Low-Intensity Strategies: Using Instructional Feedback to Support Instruction Lane and Oakes 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

Functional Assessment-Based Interventions. HELPFUL RESOURCES: 1. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT- BASED INTERVENTION (FABI) PARENT GUIDE 2. FABI TERMS AND DEFINITIONS.
Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Why does my school – and district – need an integrated approach to meet students’
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
PBIS Overview Wohlwend Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Universal Screening: A Look at Behavior Screening Tools in Tiered Systems of Support Chicago, October 29, 2014 Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D, University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
RTI & Classwide Instruction
Supporting the Instructional Process Instructional Assistant Training.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
Clarifying Retreat.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
1 CSIP: Clarifying Retreat June TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal Staff Development Objectives.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Low-Intensity Strategies: Using Behavior Specific Praise to Support Instruction.
Tier 2 Strategies: A Look at Self-Monitoring Wendy Peia Oakes, Ph.D. Arizona State University Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment – Feedback February 28,2012 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Thomasyne Beverly, Dr.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
SCTG: Setting Up Implementation Success Jessica Swain-Bradway, Kathleen Lane, Jeff Sprague.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Low-Intensity Strategies for Academics and Behavior Opportunities to RespondBehavior Specific PraiseActive SupervisionInstructional FeedbackHigh p RequestsPrecorrectionIncorporating.
Taking a Look at Behavior Contracts Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Bruhn, A.L., & Crnobori, M. (2011). Managing Challenging Behaviors in Schools: Research-Based.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Manipulating the Classroom for Student Success Jorge Preciado, Ph.D. Deborah Hudson, Ph. D.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
A Look at Repeated Readings. Agenda What is repeated readings? Why is repeated readings effective? What does the supporting research for repeated readings.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Precorrection
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
A team-based process for designing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: How does my school-site leadership team design.
Taking a Look at Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Writing.
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
Coaching at the Grade Level: Using Screening Data to Inform Instruction Presented by: Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas Catherine.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Implementing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three- Tiered (Ci3T) Models of Prevention: Installing Systematic Screening for Behavior Council for Children with.
Developing Intervention Guidelines with Student Outcomes in Mind PBIS CI3T Summer Institute June 8, 2015 Matthew Berry.
Scott Crooks Alicia Sachan Judy Felts Matthew Berry Systemic Supports & Interventions for Students with Behavioral Challenges Fall Regional Meeting November.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
Please log in to Ci3T.org … Professional Learning
Systematic Screening to Support School Success! Kathleen Lane.
Low Intensity Strategies for Supporting School Success
Agenda What is a high probability (high-p) request sequence?
Please log in to Ci3T.org … Professional Learning
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
What is Positive Behavior Intervetions and Supports (PBIS)?
B15 - Tier II Intervention: Using Academic Supports to Meet the Needs of High School Level Students Lead Presenter: Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D,
Please log in to Ci3T.org … Professional Learning
Supporting Behavior for School Success
XXXXX School Ci3T Implementation Report Social Validity and Treatment Integrity 20XX – 20XX ____________________________________ Fall 20XX Lane and Oakes.
Tier 2 Strategies: A Look at Self-Monitoring
Agenda Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (Ci3T) Models of Prevention A Look at Active Supervision What is active supervision? Why is active supervision.
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
Please log in to Ci3T.org … Professional Learning
Supporting School Success
Building Secondary (Tier 2)Prevention Efforts
Presentation transcript:

Low-Intensity Strategies: Using Instructional Feedback to Support Instruction Lane and Oakes 2013

Low-Intensity Strategies for Academics and Behavior Opportunities to Respond Behavior Specific Praise Active Supervision Instructional Feedback High p Requests Precorrection Incorporating Choice Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure, 58, 171-182, DOI: 10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573 Self-Monitoring Behavior Contracts

Agenda What is instructional feedback? Why is instructional feedback effective? What does the supporting research for instructional feedback say? What are the benefits and challenges? How do I implement instructional feedback in my classroom? Checklist for Success How well is it working? Examining the Effects

Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized individual systems for students with high-risk (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Academic Behavioral Social PBIS Framework Validated Curricula ≈80% ≈15% ≈5% Goal: Prevent Harm School/classroom-wide systems for all students, staff, & settings Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized group systems for students at-risk Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure, 58, 171-182, DOI: 10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573 Primary Prevention (Tier 1) Lane and Oakes 2013

Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support Comprehensive, Integrative, Three-tiered (CI3T) Models of Support Low Intensity Strategies Basic Classroom Management Effective Instruction Low Intensity Strategies Behavior Contracts Self-Monitoring - - Functional Assessment-Based Interventions Higher Intensity Strategies Assess, Design, Implement, and Evaluate Assessment

CI3T Primary Plan Academics Behavior Social

What is instructional feedback? Teaching strategy to: Clarify misinformation Confirm understandings Fine-tune understandings Restructure current schemas Produces learning by delivering content related information and reinforcement that positively affects motivation effort engagement (Butler & Winne, 1995; Kulhavy & Wagner, 1993) Lane and Oakes 2013

What is instructional feedback? Used when students have base of understanding working toward proficiency and fluency Two-fold Function Teachers gain students’ perception of instructions adjust instructional planning Students benefit from positive specific feedback increase intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000) increase persistence on future difficult tasks (Kamins & Dweck, 1999) If students do not have a base understanding, instruction is necessary (Hattie, 2009; Kulhavy, 1977) Lane and Oakes 2013

Feedback and/or Reinforcement The Learning Process Cues Participation Feedback and/or Reinforcement Feedback is a critical feature of the learning process (Heward, 1994; Lysakowski & Walberg, 1982; Miller & Dollard, 1941) Lane and Oakes 2013

Purpose To close the gap between expected and current performance in academics, behavior, and social skills (Hattie, 2009) The learner must have an opportunity to engage in an action in response to the feedback (Gable, Hester, Rock, & Hughes, 2009) Lane and Oakes 2013

Feedback Model Where am I going? What are the goals? How am I going? What progress is being made toward the goals? Where do I go next? What activities need to be undertaken to make better progress? Hattie and Timperley (2007) Effective instructional feedback provides information on the learning process and content acquisition instead of the correct response

Examples How am I going? Where do I go next? “Jorge, you are using the 4-step process we learned to accurately complete the problem.” Where do I go next? “Celia, please write the acronym for the 4-step process next to the problem and cross off each step as you complete it. That will help you keep the order of the steps.” – Error Correction “Celia, using the mnemonic helped you apply the process to solve the problem accurately.” Provide feedback on malleable characteristics such as effort. “You included all of the elements of the essay; you did a good job using the rubric to write your paper”

Why is Instructional Feedback Effective? Serves as a motivator and reinforcer Provides instructional information Cues students to focus on key processes, information, and concepts (Butler & Winne, 1995) Specific and offers support to correct content and misunderstandings (Harks et al., 2014) Positive, proactive approach for correcting learning errors Increases motivation (Kamins & Dweck, 1999) Supports intrinsic motivation

Why is Instructional Feedback Effective? Feedback should be related to effort and actions that are malleable, not based upon ability a criterion or the individual’s previous performance Negative effects occur when students are compared to peers (Harks et al., 2014) Critical feedback creates doubt, lowers self-confidence, and lowers motivation to attempt difficult tasks Particularly true for students with EBD and LD (Alber, Heward, & Hippler, 1999)

What does the supporting research for instructional feedback say? Increased on-task behavior for students with EBD in the general education classroom (Allday et al., 2012) Improve students’ math outcomes with use of strategy feedback (process) and outcome feedback (accuracy of response) working memory mediated the outcomes (Fyfe, DeCaro, & Rittle-Johnson, 2015) Instructional feedback related to schoolwide expectations resulted in reductions in behavioral incidents over two years (Simonsen, Britton, & Young, 2010) Allday et al. (2012): MS/ES use of BSP for students with and at risk for EBD in gen ed classrooms. Examined use of generic praise, behavior specific correction, and generic correction. In addition, data were collected on interactions between the teacher and target student (i.e., target student praise and target student corrections) and on the target students’ on-task behavior. Teachers got performance feedback and increased use of BSP. Moderate to large correlations between teachers use of BSP and target students’ on task behavior. Fyfe et al. (2015): academic instructional feedback (compared strategy (process) vs. outcome (right wrong). RCT 2nd and 3rd grade. Working memory differentiated outcomes – students with higher working memory benefitted from strategy; students with low working memory benefited from outcome feedback. (online first in 2014) Simonsen et al (2010) BSP related to expectations (as opposed to random behaviors) resulted in reductions in serious behavioral incidents.

