Figure S3: Generation and genotype analysis of P. berghei mutants with disrupted genes that encode orthologs of mosquito stage proteins of P. falciparum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HPV.  Many risk factors for development of cervical cancer. no routinely used positive predictive biological markers, which identify women at risk of.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: recombinant DNA
Genetic and physical maps around the sex-determining M- locus of the dioecious plant asparagus Telgmann-Rauber et al
Fig 11-1 Chapter 11: recombinant DNA and related techniques.
Using mutants to clone genes Objectives 1. What is positional cloning? 2.What is insertional tagging? 3.How can one confirm that the gene cloned is the.
DNA Technology Chapter 20.
15.2 Recombinant DNA Or How to Mess with DNA for Fun and Profit.
5.3 – Advances in Genetics Trashketball!. Selecting organisms with desired traits to be parents of the next generation is… A. Inbreeding A. Inbreeding.
FIGURE 7.1. Synthesis of a double-stranded DNA molecule.
Molecular Biology II Lecture 1 OrR. Restriction Endonuclease (sticky end)
RFLP ((Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism)
Chapter 20 DNA Technology and Genomics. Biotechnology is the manipulation of organisms or their components to make useful products. Recombinant DNA is.
Molecular Cloning. Definitions   Cloning :   Obtaining a piece of DNA from its original source (Genome) and introducing it in a DNA vector   Sub-cloning:
Finding a gene based on phenotype Model organisms ’s of DNA markers mapped onto each chromosome – high density linkage map. 2. identify markers linked.
Fig. S1: Fingerprinting of three BAC clones from different accessions of wild rice species with the AA genome constitution. The BAC DNAs were completely.
PCR & visualise products on gel
2470 bp 1891 bp WT bp 2314 bp A B Fig. S1. Verification with PCR amplification of the.
Figure 1. AsCpf1 and LbCpf1-mediated gene editing in human cells
Supplemental Figure 1 A) B) C)
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
Fig. S Fig. S2 Cre-mediated recombination in vivo. G2 mice displaying high levels of GFP were crossed.
Biotech Tools Review
Map-based cloning of interesting genes
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Step 1: amplification and cloning procedures
PCR genotype analysis to determine RNP-mediated knockout efficiency in C. lusitaniae. PCR genotype analysis to determine RNP-mediated knockout efficiency.
Vav‐1 gene‐targeting strategy.
Detection and Species Identification of Malaria Parasites by Isothermal tHDA Amplification Directly from Human Blood without Sample Preparation  Ying.
Consequences of T‐DNA insertion on SWP expression in swp mutant.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Sheng Ding, Xiaohui Wu, Gang Li, Min Han, Yuan Zhuang, Tian Xu  Cell 
LINEs Mobilize SINEs in the Eel through a Shared 3′ Sequence
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
(A) Schematic representation of kalata B1 showing the cyclic cystine knot, the amino acid sequence in single letter code, and the regions used for oligonucleotide.
Hou-Sung Jung, Gregory J. Tsongalis, Joel A. Lefferts 
Characterisation of proviral integrations in corrected stem cells Visualisation of COL7A1 sequence by FISH analysis in corrected stem cells at passage.
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Cooperative Primers The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Rotation review Gaurav Moghe Genetics Program
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Human Epidermal Differentiation Complex in a Single 2
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Antigenic Variation in Malaria
Structure of the GM2A Gene: Identification of an Exon 2 Nonsense Mutation and a Naturally Occurring Transcript with an In-Frame Deletion of Exon 2  Biao.
A Human Homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster diaphanous Gene Is Disrupted in a Patient with Premature Ovarian Failure: Evidence for Conserved Function.
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
Figure 1. BRCA1-associated R-Loop accumulation at a non-coding region upstream of ESR1 locus. (A) Alignment of DRIP-seq ... Figure 1. BRCA1-associated.
Tamar Ratner, Ron Piran, Natasha Jonoska, Ehud Keinan 
RAD51 is essential for L. donovani.
Both E12 and E47 Allow Commitment to the B Cell Lineage
Targeted Myostatin Gene Editing in Multiple Mammalian Species Directed by a Single Pair of TALE Nucleases  Li Xu, Piming Zhao, Andrew Mariano, Renzhi.
Sex-Linked period Genes in the Silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi
José E. Mejía, Adrian Willmott, Elaine Levy, William C
A Greedy Promoter Controls Malarial Var-iations
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
APOE Gene Targeting (A) Schematic representation of the endogenous APOE locus, the gene targeting vector and the targeted APOE locus. The exons of the.
Material for Quiz 5 from Chapter 8
Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii. Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii.
Genomic structure of LTBP-4 around the 3rd 8-Cys repeat.
A Central Role for P48/45 in Malaria Parasite Male Gamete Fertility
David A Schwarz, Carol D Katayama, Stephen M Hedrick  Immunity 
Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences
Targeting DCLK1 by miRNA-137.
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Figure S3: Generation and genotype analysis of P. berghei mutants with disrupted genes that encode orthologs of mosquito stage proteins of P. falciparum S3.1: Generic pL KO plasmid 9470 bps L695R L1419F L1420R L1662F 5ko Promotor and 5'pbdhfr/ts tgdhfr/ts -ORF 3'pbdhfr/ts 3ko amp EcoRI/EcoRV Asp718I HindIII/ClaI NotI/BamHI L695R L1419F L1420R and L191R L1662F 5ko5'pbdhfr/tstgdhfr/ts3'pbdhfr/ts 3ko linearised with Asp718I and BamHI or NotI Figure S3.1 A Schematic representation of the generic plasmid pL0001 used in gene KO targeting. Shown are 5ko and 3ko targeting regions that were cloned using the indicated restriction enzymes (for a detailed lists of primers and sites see SOM Table 2). The plasmid contains the pyrimethamine resistant Toxoplasma gondii gene tgdhfr/ts gene as a drug-selectable marker. The primers shown (L695R[Reverse], L1419F[Forward], etc.) were used in PCR’s verifying correct integration of the construct into the P.berghei genome. B Schematic representation of an integrated targeting construct into the P.berghei genome; shown are the primers used for integration PCR’s. A B L190F

