Progression of Learning Elementary English as a Second Language MELS Working Document 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach
Advertisements

Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Context Response.
Focus on Instructional Support
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
From Elaboration to Collaboration: Understanding and Supporting Second Language Writers Alfredo Urzúa, Languages and Linguistics Kate Mangelsdorf, English.
Multi-Level Elementary 2 and 3 Multi-Cycle - Multi-Level Elementary 2 and 3 ESL –
The New English Curriculum
Non-Linguistic Representation Web 2.0 Tools Helping students understand and represent knowledge non- linguistically is the most under-used instructional.
Acting on information about your learners’ writing: next steps Melanie Winthrop.
Where’s the Knowledge? SPEAQ Workshop Goal To understand: -the role and importance of the Related Content in the development of the three ESL competencies.
Beginning Oral Language and Vocabulary Development
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Presentation slide 1.1 Aims of the literacy module – the main features and teaching strategies used during English lessons – the role of the TA in supporting.
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
1.2 Cultural understanding Exploring how ideas, experiences and emotions are conveyed in a range of music from different times and cultures. 1.3 Critical.
Writing comments for reports
30/08/2015MELS Working Document /08/2015MELS Working Document 2010 Progression of Learning at the Secondary Level ESL Core Programs SPEAQ November.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
GRADE 7 & 8 ENGLISH FOR SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES Course Information.
Focus Education Assessing Reading: Meeting Year 2 Expectations Year 2 Expectations: Word Reading Decode automatically and fluently Read accurately.
Junior High Literacy Assessment May 26-28, 2008.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation Subjects MFL: optional module 5.
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
The New English Curriculum September The new programme of study for English is knowledge-based; this means its focus is on knowing facts. It is.
Bundle Up! Multi-cycle LES Grade 2 and 3. Production team  Marie-Christine Léger (Pedagogical consultant)  Danika Dutil and Nancy Rokas (ESL teachers)
Overview of the Pedagogical Guidelines (2006) IST workshop, Agadir, December, 2006.
Unwrapping the Common Core (Oklahoma Academic Standards) Moving Forward One Step At A Time Standards.
LAS LINKS DATA ANALYSIS. Objectives 1.Analyze the 4 sub-tests in order to understand which academic skills are being tested. 2.Use sample tests to practice.
 Microteaching  By Jessica Richard  DID-2929 Teaching Grammar in ESL Classes  July 2012.
Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach TEACHER GUSTAVO GÓMEZ.
Early Behaviours and What to Look For EARLY READING BEHAVIOURS…
Oracy O 6.1 Understand the main points and simple opinions in a spoken story, song or passage listen attentively, re-tell and discuss the main ideas agree.
ESL Teacher Networking Meeting Session - 2 Raynel Shepard, Ed.D.
02/06/2016MELS Working Document Progression of Learning at the Secondary Level EESL Programs SPEAQ November 2011 Information Session.
Pedagogy To Bridge The Gap ESF 2015 Conference Friday, October 2 nd, workshop session Presenters: Therese Gallen- Bradbury School Lisa Harris- Clearwater.
The importance of talking and listening for second language learners
INTO CLIL I.S. CARLO DELL’ACQUA – LEGNANO Prof.ssa Gallo Adriana.
Using Stories in the ESL Class
Secondary Cycle One Enriched English as a Second Language Program Gillian Baxter Derek Wright Winter 2008.
An Introduction to Formative Assessment as a useful support for teaching and learning.
New Writing Expectations Require a New Approach: An Introduction to Ready ® Writing Grades 3-5 Adam Berkin Vice President, Product Development
ELPS Student Expectations Learning Strategies ELPS 1A-1H Listening ELPS 2A-2I Speaking ELPS 3A-3J Reading ELPS 4A-4K Writing ELPS 5A-5G ELPS Index.
Presented by: Rashida Kausar Bhatti ( All new learners of English progress through the same stages to acquire language. However, the length of.
TheSecondary The Secondary Cycle One Core (ESL) and Enriched (EESL) Programs Regional Workshop # An Introduction to the Response, Writing and Production.
Sheltered Instruction: Making Content Comprehensible for ELLs London Middle School April 18, 2008.
LANGUAGE IMPAIRED. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Language Impaired (LI) An impairment in the language system is an abnormal processing or production of: Form including.
FRENCH Grade 7 Unit 2 Unit 2 Introduction to Basic French Part 2 People Telling Time Objects Review Numbers Essential Understandings/Learning Goals: R1.1.
03/03/2016MELS Working Document Progression of Learning at the Secondary Level EESL Programs RREALS October 2011 Information Session.
Why should we learn English? Who dares to teach must never cease to learn. ~John Cotton Dana.
1 Instructing the English Language Learner (ELL) in the Regular Classroom.
12/06/2016MELS Working Document Progression of Learning at the Secondary Level ESL Core Programs Information Session.
Hop On! A Learning and Evaluation Situation for cycle 2 students (date) A Learning and Evaluation Situation for cycle 2 students (date)
Advancing Oral Proficiency in our World Language Classrooms Jie Tian 1 Taiwan Teacher Professional Development Series.
Santa Clara County Office of Education
GGGE6533 LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING INVENTORY (SELL-IN) FINDINGS & IMPLICATIONS PREPARED BY: ZULAIKHA.
Pre-Kindergarten Scope & Sequence Unit 8: Spring is in the Air
Kindergarten Scope & Sequence Unit 10: School’s Out!
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Academic Language: More Than Just Vocabulary
Learning and Teaching Principles
THE SILENT WAY.
Intermediates Here is a simple profile for Intermediate proficiency speakers from ACTFL 2012.
National Curriculum Requirements of Language at Key Stage 2 only
Section VI: Comprehension
FCE (FIRST CERTIFICATE IN ENGLISH) General information.
Languages – key stage 2 Subject content Key stage 2: Foreign language
Intermediates Here is a simple profile for Intermediate proficiency speakers from ACTFL 2012.
FCE IES Parque de Lisboa.
Presentation transcript:

