Determining Type and Amount of Itinerant TVI Service Using the VISSIT Rona Pogrund, Ph.D. Perkins Webinar November 17, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Caseload Study: Preliminary Results Ann M. Sebald, Ed.D. Bob Pearson, Doctoral Candidate National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Getting Your Protégé Up and Running September 3, 2008 Chrissy Cowan Mentor Coordinator.
Visual Impairment Scale of Service Intensity of Texas Study Report AER International Conference San Antonio, Texas August 1, 2014.
What Do Special Education Directors Say About RTI Margaret Gessler Werts, PhD Monica Lambert, EdD.
Creating a Unified PLA Policy Recommendation for the State University of New York Ross Garmil Empire State College PLA with a Purpose Symposium April 29,
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
External Quality Assessments
Texas School for the Blind & Visually Impaired Outreach Programs Presents TETN #20436 O&M Evaluations for Everyone 8/8/2015TSBVI Outreach Programs, 2013.
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
Perkins eLearning Charlotte Cushman, M.L.S., M.Ed. November 2012 Sharing the Possibilities!
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
Mentorship. More people are applying for and completing mentorship Mentorship recommended  15 Completing mentorship  2.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
Monitoring Policy Implementation Michelle Murton, School Nutritionist.
June 12, 2015 ICD-10 Update for Maine Child Health Improvement Partnership (ME CHIP)
Working Group „Europe“ State School for the Visually Impaired, Schleswig Contact: European Agency Assessment in Practice.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
1 Communities of Practice in Tech & Literacy: A Dynamic Example from the Field
Today’s website:
By Scott Steeves  An assessment of students’ literacy abilities based on:  The Atlantic Canada English Language Arts Curriculum Outcomes (grade 8)
“Count Us In” 2007 Provincial Itinerant Conference Friday, April 20, 2007 Mary Ann Bibby with thanks to Perry Leslie for his valuable input.
Foundations of Inclusion Training Workshop
ICLS Project Planning Team: Elizabeth Arkles, Stephanie Cusworth, Steven Chang.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update August 25, 2015 Presenters: Amy Kearney, BA Director, Research and Analysis Team Thomas Miller, MA.
Direct Math Assessment State Department Training September, 2008 Cindy Johnstone Mathematics Coordinator.
 The Pennsylvania National Agenda (PANA) committee, with the help of the Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN) and the support.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Publishing in Measurement Journals Journals as People (Not Just Outlets), Publishing as a Process (Not Just an Event) Presentation for EDMS MSMS Steve.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Strategic Problem Solving Committee Report Progress during the School Year SPECIAL EDUCATION.
The AER Student Council Presents Preparing for Your Job Search Lisa McConachie Senior Director Columbia Regional Program Portland Public Schools.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
 The Pennsylvania National Agenda (PANA) committee, with the help of the Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN) and the support.
Instructional Materials for Students with Visual Impairments Kirk Behnke M.Ed, ATP Cecilia Robinson M.Ed State Leadership Services for the Blind and Visually.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
ICLS Project Planning Team: Elizabeth Arkles, Stephanie Cusworth, Steven Chang.
Functional Vision Evaluation Tips on getting it done.
Including Literacy in Every ECC Lesson Plan Karen E. Blankenship, Ph.D., TVI Nashville, TN Mary Ann Siller, M.Ed., TVI.
Developing and delivering an online course to support the effective teaching of literacy through braille Rory Cobb, RNIB Dr Steve McCall, University of.
The Liaison Librarian Program – Meeting Faculty Needs? Daphne Flanagan, AUS University Librarian, Alanna Ross, AUS Associate University.
SAGE Coffee October 7, 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE ARD PROCESS FOR PARENTS AND CAREGIVERS.
Foundations of Inclusion Training Workshop
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Caseload Analysis Michigan Severity Rating Scales for Students with Visual Impairments Quality Programs for the Visually Impaired (QPVI) Iowa Caseload.
Vision Services and Support Emily Coleman, Teacher of the Visually Impaired Washington State School for the Blind.
An Updated Profile of Music Programs at Residential Schools for Blind and Visually Impaired Students Edward P. Kahler, II, Ph.D., MT-BC Jeremy Coleman,
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
School – Based Assessment – Framework
ECC Portfolios: Using Project Based Learning to Teach the ECC
Perkins School for the Blind
Understanding Your Child’s IEP
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Parent and Family Partnership Surveys
Practice Session Using the VISSIT to Determine Service Intensity TAER Conference Corpus Christi, Texas March 30, 2017.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
ACTION PLAN Texas Association for Bilingual Education
VISSIT.
IEP Team Meeting Facilitation: What is it and How can it benefit Georgia districts? Today we are here to introduce to you a new and exciting initiative.
Update from ECO: Possible Approaches to Measuring Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Determining Type and Amount of Itinerant TVI Service Using the VISSIT Rona Pogrund, Ph.D. Perkins Webinar November 17,