Supporting Research See “Instructional Feedback Resource Guide” for additional supporting research and information.

What are the benefits and challenges? Large group Targeted small group Minimal time Creates safe learning environment Supports students in demonstrating expected behaviors Improves academic outcomes Increases engagement Determining the best type of feedback Carefully selecting words to use Students may perceive feedback as critical if care is not taken Measuring the effectiveness of feedback

How do I implement instructional feedback in my classroom How do I implement instructional feedback in my classroom? Checklist for Success Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 1 Identify learning goals Provide instruction to meet established goals Provide clear directions and checks for understanding Opportunities for practice and feedback are planned

How do I implement instructional feedback in my classroom How do I implement instructional feedback in my classroom? Checklist for Success Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 5 Implement active supervision and provide instructional feedback Provide time and direction for students to review work or have additional opportunities to practice Evaluate instructional practices Offer students an opportunity to give feedback on how instructional feedback is being offered

How do I increase Instructional Feedback in my classroom? Implementation checklist for success Step 1: Identify learning goals. Step 2: Provide instruction to meet established goals. Step 3: Provide clear directions and checks for understanding. Step 4: Opportunities for practice and feedback are planned. Step 5: Implement active supervision and provide instructional feedback. Step 6: Provide time and direction for students to review work or have additional opportunities to practice. Step 7: Evaluate instructional practices. Step 8: Offer students an opportunity to give feedback on how instructional feedback is being offered. See “Instructional Feedback Implementation Checklist for Success”

How well is it working? Examining the Effects How well did this support work for this student? Experimental Design What do stakeholders think about the goals, procedures, and outcomes? Social Validity Is it happening? Treatment Integrity

Instructional Feedback Student Outcomes Baseline A1 Feedback B2 Withdrawal A2 Feedback B1 Panel B. Paola’s Academic Engagement and Spanish Assignment Accuracy AET Accuracy Figure 5.1 Examining the effects: Students’ academic engagement and assignment accuracy: Percentage during Spanish class. Hypothetical Illustration (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015)

Ensuring the Strategy is in Place: Treatment Integrity Have structures in place to monitor whether instructional feedback is carried out as intended. Treatment integrity checklist items: I identified and shared learning goals. I provided instruction to meet the established goals. I provided clear directions and checked for understanding. Students had opportunities to practice. I used active supervision and provided instructional feedback. I provided time, direction for students to review work or have additional opportunities to practice. I evaluated instruction based on student response. See “Instructional Feedback Treatment Integrity Checklist”

What does the student think about it? See “Instructional Feedback Social Validity Student” Completed by the student(s) participating in the intervention at two time points: Pre and Post Intervention

What does the teacher think about it? See “Social Validity Adapted-IRP15 Adult” Completed by the teacher(s) and parent(s) involved in the intervention at two time points: Pre and Post Intervention

Sample Elementary Intervention Grid Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria   Instructional Feedback Instructional feedback refers to detailed, specific information for students from a teacher or peer to confirm, fine-tune, clarify, and restructure current schemas. Verbal, written, or technology based specific feedback on processes and progress. One of more of the following: Behavior: SRSS-E7: Moderate (4-8) SRSS-I5: Moderate (2-3) SRSS-E7: High (9-21) SRSS-I5: High (4-15) Ranking of 1, 2, or 3 on the Motivation to Learn subscale of the SSiS-PSG Two or more office discipline referrals (ODRs) within a grading period ___ And ___ Or Academic: Three or more assignments scoring 79% or below within a grading period AIMSweb: intensive or strategic level (math or reading) Progress report: Targeted for Growth for academic learning behaviors Student performance targeted for improvement (e.g., homework grades, quiz grades, test grades, % of work completed, academic engaged time % of intervals). Treatment integrity Implementation checklist Treatment integrity checklist Social validity IRP-15 (teacher) Student-completed survey Zero missing assignments in a grading period All assignments scoring 80% or higher in a grading period and SRSS-E7: Low (0-3) SRSS-I5: Low (0-1) or Ranking of 4 or 5 on the Motivation to Learn subscale of SSiS-PSG (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015)