Progression of Learning Elementary English as a Second Language MELS Working Document 2009

Workshop Goals  To understand the structure of the Progression of Learning document  To understand its use as a planning tool for teachers  To reflect on how to share the information with teachers MELS Working Document 2009

Agenda  Graffiti Activity (Activating prior knowledge)  Developing the Progression of Learning (Working context)  Presenting Driving Questions  Exploring the Progression of Learning  Workshop Evaluation MELS Working Document 2009

Graffiti Activity Activating Prior Knowledge  What key words and ideas come to mind when thinking about the Progression of Learning?  Write your answers on the poster paper.  Discuss with your team.  Be prepared to share one idea with the entire group. MELS Working Document 2009

Driving Questions  How can the Progression of Learning help teachers plan the development of the ESL competencies?  How can we present the Progression of Learning to elementary ESL specialists?  PB, page 2 MELS Working Document 2009

Developing the Progression of Learning  Mandate & Working Context  Research  Challenges MELS Working Document 2009

 Read the MELS General Introduction to the Progression of Learning.  Reading intention: Where does the Progression of Learning fit into the PFEQ?  Link to Progression of Learning document: MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning PFEQ BALsCCCs Subject Areas ESL Competencies Key Features Progression of Learning End-of-Cycle Outcomes Evaluation Criteria Essential Knowledge MELS Working Document 2009

Comparing the Progression of Learning & the Essential Knowledge Quiet Reading Time (QRT)  Read the general ESL Introduction on page 3 of the Progression of Learning.  Skim through the Progression of Learning and compare it to the Essential Knowledge section of the ESL programs.  What stands out for you? MELS Working Document 2009

Introduction Learning Contexts Legend Chart Format Footnote (See page 9) Sub-Category Element Category 1 Examples Sub-element (See PB, page 3) MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language  QRT: Read the Introduction and the Learning Contexts for Cycle One, Cycle Two and Cycle Three of this category. ▪ How is the information organized? ▪ How does the Learning Context evolve over the three cycles? MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Legend and Footnote  How can the symbols be explained? In your team, match the words and phrases with a symbol from the legend or with the footnote.  PB, page 4 MELS Working Document 2009

Footnote: 1  The Cycle One student constructs new knowledge by gradually becoming aware of new language, strategies, language conventions, text components and cultural elements.  (a) Initial exposure to the language  (f) Acquires naturally  (i) Imitates  (t) Discovers MELS Working Document 2009

Legend:  Student constructs knowledge with teacher guidance.  (c) Explicit teaching  (d) Teacher prompts students  (e) Teacher-centered  (g) Resources provided by teacher  (o) Teacher scaffolds learning  (s) Modeled by teacher  (u) Trial & Error MELS Working Document 2009

Legend:   Student applies knowledge by the end of the school year.  (b) Most of the students  (h) Student-centered  (j) Student takes initiative  (k) Self-directed use of resources  (m) Correctly most of the time MELS Working Document 2009

Legend:   Student reinvests knowledge.  (l) Reuses  (n) Broadens  (p) In new contexts  (q) Refines  (r) Transfers MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions Elements and Sub-Elements  Compare the Progression of Learning with the Essential Knowledge.  What do you notice about the elements? (e.g.: Classroom routines, Instructions, Delay speaking, etc.)  What do you notice about the sub-elements? (e.g.: Participates in classroom routines, Gives instructions, Stalls for time, etc.)  Look at the element Opinions on page 6 of the Progression of Learning document. What do you notice?  PB, page 5 MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions  Some elements have a vertical progression (i.e. from more simple to more complex).  What elements from Useful Expressions have a vertical progression?  PB, page 5 MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions Vertical Progression:  Identification  Capabilities (example in PB, p. 5)  Agreement, disagreement  Offers of assistance  Needs  Feelings, interests, tastes, preferences  Expressions promoting harmonious exchanges and teamwork  PB, page 5 MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions  Look at the different sub-elements for Useful Expressions.  Why are they written using action verbs?  PB, page 5 MELS Working Document 2009