S3.2: Targeted disruption of PB = PFD0425w (mutant lines 806 and 841) i-PB_RP1209 = 7624 bps ( bps) Figure S3.2 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 13 of the parental populations 806 and 841. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. C Diagnostic PCRs show 5’ and 3’ integration of plasmid pL1179 into the genomic locus, amplification of part of the tgdhfr/ts gene, wildtype and control reactions in the mutant parasite 841cl1. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5. i-PB_RP1209 PB F 2624F 2625R 2726F 2727R 2626F 2627R 2725R ORF-1 3KO5KO A Exp 806Exp  10 BC 5’ integration3’ integrationwildtype tg dhfr/ts control M 841cl1 WT X 695 = X 191 = X 2727 = X 2725 = X 538 = 700

Contig5042 = bps ( bps) Contig5042 PB F 2632F2633R 2734F2735R2634F2635F 3KO5KO 2733R 3  7 Exp 808Exp 843 Figure S3.3 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 7 of the parental populations 802 and 843 (note the stronger hybridisation signal in chromosome 7 indicating more than one gene present with the 3’ UTR of dhfr/ts). Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. C Diagnostic PCRs show 5’ and 3’ integration of plasmid pL1175 into the genomic locus, amplification of part of the tgdhfr/ts gene, wildtype and control reactions in the mutant parasite 843cl1. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5. 5’ integration3’ integrationwildtype tg dhfr/ts control M cl1 WT X 695 = X 191 = X 2735 = X 2733 = X 538 = 700 B C A S3.3: Targeted disruption of PB = MAL8P1.66 (mutant lines 808 and 843)

S3.4: Targeted disruption of PB & PB & PB = PF14_0435 (mutant lines 802 and 838) (see also S.3.5 for an alignment of PF14_0435 with P. berghei ORF-1 and sequences from other Plasmodium species) Final contig-1 = 5455 bps final Contig1 PB PB pb berg-349c08.p1c berg-1419e08.p1k berg-2274h02.p1k PB_RP2658 PCR 2713  3229 PCR 3226  3229 PCR 3227  F 2666F 3226F 2653R 3227F 3229R 3228R 2654F 2655R 2714R ORF-1ORF-2 3KO5KO A Figure S3.4 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 13 of the parental populations 802 and 838. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. C Diagnostic PCRs show 5’ and 3’ integration of plasmid pL1175 into the genomic locus, amplification of part of the tgdhfr/ts gene, wildtype and control reactions in the mutant parasite 802cl1. For details of the primers see SOM Table X 695 = X 3229 = X 1420 = X 2714 = X 3229 = X 3228 = X 3229 = X 1813 = cl1 wildtype 5’ integration3’ integration tgdhfr/ts Wildtype AWildtype BWildtype CWildtype D rhomboid 3 control WT and contig gap closure M 3 7 Exp 802  13 BC

