J. Frey 1, Efraín O’Neill-Carrillo 2, Carlos Ríos-Velázquez.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Five Month Retention of Basic Genetics Knowledge Following an Introductory Biology Course Peter Busher and Andy Andres Division of Natural Sciences and.
Introduction to Community Medicine course “COMM311”
Deborah Gentry, Instructional Development Center Randi Sutter, Library 14 th Annual Illinois Community College Assessment Fair.
T EACHING THE T EACHERS : B UILDING I NFORMATION L ITERACY I NTO THE B IOLOGY C URRICULUM Meris Mandernach James Madison University LOEX 2008.
Instruction & Assessment Plan, Melissa Bowles-Terry April 4, 2011.
DELIA A. ARCISO Researcher The Effect of Using Multimedia and Team Teaching on the Science Achievement Level of Fourth Year Students of Libertad National.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Science Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for genetics Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight Science Education Initiative.
A Hands-on Approach to Teaching Electricity and Conductivity in 8th Grade Science Introduction The Tennessee 8th grade science curriculum contains several.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Preparing for the AP Biology Exam. What do the scores mean? (According to the College Board) AP exam score Comparable freshman college course grade How.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Introduction to Community Medicine course “COMM311”
How do these groups of students think about and learn genetics?
Research Problem From historical anecdotal evidence from colleagues, as well as from my own subjective, informal observations, students have a particularly.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty Development Workshop October 31, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Technology.
AP Biology Examination Important facts and exam analysis.
Research Problem Misconceptions are known barriers to learning. To learn, students must be able to identify their misconceptions, break them down, and.
SoTL Institute Presentation Samantha Elliott Kerry July 18, 2008.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: The traditional approach.
Use of digital diagnostic Tests Baleni Z.G. R.P.L. Manager.
Assessment of Course-Level Learning Outcomes in Psychology.
DATA ANALYSIS Looking at Student Work November 2013.
Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-based and Traditional Instruction in Biomedical Engineering Others: Taylor Martin, Stephanie D. Rivale, and.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
A Brief Overview.  “FYE” stands for First Year Experience  FYE helps incoming freshman adjust to college life. They choose a “block” of courses to share.
Cameron University Library Library Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report
Biology Department Assessment Pilot Carla Hass
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics University of Maryland.
Wendy Heck Grillo North Carolina Central University Dept. of Biology Biology Scholars 2009.
Aligning Student Learning outcomes to Evaluation 1 Applied Technologies - ICRDCE Conference Day
Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.
The pre- post assessment 3 points1 point Introduction Purpose Learning targets Instruments Eliminate bias & distortion Writing conventions.
Preparing for the AP Biology Exam. What do the scores mean? (According to the College Board) AP exam score Comparable freshman college course grade How.
Research Problem Misconceptions of molecular biology concepts prevents students from understanding and retaining the correct information.
School Grades and Data Estancia Secondary Schools School Grades and Data
Dr. Fernando Paniagua Associate Professor CSIT Department
Looking at Student Work November 2013
Supporting Sustainable Active Learning
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: Debate as to whether.
Preliminary Data Analyses
with PreNRT as covariate
Assessing Students' Understanding of the Scientific Process Amy Marion, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University Abstract The primary goal of.
Research Problem: High D/W/F rates in undergraduate introductory biology. Indicates a basic lack of biological literacy Loss of students from the biology.
Stephen Hughes Assessment Coordinator October 18, 2016
Assessment and Course Redesign in Community College Geosciences
Final Portfolio Presentation
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Criminal Investigation Program School of Science, Health, and CJ Fall 2015 Assessment Report
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
AP Biology Class Bonneville High School
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Curriculum Coordinator: Kathleen Mahoney
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006

Assess Student Learning in the General Biology II Course

Justification This course – required for all biology majors (enrolls about 400 students per year) – taken in their freshman year – Teaches fundamental scientific concepts needed in more advanced courses

Activity A pre-test on course content is offered on the first day of class and the same exam is offered as post-test at end of semester

Objectives Evaluate the teaching/learning effectiveness Identify – misconceptions that students bring to course – and persisting misconceptions

Instrument 21 multiple choice questions Include fundamental concepts discussed in the course – Evolution – Classification – Kingdoms – Plant tissues, growth, transport, reproduction – Animal tissues and systems

Loop Closing Pre activity: Pre test 3052 Intervention: Lectures, laboratory exercises, course activities Post activity: Post test 3052 Results and actions taken:

Results

Impacted Population Students – Pre test students – Post test – 346 students Three different faculty members

Faculty and Global Average 50.45% 47.74% 50.42% 55.83% 51.25% 77.29% 66.38% 82.11% 78.70% 85.29% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Faculty 1Faculty 2Faculty 3Faculty 4Global Faculty Test average pre average post average

PRE TEST Most failed questions (by over 50% of students)- 13/21 (3,4,6,7,9,11,14,15,16,17,18,20, 21) Misconceptions in pretest (incorrect by more than 50% of students and same incorrect answer was chosen by more than 40%) – 6-D smooth and striated muscle move arms and legs – 7- E blood is not a connective tissue – 9-C blood has no defense functions – 16-C all chordates are vertebrates Students could be guessing

POST TEST Most failed questions in Post test (by more than 25% of students)- 8/21 3, 4, 6, 9,11,15, 16, 17 Misconceptions in post test (answer incorrectly and same incorrect answer was chosen by more than 40% of those who failed it) 6-D 9-C 15-C animal and plant distinction 16C

Results Improvement in knowledge in all but one question (10)- immunology – Question 10 has misleading terminology Misconceptions- most students clarified incoming misconceptions In some students the misconceptions persisted thus: – traditional teaching was not sufficient to correct them

Closing the loop Actions taken according to results

Actions In some sections post test was offered before semester ended Students took post test twice – Individually – In groups of 4-6 students Review for final exam Incorrect concepts were discussed again to the entire group

Group Post Test Discussion Activity Participating students- 89 students 14/18 - perfect score 2/18 -1 incorrect (#9) 1/ incorrect (#9 and #16) 1/18 – 3 incorrect (#3, 4, 6)

Actions Results presented to the faculty teaching the course before the semester ended Faculty received – Their own results – Global results Failed questions and misconceptions were analyzed Strategies were discussed

Strategies Discuss missed concepts again before semester ends Some will ask again in final Do group discussion of posttest Discuss these results – with the faculty that will teach course next semester – with teaching assistants of the course Faculty compare their individual results throughout next semesters to evaluate their efforts in clarifying misconceptions

Actions Review course content Modify the diagnostic test Correct pretest at beginning of semester to see what students bring and misconceptions to develop strategies throughout semester Conduct same study in the General Biology I course

Innovations The diagnostic test was used as teaching/ learning tools – to improve student understanding – Group test discussion Post tests offered before semester ended- allowed for immediate action

Future studies Diagnostic test in General Biology I Ethics in science across the curriculum