A competency is a set of behaviours based on the effective mobilization and use of a range of resources.... students’ learnings serve as tools for both action and thought... Source: PFEQ, Chapter 1, page 4. MELS Working Document 2009

Brain Teaser At a workshop, a teacher asks you: “How is progression shown in Cycle 1?” MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning Lunch MELS Working Document 2009

Progression of Learning Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions Examples  Close your Progression of Learning.  In pairs, write your own examples for the sub- elements. Then, compare your answers with the Progression of Learning document.  PB, page 6 MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category A – Useful Expressions Examples  How can the examples help teachers?  How can the examples be misleading? MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category B - Vocabulary  Which sub-elements of vocabulary should most students be able to apply by the end of each year at elementary?  PB, page 7 MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category B - Vocabulary Grade 3  Uses vocabulary related to school MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category B - Vocabulary Grade 4  E.g. Uses action words  Uses vocabulary related to other familiar environments  Uses personal pronouns and possessive forms to talk about self  Uses the alphabet to spell words in context  Uses cardinal and ordinal numbers frequently encountered in class  Uses the names of colours and shapes frequently encountered in class MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category B – Vocabulary Grade 5  Uses expressions of time frequently encountered in class Grade 6  E.g. Responds to question words used in context  Uses question words in context MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1: Contextual Language and Functional Language Sub-Category B – Vocabulary Which sub-elements of vocabulary will still require teacher guidance at the end of elementary school?  Uses targeted vocabulary to carry out tasks  Uses personal pronouns and possessive forms to talk about others  Uses preposition and location words required for tasks MELS Working Document 2009

Category 1 Wrap-up  Refer back to the two driving questions. What information would you add?  PB, Page 2 MELS Working Document 2009

Brain Teaser In the Progression of Learning document:  Why is Circumlocution omitted from the Useful Expressions section of the document?  Why did Yes/No Questions change sub- categories? Hint: Compare PFEQ and Progression of Learning MELS Working Document 2009

Category 2 - Strategies  QRT: Read the Introduction and Learning Contexts for this category.  Close your Progression of Learning. MELS Working Document 2009

Category 2 – Strategies  Which strategies do you think students should be able to apply by the end of Cycle 2?  Discuss your choices with your team and then compare with the Progression of Learning.  Which type of strategy is not starred? Why?  PB, page 8. MELS Working Document 2009

 Grade 3  Grade 4  Grade 5  Grade 6 -Delay speaking -Risk-taking: Dares to use functional language frequently used in class to speak only English, in spite of making errors -Asking for help -Asking for clarification -Practice -Accepting not being able to understand everything listened to or read -Attention: Decides to concentrate on the right things - Resourcing - Note-taking -Circumlocution - Risk-taking: Experiments with known language - Attention: Maintains attention during tasks - Use of prior knowledge - Predicting - Inferencing - Skimming - Scanning - Cooperation MELS Working Document 2009

Category 3 - Language Conventions  QRT: Read the Introduction and Learning Contexts for this category. MELS Working Document 2009

Category 3 - Language Conventions  Language conventions are not targeted in Cycle One. Why? Hint: Look at the Learning Contexts.  What do you think is the place of metalanguage (i.e. grammar terminology) in the Progression of Learning?  PB, page 9. MELS Working Document 2009

Context for grammar MELS Working Document 2009

Category 3 - Language Conventions  The chart below is another way of looking at the Language Conventions Category. Why do you think the sub-elements progress as follows? How would you explain this to teachers?  PB, page 9. MELS Working Document 2009

Category 3 - Language Conventions  Which sub-elements of Language Conventions will still require teacher guidance at the end of elementary school?  Places articles before nouns  Uses knowledge of verb tenses to construct meaning  Uses verb tenses targeted to task MELS Working Document 2009

Category 4 - Text Components  QRT: Read the Introduction and the Learning Contexts for this category.  What stands out for you? MELS Working Document 2009

Category 4 - Text Components  What additional information do the sub- elements provide teachers in their planning?  Hint: Compare the Progression of Learning document with the Cycles Two and Three program.  PB, page 10. MELS Working Document 2009

Category 5 – Cultural Elements and Cultural Products  Read the Introduction and the Learning Contexts for this category.  What do you notice? MELS Working Document 2009

Category 5 – Cultural Elements and Cultural Products  Look at the information in the chart of the Progression of Learning.  What stands out for you?  How would you present this category to teachers? In your team, think of some activities.  PB, page 10 MELS Working Document 2009

Driving Questions  Go back to the Driving Questions (PB, page 2).  How can the Progression of Learning help teachers plan the development of the ESL competencies?  How can we present the Progression of Learning to elementary ESL specialists?  Share ideas with your teammates. MELS Working Document 2009

What Would You Say?  Are teachers required to use the Progression of Learning?  Do we have to give knowledge quizzes?  Does the Progression of Learning make published materials inadequate or incomplete? MELS Working Document 2009

What Would You Say?  How many stars (  ) does a student need to pass each year of elementary?  Is the Progression of Learning a tool specifically for new teachers? MELS Working Document 2009

Workshop Evaluation MELS Working Document 2009