Polling Question 1 Have any of you already used the VISSIT for your students with visual impairments? Have any of you already used the VISSIT for your students with visual impairments? 2

Polling Question 2 What method or tool do you currently use in determining the recommended type and amount of service with your students? 3

Members of Service Intensity Subcommittee Rona Pogrund, TTU, Chair Cyral Miller, TSBVI Outreach Frankie Swift, SFASU Kitra Gray, Region 10 ESC Mary Ann Siller, Richardson ISD Chrissy Cowan, TSBVI Outreach Michael Munro, SFASU Tracy Hallak, SFASU Cecilia Robinson, Region 4 ESC Shannon Darst, TTU Rona Pogrund, TTU, Chair Cyral Miller, TSBVI Outreach Frankie Swift, SFASU Kitra Gray, Region 10 ESC Mary Ann Siller, Richardson ISD Chrissy Cowan, TSBVI Outreach Michael Munro, SFASU Tracy Hallak, SFASU Cecilia Robinson, Region 4 ESC Shannon Darst, TTU 4

What is the VISSIT ? Visual Impairment Scale of Service Intensity of Texas (VISSIT) Quantifiable way to determine type and amount of TVI service to recommend Type of service: direct intervention and collaborative consultation Based upon student need in the ECC areas Visual Impairment Scale of Service Intensity of Texas (VISSIT) Quantifiable way to determine type and amount of TVI service to recommend Type of service: direct intervention and collaborative consultation Based upon student need in the ECC areas 5

Creation of the VISSIT Piloted various iterations of scale Field trials of revised version June 2013 retreat of the Service Intensity Subcommittee of the Texas Action Committee for the Education of Students with Visual Impairments Creation of the VISSIT Piloted various iterations of scale Field trials of revised version June 2013 retreat of the Service Intensity Subcommittee of the Texas Action Committee for the Education of Students with Visual Impairments History of the VISSIT 6

History of the VISSIT (continued) Study IRB approval and participant selection Initial validation study implementation- Texas- September March 2014 Broader validation study- national- January May 2015 Study IRB approval and participant selection Initial validation study implementation- Texas- September March 2014 Broader validation study- national- January May

VISSIT Website Walk-Through Allow me to guide you through the VISSIT website! Allow me to guide you through the VISSIT website! 8

Frequently Asked Questions The following are some of the more commonly-asked questions I’ve heard regarding the VISSIT. The following are some of the more commonly-asked questions I’ve heard regarding the VISSIT. 9

Frequently Asked Questions PURPOSE Q: Can the VISSIT be used for all students on my caseload, including those with multiple impairments and/or those with deafblindness? How about infants? PURPOSE Q: Can the VISSIT be used for all students on my caseload, including those with multiple impairments and/or those with deafblindness? How about infants? 10

Frequently Asked Questions PURPOSE A: The VISSIT is designed to determine the appropriate type and amount of services needed for ALL students with visual impairments on the TVI caseload. PURPOSE A: The VISSIT is designed to determine the appropriate type and amount of services needed for ALL students with visual impairments on the TVI caseload. 11

