SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2014-15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
External Review Exit Report Midvale School District #433> December 3-4, 2014.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Timberlane Regional School District
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
“Commitment to Children” Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team L IMESTONE C OUNTY S CHOOL S YSTEM.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #1: PURPOSE AND DIRECTION Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
AdvancED Timeline Due Date AdvancED Accreditation Milestones
Accreditation External Review
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Making Middle Grades Work
Presentation transcript:

SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

TODAY’S OUTLINE  AdvancED's Self-Assessment (SA): Brief review  Indicators & Scoring System  Display the SA Results: Standards 1-5  Identify select Standards that need development/improvement  Committee Involvement: Analyze and Create Plan of Action  Share out

THE SELF ASSESSMENT (SA)  (SA) is designed to facilitate the process of an internal reflection and assessment of the institution's current reality.  Standard 1: Purpose and Direction  Standard 2: Governance and Leadership  Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning  Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems  Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement  Report Summary

INTRODUCTION  AdvancED's Self Assessment (SA) diagnostic is based on the AdvancED Standards of Quality, which serves as the foundation of the accreditation and continuous improvement process.  The SA is a valuable tool for collaboratively engaging staff members and stakeholders in purposeful, honest dialogue and reflection to assess the institution's adherence to the Standards, and guide its continuous improvement efforts.

INTRODUCTION  The SA includes the institution's self-ratings of and the evidence cited for each of the indicators, comments that explain the indicator's ratings and an overall narrative for each Standard.  The results of the SA are reviewed by the External Review Team as one essential component of the preparation process for the institution's External Review.

INDICATORS & SCORING  There are a total of 31 indicators for the 5 standards  Each indicator is rated on a scale: Levels  One (1) being the lowest score and four (4) being the highest.  At the end of each Standard a reflection summary is created.  The SA provides us with baseline data for each standard, providing areas of strength and areas of weaknesses. This helps us identify targets to work on.

STANDARD 1: PURPOSE & DIRECTION  The school maintains and communicates a purpose and direction that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning.  Standard 1 contains 3 indicators 1:1-1:3  Reflection Section for Standard 1 Instruction is purposeful and data driven. Consistent and systematic collaboration between all grade levels facilitates a known school purpose for student success. This collaboration is a strength among colleagues at our school. This also assists in a shared commitment to values and beliefs that benefit school success.  Overall Rating: 3.67

STANDARD 2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP  The school operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness.  Standard 2 contains 6 indicators 2:1-2:6  Reflection section for Standard 2  Our strength is leadership, staff supervision and evaluation processes that result in improved professional practice and student successes. Our principal communicates district news with the staff promptly. He provides us with consistent professional development on campus. He has an open door policy and embraces feedback. We are currently receiving state and district information on a consistent basis.  Overall Rating: 3.33

STANDARD 3: TEACHING & ASSESSING FOR LEARNING  The school's curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning.  Standard 3 contains 12 indicators 3:1-3:12  Reflection section for Standard 3  Tradewinds strength is staff development and data collection. Continued PLC's and team collaboration will sustain these areas of strength. Overall Rating : 3.0

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS  The school has resources and provides services that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students.  Standard 4 contains 7 indicators 4:1-4:7  Reflection Section for Standard 4  Areas of strength include that administration provides instructional time to meet with our teams when funds are available.  More time is needed to learn, assimilate and apply the new "Florida Standards" and "County/State" standardized assessments (BAF, FSA etc.)  However, technology is inequitable across classrooms throughout the school.  A baseline assessment should be completed to identify our school technology needs.  We have outdated teachers laptops  Smart boards are not in all classrooms  There are an inconsistent number of student computers in each classroom and some computers need to be updated or replaced.  Overall Rating: 2.0

STANDARD 5: USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT  The school implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and school effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.  Standard 5 contains 5 indicators 5:1-5:5  Reflection Section for Standard  Additional training is needed to effectively administer the reading DRA, formative math and FAIR assessments. These assessments also take too much instructional time to administer. Overall Rating: 2.4

ACTION PLAN Identify problem levels Compare and analyze weaknesses Develop a plan to improve Implement plan Stakeholders will re-evaluate the weakest standards. Identify our successes and future needs.

THE NEXT STEP…  The following slides and your handout will include: The indicators that were scored below a 3.0 on the SA will be addressed. The 4.0 level will be listed and compared to the current score of that indicator. This will allow us to determine the areas of weakness and then devise a plan of action for continuous improvement.

