Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August 20061 Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and the WRF Model Jason Knievel Material contributed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
Advertisements

Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.
Cold Fronts and their relationship to density currents: A case study and idealised modelling experiments Victoria Sinclair University of HelsinkI David.
Numerical Modeling of Climate Hydrodynamic equations: 1. equations of motion 2. thermodynamic equation 3. continuity equation 4. equation of state 5. equations.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
AIR POLLUTION. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS Why models? incomplete information (knowledge) spatial inference = prediction temporal inference.
Numerical Weather Prediction. A bit of history NWP was born at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton in 1940’s – first electronic computer Since.
Eta Model. Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Interdisciplinary Modeling for Acquatic Ecosystems July 2005 Atmospheric Modeling Vanda Grubišić Desert Research Institute Division of Atmospheric.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Basic Concepts of Numerical Weather Prediction 6 September 2012.
Numerical Weather Prediction Division The usage of the ATOVS data in the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) Sang-Won Joo Korea Meteorological Administration.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Numerical Forecast Models For more info:
Nesting. Eta Model Eta Coordinate And Step Mountains MSL ground  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION K. Lagouvardos-V. Kotroni Institute of Environmental Research National Observatory of Athens NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Atmospheric TU Delft Stephan de Roode, Harm Jonker clouds, climate and weather air quality in the urban environmentenergy.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Joe Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado Convection Resolving NWP using WRF.
Richard Rotunno NCAR *Based on:
Large Eddy Simulation of PBL turbulence and clouds Chin-Hoh Moeng National Center for Atmospheric Research.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
Lecture 5 Weather Maps and Models Chapters 5 and Chapter 6 Homework Due Friday, October 3, 2014 TYU Ch 6: 1,2,5,7,11,14,17,18,20; TYPSS Ch 6: 2 TYU Ch.
Impact of the backscatter kinetic energy on the perturbation of ensemble members for strong convective event Jakub Guzikowski
Representation of Convective Processes in NWP Models (Part I) George H. Bryan NCAR/MMM Presentation at ASP Colloquium, “The Challenge of Convective Forecasting”
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Computation and analysis of the Kinetic Energy Spectra of a SI- SL Model GRAPES Dehui Chen and Y.J. Zheng and Z.Y. Jin State key Laboratory of Severe Weather.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Standardized Test Set for Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Cores of NWP Models
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Mass Coordinate WRF Dynamical Core - Eulerian geometric height coordinate (z) core (in framework, parallel, tested in idealized, NWP applications) - Eulerian.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Computational Fluid Dynamics - Fall 2007 The syllabus CFD references (Text books and papers) Course Tools Course Web Site:
Higher Resolution Operational Models
Regional Weather and Climate Modeling:
ThermodynamicsM. D. Eastin We need to understand the environment around a moist air parcel in order to determine whether it will rise or sink through the.
Keith Kelley Presentation 2 Weather Forecasting with Parallel Computers.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Technology on the Cutting Edge of Weather Research and Forecasting
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Kurowski, M .J., K. Suselj, W. W. Grabowski, and J. Teixeira, 2018
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
A Coastal Forecasting System
Presentation transcript:

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and the WRF Model Jason Knievel Material contributed by: George Bryan, Jimy Dudhia, Dave Gill, Josh Hacker, Joe Klemp, Bill Skamarock, Wei Wang, and The COMET Program

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –A set of equations that describe the flow of fluids, –Which is translated into computer code, –Combined with parameterizations of other processes, –Then applied on a specific domain, –And integrated, based on initial conditions and conditions at the domains’ boundaries

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction  Almost every step in NWP includes –Omissions –Estimations –Approximations –Compromises

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –A set of equations that describe the flow of fluids, –Which is translated into computer code, –Combined with parameterizations of other processes, –Then applied on a specific domain, –And integrated, based on initial conditions and conditions at the domains’ boundaries

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Governing equations  Conservation of momentum (Newton’s laws) –3 equations for accelerations of 3-d wind (F = Ma)  Conservation of mass –1 equation for conservation of air (mass continuity) –1 equation for conservation of water  Conservation of energy –1 equation for the first law of thermodynamics  Relationship among p, V, and T –1 equation of state (ideal gas law)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Governing equations  Almost every model uses a slightly different set of equations.  Why? –Application to different parts of the world –Focus on different atmospheric processes –Application to different time and spatial scales –Ambiguity and uncertainty in formulations –Tailoring to different uses

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Governing equations  The WRF Model is one of the first cloud-scale models designed to conserve mass, momentum, and energy.  But… –Water is not yet perfectly conserved –There is still debate about whether momentum is perfectly conserved –Internal energy is conserved for dry processes, not moist

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Governing equations  An example of one momentum equation: 1-d wind accelerated by only the pressure gradient force Computers cannot deal with even this very simple equation!

