Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nick Beresford (CEH) & David Copplestone (Stirling Univ.)
Advertisements

Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris Objectives of this study.
David Copplestone (University of Stirling). Whats the issue? Obtaining air concentrations for noble gases Estimating doses to wildlife from noble gases.
David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool
Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?
Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
Nick Beresford (CEH).  Give an overview of what may impact on assessment results using the available approaches  In part based on things we know are.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
WSC Radioecology Research Group A new methodology for the assessment of radiation doses to biota under non-equilibrium conditions J. Vives i Batlle, R.C.
David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
PROTECTFP Screening tier comparisons ERICA, RESRAD-BIOTA & EA R&D128 Follow-up actions from Vienna workshop.
Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Noble gas dosimetry for non-human biota International Conference on Radioecology and Environmental Radioactivity, Barcelona,
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working.
Dose Assessments for Wildlife in England & Wales.
RESRAD Program Manager Environmental Science Division
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
PROTECT Work Package 2 Meeting (June 2007) Institute for Sustainable Water Integrated Management and Ecosystem Research (SWIMMER) 1 Experiences of applying.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
PROTECTFP Terrestrial Assessment Comparison of human and non human dose assessments for prospective new nuclear power stations.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
IAEA EMRAS Biota working group Future (suggested) plans.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
PROTECT Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context Oslo meeting, January 2008 OSPAR Convention for the Protection.
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Jordi Vives i Batlle Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 Radiation dosimetry for animals and plants.
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Interpretation of Measurement Results.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Copyright © 2014 ALLIANCE Updates to the ERICA Tool Barcelona – 10 th September Nick Beresford & Justin Brown (NERC-CEH,
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
IAEA Natural Terrestrial Radiation Day 3 – Lecture 7 Sources of Radiation 1.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Jordi Vives i Batlle Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 Radiation dosimetry for animals and plants.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
Risk Analyses and the Development of Radiological Benchmarks Tom Hinton (IRSN)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 Brenda Howard.
 The IAEA EMRAS programme has compared predictions of various models, to each other and to site data.  Model-model intercomparison showed considerable.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
EMRAS Biota Working Group – Main findings. IAEA EMRAS Biota Working Group Regular participants: Belgium - SCK·CEN; Canada – AECL; France – IRSN; Japan.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— ICRP And Protection of The Environment Dr Jack Valentin Scientific.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
Jordi Vives i Batlle Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, 28 June 2012 Radiation dosimetry for animals and plants.
College of Engineering Oregon State University DOE’s Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Biota: Derivation of Screening and Analysis Methodologies.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Radiological Screening Values for Effects on Aquatic Biota at the Oak Ridge Reservation Presented at The Annual Meeting of DOE Biota Dose Assessment Committee.
CEH Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June What is a benchmark? Why are benchmarks needed? How are benchmarks derived? How are benchmarks used?
DOE’s Technical Standard for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Biota: Overview of the Graded Approach Biota Dose Assessment Committee Meeting Washington, DC.
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
ComET™ Farfield Modelling Dr. Don Mackay Mr. Jon Arnot Canadian Environmental Modelling Centre Trent University Peterborough, ON Slides.
Element cycling in aquatic ecosystems – modelling general and element-specific transport and accumulation mechanisms. March 2011 Lena Konovalenko Department.
Modelling noble gases Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKE OF RADIONUCLIDES
Brenda Howard (CEH) Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Testing Biota Dose Assessment Committee Methodology with 1997 Hanford Surveillance Data by E. Antonio (PNNL) and J. P. Lair (TRP) August 1999.
Comparison of MCNP and ERICA results in two different marine areas
Making the most of what we have: application of extrapolation approaches in radioecological transfer modelling Nicholas A. Beresford, Michael D. Wood,
Transfer analysis of 210Po and 210Pb in the terrestrial environment
Radionuclides in the Baltic Sea Radiation Safety Department
Presentation transcript:

Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014

 Code which implements the USDOE’s Graded approach (replaces BCG-calculator)  Part of the RESRAD suite of models  Freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems  Database contains 46 radionuclides  Four organisms – terrestrial animal, terrestrial plant, riparian animal and aquatic animal  Can create organisms & simple foodchains

 Available at no cost for download on-line  Comparatively well documented  Being maintained and upgraded  Training available

BDAC Series of paper in: Woodhead, D.S. (Ed.), Protection of the environment from ionising radiation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 66.

