Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoNovember 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing National Historic Tax Credit Conference Chicago September 2008 Judith L. Kitchen, Ohio Historic Preservation.
Landmarks Preservation Commission.
Qualifying Buildings National Register Properties – Individual or in District Generally 50 Years Old Architectural or Historic Significance Local Landmark.
IDENTIFYING, EVALUATING, AND PRESERVING MINNESOTA'S HISTORIC ROADSIDE FACILITIES.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A NPS Fire Planning: Managing Fire in the Wilderness National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Southeast.
City of San José Distinctive Neighborhood Program Policy Options Outreach Presentation.
Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Company | Studio D Architects Analysis Concepts Refinement Integration Campus Master Plan NMSU
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
NPS Review Panel Report to the FMFADA. Recommendations The Panel recommends that the FMFADA seek an expanded NPS role at Fort Monroe.
Cultural Resource Management Plans What good are they?
URBAN CHARACTER ANALYSIS. Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban area Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Historic preservation 1.Protect this Historic Place and Keep it Vital Planning Essentials first-quality stewardship of these shared treasures Preserve.
The Preservation Principles of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation Projects David W. Look, FAIA, FAPT National Park Service.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
City of North Richland Hills TOD Code Overview. Comments from November 20 Work Session Need to ensure the preservation of key historic assets in the Smithfield.
Environmental Toolbox. Technical Module Cultural Property Protection.
Master Plan Update Chapter 213 of the Local Government Code provides that Cities may engage in Comprehensive Planning which may:  include but not be limited.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.
2 Governor’s Principles for Fort Monroe Respect Fort Monroe’s history Maintain Public Access Achieve economic sustainability.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Establishing and Managing Historic Districts
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools.
Shireen Abdelrahman Lecture 5. Individual development projects - new construction, expansion, or renovation - can affect the surrounding environment in.
Bae Real Estate Asset Management Strategy Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority March 19, 2009.
Saving places. WHY A CHAPTER ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES in the MASTER PLAN ?  A Master Plan is required by Zoning  A Historic Resources Chapter is to aid.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Fort Monroe Historic Design Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 1, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION June 1,
#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.
CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES: A TOOLBOX FOR PRESERVATION - September 5, 2007 A PLANNER’S VIEW: LESSONS LEARNED PAM FIGGE, PRESENTER.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics The Department of Defense: Transforming the Business of Military Cultural Resource Data Brian Michael Lione Deputy.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
Planning & Community Development Department 2362 East Washington Boulevard “St. Luke Medical Center” Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting December.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards and Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 25, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR.
PARKING.
JOHANNA STREET, ARCHITECT HISTORIC PRESERVATION. JOHANNA STREET, ARCHITECT Background History of historic preservation –Eugene Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc.
Restoration is defined as the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Minor Conditional Use Permit #6003 (1528 Whitefield Road) City Council Meeting.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties Building 1051 (FAI-00456) Building 1555 (FAI-00467)
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Anth January 2012.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
Planning & Community Development Department Rose Bowl Aquatic Center Master Plan 360 North Arroyo Boulevard Predevelopment Plan Review PPR City.
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies
ZTA Historic Inns and Restaurants (Clifton)
Communications Protocols: The Good Faith Process
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
The Statement of Significance: Format and Content
SALVATION ARMY BUILDING
Presentation transcript:

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoProgrammatic AgreementNovember 20, ) The FMFADA shall ensure the following: a)Historic Preservation Design Standards i)Prior to the Army’s departure and the Commonwealth assuming responsibility for the Reversionary Land, the FMFADA shall develop Historic Preservation Design Standards (Design Standards) for activities occurring on the reversionary and non-reversionary land at Fort Monroe. ii) The Design Standards shall be based upon and consistent with the property management and treatment of historic property requirements found in Stipulation 4)c) and The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes (National Park Service 1996) and Preservation Bulletin 36: Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment, and Management of Historic Landscapes, and at a minimum will address the following: 1.The array of treatment options (rehabilitation, restoration, reconstruction, preservation) for existing historic buildings, structures, objects, and landscapes. 2.Appropriate mass, scale, design, height, materials, location, spatial relationships, density, etc. for new construction and additions to existing buildings or structures within each Management Zone. 3.Significant historic viewsheds and cultural landscapes identified by the Army pursuant to Stipulation 1)d) and 1)e) above. 4.Potential to affect archaeological sites resulting from proposed ground disturbing activities. Develop: Design Standards Based on: Management Zones Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Address: Treatment Options New Construction/Additions Cultural Landscapes Archaeology

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoOutlineNovember 20, 2008 FOUR-PART DOCUMENT 1.Overview 2.Preservation Design Standards 3.Resource Inventory 4.New Construction Design Standards FOUR-PART DOCUMENT 1.Overview 2.Preservation Design Standards 3.Resource Inventory 4.New Construction Design Standards

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 1 - OverviewNovember 20, 2008 Part 1. Overview 1.Purpose/Intent of the Standards 2.Implementation Policies 3.Synopsis of the Programmatic Agreement 4.Synopsis of the Reuse Plan 5.Description of the NHL District 6.Overview of Historic Resources 7.Description of the Management Zones

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008 Part 2. Preservation Design Standards 1.Management Zones 2.Architectural Styles 3.Appropriate Treatments 4.Interim Measures A.Stabilization B.Mothballing C.Emergency Measures 5.Glossary

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Part 3. Resource Inventory 1.Building Data 2.Description 3.Historic Data 4.What is Important to Preserve/Key Preservation Issues Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008 Building Data

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008 Location

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008 Description and Historic Data

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008 Preservation Issues

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 3 – Resource InventoryNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008 Part 2. Preservation Design Standards 1.Management Zones 2.Architectural Styles 3.Appropriate Treatments 4.Interim Measures A.Stabilization B.Mothballing C.Emergency Measures 5.Glossary

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 – Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008 Masonry

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008 Roofs

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoPart 2 - Preservation Design StandardsNovember 20, 2008

Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoNovember 20, 2008 Q & A