Sample Secondary Intervention Grid Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria   Instructional Feedback Instructional feedback refers to detailed, specific information for students from a teacher or peer to confirm, fine-tune, clarify, and restructure current schemas. Verbal, written, or technology based specific feedback on processes and progress. One of more of the following: Behavior: SRSS-E7: Moderate (4-8) SRSS-I5: Moderate (2-3) SRSS-E7: High (9-21) SRSS-I5: High (4-15) Ranking of 1, 2, or 3 on the Motivation to Learn subscale of the SSiS-PSG Two or more office discipline referrals (ODRs) within a grading period ___ And ___ Or Academic: Two or more missing assignments in any class Three or more assignments in any class at C or below Progress report: Targeted for Growth for academic learning behaviors Student performance targeted for improvement (e.g., homework grades, quiz grades, test grades, % of work completed, academic engaged time % of intervals). Treatment integrity Implementation checklist Treatment integrity checklist Social validity IRP-15 (teacher) Student-completed survey Zero missing assignments in target class(es) for a grading period 2.5 GPA or higher in a grading period and SRSS-E7: Low (0-3) SRSS-I5: Low (0-1) or Ranking of 4 or 5 on the Motivation to Learn subscale of SSiS-PSG (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015)

CI3T Ticket Examples Changed to latest version of ticket SWMS made/modified, and added Connect with Kids logo toward the bottom.

Will you please… Let’s talk … Determine when you will use instructional feedback. Make a list of instructional feedback statements you can use: In your classroom during various instructional activities. In other key areas in your building (use school expectation matrix). Using this PowerPoint break timer 10 MIN This PowerPoint slide uses images, custom animation, and timing to provide a countdown timer that you can use in any presentation. When you open the template, you’ll notice that the timer is set at 00:00. However, when you start the slide show, the timer will start at the correct time and count down by 1-minute intervals until it gets to 1 minute. At that point, it will count down in two 30-seconds intervals to 00:00. To insert this slide into your presentation Save this template as a presentation (.ppt file) on your computer. Open the presentation that will contain the timer. On the Slides tab, place your insertion point after the slide that will precede the timer. (Make sure you don't select a slide. Your insertion point should be between the slides.) On the Insert menu, click Slides from Files. In the Slide Finder dialog box, click the Find Presentation tab. Click Browse, locate and select the timer presentation, and then click Open. In the Slides from Files dialog box, select the timer slide. Select the Keep source formatting check box. If you do not select this check box, the copied slide will inherit the design of the slide that precedes it in the presentation. Click Insert. Click Close. Let’s talk … Plan: Implementation Checklist for Success Instructional Feedback

Related Resource Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Ennis, R. P., & Oakes, W. P. (2015). Supporting behavior for school success: A step-by-step guide to key strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Thank you! Questions kathleen.lane@ku.edu Lane and Oakes 2013

Resources Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Step by Step Guide (2014). A special issue of Preventing School Failure, volume 58, issue 3 www.tandfonline.com/toc/vpsf20/58/3 Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M, Oakes, W. P., & Kalberg, J. R. (2012). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Recommended Resources Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Bruhn, A.L., & Crnobori, M. (2011). Managing Challenging Behaviors in Schools: Research-Based Strategies That Work. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R. & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing Schoolwide Programs to Prevent and Manage Problem Behaviors: A Step-by-Step Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Lane, K.L., Menzies, H.M., Ennis, R.P., & Oakes, W. P. (2015). Supporting Behavior for School Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Key Strategies. New York, NY: Guilford.