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Governing equations  The problem: computers can perform arithmetic but not calculus  The solution: numerical methods

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical methods  Goal: convert spatial and temporal derivatives into algebraic equations that computers can solve  Examples of methods: –Finite difference (based on Taylor series) –Finite volume (based on fluxes in and out of volume) –Spectral (calculated in Fourier space)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical methods  WRF Model uses finite differences  Taylor series: Equality only true if series is infinite… an impossibility! Truncation is always necessary –What gets cut (truncation error) defines order of scheme

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical methods  Numerical methods directly affect model output, mostly at small scales  Some model features are real, but some are due to numerical techniques. In the WRF Model: –Larger than 6  x, it may be real –Smaller than 6  x, it’s not to be trusted

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical methods  MM5: leapfrog (t) and 2nd-order centered (x) From George Bryan

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerical methods  WRF: Runge-Kutta (t) and 6th-order centered (x) From George Bryan

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Introduction to numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Parameterizations  Parameterizations approximate the bulk effects of physical processes too small, too brief, too complex, or too poorly understood to be explicitly represented

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Parameterizations  In the WRF Model, parameterizations include: –Cumulus convection –Microphysics of clouds and precipitation –Radiation (short-wave and long-wave) –Turbulence and diffusion –Planetary boundary layer and surface layer –Interaction with Earth’s surface  Some of the biggest future improvements in the WRF Model will be in parameterizations

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Introduction to numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Number of dimensions  Degree and kind of structure  Shape  Vertical coordinate  Resolution

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Number of dimensions From Josh Hacker 1D: Single-column model 2D: Simulation of density current 3D: Simulation of thunderstorm From Joe Klemp

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Degree and kind of structure MM5 and othersWRF and others From Randall (1994)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Degree and kind of structure HexagonalTriangular From ccrma.standford.edu/~bilbao

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Degree and kind of structure Unstructured: Omega Model From Boybeyi et al. (2001)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Shape From Rife et al. (2004) From mitgcm.org (2006) Spherical Flat

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Key features of WRF Model  Nesting of domains –One-way and two-way communication Information flows only to finer grid Information flows both directions between grids Parent domain Nested domain

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Vertical coordinate From Pielke (2002)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Vertical coordinate From Wei Wang In WRF Model, vertical coordinate is normalized hydrostatic pressure, 

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Domains  Resolution From Rife and Davis (2005) RTFDDA terrain elevation on different domains  x = 30 km  x = 3.3 km

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Introduction to numerical weather prediction Q:What is NWP? A:A method of weather forecasting that employs: –Governing equations –Numerical methods –Parameterizations –Domains –Initial and boundary conditions

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Initial and boundary conditions  Initial conditions define the atmosphere’s current state…the starting point  Boundary conditions define the atmosphere’s state at domains’ edges

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Initial and boundary conditions  Idealized lateral boundary conditions –Open –Rigid –Periodic  Operational lateral boundary conditions –Generally updated during simulations –Not needed for global models, only for limited-area models (LAMs), such as RTFDDA –Can come from larger domains of same/different model or from global model For RTFDDA, source is NAM (was Eta, now NMM-WRF)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Introduction to WRF Model  Weather Research and Forecasting Model  The term WRF Model does not mean the same thing to all people  Different WRF Models with same architecture but different core codes –ARW (Advanced Research WRF) at NCAR –NMM (Non-Hydrostatic Mesoscale Model) at NCEP Based on Eta Model’s code Is now the source of NAM simulations –Other cores may be coming soon

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Architecture of WRF Model  Based on an innovative software architecture that makes it easy for users to contribute and modify code

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August WRF Model in RTFDDA  The WRF Model is replacing MM5 as the forecast engine in RT-FDDA –MM5-RTFDDA will be run in parallel as back-up  MM5 will not be turned off until ATEC is ready, or until maintenance becomes impossible

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August History of WRF Model  WRF Model is young  Releases –2000: V1.0 (beta release of EH core) –2002: V1.2 (beta release of EM core) –2004: V2.0 (first official release)  Current version: 2.1 (released in August 2005)  Version 2.2 is scheduled for later this summer

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Importance of age  WRF Model is based on more recent technology and techniques  But… The WRF Model has not benefited from many years of trouble-shooting and input from users

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Grand vision for WRF Model  From the start, WRF was intended to be used for both research and operations –Shorten time between research developments in NWP and application to operations –Increase communication and understanding between research and operational communities  MM5 started as a research model and was later adopted by some operational forecasters

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Platforms for WRF Model  Can be run on a variety of platforms on single processor or with shared or distributed memory Courtesy of Dell Courtesy of NCAR NCAR’s Bluesky

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerics in WRF Model  The WRF Model’s numerics are higher order than MM5’s, so they contain more terms and better approximate the governing equations –Horizontal advection: 5 th order –Vertical advection: 3 rd order –Temporal integration: 3 rd order

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Numerics in WRF Model  Higher order advection schemes, which lead to a higher effective resolution than in many other NWP models wavelength (km) wavenumber (km -1 ) Energy Spectra grid interval: 10 km After Skamarock (2004)

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Closing comments  Numerical weather prediction models are: –Powerful and useful –Founded on basic physics –The result of many compromises and approximations –Always wrong — at least a little…this includes the WRF Model  The WRF Model is state-of-the-art in operational mesoscale NWP

Jason KnievelATEC Forecasters’ Conference, July and August Additional reading  Kalnay, E., 2003: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 341 pp.  Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1070–1096.  Pielke, R. A., Sr., 2002: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling, 2nd edition. Academic Press, 676 pp.  Skamarock, W. C., 2004: Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra. Monthly Weather Review: 132, 3019–3032.  WRF Tutorial presentations in PPT and PDF  WRF technical paper