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS Indicator 4:1 Qualified professional and support staff are sufficient in number to fulfill their roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school's purpose, direction, and the educational program  LEVEL 4: Clearly defined policies, processes, and procedures ensure that school leaders have access to, hire, place, and retain qualified professional and support staff. School leaders use a formal, systematic process to determine the number of personnel necessary to fill all the roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school purpose, educational programs, and continuous improvement. Sustained fiscal resources are available to fund all positions necessary to achieve the purpose and direction of the school.  LEVEL 2: Policies, processes, and procedures describe how school leaders are to access, hire, place, and retain qualified professional and support staff. School leaders determine the number of personnel necessary to fill the roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school purpose, educational programs, and continuous improvement. Sustained fiscal resources are available to fund most positions critical to achieve the purpose and direction of the school.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS Indicator 4:3 The school maintains facilities, services, and equipment to provide a safe, clean, and healthy environment for all students and staff.  LEVEL 4: School leaders have adopted or collaboratively created clear definitions and expectations for maintaining safety, cleanliness, and a healthy environment and they have shared these definitions and expectations with all stakeholders. All school personnel and students are accountable for maintaining these expectations. Valid measures are in place that allow for continuous tracking of these conditions. Improvement plans are developed and implemented by appropriate personnel to continuously improve these conditions. The results of improvement efforts are systematically evaluated regularly.  LEVEL 2: School leaders have some expectations for maintaining safety, cleanliness, and a healthy environment and have shared these definitions and expectations with most stakeholders. Selected school personnel are accountable for maintaining these expectations. Some measures are in place that allow for tracking of these conditions. Personnel work to improve these conditions. Results of improvement efforts are monitored.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS Indicator 4.4 students and school personnel use a range of media and information resources to support the school's educational programs. LEVEL 4: All students and school personnel have access to an exceptional collection of media and information resources necessary to achieve the educational programs of the school. Qualified personnel in sufficient numbers are available to assist students and school personnel in learning about the tools and locations for finding and retrieving information. LEVEL 1: Students and school personnel have access to limited media and information resources necessary to achieve most of the educational programs of the school. Limited assistance may be available for students and school personnel to learn about the tools and locations for finding and retrieving information.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS Indicator 4.5 The technology infrastructure supports the school's teaching, learning, and operational needs.  LEVEL 4: The technology infrastructure is modern, fully functional, and meets the teaching, learning, and operational needs of all stakeholders. School personnel develop and administer needs assessments and use the resulting data to develop and implement a technology plan to continuously improve technology services and infrastructure.  LEVEL 1: The technology infrastructure meets the teaching, learning, and operational needs of few stakeholders. A technology plan, if one exists, addresses some technology services and infrastructure needs.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 4: RESOURCES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS Indicator 4.7 The school provides services that support the counseling, assessment, referral, educational, and career planning needs of all students.  LEVEL 4: School personnel implement a clearly defined, systematic process to determine the counseling, assessment, referral, educational, and career planning needs of all students. School personnel provide or coordinate programs necessary to meet the needs of all students. Valid and reliable measures of program effectiveness are in place, and school personnel use the data from these measures to regularly evaluate all programs. Improvement plans related to these programs are designed and implemented to more effectively meet the needs of all students.  LEVEL 2: School personnel endeavor to determine the counseling, assessment, referral, educational, and career planning needs of students in the school. School personnel provide or coordinate programs to meet the needs of students when possible. School personnel evaluate all programs. Improvement plans related to these programs are sometimes designed and implemented to meet the needs of student’s.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 5: USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Indicator 5.1 The school establishes and maintains a clearly defined and comprehensive student assessment system.  LEVEL 4 School personnel maintain and consistently use a comprehensive assessment system that produces data from multiple assessment measures, including locally developed and standardized assessments about student learning and school performance. The system ensures consistent measurement across all classrooms and courses. All assessments are proven reliable and bias free. The system is regularly and systematically evaluated for reliability and effectiveness in improving instruction, student learning, and the conditions that support learning.  LEVEL 2-School personnel use an assessment system that produces data from multiple assessment measures about student learning and school performance. The system generally provides consistent measurement across classrooms and courses. Some assessments, especially those related to student learning, are proven reliable and bias free. The system is evaluated for effectiveness in improving instruction, student learning, and the conditions that support learning.  Action Plan:

STANDARD 5- USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Indicator 5.2 Professional and support staff continuously collect, analyze, and apply learning from a range of data sources, including comparison and trend data about student learning, instruction, program evaluation, and organizational conditions.  LEVEL 4-Systematic processes and procedures for collecting, analyzing, and applying learning from all data sources are documented and used consistently by professional and support staff. Data sources include comparison and trend data that provide a comprehensive and complete picture of student learning, instruction, the effectiveness of programs, and the conditions that support learning. All school personnel use data to design, implement, and evaluate continuous improvement plans to improve student learning, instruction, the effectiveness of programs, and organizational conditions.  LEVEL 2-Some processes and procedures for collecting, analyzing, and applying learning from data sources are used by professional and support staff. Data sources include limited comparison and trend data about student learning, instruction, the effectiveness of programs, and organizational conditions. School personnel use data to design, implement, and evaluate continuous improvement plans. Action Plan:

STANDARD 5- USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Indicator 5.3 Professional and support staff are trained in the evaluation, interpretation, & use of data.  LEVEL 4: All professional and support staff members are regularly and systematically assessed and trained in a rigorous, individualized professional development program related to the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data.  LEVEL 1: Few or no professional and support staff members are trained in the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data. Action Plan:

PLAN OF ACTION  To be continued….

NARRATIVE SECTION PARTICIPANTS CHOSE EVIDENCE FROM LIST AND SOME PARTICIPANT PROVIDED NARRATIVES INDICATED BELOW  4:1 evidence only  4:3 There are 5 full-time janitorial staff who are required to clean approximately 20 classrooms/common areas. It has been observed that that the cleanliness (e.g., sweeping, mopping and cleaning the toilets) are inconsistent. Also, the outside grounds are not consistently maintained. It is often strewn with litter, clothing, sand and school recess equipment.  4.4 Students have access to the media center during media class (30 minutes every 6 school days) however, the student(s) needing to do research at other times would not have and adult resource for assistance.  4.5 We have upgraded technology for students by adding computer labs and computer carts. There have been no known upgrades for teacher's technology to support basic educational needs.  4.7: evidence only  5:1 evidence only  5:2 evidence only  5:3 There is no current professional and support staff members trained in the evaluation, interpretation and use of data. We have not had data training at this time.