 Tiers are Levels  CRs are Bivs  EMCLs are BCGs (Biota Concentration Guides)  DCCs are DCFs (Dose Conversion Factor)

RESRAD-BIOTA Level

Based on NCRP & IAEA set dose limits for protection of: Aquatic animals - 10 mGy d -1 Terrestrial plants - 10 mGy d -1 Terrestrial animals - 1 mGy d -1

Estimated assuming:  Infinitely large (internal) and small (external) geometries for dose calculations  Daughter T 1/2 ’s up to 100 y included  All terrestrial organisms 100% in soil; aquatic 100% water-sediment interface  ‘Maximum’ CR values or 95th percentile CR values predicted using a kinetic-allometric approach

Screening assessment - Levels 1  Cs-137 water 10 Bq/l sediment 1000 Bq/kg  Am-241 sediment 1000 Bq/kg  Cf-252 water 1 Bq/kg  Use 10 µGy/h screening level (2.4E-4 Gy/d)

 Run the freshwater and terrestrial scenarios from the ERICA Tier 1 practical  Use ERICA screening value 10 µGy/h  Leave out the radionuclides which are not included in RESRAD

RadionuclideFreshwater (Bq/l) H-34 Co Cs Pu RadionuclideSoil (Bq/kg) Cs Am Pu Co Sr-901.3

 Site specific CR values available for aquatic animal:  Co 1500; Cs 9000; H 0.25; Pu RadionuclideFreshwater (Bq/l) H-34 Co Cs Pu

 Also uses CRs (or Bivs), but:

 Can use kinetic-allometric approach with simple foodchains for terrestrial/riparian vertebrates Soil contamination Fugitive dust Vegetation Soil invertebrate Herbivorous mammals Herbivorous birds Carnivorous mammals Water contamination Root uptake

 Size effects rates of all biological structures and processes from cellular metabolism to population dynamics  The dependence of a biological variable Y on a body mass M is typically characterised by an allometric scaling law of the form: Y = aM b where a and b are constants

 b most often = ‘quartile values’:  metabolic rates scale as M 0.75  M 0.75 is often referred to as metabolic live- weight  life-span scales as M 0.25  food, water and inhalation rates scale as M 0.75  All potential useful for radioecological models, but:

 For (some) radionuclides both the biological half-life (often M 0.25 ) and transfer from diet (M ) have been found to scale allometrically  RESRAD-BIOTA uses allometric relationships for radionuclide biological half- lives and a number of other animal parameters (e.g. food & water intake, life- span, inhalation rate) for terrestrial and riparian vertebrates

kg/d T1/2 =13.22*(mass )

kg/d T1/2 =13.22*(mass ) Ff=8.89*(mass ) Transfer coefficient F f ( d kg -1 ) = Equilibrium activity concentration in animal (Bq kg -1 FW) Daily intake of radionuclide (Bq d -1 )

kg/d T1/2 =13.22*(mass ) Ff=8.89*(mass ) DMI=0.0551*(mass 0.74 )

kg/d T1/2 =13.22*(mass ) Ff=8.89*(mass ) DMI=0.0551*(mass 0.74 )

kg/d T1/2 =13.22*(mass ) Ff=8.89*(mass ) DMI=0.0551*(mass 0.74 ) Bq/kg = Ff x DMI Transfer coefficient F f ( d kg -1 ) = Equilibrium activity concentration in animal (Bq kg -1 FW) Daily intake of radionuclide (Bq d -1 )

Create an organism and foodchain

RESRAD-BIOTA Level 3  Soil activity concentrations are available: Cs Bq/kg Pu Bq/kg  Water concentration: Cs Bq/kg Pu-239 1E-3 Bq/kg  Alpha RBE=10; Cut-off half-life=180  Dormouse characteristics: Size – 9x3x3 cm Weight - 30 g Occupancy – 50% in soil/50% on soil

RESRAD-BIOTA Level 3 Diet – 70 % seeds and 30 % invertebrates Concentration ratios for dormouse diet Seed Cs Pu-239 5E-3 Invertebrate Cs Pu