S3.5: Alignment of P. falciparum protein PF14_0435 and orthol0gous sequences from P. chabaudi, P. yoelii, P. berghei, P. knowlesi and P. vivax.

S3.6: Targeted disruption of PB & PB & PB = PF11_0528 (mutant lines 800 and 836) 3 7  9 9 Exp 800Exp 836 i-Contig -1 = bps PB PB PB i-Contig -1 PCR 3684  3685 PB_RP0861 Pb_3654 berg-2260a06.p1k and berg-2259a06.p1k PB_RP F 2644F2645R 3684F 3685R2646F ORF-2ORF-1ORF-6ORF-5ORF-4ORF-3 3KO5KO 2710R 2647R A B Figure S3.6 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model PB Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 9 of the parental populations 800 and 836. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. C Diagnostic PCRs show 5’ and 3’ integration into the genomic locus, amplification of part of the tgdhfr/ts gene, wildtype and control reactions in the mutant parasite 836 For details of the primers see SOM Table  0695 = 1413 = 5’ integration 1662  2710 = 1202 = 3’ integration Exp 836 WT C Integration PCRs of Exp 836 after mosquito passage

S3.7: Targeted disruption of PB = PF14_0074 (mutant lines 808 and 842) i-Contig5207 = bps ( bps) i-Contig5207 PB F 2664F 2665R 2730F 2731R 2630F2631R2729R ORF-3 3KO5KO A 3 7  10 Exp 807Exp 842 B Figure S3.7 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 10 of the parental populations 807 and 842. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5. Exp 842 after mosquito passage

S3.8: Targeted disruption of PB & PB & PB = MAL6P1.181 = PFF1195c (mutant lines 801 and 837) Final Contig 1 = 6425 bps final Contig 1 PCR 3686  2651 PB_RP3969 Contig4427 PB PB PB F 2648F2649R3686F2650F 2651R 2712R 3KO5KO A 3 7  11 Exp 837 B Figure S3.8 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing correct integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 11 of the parental populations 801 and 837. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5. Exp 801 Exp 837 after mosquito passage

S3.9: Constructs for targeted disruption of PB = PF14_0607 (exp. 803, 829 and 839) 3 7 9/10/11  13/14 Exp 803Exp 839Exp 829 Integration predicted in Chromosome 13 plasmid "final“ = 8090 bps F 2656F 265R7 3687F 2866F3688R2658F 2659R 2716R "final" PB PB PB Pb_3602 i-Contig4534 berg-185f01.q1c PCR 3687  3688 PCR 2866  KO5KO A B Figure S3.9 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing no integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 13 of the parental populations 803, 829 and 839. Only the hybridization signals of episomal plasmid are clearly visible. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5.

S3.10: Constructs for targeted disruption of PB = MAL1P.31 = PFA0205w (exp. 809, 830 and 844) 3 7 plasmid Exp 830Exp 844 Contig1 = 2938 bps Contig1 PB_PH5682 i-berg-208e01.p1c 3KO5KO PCR 2638  PB cDNA A B Figure S3.10 A Schematic representation of the genomic region containing Plasmodium berghei gene model pb Shown are also the positions of the primers used in contig assembly, KO plasmid construction on either side of the (orange) 5’ targeting and the (red) 3’ targeting region, and the primers used to analyze the mutant lines. B FIGE showing no integration of the targeting plasmid into chromosome 2 of the parental populations 800 and 836. Only the hybridization signals of episomal plasmid are visible. Hybridisation was done with a P. berghei 3’ UTR dhfr/ts probe; signals in chromosome 3 and 7 represent the gfp transgene and the endogenous dhfr/ts gene. For details of the primers see SOM Table 5. Exp 809

S3.11: GenBank accession numbers for PCR gap closures and location of primers relating to contigs and reads