Frequently Asked Questions PURPOSE Q: Is the VISSIT to be used as a caseload analysis? PURPOSE Q: Is the VISSIT to be used as a caseload analysis? 12

Frequently Asked Questions PURPOSE A: The VISSIT is not a caseload analysis tool but can be used as part of a process to determine appropriate caseload size. The VISSIT does not take into account issues related to workload (e.g., planning, travel, and material preparation). PURPOSE A: The VISSIT is not a caseload analysis tool but can be used as part of a process to determine appropriate caseload size. The VISSIT does not take into account issues related to workload (e.g., planning, travel, and material preparation). 13

Frequently Asked Questions HOW TO USE THE VISSIT Q: Can professionals who are not teachers of students with visual impairments fill out the VISSIT? HOW TO USE THE VISSIT Q: Can professionals who are not teachers of students with visual impairments fill out the VISSIT? 14

Frequently Asked Questions HOW TO USE THE VISSIT A: The VISSIT must be completed by a TVI who has the vision- specific knowledge to quantify the levels of service intensity. HOW TO USE THE VISSIT A: The VISSIT must be completed by a TVI who has the vision- specific knowledge to quantify the levels of service intensity. 15

Frequently Asked Questions Q: How often should the VISSIT be completed? When might I complete the VISSIT? Q: How often should the VISSIT be completed? When might I complete the VISSIT? 16

Frequently Asked Questions A: The VISSIT should be completed prior to any determination of service type and amount. It should be completed prior to any IEP or IFSP meeting, so that the TVI can have data to determine and support recommended type and amount of services for students. A: The VISSIT should be completed prior to any determination of service type and amount. It should be completed prior to any IEP or IFSP meeting, so that the TVI can have data to determine and support recommended type and amount of services for students. 17

Additional FAQs 18

Initial Validation Study in Texas -38 responded and consented to participate -25 actual participants -81 actual VISSITs completed and returned -Electronic survey -38 responded and consented to participate -25 actual participants -81 actual VISSITs completed and returned -Electronic survey 19

#Question Completely did not translate to recommendation Mostly did not translate to recommend- ation Somewhat translated to recommend- ation Mostly translated to recommend- ation Completely translated to recommendation Total Responses Mean 1Translated to recommendation? Did your VISSIT results directly translate into the type and amount of service you recommended for your student's IEP? (n=24) 20

#AnswerResponse% 2Yes2296% 1No14% Total23100% Do you feel you would use the VISSIT in the future for determining the type and amount of service you recommend for your students? (n=23) 21

#AnswerResponse% 2Yes1878% 1No522% Total23100% Do you feel that the VISSIT is a better tool to use for determining the type and a mount of service than other available tools or methods you are currently using? (n=23) 22

Validity and Reliability of VISSIT The results of the initial study indicated that the current version of the VISSIT is moderately valid and reliable “Initial Validation Study for a Scale Used to Determine Service Intensity for Itinerant Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments” (results of Texas study done on VISSIT in ) (Pogrund, Darst, & Munro) Accepted by Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness- will be published in November/December 2015 Critical Issues edition of JVIB The results of the initial study indicated that the current version of the VISSIT is moderately valid and reliable “Initial Validation Study for a Scale Used to Determine Service Intensity for Itinerant Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments” (results of Texas study done on VISSIT in ) (Pogrund, Darst, & Munro) Accepted by Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness- will be published in November/December 2015 Critical Issues edition of JVIB 23

National VISSIT Validation Study Sent out s January 2015 all over the country to State Departments of Education, Schools for the Blind, Outreach Directors, and any other visual impairment lists that could distribute requests for participation in the study to further validate the VISSIT with a larger audience 259 TVIs from 33 states (and 1 in Canada) indicated their interest in trying out the VISSIT Sent out s January 2015 all over the country to State Departments of Education, Schools for the Blind, Outreach Directors, and any other visual impairment lists that could distribute requests for participation in the study to further validate the VISSIT with a larger audience 259 TVIs from 33 states (and 1 in Canada) indicated their interest in trying out the VISSIT 24

