Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Categorical Logic Categorical statements
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
4 Categorical Propositions
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 6 Preparing to Evaluate Arguments.
Syllogistic Logic 1. C Categorical Propositions 2. V Venn Diagram 3. The Square of Opposition: Tradition / Modern 4. C Conversion, Obversion, Contraposition.
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Categorical Syllogisms
Copyright © Curt Hill Rules of Inference What is a valid argument?
CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Categorical Propositions All S is P No S is P Some S is P Some S is not P.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
The Science of Good Reasons
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Reasoning. Inductive and Deductive reasoning Inductive reasoning is concerned with reasoning from “specific instances to some general conclusion.” Deductive.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Deductive Reasoning Rules for Valid Syllogisms. Rules for a valid categorical syllogism 1.A valid syllogism must possess three, and only three, unambiguous.
Chapter 18: Conversion, Obversion, and Squares of Opposition
Strict Logical Entailments of Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
The construction of a formal argument
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Chapter 19: Living in the Real World. Introductory Remarks (p. 190) The joy and misery of ordinary English is that you can say the same thing in many.
SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Subject Predicate Subject Predicate Auxiliary verb.
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Categorical Logic PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 18, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Philosophy 1504: Language and Logic March 28, 2016.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Deductive reasoning.
a valid argument with true premises.
Either: any one of two. Each of two (A garden with a fence on either side) Either…or: introducing two choices (Either you come or I go) Neither: not the.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions

Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms concern relations among classes. They were first discussed by Aristotle ( BCE)

Categorical Propositions (pp ) Categorical Propositions state relations among classes of objects. Quantity –Universal –Particular –Singular Quality –Affirmative –Negative

Categorical Propositions (pp ) Four forms of categorical propositions –Universal Affirmative (A): All dogs are mammals. –Universal Negative (E): No cats are dogs. –Particular Affirmative (I): Some dogs are collies. –Particular Negative (O): Some dogs are not schnauzers.

Categorical Propositions (pp ) Standard form categorical propositions –It has a quantifier, which is either ‘all’, ‘no’, or ‘some’. –It has a subject term, which is immediately to the right of the quantifier. –It has a form of the verb ‘to be’, which is immediately to the right of the subject term. –It has a predicate term, which is immediately to the right of the verb.