Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance http://b1105.wordpress.com

Chapter 5: Logical Fallacies--1 Assessing Relevance Determine whether the premises in the following arguments are positively relevant, negatively relevant, or irrelevant to the conclusion. 1. Felix is a parrot. So Felix has feathers. 2. Halle is fifteen-years-old. So, Halle is a senior in high school. 3. Figure X is a triangle. So, figure X is a square.

Chapter 5: Logical Fallacies--1 Assessing Relevance Determine whether the premises in the following arguments are positively relevant, negatively relevant, or irrelevant to the conclusion. 1. Felix is a parrot. So Felix has feathers. 2. Halle is fifteen-years-old. So, Halle is a senior in high school. 3. Figure X is a triangle. So, figure X is a square. 1. positively relevant 2. negatively relevant 3. negatively relevant

Indicate in the space provide whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. A fallacy is an argument that contains at least one false premise. ______ 2. Fallacies of relevance are fallacies that occur because the premises, though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion. ______ 3. A statement is positively relevant to another statement if it counts in favor of that statement.

Indicate in the space provide whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. A fallacy is an argument that contains at least one false premise. ______ 2. Fallacies of relevance are fallacies that occur because the premises, though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion. ______ 3. A statement is positively relevant to another statement if it counts in favor of that statement. 1. F 2. F 3. T

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of relevance committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Gambling is wrong, because it's wrong to play at games of chance for stakes. 2. It would be a mistake to appoint Pete Dobson as Superintendent of Schools. Mr. Dobson has twice been convicted of child endangerment and he was recently charged with embezzlement. 3. In a recent issue of Stogey magazine, Julio Fumar argues that Honduran cigars are better than Cuban cigars. But Fumar's argument isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Fumar is biased against Cuba because the Castro regime imprisoned his parents.

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of relevance committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Gambling is wrong, because it's wrong to play at games of chance for stakes. 2. It would be a mistake to appoint Pete Dobson as Superintendent of Schools. Mr. Dobson has twice been convicted of child endangerment and he was recently charged with embezzlement. 3. In a recent issue of Stogey magazine, Julio Fumar argues that Honduran cigars are better than Cuban cigars. But Fumar's argument isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Fumar is biased against Cuba because the Castro regime imprisoned his parents. 1. begging the question 2. no fallacy 3. attacking the motive

Chapter 6: Logical Fallacies--2 True/False Indicate in the space provided whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. Critical thinkers never accept a claim on the mere say-so of another. ______ 2. If a person accepts a claim on the say-so of an alleged witness or authority, and there is good reason to believe that the alleged witness or authority is biased, then the person commits the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority.

True/False Indicate in the space provided whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. Critical thinkers never accept a claim on the mere say-so of another. ______ 2. If a person accepts a claim on the say-so of an alleged witness or authority, and there is good reason to believe that the alleged witness or authority is biased, then the person commits the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority. 1. F 2. T

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. 2. IRS agent: Mr. Peckinsniff, there is nothing in these documents that proves that you haven't been cheating on your taxes. Therefore, I must assume that you have been cheating on your taxes. 3. Kids play too many video games. That's why there's so much juvenile crime today.

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. 2. IRS agent: Mr. Peckinsniff, there is nothing in these documents that proves that you haven't been cheating on your taxes. Therefore, I must assume that you have been cheating on your taxes. 3. Kids play too many video games. That's why there's so much juvenile crime today. 1. false alternatives 2. appeal to ignorance 3. questionable cause