National VISSIT Validation Study Preliminary Results Of the 259 TVIs who expressed interest, 90 actually returned at least one VISSIT that they had completed on a student (some sent in multiple VISSITs) They were then sent a survey link to complete regarding their use and opinions about the VISSIT as a tool to determine type and amount of service Out of the 90 who returned a scale, 86 surveys were started and 77 were completed. Of the 259 TVIs who expressed interest, 90 actually returned at least one VISSIT that they had completed on a student (some sent in multiple VISSITs) They were then sent a survey link to complete regarding their use and opinions about the VISSIT as a tool to determine type and amount of service Out of the 90 who returned a scale, 86 surveys were started and 77 were completed. 25

Preliminary Results (continued) Used: in urban (25%), suburban (58%), and rural (44%) service delivery areas with students from 9 months - 20 years old with students who were totally blind, with low vision, and with CVI with students with a wide range of multiple impairments (intellectual disability the highest) with students who were braille readers, print readers, dual media users, tactile and object symbol users, large print users, auditory learners, etc. Used: in urban (25%), suburban (58%), and rural (44%) service delivery areas with students from 9 months - 20 years old with students who were totally blind, with low vision, and with CVI with students with a wide range of multiple impairments (intellectual disability the highest) with students who were braille readers, print readers, dual media users, tactile and object symbol users, large print users, auditory learners, etc. 26

Overall, was the VISSIT easy to use? 27

Did the results of the VISSIT match your professional judgment regarding student need & recommended type & amount of service? 28

Do you feel you would use the VISSIT in the future for determining the type and amount of service you recommend for your students? 29

Comments “I will use this with all of my students. It is an invaluable tool that provides information that an IEP committee can easily understand.” 30

Comments (continued) “After I completed the VISSIT, the 4 of us TVIs in my district completed a VISSIT on each of our students. We as a department are hoping to use the VISSIT as data to show our need for more staff. We also realized that we can take the information from each ECC area and see where the intense needs are in order to choose what assessment areas to focus on using the EVALS kit.” “After I completed the VISSIT, the 4 of us TVIs in my district completed a VISSIT on each of our students. We as a department are hoping to use the VISSIT as data to show our need for more staff. We also realized that we can take the information from each ECC area and see where the intense needs are in order to choose what assessment areas to focus on using the EVALS kit.” 31

Comments (cont.) “I found the tool very useful. It helped me reflect with more objectivity. It helped assure me I was looking at the whole child and his needs for TVI service.” “I plan to use the VISSIT from here on as my primary tool for determining and justifying service times. I especially like that direct and consultative services are separated and given individual consideration.” “I found the tool very useful. It helped me reflect with more objectivity. It helped assure me I was looking at the whole child and his needs for TVI service.” “I plan to use the VISSIT from here on as my primary tool for determining and justifying service times. I especially like that direct and consultative services are separated and given individual consideration.” 32

Do you feel that the VISSIT is a better tool to use for determining the type and amount of service than other available tools or methods you are currently using? 33

Next Steps The electronic version has been completed. A website for accessing the electronic and paper versions has been developed: Continuing evaluation of VISSIT and data analysis to gather more information about various aspects of the validity and reliability of the tool. O&M VISSIT in development. The electronic version has been completed. A website for accessing the electronic and paper versions has been developed: Continuing evaluation of VISSIT and data analysis to gather more information about various aspects of the validity and reliability of the tool. O&M VISSIT in development. Recent and Next Steps for VISSIT 34

Filling Out the VISSIT Sample Student - “Bud” (MS Word Document) 35

Q&A Session with Rona Pogrund 36

Contact Information Rona Pogrund, Ph.D., Texas Tech University – VISSIT website: Contact Information Rona Pogrund, Ph.D., Texas Tech University – VISSIT website:

Thank You for attending! 38